37
Behavioural Safety at the Carrington Behavioural Safety at the Carrington Site Site From a plateau to an iceberg, trying to avoid a few crevasses Peter Webb, HSEQ Manager, Basell Polyolefins Carrington Site

Behavioural Safety at the Carrington Site From a plateau to an iceberg, trying to avoid a few crevasses Peter Webb, HSEQ Manager, Basell Polyolefins Carrington

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Behavioural Safety at the Carrington Site From a plateau to an iceberg, trying to avoid a few crevasses Peter Webb, HSEQ Manager, Basell Polyolefins Carrington Site
  • Slide 2
  • Outline What is behavioural safety How we implemented a behavioural programme Some key learning points
  • Slide 3
  • Safety . A potted history TIME Human Factors Technological Improvements INCIDENTS Management Systems We are here!
  • Slide 4
  • Why Behavioural Safety? Its just another tool in the human factors tool box
  • Slide 5
  • What does a Behavioural Approach Comprise? All behavioural safety programmes have a system of OBSERVATION and FEEDBACK The observations can be done by anybody on anybody Its all about people talking to each other about safety
  • Slide 6
  • The Observation Process Stop and observe Put the person being observed at ease Explain what you are doing and why Discuss the job being carried out Observe the work activity for a few minutes Praise safe behaviours Discuss any at risk behaviours What Why Discuss what the worst consequences could have been Ask what corrective action is required Get commitment to act Finally record the observation - but no names! Observation On the spot Feedback
  • Slide 7
  • Why do we behave the way we do? Values Attitudes Behaviours Our behaviour is driven by our attitudes and values
  • Slide 8
  • What Are Behaviours? Attitude: Im going to use the right tools for the job Behaviour: *$%^&!!! Ive brought the wrong tool out with me. But Im not going to use it, because that would be unsafe. Im going to walk back to the workshop and get the right one. Our behaviour is driven by our attitudes and values Value: I think safetys important
  • Slide 9
  • How can you modify At Risk Behaviours? At risk behaviours are driven by attitudes and values But you cant modify peoples values and attitudes directly . They are too deep within us. So you use a system of observations which address the at risk behaviours. If you work on modifying the at risk behaviours, eventually the at risk attitudes and values change too. We used to feel it was safe to ride in a car without a seat belt.
  • Slide 10
  • Modify the behaviour and the value will follow Value: I feel safe in my car without a seat belt Attitude: Wearing seat belts is unnecessary Behaviour: I dont wear my seat belt in my car. Behaviour: I wear my seat belt in my car. Attitude: Wearing seat belts is a responsible thing to do Value: I feel uncomfortable and exposed in my car without a seat belt Value: I feel uncomfortable and exposed in my car without a seat belt Behaviour modification: You must wear your seat belt, its the law!
  • Slide 11
  • Carrington Site
  • Slide 12
  • How did we come to BBS 1980s Systems initiatives in HSE. Total recordable injury rate reduced from ~18 to ~10 injuries per million hours worked. Mid 1990s Safety performance had plateaued 1996 became aware of behavioural programmes Decision was taken to pilot it on one plant (Styrocell) Engaged BS provider to assist in implementation Started with observations in January 1997.
  • Slide 13
  • BBS Programme Ref HSE CRR 430/2002 Carrington implementation followed classical approach...
  • Slide 14
  • BBS Programme Some specifics of our implementation: List of critical behaviours Developed by reviewing near miss reports. Follow up We dont wait for trends to develop. We follow up on the individual at risks - prioritised short list. Facilities vs behaviour We dont limit the at risks to behaviour related We allow at risks which are related to the facilities as well The most important thing is that people are doing the observations face to face
  • Slide 15
  • BBS Programme Styrocell programme was a great success. Great enthusiasm amongst (most/enough) technicians. Programme was rolled out to rest of site in 1997/8. Steering groups set up in each dept Separate list of critical behaviours in each dept Cross site facilitators group Approx 10 - 15% of workforce were observers (now its 100% plus contractors) A lot of creativity and energy put into it
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • > 18 Before 1990 Total Recordable Injury Rate (per 10 6 hrs) BBS introduced
  • Slide 18
  • In 1999 it was clear there were problems Fall off in observations Technicians were saying: The same observations are being done on the same tasks People cant be bothered Its the same people being observed all the time Observation process is too formal Carrington is already safe, so why bother? Whats coming out of it? Data input to database is difficult Resuscitation
  • Slide 19
  • Resuscitation Managers were saying the same as the technicians, and Theres not enough visible output. We need more performance metrics contact rate, observation quality Vision is that everybody needs to be an observer. Whole process needs to become part of the existing HSE system. We need to move on from the original concept and make BBS our own.
  • Slide 20
  • Resuscitation It was not delivering to its full potential But we thought the approach was fundamentally sound So we launched a resuscitation Decision to work without the original BS provider .. A representative team identified 4 issues
  • Slide 21
  • Resuscitiation Issue 1: Organisation Issue Need to make line supervisors part of the process. Need to integrate BBS into the site HSE systems.
  • Slide 22
  • Resuscitiation Issue 1: Organisation Made up of Managers and technicians Only Technicians The BBS organisation we started with
  • Slide 23
  • Resuscitiation Issue 1: Organisation Managers supervisors and technicians Subgroup made up of Improvement Leader and cell focal points Site divided into cells of 6 - 8 people Everybody is an observer, including contractors And the organisation we changed to . Its fully integrated! Key person
  • Slide 24
  • Resuscitiation Issue 2: Perceptions Issue Overcome the complacency Its already safe at Carrington People dont see the value. Response At the end of the observation, during the feedback, if there are at risks to discuss, jointly agree what was the worst consequence which could have happened. Jointly agree a ranking (L, M, H) for the potential outcome on a defined scale ranging from slight injury (first aid), through to fatality. Gets people to visualise what could go wrong
  • Slide 25
  • Resuscitation Issue 3: Reporting Issue Need to pull out learning points. Need to give feedback to observers. Integrate into the business link with near miss reporting. Response Every month .. Overall KPIs reviewed by site HSE Council (chaired by Site Manager) Department HSE committees review performance against KPIs Cell members receive a report showing status of the at risks
  • Slide 26
  • Resuscitation Issue 4: Observations Issue People should want to carry out observations. Need to simplify the observation process. Need to make recording simpler. Response Original programme design comprised a different list of critical behaviours in each department Created a generic list to be used by everybody Allows any observer to carry out observations anywhere on site The generic list is quite short, observation time can be as short as 5 minutes Some people even do it without the checklist!
  • Slide 27
  • Other things weve learned! Key Performance Indicators Currently have 3 KPIs: Number of observations, 1 per person per month (all employees and contractors) Quality, Percent of observations for which the what and the why are filled out > 80% Close-out of High at risks, 100% in < 3 months Number of observations forms part of bonus scheme 1800 observations in 2001, 2400 in 2002 . We dont have a KPI on % safe! If you get 100% safe, does that mean youve finally made it? A safe work place at last? Or does it mean people arent looking hard enough? With our generic list of critical behaviours, its hard to imagine we could reach 100% safe.
  • Slide 28
  • Other things weve learned! Management Commitment Everybody knows its important, but what can they do to show it By taking an active interest Management team must be active observers Use managers to coach in the observer training
  • Slide 29
  • Other things weve learned! Hold an away day in a nice hotel! Organised by the BBS department focal points Attended by site management team, cell focal points, term contractors Generated several action items for enhancing the programme Demonstrates management commitment, generates good ideas, gets buy in.
  • Slide 30
  • Other things weve learned! Organisational readiness Implementing BBS is a big commitment - you dont want it to fail! Organisational readiness (climate/culture) is a key factor which influences likelihood of success. HSE CRR 430/2002 - of 8 providers interviewed, 3 said they would proceed regardless of readiness. To avoid a costly failure, discuss up front, or conduct independent culture survey.
  • Slide 31
  • Other things weve learned! Can be extended to other areas e.g. We have now included environmentally critical behaviours in the programme Is environmental protection equipment available Is pollution prevention achieved Releases controlled Waste disposed of appropriately Energy used efficiently
  • Slide 32
  • Other things weve learned! Major Accident Hazards Behavioural safety has been driven by injury frequency Our inventory of critical behaviours was developed by reviewing near miss/incident reports -> focus on workplace safety It doesnt follow that a reduction in the risks due to major accident hazards will occur It depends on the list of critical behaviours Heres an example of how BBS added to the major accident hazard risk!
  • Slide 33
  • Major Accident Hazards Manlid was not only used for process reasons, but was also a relief device Handle had been fitted to solve a manual handling at risk after a BBS observation. Plant change procedure was not followed Bolts interfered with sealing surface Pentane vapour leakage Completely lost sight of the MAH risks Handle Bolts
  • Slide 34
  • Major Accident Hazards Incident investigations indicated Procedures were often a root cause Procedures often relate to controlling major accident hazards (plant change, safe operation, permit to work etc.) Weve added procedures to our inventory of critical behaviours
  • Slide 35
  • Was there a procedure for the activity? Was the procedure appropriate? Was the procedure followed? Safe NO At risk NO At risk NO At risk Yes Major Accident Hazards You can substitute the word Training for Procedure Procedures: permit to work safe operation plant change control of contractors etc
  • Slide 36
  • References Health & Safety Executive (2002). Strategies to promote safe behaviour as part of a health and safety management system, Contract Research Report 430/2002, www.hse.gov.uk PRISM (2002). Behavioural Safety Application Guide, www.prism-network.org
  • Slide 37
  • Summary The organisation must be ready for it Management commitment is essential It needs to be easy to carry out the observations Needs to be integrated into the HSE MS Need at least a few enthusiastic people to keep things going in their departments People need to see some output Make sure the programme addresses all the issues which are important for your organisation - Dont forget about major accident hazards We think BBS works, but its not easy The End!