Benchmarking Productivity Metrics

Benchmarking Productivity Benchmarking Productivity MetricsMetrics

Annual ConferenceAnnual ConferenceKeystone, ColoradoKeystone, Colorado

Session ParticipantsSession Participants

ModeratorModerator

• Dave Hile – Dave Hile – Watkins Engineers & Constructors Watkins Engineers & Constructors

PanelistsPanelists

• Jimmy Slaughter - S&B Engineers and Jimmy Slaughter - S&B Engineers and

Constructors Constructors

• Paul Woldy – ChevronTexaco CorporationPaul Woldy – ChevronTexaco Corporation

• Ken Walsh - Arizona State UniversityKen Walsh - Arizona State University

• Kent Goddard – SolutiaKent Goddard – Solutia

• Steve Thomas – CIISteve Thomas – CII

Goals of this SessionGoals of this Session

• Provide an Update on the CII Provide an Update on the CII Benchmarking Productivity Metrics effortBenchmarking Productivity Metrics effort

• Illustrate proposed uses of the Illustrate proposed uses of the productivity metricsproductivity metrics

• Discuss the alignment of efforts between Discuss the alignment of efforts between the CII Benchmarking initiative and the CII Benchmarking initiative and Project Team 192, Engineering Project Team 192, Engineering Productivity Measures research effortProductivity Measures research effort

First CII Annual MeetingFirst CII Annual MeetingKeystone, ColoradoKeystone, ColoradoAugust 7-8, August 7-8, 19851985

AGENDAAGENDA

General Session, August 7, 1985General Session, August 7, 1985

8:30 A.M.8:30 A.M. Opening RemarksOpening Remarks

8:45 A.M.8:45 A.M. Keynote AddressKeynote Address

9:30 A.M.9:30 A.M. CII OverviewCII Overview

……

11:15 A.M.11:15 A.M. Productivity MeasurementsProductivity Measurements

……

What Can Be AccomplishedWhat Can Be AccomplishedOwner & Contractor Safety PerformanceOwner & Contractor Safety Performance

4.104.20

4.004.40

4.504.90

5.505.505.806.10

6.796.80

3.44

0.260.270.410.31

0.450.550.810.631.14

1.451.551.90

0.23

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

325 413 477 497 527 613 644 888 591 763 1,122 936 1,115

Year and Work-hours (MM)

Lo

st W

ork

day

Cas

e In

cid

ence

Rat

e

Industry*

CII

Estimated*

What Are We Doing?What Are We Doing?

Construction Construction

ProductivityProductivity • ConcreteConcrete

• Structural SteelStructural Steel

• PipingPiping

• InstrumentationInstrumentation

• EquipmentEquipment

• ElectricalElectrical

• InsulationInsulation

Engineering Engineering

ProductivityProductivity • ConcreteConcrete

• Structural SteelStructural Steel

• PipingPiping

• InstrumentationInstrumentation

• EquipmentEquipment

• ElectricalElectrical

Construction Productivity - Construction Productivity - ConcreteConcrete

Engineering Productivity - Engineering Productivity - ConcreteConcrete

Productivity Metrics Productivity Metrics MilestonesMilestones

Jun 2000Jun 2000 Established path forward.Established path forward.

Jul 2000Jul 2000 Identified and discussed issues.Identified and discussed issues.

Developed work plan and resource teams.Developed work plan and resource teams.

Sept 2000Sept 2000 Developed preliminary Construction Metric Developed preliminary Construction Metric definitions.definitions.

Nov 2000Nov 2000 Reviewed Construction Metric definitions.Reviewed Construction Metric definitions.

Developed Engineering Metric categories.Developed Engineering Metric categories.

Feb 2001Feb 2001 Finalized Construction Metric definitions.Finalized Construction Metric definitions.

Jun 2001Jun 2001 Finalized Construction Metric questionnaire.Finalized Construction Metric questionnaire.

Initiated pilot data collection.Initiated pilot data collection.

Oct 2001Oct 2001 Validated Construction Metric questionnaire.Validated Construction Metric questionnaire.

Jan 2002Jan 2002 -Developed Engineering Productivity Metrics – Developed Engineering Productivity Metrics – first cutfirst cut

Apr 2002Apr 2002 Refined/Finalized Engineering Productivity Refined/Finalized Engineering Productivity Metrics Metrics

Apr – Jun Apr – Jun 20022002

Integration with Project Team 192 Integration with Project Team 192

How to Use the MetricsHow to Use the Metrics

Benchmarking ROADMAPBenchmarking ROADMAP

Determine What to BenchmarkDetermine What to BenchmarkDetermine What to BenchmarkDetermine What to Benchmark

Define the MetricsDefine the MetricsDefine the MetricsDefine the Metrics

Develop Data CollectionDevelop Data Collection MethodologyMethodology


Collect DataCollect DataCollect DataCollect Data

Identify Performance GapIdentify Performance GapIdentify Performance GapIdentify Performance Gap

Identify Reasons for DeficienciesIdentify Reasons for DeficienciesIdentify Reasons for DeficienciesIdentify Reasons for Deficiencies

Develop Action PlanDevelop Action PlanDevelop Action PlanDevelop Action Plan

Integrate Goals into BusinessIntegrate Goals into BusinessPracticesPractices


Improvement?Improvement?Improvement?Improvement?

Identify Performance GapIdentify Performance Gap

• Collect data and calculate raw Collect data and calculate raw

productivity productivity →→ Norms: wk-hrs/installed Norms: wk-hrs/installed quantityquantity

• Calculate expected productivity Calculate expected productivity →→ Regression Regression model(s)model(s)

• Assess the gapAssess the gap

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

-10 -5 0 5 10

Project Environment Index

Productivity Gap

Database Values

Your Project

Expected Productivity

Hrs

/CY

Determining the Performance Determining the Performance GapGap

(Notional Data)(Notional Data)

Concrete Foundations21-50 CY












Benchmarking ROADMAPBenchmarking ROADMAP

Identify Reasons for Identify Reasons for DeficienciesDeficiencies

•Perform Self-assessment: Perform Self-assessment:

Gap analysis & Key reportsGap analysis & Key reports

•Review References: Review References:

CII Products On-lineCII Products On-line

Metric Metric CategoryCategory

Unit Unit of of

MeasMeas..

Actual Actual QtyQty

Your Your Proj.Proj.

Act Wk-Act Wk-HrHr

Your Your Proj.Proj.

Raw Raw ProdProd

. .

DB DB NormNorm

ss

Wk-HrWk-Hr

Gain/Gain/LossLoss

ConcreteConcrete5-10 CY5-10 CY CYCY 300300 30753075 10.2510.25 8.158.15 630630

Structural Structural SteelSteel

TNTN 150150 10281028 6.856.85 4.754.75 315315

PipingPiping6” CS Sched 806” CS Sched 80 LFLF 80508050 14,08814,088 1.751.75 1.251.25 40254025

EquipmentEquipmentPressure VesselsPressure Vessels EAEA 44 20002000 500500 350350 600600

ElectricalElectricalCableCable LFLF 20,00020,000 3,3003,300 .165.165 .102.102 12601260

InsulationInsulation ELFELF 5,0005,000 5,0005,000 1.001.00 .75.75 12501250

InstrumentatioInstrumentationn

InstrumentsInstruments

EAEA 600600 1,5901,590 2.652.65 2.002.00 390390

84708470

Other Uses for the Data: Wk-hr Other Uses for the Data: Wk-hr Gain/LossGain/Loss

Metric CategoryMetric Category Unit Unit of of

MeasMeas..

Estimated Estimated QtyQty

•DB DB Productivity Productivity

NormsNorms

Expected Expected Wk-HrWk-Hr

ConcreteConcrete

5-10 CY5-10 CY CYCY 450450 8.158.15 36683668

Structural SteelStructural Steel TNTN 500500 4.754.75 23752375

PipingPiping

6” CS Sched 806” CS Sched 80 LFLF 15,25015,250 1.251.25 19,06319,063

EquipmentEquipment

Pressure VesselsPressure Vessels EAEA 66 350350 21002100

ElectricalElectrical

CableCable LFLF 36,00036,000 .102.102 36723672

InsulationInsulation ELFELF 10,00010,000 .75.75 75007500

InstrumentationInstrumentation

InstrumentsInstruments EAEA 10001000 2.002.00 20002000

Other Uses: Potential Project Other Uses: Potential Project OpportunityOpportunity

ROADMAPROADMAP












Why Measure Productivity?Why Measure Productivity?

•IndustryIndustry

•CompetitivenessCompetitiveness

•ImprovementsImprovements

•ProfitsProfits

How to Get Started?How to Get Started?

•http://cii-http://cii-benchmarking.orgbenchmarking.org

•Benchmarking TrainingBenchmarking Training•InputInput•Compare My ProjectCompare My Project•ImproveImprove

ChallengesChallenges

•Roadmap StepsRoadmap Steps•EducationEducation•Management Buy-In Management Buy-In

ROADMAPROADMAP












ChallengesChallenges

•Roadmap StepsRoadmap Steps•EducationEducation•Management Buy-In Management Buy-In

FutureFuture

Concrete Foundations

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

< 5 CY 5-20 CY 21-50 CY > 50 CY

Hrs

/CY

mean ——— confidence interval -------- Notional Data

Where Will You Be in Ten Where Will You Be in Ten Years?Years?

Productivity PerformanceProductivity Performance

Con

str

ucti

on

Pro

du

cti

vit

y W

k-H

rs/Q

ty

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

925 875 1012 985 1010 1045 1003 1117 1092 1101 1057

Year and Work-hours (MM)

IndustryIndustry

CIICII

2013

1111

Notional DataNotional Data

SummarySummary

Update on CII Benchmarking Productivity MetricsUpdate on CII Benchmarking Productivity Metrics

• Construction & Engineering MetricsConstruction & Engineering Metrics have been developedhave been developed

• We are collecting data on construction metrics nowWe are collecting data on construction metrics now

• Data collection for engineering metrics will begin by August Data collection for engineering metrics will begin by August 31st 31st

• If you need the metrics, you need to submit data!If you need the metrics, you need to submit data!

SummarySummary

Proposed Uses for the MetricsProposed Uses for the Metrics

• Gap analysisGap analysis

• Identify work-hour gains/lossesIdentify work-hour gains/losses

• Provide check on estimating systemProvide check on estimating system

• Trend analysis – are you improving?Trend analysis – are you improving?

SummarySummaryAlignment between CII Benchmarking & PT192Alignment between CII Benchmarking & PT192

• BM&M and PT192 are working together to coordinate effortsBM&M and PT192 are working together to coordinate efforts

• Differences, overlaps, and similarities between both groups Differences, overlaps, and similarities between both groups have been identifiedhave been identified

• Both efforts will share data and results where possible on an Both efforts will share data and results where possible on an ongoing basisongoing basis

• Both efforts need data to succeedBoth efforts need data to succeed

You Need To Benchmarkand Support PT 192!

PT 192 PT 192 Engineering Productivity Engineering Productivity

MeasurementMeasurement


Comparison of BM&M and PT Comparison of BM&M and PT 192 Engineering Productivity 192 Engineering Productivity

Efforts Efforts

““Similar but Different and Similar but Different and Complimentary”Complimentary”

Actions to Align BM&M and Actions to Align BM&M and PT192PT192

• Share PT192 workshop results with BM&M. - Share PT192 workshop results with BM&M. - DoneDone

• Design “General Project Information” portion of Design “General Project Information” portion of PT192 data collection form to avoid redundancy PT192 data collection form to avoid redundancy with BM&M questionnaire. - Done with BM&M questionnaire. - Done

• PT192 participation on BM&M’s Implementation PT192 participation on BM&M’s Implementation Session at 2002 Annual Conference. - TodaySession at 2002 Annual Conference. - Today

• Share team members to maintain integration. - Share team members to maintain integration. - In progressIn progress

• Share data. - Will begin as data is receivedShare data. - Will begin as data is received

• Joint BM&M / PT192 meeting to share results. - Joint BM&M / PT192 meeting to share results. - 11/15/0211/15/02

• Report to CII Executive Committee. - Fall 2002Report to CII Executive Committee. - Fall 2002


Documents

Benchmarking Productivity Metrics