28
Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics Pedro Valdes-Sosa Eduardo Martínez-Montes Cuban Neurosciences Centre Wael El-Deredy School of Psychological Sciences

Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

  • Upload
    eze

  • View
    25

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics. Pedro Valdes-Sosa Eduardo Martínez-Montes Cuban Neurosciences Centre. Wael El-Deredy School of Psychological Sciences. Outline. Different event-related scenarios From time to time-frequency Examples of pitfalls of current methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Pedro Valdes-Sosa Eduardo Martínez-Montes Cuban Neurosciences CentreWael El-Deredy School of Psychological Sciences

Page 2: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Different event-related scenarios From time to time-frequency Examples of pitfalls of current methods New methods based on complex statistics Where do we go next?

Outline

Page 3: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

How did we get here?

Makeig et al, S

cience 2002

Page 4: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Event-Related Potential (ERP)

Induced Activity: Event-related synchronization and desynchronization (ERS/ERD)

AVG [ + ] =

AVG [ ] =

ERBD = ongoing EEG + Additive ERP;

ERBD = PPR (ongoing EEG); Partial Phase Resetting

Event-related scenarios

Page 5: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

A measure of the distribution of the energy of the signal in time and frequency: STFT, Morlet Wavelet, Hilbert, Gabor, etc

Complex coefficients , whose moduli is a measure of the amplitude of the oscillations and whose argument is a measure of their phases.

arctan Im( ) Re( )ift iftx x| |iftxiftx

0 500 1000

µV

Time (ms)0 500 1000 ms

µV2

Hz

From time to time-frequency

Page 6: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Real

Imag Net vector

From time to time-frequency

Each point is a complex wavelet coefficient of a trial at a given frequency and time

All trials at a certain t & f form a complex cloud

Net Phase

Page 7: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

From time to time-frequency

Event-related scenarios Change in the position of the cloud mean vector Change in the shape of the cloud Eigen structure Change in the dispersion of the cloud variance

Current measures confound changes

Page 8: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

ITC measures the uniformity of the distribution of angles, wrt the origin - not wrt the centre of the cloud

Example confound: Mean vector & Phase1 1

1 1ITC iftL L

j iftft

i i ift

xe

L L x

Intertrial Phase Coherence

Page 9: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Removing Mean Activity

1 1

1 1ITC iftL L

j iftft

i i ift

xe

L L x

Example confound: Mean vector & Phase

Therefore, ITC (and its variants) are NOT a valid tests for inter-trial phase organisation

Page 10: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Tests on the complex cloud

Real

Imag

Complex statistics on the features of the cloud (SEPARATELY): mean vector; variance; form

Real

Imag Net vector

Variance

Page 11: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Tests on the complex cloudNecessary conditions

Real

Imag

For PPR: It has to survive the subtraction of the mean vector.• Significant test wrt pre-stim

Real

Imag

For additive ERP: It has to survive a T-test on the mean(compared to pre-stim)

Page 12: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

T-complex mean (test for additive activity)*

2

( )( )1

pre preft f ft f

ft

ft

x x x xT N

1

1 L

ft ifti

x xL

Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests

L

Page 13: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

T-complex mean (test for additive activity)*

2

( )( )1

pre preft f ft f

ft

ft

x x x xT N

2

2 2( )1

ft

preft f

ft preT NSTD

2 *

1

1 ( )( )1

L

ft ift ft ift fti

x x x xL

1

1 L

ft ifti

x xL

T-complex variance (test for induced activity)

Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests

L

L

Page 14: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

T-Eigenvalue (test for phase similarity)• Generalised correlation

1 2 2 1 2( 15 6) log ( ) 4ft ft ft ft ftL

Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests

The eigen values of the covariance matrix (2 x L)

Mardia, Kent and Bibby Multivariate analysis, 1979.

L

Page 15: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

T-Eigen value (test for phase similarity - bimodal)• Second trigonometric moment

22

1

1 iftL

jft

i

R eL

Tests on the complex cloudProposed tests

Mardia, Statistics of Directional Data, 1972.

L

Page 16: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

ERP

PPR

Testing the tests: Simulations

Page 17: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

ERP

PPR

Testing the tests

Page 18: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Real DataVisual spatial attention. POz

Testing the tests

Page 19: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Current measures (e.g. ITC) cannot distinguish between additive activity and phase resetting.

Statistical tests based on the complex time-frequency are more sensitive to changes event-related brain dynamics.

Separate tests for separate features, to avoid confounds.

Purely descriptive: No mechanistic interpretation.

Summary

Page 20: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

What happens next? New tests based on comparing models fitted to data.

○ Neural mass models○ Non-parametric time series modeling

Page 21: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Non-parametric time series modeling

Page 22: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

22

Original LIN-Surr

SW linear AR

Page 23: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

Kernel Regression

Page 24: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

24

Original Kernel-NFR

SW Kernel-AR

Page 25: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

25

Page 26: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

26

Nonstationary Kernel AR

0 01

0 0

0 01

;

ˆ ;x t

x t

t t t

N

t h htN

h ht

v f t

v K L t tf t

K L t t

x

x xx

x x

0

* * *; 1 0

ˆ ;t t t tv f t x

0

** **; 1 0

ˆ ;t t tv f t x

Page 27: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

27

Non Stationary NW **

; , , ,kt t kv t A B C D

Page 28: Being Comoplex is Simpler: Event Related Dynamics

28

Appearance of Limit Cycle in Epilepsy

LH

RA

LH t

ra t

**

;limmax s ts

t

abs v