Upload
eze
View
25
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics. Pedro Valdes-Sosa Eduardo Martínez-Montes Cuban Neurosciences Centre. Wael El-Deredy School of Psychological Sciences. Outline. Different event-related scenarios From time to time-frequency Examples of pitfalls of current methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics
Pedro Valdes-Sosa Eduardo Martínez-Montes Cuban Neurosciences CentreWael El-Deredy School of Psychological Sciences
Different event-related scenarios From time to time-frequency Examples of pitfalls of current methods New methods based on complex statistics Where do we go next?
Outline
How did we get here?
Makeig et al, S
cience 2002
Event-Related Potential (ERP)
Induced Activity: Event-related synchronization and desynchronization (ERS/ERD)
AVG [ + ] =
AVG [ ] =
ERBD = ongoing EEG + Additive ERP;
ERBD = PPR (ongoing EEG); Partial Phase Resetting
Event-related scenarios
A measure of the distribution of the energy of the signal in time and frequency: STFT, Morlet Wavelet, Hilbert, Gabor, etc
Complex coefficients , whose moduli is a measure of the amplitude of the oscillations and whose argument is a measure of their phases.
arctan Im( ) Re( )ift iftx x| |iftxiftx
0 500 1000
µV
Time (ms)0 500 1000 ms
µV2
Hz
From time to time-frequency
Real
Imag Net vector
From time to time-frequency
Each point is a complex wavelet coefficient of a trial at a given frequency and time
All trials at a certain t & f form a complex cloud
Net Phase
From time to time-frequency
Event-related scenarios Change in the position of the cloud mean vector Change in the shape of the cloud Eigen structure Change in the dispersion of the cloud variance
Current measures confound changes
ITC measures the uniformity of the distribution of angles, wrt the origin - not wrt the centre of the cloud
Example confound: Mean vector & Phase1 1
1 1ITC iftL L
j iftft
i i ift
xe
L L x
Intertrial Phase Coherence
Removing Mean Activity
1 1
1 1ITC iftL L
j iftft
i i ift
xe
L L x
Example confound: Mean vector & Phase
Therefore, ITC (and its variants) are NOT a valid tests for inter-trial phase organisation
Tests on the complex cloud
Real
Imag
Complex statistics on the features of the cloud (SEPARATELY): mean vector; variance; form
Real
Imag Net vector
Variance
Tests on the complex cloudNecessary conditions
Real
Imag
For PPR: It has to survive the subtraction of the mean vector.• Significant test wrt pre-stim
Real
Imag
For additive ERP: It has to survive a T-test on the mean(compared to pre-stim)
T-complex mean (test for additive activity)*
2
( )( )1
pre preft f ft f
ft
ft
x x x xT N
1
1 L
ft ifti
x xL
Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests
L
T-complex mean (test for additive activity)*
2
( )( )1
pre preft f ft f
ft
ft
x x x xT N
2
2 2( )1
ft
preft f
ft preT NSTD
2 *
1
1 ( )( )1
L
ft ift ft ift fti
x x x xL
1
1 L
ft ifti
x xL
T-complex variance (test for induced activity)
Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests
L
L
T-Eigenvalue (test for phase similarity)• Generalised correlation
1 2 2 1 2( 15 6) log ( ) 4ft ft ft ft ftL
Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests
The eigen values of the covariance matrix (2 x L)
Mardia, Kent and Bibby Multivariate analysis, 1979.
L
T-Eigen value (test for phase similarity - bimodal)• Second trigonometric moment
22
1
1 iftL
jft
i
R eL
Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests
Mardia, Statistics of Directional Data, 1972.
L
ERP
PPR
Testing the tests: Simulations
ERP
PPR
Testing the tests
Real DataVisual spatial attention. POz
Testing the tests
Current measures (e.g. ITC) cannot distinguish between additive activity and phase resetting.
Statistical tests based on the complex time-frequency are more sensitive to changes event-related brain dynamics.
Separate tests for separate features, to avoid confounds.
Purely descriptive: No mechanistic interpretation.
Summary
What happens next? New tests based on comparing models fitted to data.
○ Neural mass models○ Non-parametric time series modeling
Non-parametric time series modeling
22
Original LIN-Surr
SW linear AR
Kernel Regression
24
Original Kernel-NFR
SW Kernel-AR
25
26
Nonstationary Kernel AR
0 01
0 0
0 01
;
ˆ ;x t
x t
t t t
N
t h htN
h ht
v f t
v K L t tf t
K L t t
x
x xx
x x
0
* * *; 1 0
ˆ ;t t t tv f t x
0
** **; 1 0
ˆ ;t t tv f t x
27
Non Stationary NW **
; , , ,kt t kv t A B C D
28
Appearance of Limit Cycle in Epilepsy
LH
RA
LH t
ra t
**
;limmax s ts
t
abs v