44
1 Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of Digital Engineering/Model-Based SE Tom McDermott, Stevens Inst. of Technology Nicole Hutchison, Megan Clifford (Stevens) Eileen Van Aken, Alejandro Salado, Kaitlin Henderson (Va Tech) www.sercuarc.org This material is based upon work supported, in whole or in part, by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) under Contract H98230-08-D-0171. The SERC is a federally funded University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) managed by Stevens Institute of Technology consisting of a collaborative network of over 20 universities. More information is available at www.SERCuarc.org

Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of …...2020/03/26  · • DoD Digital Engineering Strategy ―Vision, mission, and goals can be generalized to any organization •

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of Digital Engineering/Model-Based SE

    Tom McDermott, Stevens Inst. of Technology Nicole Hutchison, Megan Clifford (Stevens)

    Eileen Van Aken, Alejandro Salado, Kaitlin Henderson (Va Tech)

    www.sercuarc.org

    This material is based upon work supported, in whole or in part, by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) under Contract H98230-08-D-0171. The SERC is a federally funded University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) managed by

    Stevens Institute of Technology consisting of a collaborative network of over 20 universities. More information is available at www.SERCuarc.org

    http://www.sercuarc.org/

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 2

    Frameworks for Evaluating DE Value

    • DoD Digital Engineering Strategy ―Vision, mission, and goals can be generalized to any organization

    • INCOSE Model-Based Enterprise Capability Matrix ―Benchmark for Organizational and Industry-wide DE Maturity, published

    January 2020

    • DE/MBSE Value, Benefits, and Metrics Framework ―Developed by the SERC, four categories for DE value/benefits:

    Quality, Velocity/Agility, User Experience, Knowledge Transfer

    • DE/MBSE Enterprise Adoption Framework ―Developed by the SERC from the Baldrige CPE Framework:

    Adoption

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 3

    DoD Digital Engineering Strategy

    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Digital Engineering (DE) Vision: Modernize how the Department designs, develops, delivers, operates, and sustains systems. DE Mission: Securely and safely connect people, processes, data, and capabilities across an end-to-end digital enterprise.

    WAY

    S /I

    NIT

    IATI

    VES

    END

    S EN

    DS

    WAYS / IN

    ITIATIVES M

    EAN

    S MEANS

    An enduring, authoritative

    source of truth is used over the

    lifecycle

    Plan and develop the authoritative source

    of truth

    Govern the authoritative source

    of truth

    Use technological innovation to

    improve engineering practices

    Infuse technological innovations to enable the end-to-end digital

    enterprise

    Advance human-machine interactions

    Make use of data to improve awareness,

    insights, and decision making

    Models are used to inform enterprise

    and program decision making

    Formalize the planning for models to support engineering activities and decision making across the lifecycle

    Use the authoritative source of truth across

    the lifecycle

    Use models to support engineering activities and decision making across the lifecycle

    Improve the digital engineering

    knowledge base

    Transform culture and workforce

    engineering across the lifecycle

    Build and prepare the workforce

    Lead and support digital engineering

    transformation efforts

    Process, Methods, Tools, Technology, People

    Infrastructure and environments support improved

    communication and collaboration

    Develop, mature, and use digital

    engineering IT infrastructures

    Secure IT infrastructure and protect intellectual

    property

    Develop, mature, and use digital

    engineering methodologies

    Formally develop, integrate,

    and curate models

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 4

    Focus: Enterprise Transformation Measures

    • Gartner: “Select just 5 to 9 metrics to track, report and act on. The value of a metric lies in its ability to influence business decision making.”

    • The best metrics: ―Have a defined and defensible causal relationship to a business outcome ―Work as a leading, not lagging, indicator ―Address a specific defined audience – in a way they can understand ―Drive action when they change from green to yellow to red

    • There are no universal metrics – must be enterprise specific • Good Digital Transformation metrics have some traits ―Measure people adoption, and enterprise process adoption ―Analyze breadth of usability, and issues with usability ―Measure productivity indicators ―Generate new value to the enterprise (revenue, operational efficiency, etc.)

    https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/how-to-measure-digital-transformation-progress/

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 5

    Summary DE Success Measures Framework

    Quality: • Reduce Errors/Defects • Improve System Quality • Improve Traceability • Reduce Cost

    Knowledge Transfer: • Better access to

    information • Better communication/

    info sharing • Collaboration

    An enduring, authoritative

    source of truth is used over the

    lifecycle

    Use technological innovation to

    improve engineering

    practices

    Models are used to inform enterprise

    and program decision making

    Transform culture and workforce

    engineering across the lifecycle

    Infrastructure and environments support improved

    communication and collaboration

    Adoption: • Methods/Processes • Roles/Skills • Training/Tools • Leadership support • Change Mgmt Process • Resources

    Velocity/Agility: • More Reuse • Improve Consistency • Increase Efficiency • Support Integration • Reduce Time

    User Experience: • Manage Complexity • Improved System

    Understanding • Automation

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 6

    MBSE Benefits: Literature Review Results

    • Searched papers that mention a benefit of MBSE and what the source of that benefit was: measured gains, observed gains, perceived gains (no source for benefit), reference. ―Total Papers that mention MBSE: 847 oPapers that mention benefits: 360 ―Measured gains: 2 ―Observed gains: 27 ―Perceived gains: 236 ―Reference: 114 ―Misc.: 2

    *Kaitlin Henderson (VT) PhD studies

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 7

    Literature Review Benefit Categories (48)

    Category List of Benefits

    Quality

    Reduce errors/ defects Improved risk analysis Improved capability

    Improved traceability Improved system design More stakeholder involvement

    Improved system quality Better requirements generation Strengthened testing

    Reduce risk Increased accuracy of estimates Reduce cost

    Increased rigor Improved predictive ability Better analysis capability

    Increased effectiveness Improved deliverable quality

    Velocity/ Agility

    Improved consistency Increased productivity Higher level support for integration Increased capacity for reuse Increased transparency Increased uniformity

    Increased efficiency Increased confidence Increased precision

    Reduce rework Increased flexibility Early V&V

    Reduce time Better requirements management Reduce ambiguity

    Reduce waste Ease of design customization Easy to make changes

    User Experience

    Higher level support for automation Improved system understanding Reduce effort

    Reduce burden of SE tasks Better data management/capture

    Better manage complexity Better decision making

    Knowledge Transfer

    Better accessibility of info Improved architecture Better communication/ info sharing Better knowledge management/ capture Multiple viewpoints of model Improved collaboration

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 8

    Literature Review Quantitative Results (most cited)

    Category Perceived Observed Measured

    Quality

    Reduce Errors/Defects (16) Reduce Errors/Defects (26) Reduce Errors/Defects (2)

    Improve Traceability (61) Improve Traceability (9) Improve Traceability (1)

    Improve System Quality (21) Improve System Quality (0) Improve System Quality (1)

    Reduce Risk (22) Reduce Risk (2) Reduce Risk (1)

    Increased Rigor (0) Increased Rigor (0) Increased Rigor (1)

    Reduce Cost (33) Reduce Cost (4) Reduce Cost (0)

    Velocity/ Agility

    Consistency (44) Consistency (6) Consistency (1)

    Reuse (37) Reuse (5) Reuse (1)

    Efficiency (13) Efficiency (2) Efficiency (0)

    Improve Standardization Improve Standardization Improve Standardization (0)

    Collaboration/Info Sharing (68) Collaboration/Info Sharing (11) Collaboration/Info Sharing (0)

    Integration/V&V (11) Integration/V&V (3) Integration/V&V (1)

    Reduce Time (24) Reduce Time (8) Reduce Time (1)

    User Experience

    Automation (0) Automation (0) Automation (2)

    Reduce SE Task Burden (0) Reduce SE Task Burden (0) Reduce SE Task Burden (1)

    Manage Complexity (48) Manage Complexity (2) Manage Complexity (0)

    Productivity (14) Productivity (0) Productivity (0)

    System Understanding (24) System Understanding (2) System Understanding (0)

    Knowledge Transfer

    Information Access (27) Information Access (5) Information Access (2)

    Knowledge Capture/Sharing (13) Knowledge Capture/Sharing (0) Knowledge Capture/Sharing (2)

    Architecture/Sys Understanding (23) Architecture/Sys Understanding (2) Architecture/Sys Understanding (1)

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 9

    mbsematuritysurvey.sercuarc.org

    Final Survey data as of February 1, 2020. Quantitative metrics reflect “effective” participants. Information derived from text

    responses reflects “all” participants

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 10

    MBSE Survey Overview Topics Summary of Survey Questions 7. Model

    Sharing and Reuse

    19. Support model libraries for reuse 20. Have interfaces around models for stakeholder use 21. Shared models are used to consistently manage

    programs across lifecycle 22. Identify practices for data/model discovery, reuse?

    8. Modeling Environments

    23. Our modeling environment is secure 24. Our modeling environment protects IP 25. Have defined processes for tools, data

    interoperability 26. Identify benefits from collaborating on models

    across disciplines

    9. Organizational Implementation

    27. Identify most challenging org obstacles for MBSE 28. Identify best organizational enablers for MBSE 29. Identify biggest changes our org needs for MBSE

    10. Workforce 30. Have defined critical roles to support MBSE 31. Identify top MBSE roles in your organization 32. Have sufficient staffing to fill MBSE-related roles

    11. MBSE Skills 33. Have defined critical skills for MBSE 34. Identify the most critical skills for MBSE

    12. Demographics

    Organizational size, domain, MBSE experience, role

    Topics Summary of Survey Questions 1. MBSE

    Usage 1. MBSE strategy is integrated with product strategy at the

    enterprise level 2. MBSE processes & tools are integrated with product-level

    processes and tools 3. Most important reasons for integrating MBSE

    2. Model Manage-ment

    4. Have a taxonomy for modeling across organization 5. Have defined processes/tools for model management 6. Have standard guidance for model management/tools 7. Identify business value from consistent model management

    3. Technical Manage-ment

    8. Use modeling as the basis for technical processes 9. MBSE process supports our technical review process 10. Identify benefits or challenges of MBSE in technical

    reviews

    4. Metrics 11. Modeling provides measurable improvement across projects

    12. Have consistent metrics across programs/enterprise 13. Identify any metrics that have proven useful

    5. Model Quality

    14. Have defined processes/tools for V&V of models 15. Have defined processes/tools for data/model quality

    assurance

    6. Data Manage-ment

    16. Have effective approaches for managing the data interface between tools 17. Data is managed independent of tools for portability 18. Identify new data management roles/processes

    Survey content is derived from the draft INCOSE Digital Engineering Capabilities Definition

    *Questions in italics elicit free text responses

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 11

    Demographics - My organization is:

    Aerospace and defense, 56

    Automotive, 7

    Consultancy and Services, 6

    Tools & MBSE services, 4

    Agricultural, 4

    Manufacturing , 2 Meteorology, 1

    Ship building, 1 Rail, 1 R&D, 1

    Medical device, 1 Health IT, 1 Genomics, 1

    Food & beverage packaging, 1

    Electronics Manufacturing, 1

    Construction and infrastructure, 1

    Industry-Reported Market Areas

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 12

    Demographic – type, size, experience

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 13

    -29 -63

    -86 -98 -92

    -118 -77

    30 -153

    -61 -73

    -91 -111

    18 -85

    -107 243

    195 -10

    -70 -165

    -53 -24

    -250 -150 -50 50 150 250

    1. Mature use strategy2. Mature process/tool strategies4. Consistent lexicon & taxonomy across enterprise5. Mature model management processes6. Standard program & business guidance for models8. Models are the basis for technical processes9. MBSE is the basis for Technical Reviews11. Modeling provides measurable improvements12. Have consistent metrics across enterprise14. Consistent data/model V&V processes15. Consistent data/model quality assurance processes16. Processes to manage data interface between tools17. Data is portable across organizations & tools19. Support model libraries for model reuse20. Libraries support discoverable knowledge21. Consistent use of shared models23. Trust that environment is secure24. Trust that environment protects IP25. Have processes and tool selection & interoperability30. Have clearly defined roles supporting MBSE32. Have sufficient staffing for all roles33. Have defined critical skills supporting MBSE35. Training is linked to critical skills

    Overall Survey Scores

    MBSE Usage

    Model Management

    Technical Management

    Metrics

    Model Quality

    Data Management

    Model Sharing & Reuse

    Modeling Environment

    Workforce

    MBSE Skills

    AGREE DISAGREE

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 14

    Demographics – Participant roles

    Systems Engineer, 92

    Project, Product or other

    Management, 29

    Executive Management, 17

    Modeling and Simulation

    Professional, 13

    Other, 12

    Acquisition Professional, 4

    Other Engineering or

    Software Disciplines, 3

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 15

    Overall Survey Scores by Role

    MBSE Usage

    Model Management

    Technical Management

    Metrics

    Model Quality

    Data Management

    Model Sharing & Reuse

    Modeling Environment

    Workforce

    MBSE Skills

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    1. M

    atur

    e us

    e st

    rate

    gy

    2. M

    atur

    e pr

    oces

    s/to

    ol st

    ateg

    ies

    4. C

    onsis

    tent

    lexi

    con

    & ta

    xono

    my

    acro

    ss e

    nter

    prise

    5. M

    atur

    e M

    odel

    Man

    agem

    ent P

    roce

    sses

    6. S

    tand

    ard

    Prog

    ram

    & B

    usin

    ess G

    uida

    nce

    for M

    odel

    s

    8. M

    odel

    s are

    the

    basis

    for T

    echn

    ical

    Pro

    cess

    es

    9. M

    BSE

    is th

    e ba

    sis fo

    r Tec

    hnic

    al R

    evie

    ws

    11. M

    odel

    ing

    prov

    ides

    mea

    sura

    ble

    impr

    ovem

    ents

    12. H

    ave

    cons

    isten

    t met

    rics a

    cros

    s ent

    erpr

    ise

    14. C

    onsis

    tent

    dat

    a/m

    odel

    V&

    V pr

    oces

    ses

    15. C

    onsis

    tent

    dat

    a/m

    odel

    QA

    proc

    esse

    s

    16. P

    roce

    sses

    to m

    anag

    e da

    ta in

    terf

    ace

    betw

    een

    tool

    s

    17. D

    ata

    is po

    rtab

    le a

    cros

    s org

    aniza

    tions

    & to

    ols

    19. S

    uppo

    rt m

    odel

    libr

    arie

    s for

    mod

    el re

    use

    20. L

    ibra

    ries s

    uppo

    rt d

    iscov

    erab

    le k

    now

    ledg

    e

    21. C

    onsis

    tent

    use

    of s

    hare

    d m

    odel

    s

    23. T

    rust

    that

    env

    ironm

    ent i

    s sec

    ure

    24. T

    rust

    that

    env

    ironm

    ent p

    rote

    cts I

    P

    25. H

    ave

    proc

    esse

    s for

    tool

    sele

    ctio

    n &

    inte

    rope

    rabi

    lity

    30. H

    ave

    clea

    rly d

    efin

    ed ro

    les s

    uppo

    rtin

    g M

    BSE

    32. H

    ave

    suffi

    cien

    t sta

    ffing

    for a

    ll ro

    les

    33. H

    ave

    defin

    ed c

    ritic

    al sk

    ills s

    uppo

    rtin

    g M

    BSE

    35. T

    rain

    ing

    is lin

    ked

    to c

    ritic

    al sk

    ills

    Executive Management

    Program/Project/Other Management

    System Engineers and Other roles

    AGRE

    E DI

    SAGR

    EE

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 16

    MBSE Usage and Model Management Survey Results

    Our MBSE processes and tools are integrated with our overall product-level processes and tools.

    Our organization has standard business and program guidance that defines our model management processes and tools.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 17

    Technical Management Survey Results

    Our organization uses modeling as the basis for our technical processes consistently across the enterprise. Our MBSE process fully supports our technical review process.

    Free-text question: Please identify any benefits or challenges your organization has found in the use of MBSE (or 'digital engineering') in the technical review process.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 18

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    MBS

    E m

    etho

    ds/p

    roce

    sses

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cul

    ture

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ing

    succ

    ess s

    torie

    s/pr

    actic

    es

    Cust

    omer

    /sta

    keho

    lder

    buy

    -in/e

    ngag

    emen

    t

    MBS

    E te

    rmin

    olog

    y/on

    tolo

    gy/li

    brar

    ies

    Lega

    cy/c

    urre

    nt p

    roce

    sses

    Peop

    le w

    illin

    g to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Trai

    ning

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Cost

    to u

    se M

    BSE

    tool

    s

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    mor

    e st

    akeh

    olde

    r inv

    olve

    men

    t

    Lead

    ersh

    ip su

    ppor

    t/co

    mm

    itmen

    t

    Incr

    ease

    d tr

    acea

    bilit

    y

    mul

    tiple

    vie

    wpo

    ints

    of m

    odel

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ion/

    info

    shar

    ing

    Incr

    ease

    d ca

    paci

    ty fo

    r reu

    se

    impr

    oved

    syst

    em u

    nder

    stan

    ding

    Redu

    ce ri

    sk

    Redu

    ce ti

    me

    Redu

    ce e

    rror

    s

    Redu

    ced

    SE ta

    sk b

    urde

    n

    Incr

    ease

    d co

    nsist

    ency

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    Obstacles vs. Enablers

    Comparing Obstacles vs. Enablers in Tech Review Processes

    Benefits of DE/MBSE Adoption of DE/MBSE

    Participants were asked to respond to the prompt, “Please identify any benefits or challenges your organization has found in the use of MBSE (or 'digital engineering') in the technical review process.”

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 19

    DE/MBSE Metrics Survey Result

    Modeling activities in our organization provide measurable improvements within and across projects.

    We have consistent metrics across our program(s)/enterprise that include our modeling activities.

    Free-text question: Please identify any metrics that have proven to be useful for measuring the performance of your MBSE activities.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 20

    Model Quality Survey Results

    Our organization has defined processes and tools for V&V of models at appropriate levels and program phases.

    Our organization has defined processes and tools for data and model quality assurance.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 21

    Data Management Survey Results

    Our organization has effective approaches for managing the data interface between tools.

    Data is managed independent of tools and allows for portability across different organizational structures and related disciplines.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 22

    Model Sharing & Reuse Survey Result

    Our organization supports model libraries for the purpose of model reuse.

    Shared models are being used to consistently manage systems across the lifecycle.

    Free-text question: Please identify any practices your organization has implemented to improve data and model discovery and reuse, either within or

    between teams. Include examples of appropriate model reuse if possible.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 23

    Data/Model Discovery & Reuse

    Participants were asked to respond to the prompt, “Please identify any practices your organization has implemented to improve data and model discovery and reuse, either within or between teams. Include examples of appropriate model reuse if possible.”

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Libr

    arie

    s

    Tool

    Spe

    cific

    Chal

    leng

    es

    Uni

    que

    vers

    us In

    tegr

    ated

    Solu

    tions

    EA F

    ram

    ewor

    k

    Mod

    el C

    urat

    ion

    Fram

    ewor

    k

    Mod

    el o

    r Too

    l Int

    egra

    tion

    Crea

    ted

    MBS

    E Ro

    les

    Data

    Man

    agem

    ent P

    roce

    sses

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l Tax

    onom

    y an

    dO

    ntol

    ogy

    Oth

    er

    Total Responses None or NA TBD or Too Immature

    Analyzable responses

    Q10 Data and Model Discovery and Reuse 97 13 26 58

    Foundational

    Advanced

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 24

    Modeling Environment Survey Results

    Our organization takes steps to make sure that our modeling environment protects our intellectual property.

    Our organization has defined processes and work instructions that cover tool selection, use, and related data interoperability concerns.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 25

    Workforce and Skills Survey Results

    Our organization has clearly defined the critical roles to support MBSE. Our organization has clearly defined critical skills for MBSE.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 26

    Survey Results of Critical Skills

    020406080

    100120

    Syst

    ems

    Engi

    neer

    ing…

    Tool

    Exp

    ertis

    e

    Digi

    tal

    Engi

    neer

    ing

    Non

    -Tec

    hnic

    alSk

    ills

    Attr

    ibut

    es

    Appl

    ied

    Expe

    rienc

    e

    Soft

    war

    eDe

    velo

    pmen

    t

    Chal

    leng

    es

    Mul

    ti-Di

    scip

    linar

    y

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    lCo

    ntex

    t

    Proj

    ect

    Man

    agem

    ent

    Question 34 The most critical skills for MBSE are:

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 27

    Survey Results of Critical Skills

    05

    1015202530

    Mod

    elin

    g

    Data

    Sci

    ence

    Sim

    ulat

    ion

    MBS

    EEn

    viro

    nmen

    t

    Mod

    elGo

    vern

    ance

    Most Critical Digital Skills

    Question 34 The most critical skills for MBSE are:

    05

    1015202530

    Gene

    ral T

    ool

    Expe

    rtise

    Mod

    elin

    gLa

    ngua

    ges

    Tool

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    Abili

    ty to

    Lear

    n N

    ewTo

    ols

    Most Critical Tool Expertise

    Question 34 The most critical skills for MBSE are:

    020406080

    100120

    Syst

    ems

    Engi

    neer

    ing…

    Tool

    Exp

    ertis

    e

    Digi

    tal

    Engi

    neer

    ing

    Non

    -Tec

    hnic

    alSk

    ills

    Attr

    ibut

    es

    Appl

    ied

    Expe

    rienc

    e

    Soft

    war

    eDe

    velo

    pmen

    t

    Chal

    leng

    es

    Mul

    ti-Di

    scip

    linar

    y

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    lCo

    ntex

    t

    Proj

    ect

    Man

    agem

    ent

    Question 34 The most critical skills for MBSE are:

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 28

    • Survey questions related to benefits are: ―Q3. What do you see as the most important reasons for integrating MBSE processes

    with program and business management processes? ―Q7. Please provide one or more descriptions of the business value you are realizing

    from consistent model management processes and tools. ―Q26. Please identify any additional benefits you find from collaborating on models

    across disciplines.

    Survey Free-Response Analysis - Benefits

    Non-response

    No value achieved

    Response containing

    benefits Q3 Reason for integrating

    MBSE 41 N/A 104

    Q7 Value from consistent model mgt.

    23 18 70

    Q26 Benefit from collaboration

    24 6 52

    Totals 88 24 226

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 29

    List of DE/MBSE Benefit Categories (Literature Review)

    Category

    List of Benefits

    Quality

    Reduce errors/ defects Improved risk analysis Improved capability

    Improved traceability Improved system design More stakeholder involvement Improved system quality Better requirements generation Strengthened testing Reduce risk Increased accuracy of estimates Reduce cost Increased rigor Improved predictive ability Better analysis capability Increased effectiveness Improved deliverable quality

    Velocity/ Agility

    Improved consistency Increased productivity Higher level support for integration Increased capacity for reuse Increased transparency Increased uniformity Increased efficiency Increased confidence Increased precision Reduce rework Increased flexibility Early V&V Reduce time Better requirements management Reduce ambiguity Reduce waste Ease of design customization Easy to make changes

    User Experience

    Higher level support for automation Improved system understanding Reduce effort

    Reduce burden of SE tasks Better data management/capture

    Better manage complexity Better decision making

    Knowledge Transfer

    Better accessibility of info Improved architecture Improved collaboration Better knowledge management/ capture

    Better communication/ info sharing

    Multiple viewpoints of model

    Category

    List of Benefits

    Quality

    Reduce errors/ defects

    Improved risk analysis

    Improved capability

    Improved traceability

    Improved system design

    More stakeholder involvement

    Improved system quality

    Better requirements generation

    Strengthened testing

    Reduce risk

    Increased accuracy of estimates

    Reduce cost

    Increased rigor

    Improved predictive ability

    Better analysis capability

    Increased effectiveness

    Improved deliverable quality

    Velocity/ Agility

    Improved consistency

    Increased productivity

    Higher level support for integration

    Increased capacity for reuse

    Increased transparency

    Increased uniformity

    Increased efficiency

    Increased confidence

    Increased precision

    Reduce rework

    Increased flexibility

    Early V&V

    Reduce time

    Better requirements management

    Reduce ambiguity

    Reduce waste

    Ease of design customization

    Easy to make changes

    User Experience

    Higher level support for automation

    Improved system understanding

    Reduce effort

    Reduce burden of SE tasks

    Better data management/capture

    Better manage complexity

    Better decision making

    Knowledge Transfer

    Better accessibility of info

    Improved architecture

    Improved collaboration

    Better knowledge management/ capture

    Better communication/ info sharing

    Multiple viewpoints of model

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 30

    Most Frequently-Reported Benefits from Survey Analysis by Question

    Q3 Reason for integrating MBSE Q7 Value from consistent model mgt. Q26 Benefit from collaboration

    Reduce cost (17) Increased capacity for reuse (18) Better communication/ information sharing (13)

    Reduce time (17) Improved consistency (16) Improved system understanding (10)

    Better accessibility of info (16) Improved system understanding (9) Better accessibility of info (6)

    Increased efficiency (14) Reduce time (9) Improved consistency (5)

    Improved consistency (13) Better communication/ information sharing (7)

    Reduce errors (5)

    Increased traceability (11) Better accessibility of info (7) Reduce time (5)

    Improved system understanding (10) Reduce cost (7) Increased capacity for reuse (5)

    • Integration Benefits • Model Mgmt. Benefits • Collaboration Benefits

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 31

    Top Benefits Reported from Survey Questions

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    Survey Questions on Benefits- Top Responses

    Q3 Reason for integrating MBSE

    Q7 Value from consistent model mgt.

    Q26 Benefit from collaboration

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 32

    All Benefit Categories Reported from Survey Questions

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    Redu

    ce c

    ost

    Redu

    ce ti

    me

    Bett

    er a

    cces

    sibili

    ty o

    f inf

    oIn

    crea

    sed

    effic

    ienc

    yIm

    prov

    ed c

    onsis

    tenc

    yIn

    crea

    sed

    trac

    eabi

    lity

    Impr

    oved

    syst

    em u

    nder

    stan

    ding

    Bett

    er c

    omm

    unic

    atio

    n/ in

    fo sh

    arin

    gHi

    gher

    leve

    l sup

    port

    for i

    nteg

    ratio

    nRe

    duce

    err

    ors

    Bett

    er m

    anag

    e co

    mpl

    exity

    Impr

    oved

    syst

    em q

    ualit

    yIn

    crea

    sed

    capa

    city

    for r

    euse

    Impr

    oved

    syst

    em d

    esig

    nBe

    tter

    dec

    ision

    mak

    ing

    Impr

    oved

    col

    labo

    ratio

    nIn

    crea

    sed

    effe

    ctiv

    enes

    sBe

    tter

    ana

    lysis

    cap

    abili

    tyBe

    tter

    requ

    irem

    ents

    gen

    erat

    ion

    Redu

    ce ri

    skIm

    prov

    ed d

    eliv

    erab

    le q

    ualit

    yBe

    tter

    dat

    a m

    gt./

    capt

    ure

    Bett

    er k

    now

    ledg

    e m

    gt./

    cap

    ture

    Redu

    ce re

    wor

    kM

    ultip

    le v

    iew

    poin

    ts o

    f mod

    elRe

    duce

    am

    bigu

    ityHi

    gher

    leve

    l sup

    port

    for a

    utom

    atio

    nEa

    rly V

    &V

    Redu

    ce e

    ffort

    Incr

    ease

    d pr

    oduc

    tivity

    Impr

    oved

    arc

    hite

    ctur

    eIn

    crea

    sed

    rigor

    Stre

    ngth

    ened

    test

    ing

    Bete

    r req

    uire

    men

    ts m

    gt.

    Impr

    oved

    risk

    ana

    lysis

    Incr

    ease

    d pr

    ecisi

    onIm

    prov

    ed c

    apab

    ility

    Incr

    ease

    d fle

    xibi

    lity

    Redu

    ce w

    aste

    Incr

    ease

    d un

    iform

    ityM

    ore

    stak

    ehol

    der i

    nvol

    vem

    ent

    Easy

    to m

    ake

    chan

    ges

    Redu

    ce b

    urde

    n of

    SE

    task

    sIm

    prov

    ed p

    redi

    ctiv

    e ab

    ility

    Incr

    ease

    d tr

    ansp

    aren

    cy

    Q3 Reason for integrating MBSE

    Q7 Value from consistent model mgt.

    Q26 Benefit from collaboration

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 33

    Analysis of Survey Question on Metrics

    • Question 13 Please identify any metrics that have proven to be useful for measuring the performance of your MBSE activities was also analyzed against the literature review benefit categories

    Adoption metrics: metrics related to the successful adoption and implementation of MBSE instead of measuring the value of MBSE itself

    Non-

    response No

    metrics

    Response containing

    metrics Q13 Metrics

    for MBSE 19 33 44

    Adoption metrics

    Lit review benefit metrics

    Unable to categorize

    Q13 Metrics for MBSE

    17 72 11

    Number of complete responses

    Number of unique

    comments

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 34

    Most cited benefits and metrics categories from survey data

    Top survey response metrics (Q13 only) Survey response benefits (Q3, Q7, and Q26) Better requirements generation 7 Better requirements generation 7

    Reduce errors 7 Reduce errors 19 Increased traceability 6 Increased traceability 17

    Better requirements mgt. 6 Better requirements mgt. 3 Improved system design 5 Improved system design 9

    Reduce cost 5 Reduce cost 25 Reduce time 5 Reduce time 31

    Increased capacity for reuse 5 Increased capacity for reuse 30 Better analysis capability 4 Better analysis capability 6 Improved system quality 2 Improved system quality 14 Increased effectiveness 2 Increased effectiveness 6

    Higher level support for automation 2 Higher level support for automation 3 Higher level support for integration 2 Higher level support for integration 14

    Top survey response metrics (Q13 only)

    Survey response benefits (Q3, Q7, and Q26)

    Better requirements generation

    7

    Better requirements generation

    7

    Reduce errors

    7

    Reduce errors

    19

    Increased traceability

    6

    Increased traceability

    17

    Better requirements mgt.

    6

    Better requirements mgt.

    3

    Improved system design

    5

    Improved system design

    9

    Reduce cost

    5

    Reduce cost

    25

    Reduce time

    5

    Reduce time

    31

    Increased capacity for reuse

    5

    Increased capacity for reuse

    30

    Better analysis capability

    4

    Better analysis capability

    6

    Improved system quality

    2

    Improved system quality

    14

    Increased effectiveness

    2

    Increased effectiveness

    6

    Higher level support for automation

    2

    Higher level support for automation

    3

    Higher level support for integration

    2

    Higher level support for integration

    14

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 35

    Most cited benefits and metrics categories from survey data

    Remaining survey response metrics (Q13 only) Top Survey response benefits (Q3, Q7, and Q26) (not cited) 0 Improved consistency 34 (not cited) 0 Increased capacity for reuse 30

    Better accessibility of info 1 Better accessibility of info 29 Improved system understanding 1 Improved system understanding 29

    (not cited) 0 Better communication/ info sharing 29 (not cited) 0 Increased efficiency 20 (not cited) 0 Improved collaboration 13

    Better knowledge mgt./ capture 1 Better knowledge mgt./ capture 8 Reduce ambiguity 1 Reduce ambiguity 8

    Better manage complexity 1 Better manage complexity 7 Better decision making 1 Better decision making 7

    (not cited) 0 Reduce rework 7 Improved deliverable quality 1 Improved deliverable quality 6

    Better data mgt./ capture 1 Better data mgt./ capture 6 Reduce risk 1 Reduce risk 5

    Increased uniformity 1 Increased uniformity 5 Multiple viewpoints of model 1 Multiple viewpoints of model 4

    Strengthened testing 1 Strengthened testing 4 Reduce effort 1 Reduce effort 3

    Improved capability 1 Improved capability 1

    Remaining survey response metrics (Q13 only)

    Top Survey response benefits (Q3, Q7, and Q26)

    (not cited)

    0

    Improved consistency

    34

    (not cited)

    0

    Increased capacity for reuse

    30

    Better accessibility of info

    1

    Better accessibility of info

    29

    Improved system understanding

    1

    Improved system understanding

    29

    (not cited)

    0

    Better communication/ info sharing

    29

    (not cited)

    0

    Increased efficiency

    20

    (not cited)

    0

    Improved collaboration

    13

    Better knowledge mgt./ capture

    1

    Better knowledge mgt./ capture

    8

    Reduce ambiguity

    1

    Reduce ambiguity

    8

    Better manage complexity

    1

    Better manage complexity

    7

    Better decision making

    1

    Better decision making

    7

    (not cited)

    0

    Reduce rework

    7

    Improved deliverable quality

    1

    Improved deliverable quality

    6

    Better data mgt./ capture

    1

    Better data mgt./ capture

    6

    Reduce risk

    1

    Reduce risk

    5

    Increased uniformity

    1

    Increased uniformity

    5

    Multiple viewpoints of model

    1

    Multiple viewpoints of model

    4

    Strengthened testing

    1

    Strengthened testing

    4

    Reduce effort

    1

    Reduce effort

    3

    Improved capability

    1

    Improved capability

    1

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 36

    Challenges in Enterprise Adoption of MBSE

    • Successful adoption of Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE), like many other large-scale enterprise change initiatives, can present significant challenges - requires intentional focus on many aspects within an organization -not just the technical details of processes and tools. ―The Digital Engineering Work Group pain points relate to technical aspects such as

    tools, reference models, standards, and data, as well as other organization-level challenges such as implementation/deployment approach, IT infrastructure, and training/skills of the workforce.

    ―Cloutier (2019) reported the top five inhibitors to successful adoption of MBSE were: cultural and general resistance to change, availability of skills, the MBSE learning curve, lack of perceived value of MBSE, and lack of management support.

    • This breadth of factors demonstrates the importance of a holistic, enterprise-wide perspective in designing and implementing the approach to adopt MBSE.

    • Examining MBSE adoption from the lens of the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence (CPE) can generate insight and more complete understanding of MBSE adoption.

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 37

    List of enterprise success factors from the survey analysis

    Category

    List of Success Factors

    Leadership Leadership support/commitment

    Leadership understanding of MBSE

    Communication Awareness of MBSE benefits/value Communicating success stories/practices Need for change

    Resources Cost to use MBSE tools General resources for MBSE implementation

    Workforce

    General MBSE awareness and knowledge People willing to use MBSE tools Teamwork

    MBSE learning curve People in SE roles Training Workforce knowledge/skills

    Change Processes

    Champions Competing priorities Legacy/current processes Change management process design

    Integration to support MBSE implementation

    Vision and strategy for MBSE

    Community of practice Demonstrating benefits/results

    MBSE Processes MBSE methods/processes MBSE tools Security of data and IP MBSE terminology/ontology/libraries

    Projects/programs to apply MBSE

    Organizational Environment

    Alignment with business strategy Organizational culture Success metrics

    Organizational characteristics Rewards/recognition Supportive infrastructure

    External Environment

    Alignment with customer requirements

    Customer/stakeholder buy-in/engagement

    External regulations Use in SE community

    Category

    List of Success Factors

    Leadership

    Leadership support/commitment

    Leadership understanding of MBSE

    Communication

    Awareness of MBSE benefits/value

    Communicating success stories/practices

    Need for change

    Resources

    Cost to use MBSE tools

    General resources for MBSE implementation

    Workforce

    General MBSE awareness and knowledge

    People willing to use MBSE tools

    Teamwork

    MBSE learning curve

    People in SE roles

    Training

    Workforce knowledge/skills

    Change Processes

    Champions

    Competing priorities

    Legacy/current processes

    Change management process design

    Integration to support MBSE implementation

    Vision and strategy for MBSE

    Community of practice

    Demonstrating benefits/results

    MBSE Processes

    MBSE methods/processes

    MBSE tools

    Security of data and IP

    MBSE terminology/ontology/libraries

    Projects/programs to apply MBSE

    Organizational Environment

    Alignment with business strategy

    Organizational culture

    Success metrics

    Organizational characteristics

    Rewards/recognition

    Supportive infrastructure

    External Environment

    Alignment with customer requirements

    Customer/stakeholder buy-in/engagement

    External regulations

    Use in SE community

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 38

    Analysis of Survey Responses: Obstacles

    • There were 166 respondents providing comments to the question on obstacles, parsed into 303 unique response comments.

    05

    101520253035404550

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cul

    ture

    Wor

    kfor

    ce k

    now

    ledg

    e/sk

    ills

    Lead

    ersh

    ip su

    ppor

    t/co

    mm

    itmen

    tAw

    aren

    ess o

    f MBS

    E be

    nefit

    s/va

    lue

    Chan

    ge m

    anag

    emen

    t pro

    cess

    des

    ign

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    to su

    ppor

    t MBS

    E im

    plem

    enta

    tion

    MBS

    E m

    etho

    ds/p

    roce

    sses

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Com

    petin

    g pr

    iorit

    ies

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    Gen

    eral

    reso

    urce

    s for

    MBS

    E im

    plem

    enta

    tion

    Trai

    ning

    Proj

    ects

    /pro

    gram

    s to

    appl

    y M

    BSE

    Lega

    cy/c

    urre

    nt p

    roce

    sses

    Gen

    eral

    MBS

    E aw

    aren

    ess a

    nd k

    now

    ledg

    eLe

    ader

    ship

    und

    erst

    andi

    ng o

    f MBS

    ECo

    st to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    MBS

    E le

    arni

    ng c

    urve

    Supp

    ortiv

    e in

    fras

    truc

    ture

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    cus

    tom

    er re

    quire

    men

    tsCu

    stom

    er/s

    take

    hold

    er b

    uy-in

    /eng

    agem

    ent

    MBS

    E te

    rmin

    olog

    y/on

    tolo

    gy/li

    brar

    ies

    Nee

    d fo

    r cha

    nge

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    bus

    ines

    s str

    ateg

    yEx

    tern

    al re

    gula

    tions

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cha

    ract

    erist

    ics

    Rew

    ards

    /rec

    ogni

    tion

    Secu

    rity

    of d

    ata

    and

    IPVi

    sion

    and

    stra

    tegy

    for M

    BSE

    Q27: Obstacles to Implementing MBSE Code

    # Comments Obstacles

    Organizational culture 44 Workforce knowledge/skills 30 Leadership support/commitment 25 Awareness of MBSE benefits/value 18 Change management process design 13 Integration to support MBSE implementation 13

    MBSE methods/processes 13 MBSE tools 13 Competing priorities 11 Demonstrating benefits/results 11 General resources for MBSE implementation 11

    Training 11 Projects/programs to apply MBSE 10 Legacy/current processes 9 General MBSE awareness and knowledge 8

    Leadership understanding of MBSE 8

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 39

    Analysis of Survey Responses: Enablers

    • There were 156 respondents providing comments to the question on enablers, parsed into 223 unique response comments.

    Code

    # Comments Enablers

    Leadership support/commitment 27 People willing to use MBSE tools 21 Workforce knowledge/skills 19 Champions 15 Demonstrating benefits/results 15 Training 13 People in SE roles 12 MBSE tools 11 Alignment with customer requirements 10

    Change management process design 7

    Communicating success stories/practices 6

    Community of practice 6 Integration to support MBSE implementation 6

    Use in SE community 6

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    Lead

    ersh

    ip su

    ppor

    t/co

    mm

    itmen

    tPe

    ople

    will

    ing

    to u

    se M

    BSE

    tool

    sW

    orkf

    orce

    kno

    wle

    dge/

    skill

    sCh

    ampi

    ons

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    Trai

    ning

    Peop

    le in

    SE

    role

    sM

    BSE

    tool

    sAl

    ignm

    ent w

    ith c

    usto

    mer

    requ

    irem

    ents

    Chan

    ge m

    anag

    emen

    t pro

    cess

    des

    ign

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ing

    succ

    ess s

    torie

    s/pr

    actic

    esCo

    mm

    unity

    of p

    ract

    ice

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    to su

    ppor

    t MBS

    E…U

    se in

    SE

    com

    mun

    ityGe

    nera

    l res

    ourc

    es fo

    r MBS

    E…M

    BSE

    term

    inol

    ogy/

    onto

    logy

    /libr

    arie

    sN

    eed

    for c

    hang

    ePr

    ojec

    ts/p

    rogr

    ams t

    o ap

    ply

    MBS

    EAw

    aren

    ess o

    f MBS

    E be

    nefit

    s/va

    lue

    MBS

    E m

    etho

    ds/p

    roce

    sses

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cul

    ture

    Cust

    omer

    /sta

    keho

    lder

    buy

    -…Te

    amw

    ork

    Gene

    ral M

    BSE

    awar

    enes

    s and

    kno

    wle

    dge

    Lead

    ersh

    ip u

    nder

    stan

    ding

    of M

    BSE

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cha

    ract

    erist

    ics

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    bus

    ines

    s str

    ateg

    yCo

    st to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Rew

    ards

    /rec

    ogni

    tion

    Succ

    ess m

    etric

    sVi

    sion

    and

    stra

    tegy

    for M

    BSE

    Q28: Enablers to Implementing MBSE

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 40

    Analysis of Survey Responses: Changes

    • There were 153 respondents providing comments to the question on changes, parsed into 273 unique response comments.

    Code

    # Comments Changes

    MBSE methods/processes 45 Training 31 MBSE tools 20 General resources for MBSE implementation 16

    Leadership support/commitment 16 Change management process design 14

    Workforce knowledge/skills 13 Organizational culture 12 Integration to support MBSE implementation 11

    Demonstrating benefits/results 10 MBSE terminology/ontology/libraries 9 Supportive infrastructure 9 Awareness of MBSE benefits/value 7 Leadership understanding of MBSE 6 Vision and strategy for MBSE 6

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    MBS

    E m

    etho

    ds/p

    roce

    sses

    Trai

    ning

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Gene

    ral r

    esou

    rces

    for M

    BSE…

    Lead

    ersh

    ip su

    ppor

    t/co

    mm

    itmen

    tCh

    ange

    man

    agem

    ent p

    roce

    ss d

    esig

    nW

    orkf

    orce

    kno

    wle

    dge/

    skill

    sO

    rgan

    izatio

    nal c

    ultu

    reIn

    tegr

    atio

    n to

    supp

    ort M

    BSE…

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    MBS

    E te

    rmin

    olog

    y/on

    tolo

    gy/li

    brar

    ies

    Supp

    ortiv

    e in

    fras

    truc

    ture

    Awar

    enes

    s of M

    BSE

    bene

    fits/

    valu

    eLe

    ader

    ship

    und

    erst

    andi

    ng o

    f MBS

    EVi

    sion

    and

    stra

    tegy

    for M

    BSE

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    cus

    tom

    er re

    quire

    men

    tsN

    eed

    for c

    hang

    eCo

    mm

    unic

    atin

    g su

    cces

    s sto

    ries/

    prac

    tices

    Gene

    ral M

    BSE

    awar

    enes

    s and

    kno

    wle

    dge

    Peop

    le w

    illin

    g to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Cust

    omer

    /sta

    keho

    lder

    buy

    -in/e

    ngag

    emen

    tSu

    cces

    s met

    rics

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    bus

    ines

    s str

    ateg

    yCh

    ampi

    ons

    Cost

    to u

    se M

    BSE

    tool

    sPr

    ojec

    ts/p

    rogr

    ams t

    o ap

    ply

    MBS

    ERe

    war

    ds/r

    ecog

    nitio

    nTe

    amw

    ork

    Use

    in S

    E co

    mm

    unity

    Com

    mun

    ity o

    f pra

    ctic

    eLe

    gacy

    /cur

    rent

    pro

    cess

    esM

    BSE

    lear

    ning

    cur

    veO

    rgan

    izatio

    nal c

    hara

    cter

    istic

    sPe

    ople

    in S

    E ro

    les

    Secu

    rity

    of d

    ata

    and

    IP

    Q29: Changes to Improve MBSE Implementation

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 41

    Comparing Obstacles vs. Enablers vs. Changes

    05

    101520253035404550

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cul

    ture

    Wor

    kfor

    ce k

    now

    ledg

    e/sk

    ills

    Lead

    ersh

    ip su

    ppor

    t/co

    mm

    itmen

    tAw

    aren

    ess o

    f MBS

    E be

    nefit

    s/va

    lue

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Chan

    ge m

    anag

    emen

    t pro

    cess

    des

    ign

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    to su

    ppor

    t MBS

    E im

    plem

    enta

    tion

    MBS

    E m

    etho

    ds/p

    roce

    sses

    Dem

    onst

    ratin

    g be

    nefit

    s/re

    sults

    Trai

    ning

    Gene

    ral r

    esou

    rces

    for M

    BSE

    impl

    emen

    tatio

    nCo

    mpe

    ting

    prio

    ritie

    sPr

    ojec

    ts/p

    rogr

    ams t

    o ap

    ply

    MBS

    ELe

    gacy

    /cur

    rent

    pro

    cess

    esLe

    ader

    ship

    und

    erst

    andi

    ng o

    f MBS

    EGe

    nera

    l MBS

    E aw

    aren

    ess a

    nd k

    now

    ledg

    eCo

    st to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Supp

    ortiv

    e in

    fras

    truc

    ture

    MBS

    E le

    arni

    ng c

    urve

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    cus

    tom

    er re

    quire

    men

    tsCu

    stom

    er/s

    take

    hold

    er b

    uy-in

    /eng

    agem

    ent

    MBS

    E te

    rmin

    olog

    y/on

    tolo

    gy/li

    brar

    ies

    Nee

    d fo

    r cha

    nge

    Org

    aniza

    tiona

    l cha

    ract

    erist

    ics

    Alig

    nmen

    t with

    bus

    ines

    s str

    ateg

    yEx

    tern

    al re

    gula

    tions

    Visio

    n an

    d st

    rate

    gy fo

    r MBS

    ERe

    war

    ds/r

    ecog

    nitio

    nSe

    curit

    y of

    dat

    a an

    d IP

    Peop

    le w

    illin

    g to

    use

    MBS

    E to

    ols

    Cham

    pion

    sPe

    ople

    in S

    E ro

    les

    Com

    mun

    icat

    ing

    succ

    ess s

    torie

    s/pr

    actic

    esU

    se in

    SE

    com

    mun

    ityCo

    mm

    unity

    of p

    ract

    ice

    Team

    wor

    kSu

    cces

    s met

    rics

    Obstacles vs. Enablers vs. Changes

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 42

    Framework for MBSE Adoption

    • Insight from analysis of both obstacles and enablers, mapped to the Baldrige CPE, can be used to define a more comprehensive set of adoption practices for maturity in MBSE – e.g.:

    ― Leaders communicate a clear reason and need for MBSE adoption ― Leaders understand MBSE ― Leaders support and are committed to MBSE ― People understand the benefits of MBSE ― MBSE is aligned with the overall business strategy ― MBSE is used for the right projects/programs ― MBSE adoption is aligned with what customers need ― Customers and stakeholders buy-in to MBSE ― Data management processes support MBSE ― The IT infrastructure supports MBSE use ― Clear metrics are defined to track results & progress of MBSE ― Systems engineers have skills needed to support MBSE use ― Training is provided to develop needed skills ― People are rewarded/recognized for using MBSE ― The organizational culture is aligned with MBSE use

    Baldrige CPE Framework

    http://www.nist.gov/baldrige

  • Systems Engineering Research Center 43

    Summary: Top DE Metrics Areas (numbers reflect survey citations)

    Category Most Cited Benefits Quality Reduce Cost (25)

    Reduce Defects/Errors/Rework (19) Increased Traceability (17) Improved System Quality (14)

    Velocity/Agility Improved Consistency (34) Reduce Time (31) Improved Capacity for Reuse (30) Increased Efficiency (20) Better Collaboration/Information Sharing (8)

    User Experience Improved System Understanding (28) Better Manage Complexity (9) Reduced Waste (4) Support for Automation (3)

    Knowledge Transfer Better Accessibility of Information (29) Better Communication/ Information Sharing (29) Improved System Understanding (29)

    Adoption Methods/Processes (45) Roles/Skills, People Willing to Use (31) Leadership support/Commitment (27) Training/Tools, People Willing to Use (21) Change Management Process Design (14)

  • 44

    Questions?

    Thank you!

    Benchmarking the Benefits and Current Maturity of Digital Engineering/Model-Based SEFrameworks for Evaluating DE ValueDoD Digital Engineering StrategyFocus: Enterprise Transformation MeasuresSummary DE Success Measures FrameworkMBSE Benefits: Literature Review ResultsLiterature Review Benefit Categories (48)Literature Review Quantitative Results (most cited)mbsematuritysurvey.sercuarc.orgMBSE Survey OverviewDemographics - My organization is:Demographic – type, size, experienceOverall Survey ScoresDemographics – Participant rolesOverall Survey Scores by RoleMBSE Usage and Model Management Survey ResultsTechnical Management Survey ResultsComparing Obstacles vs. Enablers in �Tech Review ProcessesDE/MBSE Metrics Survey ResultModel Quality Survey ResultsData Management Survey ResultsModel Sharing & Reuse Survey ResultData/Model Discovery & ReuseModeling Environment Survey ResultsWorkforce and Skills Survey ResultsSurvey Results of Critical SkillsSurvey Results of Critical SkillsSlide Number 28List of DE/MBSE Benefit Categories �(Literature Review)Most Frequently-Reported Benefits from Survey Analysis by QuestionTop Benefits Reported from Survey QuestionsAll Benefit Categories Reported from Survey QuestionsAnalysis of Survey Question on MetricsMost cited benefits and metrics categories from survey dataMost cited benefits and metrics categories from survey dataChallenges in Enterprise Adoption of MBSEList of enterprise success factors from the survey analysisAnalysis of Survey Responses: ObstaclesAnalysis of Survey Responses: EnablersAnalysis of Survey Responses: ChangesComparing Obstacles vs. Enablers vs. ChangesFramework for MBSE AdoptionSummary: Top DE Metrics Areas�(numbers reflect survey citations)Questions?