1
M. RAMELET 1 , J.-F. MIRJOLET 1 , D. FRANCE 1 , L. MORGAND 1 , X. TIZON 1 , L. ARNOULD 2, M. HILLAIRET de BOISFERON 1 1 Oncodesign, Dijon (France), 2 Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (France) Beneficial outcome of combination therapy with 4-1BB mAb targeting antibody #293 Immune checkpoint: promising results and adverse effects Conclusions and perspectives < I N T R O D U C T I O N Survival increase by co-treatment with anti-4-1BB highlights anti-tumor activities of immune checkpoint antibodies For more information: [email protected] Immunotherapy based on mAbs targeting cancer cells is now developed as a valid approach to treat cancer. Suppressive mechanisms in immune responses normally play a critical role in maintaining immune homeostasis. However, these suppressive mechanisms are also considered as one of the main reasons for the failure of cancer immunotherapies because they induce peripheral tolerance of tumor-specific immune responses and allow tumor growth. CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells have been revealed as the most important population of immune suppressors, and their depletion has been reported to enhance antitumor immune responses. CTLA-4 (CD152) was reported as a critical target for regulatory T-cell function [1] and thus blockade of CTLA-4 mediated signals has been suggested as a possible strategy to treat cancers. The first anti-CTLA-4 human monoclonal antibody (mAb), ipilimumab, was approved in 2011 by the FDA for use in metastatic melanoma. Success for ipilimumab was reported in a large phase III clinical trial involving patients with metastatic melanoma, who had undergone previous failed treatment [2]. Moreover, programmed death-1 (PD-1) mediated signals was also reported as a critical inhibitory mechanism regulating antitumor immune responses [3]. Nivolumab, a fully human mAb that blocks the programmed death-1 (PD-1) protein showed responses lasting over 1 year in previously treated metastatic melanoma patients. Combination therapy concurrently targeting PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints leads to remarkable antitumor effects [4]. While these promising results have led to a great expectancy in treatments for cancer, these approaches are also show adverse toxicities associated with continuous treatment. To study these adverse side toxicities, we chose to characterize the murine orthotopic 4T1 mammary carcinoma model, known for his hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibody (mAb) administration in this model. These effects were also studied with 4-1BB mAb combined to these immune checkpoint. EORTC-NCI-AACR Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics Symposium / Munich, Germany. November 29- December 1 st , 2016 Combinations of anti-4-1BB mAb with immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent adverse side effects of ICIs alone in the murine 4T1 mammary carcinoma model. This increased survival then allowed to observe antitumor activity of checkpoint inhibitor antibodies when combined to anti-4-1BB antibody, Fatal hypersensitivity reactions in murine 4T1 mammary tumor bearing mice treated with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 seem to be in correlation with a specific cytokine storm Highly characterized models (exome sequencing, immune infiltrate, response to standard of care therapies : radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy,…) as well as high level technologies (ex-vivo assays, flow cytometry, imaging, hCS,…) are valuable tools to identify potent combination therapies. Protected side effect (toxicity/survival) Repeated IP injections of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody alone led to mortality of 29%, 86% and 86% of tumor bearing mice, respectively, within 2 weeks of the initiation of treatment. No death was observed when mice were treated with repeated IP injections of anti 4- 1BB (clone 3H3) agonist antibody. From different experiments, no death was observed when tumor bearing mice were treated with irrelevant IgG controls of the corresponding origin. When anti 4-1BB antibody was combined to either anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, a significant increase in survival was observed with no death observed in case of 4-1BB targeting antibody combined to either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies and only 14% of death when anti-4-1BB antibody was combined to anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Antitumor efficacy Due to lethality in mice bearing orthotopic 4T1 tumor, the use of anti-PD-1, anti-PD- L1 or anti-CTLA-4 as single therapy is compromised and don’t permit to observe anti- tumor activity of these therapies. In contrast, when used in combination with 4-1BB antibody, the increase of the mice survival observed permit to highlight an antitumor activity of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. This antitumor activity was significant for mice treated with anti-PD-L1 antibody combined with 4-1BB targeting antibody (optimal T/C value of 37% on D30). In group receiving 4-1BB targeting antibody alone, a moderate antitumor efficacy was observed with an optimal T/C value of 65% on D30. Immune response Interestingly, Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain representative of lung shows a slight lymphocyte infiltration score for mice treated with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4 or anti-4-1BB antibodies whereas the scoring was increase for all mice treated in combination. On D26, a cytokine release was evidenced in blood of mice treated with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4. This release was decreased for mice treated with these immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with 4-1BB. Luminex values (in pg/mL) were first normalized, by cytokine/chemokine, with respect to the untreated group (value-mean untreated )/mean untreated . A z-score was then calculated from the normalized values, within each row of the heatmap. Splenomegaly was observed in mice receiving anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody alone, whereas splenomegaly was decreased when both monoclonal antibodies were administrated in combination with anti-4-1BB mAb. * Bronchus * Blood vessel Untreated Lymphocyte infiltration score: 0 Anti-4-1BB mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 1+ * * * * * * Untreated Anti-CTLA-4 mAb Anti-CTLA-4 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb Time post engraftment 20 25 30 35 0 20 40 60 80 100 86% vs 0% 0 10 20 30 0 1000 Anti-CTLA-4 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb 500 Untreated Anti-CTLA-4 mAb Anti-4-1BB mAb Survival increase: 86% Time post engraftment Anti-CTLA-4 mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 1+ * * * Anti-CTLA-4 & anti-4-1BB mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 3+ * * Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm 3 ) Survival (%) CTLA-4 Lymphocyte infiltration lungs Scoring in blind manner at x200 magnification In-vivo experiments Mice (BALB/c, Charles River, FR) were orthotopically injected with 4T1 syngeneic breast tumor cell lines on D0. They were randomized on D18 (mean tumor volume of about 170 mm 3 ) and then treated with anti-PD-1 (clone RMP1-14), anti-PD-L1 mAb (clone 10F.9G2 at 10 mg/kg (Q2Dx4), anti-CTLA-4 (clone 9H10), or with anti-4-1BB mAb (clone 3H3 at 10 mg/kg (Q3Dx3). References 1. WING K. et al., Science, 322: 271–275, 2008 2. HODI F.S. et al., N Engl J Med., 363:711–723, 2010 3. DONG H. et al., J. Mol. Med., 81: 281–287, 2003 4. DAS R. et al., The Journal of Immunology 194(3):950-959, 2014. R E S U L T S Luminex values (in pg/mL) were first normalized, by cytokine/chemokine, with respect to the untreated group (value-mean untreated )/mean untreated . Spleen weights (g) Une division d'Oncodesign Untreated Anti-PD-1 mAb Anti-PD-1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb PD1 * * Time post engraftment 20 40 60 80 100 29% vs 0% 20 25 30 35 0 1000 Anti-PD-1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb 0 10 20 30 0 500 Untreated Anti-PD-1 mAb Anti-4-1BB mAb Survival increase: 29% Time post engraftment Survival (%) Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm 3 ) * * Anti-PD1 mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 0 Anti-PD1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 2+ H&E stain of lungs Cytokine & chemokine heatmap Anti-PD-L1 mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 0 Anti-PD-L1 & anti-4-1BB mAb Lymphocyte infiltration score: 3+ * * * * * Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm 3 ) Survival (%) PD-L1 T-cells TCR APCs MHC class II Co-inhibitory receptors PD-1 ? TIM3 CTLA-4 A2aR ? CD200R BTLA PD-L1 PD-L2 B7-H3 B7-H4 Gal9 Ade CD200 (HVEM) TNFSF14 (CD80) B7-1 (CD86) B7-2 Co-stimulatory receptors CD28 ICOS CD137 OX40 CD27 B7RP1 CD137L OX40L CD70 (CD80) B7-1 (CD86) B7-2 Cytokine et chemokine heatmap - Monotherapies T-cell activation 20 40 60 80 86% vs 14% 100 20 0 25 30 35 Time post engraftment Untreated Anti-PDL1 mAb Anti-PDL1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb 1000 0 10 20 30 0 500 Untreated Anti-PDL1 mAb Anti-4-1BB mAb Anti-PDL1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAb Survival increase: 72% Time post engraftment

Beneficial outcome of combination therapy with 4-1BB mAb … · 2019-03-22 · November 29 - December 1st, 2016 Combinations of anti-4-1BB mAb with immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Beneficial outcome of combination therapy with 4-1BB mAb … · 2019-03-22 · November 29 - December 1st, 2016 Combinations of anti-4-1BB mAb with immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent

M. RAMELET1, J.-F. MIRJOLET1, D. FRANCE1, L. MORGAND1, X. TIZON1, L. ARNOULD2, M. HILLAIRET de BOISFERON1

1Oncodesign, Dijon (France), 2Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon (France)

Beneficial outcome of combination therapy with 4-1BB mAb targeting antibody #293

Immune checkpoint: promising results and adverse effects

Conclusions and perspectives<

INTRODUCTION

Survival increase by co-treatment with anti-4-1BB highlights anti-tumor activities of immune checkpoint antibodies

For more information: [email protected]

Immunotherapy based on mAbs targeting cancer cells is now developed as a valid approach totreat cancer. Suppressive mechanisms in immune responses normally play a critical role inmaintaining immune homeostasis. However, these suppressive mechanisms are also considered asone of the main reasons for the failure of cancer immunotherapies because they induce peripheraltolerance of tumor-specific immune responses and allow tumor growth.

CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells have been revealed as the most important population ofimmune suppressors, and their depletion has been reported to enhance antitumor immuneresponses. CTLA-4 (CD152) was reported as a critical target for regulatory T-cell function [1] andthus blockade of CTLA-4 mediated signals has been suggested as a possible strategy to treatcancers. The first anti-CTLA-4 human monoclonal antibody (mAb), ipilimumab, was approved in2011 by the FDA for use in metastatic melanoma. Success for ipilimumab was reported in a largephase III clinical trial involving patients with metastatic melanoma, who had undergone previousfailed treatment [2].

Moreover, programmed death-1 (PD-1) mediated signals was also reported as a critical inhibitorymechanism regulating antitumor immune responses [3]. Nivolumab, a fully human mAb that blocksthe programmed death-1 (PD-1) protein showed responses lasting over 1 year in previouslytreated metastatic melanoma patients. Combination therapy concurrently targeting PD-1, PD-L1and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints leads to remarkable antitumor effects [4].

While these promising results have led to a great expectancy in treatments for cancer, theseapproaches are also show adverse toxicities associated with continuous treatment. To study theseadverse side toxicities, we chose to characterize the murine orthotopic 4T1 mammary carcinomamodel, known for his hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibody (mAb) administration inthis model. These effects were also studied with 4-1BB mAb combined to these immunecheckpoint.

EORTC-NCI-AACR Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics Symposium / Munich, Germany. November 29- December 1st, 2016

Combinations of anti-4-1BB mAb with immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent adverse side effects of ICIs alone in the murine 4T1 mammary carcinoma model. This increased survival then allowed to observe antitumor activity of checkpoint inhibitor antibodies when combined to anti-4-1BB antibody,

Fatal hypersensitivity reactions in murine 4T1 mammary tumor bearing mice treated with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 seem to be in correlation with a specific cytokine storm

Highly characterized models (exome sequencing, immune infiltrate, response to standard of care therapies : radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy,…) as well as high level technologies (ex-vivo assays, flow cytometry, imaging, hCS,…) are valuable tools to identify potent combination therapies.

Protected side effect (toxicity/survival)

Repeated IP injections of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodyalone led to mortality of 29%, 86% and 86% of tumor bearing mice, respectively,within 2 weeks of the initiation of treatment.

No death was observed when mice were treated with repeated IP injections of anti 4-1BB (clone 3H3) agonist antibody. From different experiments, no death was observedwhen tumor bearing mice were treated with irrelevant IgG controls of thecorresponding origin. When anti 4-1BB antibody was combined to either anti-PD-1,anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, a significant increase in survival wasobserved with no death observed in case of 4-1BB targeting antibody combined toeither anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies and only 14% of death whenanti-4-1BB antibody was combined to anti-CTLA-4 antibody.

Antitumor efficacy

Due to lethality in mice bearing orthotopic 4T1 tumor, the use of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 as single therapy is compromised and don’t permit to observe anti-tumor activity of these therapies. In contrast, when used in combination with 4-1BBantibody, the increase of the mice survival observed permit to highlight an antitumoractivity of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. This antitumor activity wassignificant for mice treated with anti-PD-L1 antibody combined with 4-1BB targetingantibody (optimal T/C value of 37% on D30). In group receiving 4-1BB targetingantibody alone, a moderate antitumor efficacy was observed with an optimal T/Cvalue of 65% on D30.

Immune response

Interestingly, Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain representative of lung shows a slightlymphocyte infiltration score for mice treated with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4or anti-4-1BB antibodies whereas the scoring was increase for all mice treated incombination.

On D26, a cytokine release was evidenced in blood of mice treated with anti-PD-1,anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4. This release was decreased for mice treated with theseimmune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with 4-1BB.

Luminex values (in pg/mL) were first normalized, by cytokine/chemokine, withrespect to the untreated group (value-meanuntreated)/meanuntreated. A z-score was thencalculated from the normalized values, within each row of the heatmap.

Splenomegaly was observed in mice receiving anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 monoclonalantibody alone, whereas splenomegaly was decreased when both monoclonalantibodies were administrated in combination with anti-4-1BB mAb.

*Bronchus

*Blood vessel

UntreatedLymphocyte infiltration score: 0

Anti-4-1BB mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 1+

* **

* *

*

UntreatedAnti-CTLA-4 mAbAnti-CTLA-4 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

Time post engraftment20 25 30 35

0

20

40

60

80

100

86% vs 0%

0 10 20 300

1000

Anti-CTLA-4 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

500

Untreated

Anti-CTLA-4 mAbAnti-4-1BB mAb

Survival increase: 86%

Time post engraftment

Anti-CTLA-4 mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 1+

** *

Anti-CTLA-4 & anti-4-1BB mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 3+

*

*

Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm3)

Survival (%)

CTLA-4

Lymphocyte infiltration lungsScoring in blind manner at x200 magnification

In-vivo experiments

Mice (BALB/c, Charles River, FR) were orthotopically injected with 4T1 syngeneic breast tumorcell lines on D0. They were randomized on D18 (mean tumor volume of about 170 mm3) and thentreated with anti-PD-1 (clone RMP1-14), anti-PD-L1 mAb (clone 10F.9G2 at 10 mg/kg (Q2Dx4),anti-CTLA-4 (clone 9H10), or with anti-4-1BB mAb (clone 3H3 at 10 mg/kg (Q3Dx3).

References1. WING K. et al., Science, 322: 271–275, 20082. HODI F.S. et al., N Engl J Med., 363:711–723, 20103. DONG H. et al., J. Mol. Med., 81: 281–287, 20034. DAS R. et al., The Journal of Immunology 194(3):950-959, 2014.

RESULTS

Luminex values (in pg/mL) were first normalized, by cytokine/chemokine, with respect to the untreated group (value-mean untreated)/mean untreated.

Spleen weights (g)

Une division d'Oncodesign

Untreated

Anti-PD-1 mAb

Anti-PD-1 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

PD1

**

Time post engraftment

20

40

60

80

10029% vs 0%

20 25 30 350

1000 Anti-PD-1 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

0 10 20 300

500

Untreated

Anti-PD-1 mAb

Anti-4-1BB mAb

Survival increase: 29%

Time post engraftment

Survival (%)

Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm3)

* *

Anti-PD1 mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 0

Anti-PD1 mAb & anti-4-1BB mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 2+

H&E stain of lungsCytokine & chemokine heatmap

Anti-PD-L1 mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 0

Anti-PD-L1 & anti-4-1BB mAbLymphocyte infiltration score: 3+

**

** *

Median tumor volume ± IQR (mm3)

Survival (%)

PD-L1

T-cellsTCR

APCsMHC class II

Co-inhibitoryreceptors

PD-1

?

TIM3

CTLA-4

A2aR

?

CD200R

BTLA

PD-L1PD-L2B7-H3

B7-H4

Gal9

Ade

CD200

(HVEM) TNFSF14

(CD80) B7-1(CD86) B7-2

Co-stimulatoryreceptors

CD28

ICOS

CD137

OX40

CD27

B7RP1

CD137L

OX40L

CD70

(CD80) B7-1(CD86) B7-2

Cytokine et chemokine heatmap - Monotherapies

T-cell activation

20

40

60

80 86% vs 14%

100

200

25 30 35

Time post engraftment

UntreatedAnti-PDL1 mAbAnti-PDL1 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

1000

0 10 20 300

500

Untreated

Anti-PDL1 mAb

Anti-4-1BB mAb

Anti-PDL1 mAb& anti-4-1BB mAb

Survival increase: 72%

Time post engraftment