59
Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Beams

Stephen Krone, DSc, PEUniversity of Toledo

Page 2: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Shear and Moment

A beam is a structural member subjected to transverse loads and negligible axial loads.

Page 3: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Internal Shear Causes Moment

These internal shear forces and bending moments cause longitudinal axial stresses and shear stresses in the cross-section.

Page 4: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Increasing Loads

Maximum bending moment is reached at extreme fibers first, where the stress reaches the yield stress limit.

Page 5: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

The Moment - Curvature (M-f) response With Increasing Moment

Page 6: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

My is the yield and Mp is the plastic moment capacity of the cross-section. The ratio Mp to My is the shape factor f. For a rectangular section, f is equal to 1.5. For a wide-flange section, f is equal to 1.1.

Page 7: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Developing the Plastic Moment

Page 8: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

LRFD Raised the ASD Limit State

Page 9: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Columns’ Slenderness Ratio Controls the Critical Buckling Stress

Page 10: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling Behavior

Compression flange begins to buckle out of plane.Bracing on the compression flange makes it more difficult to fail.

Page 11: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Methods of Bracing Compression Flange

Page 12: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Beam and Column Similarities• The design of the beam is usually

based on the compression flange.

• The braced length of support of the compression flange, Lb, usually determines the type of failure.

• There are three zones of failure: plastic, inelastic buckling, and elastic buckling.

• Each failure zone has its own set of equations.

Page 13: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lb Lp

AISC F2-1 AISC F2-

2

Mn = Fcr Sx <= Mp

AISC F2-3

AISC F2-5Lp = 1.76 ry yFE /

Lr AISC F2-6 AISC 16.1-48

Plastic

Inelastic Buckling

Elastic Buckling

Page 14: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Plastic Buckling•Most beams fall in the plastic zone.

•AISC Table 3-10

•Fully braced reaches full Mp. This is closely spaced lateral bracing, where Lb < Lp

AISC F2-1 AISC F2-2

Mn = Fcr Sx <= MpAISC F2-3

Page 15: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Plastic centroid. A1

A2

y

y

yA1

yA2

y1

y2

22

11

21y

21

2y1y

Aofcentroidy

Aofcentroidy,Where

)yy(2

AM

2/AAA

0AAF

Plastic centroid. A1

A2

y

y

yA1

yA2

y1

y2

22

11

21y

21

2y1y

Aofcentroidy

Aofcentroidy,Where

)yy(2

AM

2/AAA

0AAF

Plastic Section Modulus

Page 16: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Mp, Plastic Moment and Plastic Section Modulus

Page 17: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

W Shapes – Braced => Mp

Page 18: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Mp, Plastic Moment

Concrete floor slab provides lateral bracing.Lb= 0.

Page 19: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Beam Example: Compact & Braced

Design a simply supported beam subjected to uniformly distributed dead load of 450 lbs/ft. and a uniformly distributed live load of 550 lbs/ft. The dead load does not include the self-weight of the beam.

Step I. Calculate the factored design loads (without self-weight).

• wU = 1.2 wD + 1.6 wL = 1.42 kips / ft.

• MU = wuL2/8 = 1.42 x 302/8 = 159.75 kip-ft.

Page 20: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Beam Example (Cont.)Step II. Select the lightest section

from the AISC Manual design tables.• From the AISC manual, select W16 x

26 made from 50 ksi steel with fbMp = 166.0 kip-ft.

Step III. Add self-weight of designed section and check design

• wsw = 26 lbs/ft• Therefore, wD = 476 lbs/ft = 0.476

lbs/ft.• wu = 1.2 x 0.476 + 1.6 x 0.55 = 1.4512

kips/ft.• Therefore, Mu = 1.4512 x 302 / 8 = 163.26

kip-ft. < fbMp of W16 x 26.

• OK!

Page 21: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step IV. Check deflection at service loads.

• w = 0.45 + 0.026 + 0.55 kips/ft. = 1.026 kips/ft.

• D = 5 w L4 / (384 E Ix) = 5 x(1.026/12) x (30 x 12)4/(384 x 29000

x 301) • D = 2.142 in. > L/360

Step V. Redesign with service-load deflection as design criteria

• L /360 = 1.0 in. > 5 w L4/(384 E Ix)

• Therefore, Ix > 644.8 in4

Beam Example (Cont.)

Page 22: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Example (Cont.)

• Select the section from the moment of inertia tables in the AISC Table 3-3. (p. 3-21) Ix > 644.8 in4

• Select W21 x 44.

• W21 x 44 with Ix = 843 in4 and fbMp = 358 kip-ft. (50 ksi steel).

• Deflection at service load D = 0.765 in. < L/360 - OK!

Page 23: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step VI. Check shear for W16 x 26 .

wu = 1.2 wD + 1.6 wL = 1.42 kips / ft.V = wl/2 = 1.42(30)/2 = 21.3 kips

Vn = 0.6FyAwCv

= 0.6 (50ksi)(0.25x15.7)(1.0)= 118 kips > 21.3 kips

Vn can be compared with Z Table (3-2) of

fvVnx = 106.0 kips > 21.3 kips

Beam Example (Cont.)

Page 24: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Non-plastic Failure

The development of a plastic stress distribution over the cross-section can be hindered by two different length effects:

(1)Local buckling of the individual plates (flanges and webs) of the cross-section fail before they develop the compressive yield stress sy.

(2) Lateral-torsional buckling of the unsupported length of the beam / member fail before the cross-section develops the plastic moment Mp.

Page 25: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral-Torsional Buckling• Lb of a beam-member can

undergo lateral-torsional buckling due to the applied flexural loading (bending moment).

• Lateral-torsional buckling is similar to the flexural buckling or flexural-torsional buckling of a column subjected to axial loading.

• There is one very important difference. For a column, the axial load causing buckling remains constant along the length. But, for a beam, usually the lateral-torsional buckling causing bending moment varies along the unbraced length.

Page 26: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

LTB: Lateral-Torsional Buckling bMn is a function of:

– Beam section properties – (Zx, ry, x1, x2, Sx, G, J, A, Cw, Iy)

– Unbraced length, Lb – Lb = distance between points which

are either braced against lateral displacement of compression flange or braced against twist of the cross section

– Lp : Limiting Lb for full plastic bending capacity

– Lr : Limiting Lb for inelastic LTB

• E : Modulus of elasticity, ksi

• Cb: Bending coefficient based on moment gradient.

Page 27: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lp Lb Lr

• If the laterally unbraced length Lb is less than or equal to a plastic length Lp then lateral torsional buckling is not a problem and the beam will develop its plastic strength Mp.

• - for I members & Channels (See Pg. 16.1-48, F2-5)

• If Lb is greater than Lp then lateral torsional buckling will occur and the moment capacity of the beam is reduced below the plastic strength Mp.

Lp = 1.76 ry yFE /

Page 28: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lp Lb Lr

AISC F2-1 AISC F2-

2

Mn = Fcr Sx <= Mp

AISC F2-3

AISC F2-5Lp = 1.76 ry yFE /

Lr AISC F2-6 AISC 16.1-48

Page 29: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lp Lb Lr

• When Lp Lb Lr, then the lateral-torsional buckling Mn is given by:

Mn= Cb[Mp – (Mp -0.7Fy Sx )(Lb- Lp / Lr–Lp)]

•Linear interpolation between (Lp, Mp) and (Lr, Mr)

•AISC Table 3-2 - Lp, Lr, Mp, MrMp

Mr

Lp Lb Lr

Page 30: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

• As the spacing of lateral bracing increases but not all compression fibers will reach Fy.

• This is referred to as inelastic buckling.

• Easier to use BF: – Mn= Mp – (BF )(Lb- Lp)

• Lr is the point where the transition is to elastic buckling.

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lp Lb Lr

Page 31: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lb > Lr

AISC F2-1

AISC F2-2

AISC F2-3

•Elastic Buckling

•The buckling moment becomes smaller and smaller as the unbraced length increases.

•AISC p. 16.1-47

Page 32: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Lateral Torsional Buckling: Lb > Lr

AISC F2-1 AISC F2-

2

Mn = Fcr Sx <= Mp

AISC F2-3

AISC F2-5Lp = 1.76 ry yFE /

Lr AISC F2-6 AISC 16.1-48

Plastic

Inelastic Buckling

Elastic Buckling

Page 33: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Compact, Non-Compact, and Slender

• Slender sections cannot develop Mp due to elastic local buckling. Non-compact sections can develop My but not Mp before local buckling occurs.

• Only compact sections can develop the plastic moment Mp.

• Applies to major and minor axis bending

Page 34: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Local Buckling of Flange Due to Compressive Stress• Equations for local

buckling of steel plates have limiting slenderness ratios for the individual plate elements of the cross-sections.

• AISC B4 (page 16.14), Table B4.1 (16.1-13) and Page 16.1-223

• Steel sections are classified as compact, non-compact, or slender depending upon the slenderness (l) ratio of the individual plates of the cross-section.

M

M

M

M

Page 35: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Local Buckling

Page 36: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Limit States for Local BucklingTable B4.1 (p 16.1-16)

Page 37: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Limit States for Local BucklingTable B4.1 (p 16.1-16)

Page 38: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Strength Limit State for Local Buckling

= Slenderness parameter; must be calculated for flange and web buckling (actually no web slender for W, M, C)

p= limiting slenderness parameter for compact element

r = limiting slenderness parameter for non-compact element

p : Section capable of developing fully plastic stress distribution

Page 39: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Strength Limit State for Local Buckling

p r : Section capable of developing yield stress before local buckling occurs; will buckle before fully plastic stress distribution can be achieved.

r : Slender compression elements; will buckle elastically before yield stress is achieved.

Page 40: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Compact, Non Compact, or Slender• For inelastic buckling because of

unbraced length:Mn= Mp – (Mp -0.7Fy Sx )(Lb- Lp / Lr–Lp)]

• For Flange Local Buckling because flange in not compact:

Mn= Mp – (Mp -0.7Fy Sx )( - pp / rr - - pp)

AISC F2-2

AISC F3-1

Page 41: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

The Bending Coefficient, Cb

• Worse case scenario is for compression flange under constant uniform moment

• Moments usually vary over unbraced length, so AISC uses Cb to modify for only segment that undergoes LTB under the highest moment.

• This factor is similar to the effective length K that we modified in column buckling. – (Old formula like G/G)

– Cb =1.75 + 1.05(M1/M2)+0.3(M1/M2 )

Page 42: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

• Cb can always be taken as 1.

Cb =12.5 Mmax/(2.5Mmax+3Ma +4Mb + 3Mc)

• Mmax = maximum value in braced section

• Ma = value at quarter point

• Mb = value at center point

• Mc = value at three quarter point

The Bending Coefficient, Cb

Page 43: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

The AISC Specification says that:• Cb is a multiplier.

• Cb is always greater than 1.0 for non-uniform bending moment.

– Cb is equal to 1.0 for uniform bending moment.

– If you cannot calculate or figure out Cb, then it can be conservatively assumed as 1.0.

Page 44: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Moment Capacity versus Lb

(for non-uniform moment case)

Page 45: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

• Bending Coefficient, Cb

• AISC Table 3-1

Page 46: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Example

• Design the beam shown below. The unfactored uniformly distributed live load is equal to 3 kips/ft. There is no dead load. Lateral support is provided at the end reactions.

Page 47: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step I. Calculate the factored loads assuming a reasonable self-weight.

• Assume self-weight = wsw = 100 lbs/ft.

• Dead load = wD = 0 + 0.1 = 0.1 kips/ft.

• Live load = wL = 3.0 kips/ft.

• Ultimate load =

– wu = 1.2wD + 1.6wL = 4.92 kips/ft.

• Factored ultimate moment =

– Mu = wu L2/8 = 354.24 kip-ft.

Page 48: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step II. Determine unsupported length Lb & Cb

• One unsupported span with Lb = 24 ft.

• Cb = 1.14 for the parabolic bending moment diagram, See values of Cb shown in Table 3-1.

Step III. Select a wide-flange shape• The moment capacity of the selected section fb Mn > Mu (Note fb = 0.9)

• fbMn = moment capacity = Cb x (fbMn for the case with uniform moment) fbMn

• Table 3-10 in the AISC-LRFD manual shows plots of fbMn - Lb for the case of uniform bending moment (Cb =1.0)

Page 49: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Therefore, in order to select a section, calculate Mu/ Cb and use it with Lb to find the first section with a solid line.

• Mu/ Cb = 354.24/1.14 = 310.74 kip-ft.

• Select W16 x 67 (50 ksi steel) fbMn =357 kip-ft. for Lb = 24 ft. and Cb =1.0

• For the case with Cb = 1.14,

• fbMn = 1.14 x 357 = 406.7 kip-ft., which must be fbMn = 491 kip-ft. OK!

• Thus, W16 x 67 made from 50 ksi steel with moment capacity equal to 406.7 kip-ft. for an unsupported length of 24 ft. is the designed section.

Page 50: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step IV. Check for local buckling. Also found in footnotes of sections.

• l = bf / 2tf = 7.7; lp = 0.38 (E/Fy)0.5 = 9.192

Therefore, l < lp - compact flange• l = h/tw = 34.4; lp = 3.76 (E/Fy)0.5 = 90.5

Therefore, l < lp - compact web

Page 51: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step V. Check shear. (W16 x 67 made from 50 ksi steel)

wu = 1.2wD + 1.6wL = 4.92 kips/ft.

V = wl/2 = 4.92(24)/2 = 59 kipsVn = 0.6FyAwCv

= 0.6 (50ksi)(0.395x16.3)(1.0)

= 193 kipsOK

Page 52: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Step VI. Check deflection. (W16 x 67 made from 50 ksi steel)

D = Wl3/384 EID = (4.92 klf x 24ft)(24 x 12) 3/384(29,000 ksi)(954

in4)

D = 0.27inDallow = L /360 = 24 x 12/ 360 = 0.8 in.

OK

Page 53: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary LRFD Beam Design1. Determine the location and

magnitude of the loads and draw a load diagram.

2. Determine if the shape is compact by calculating slenderness parameter

pp Full plastic moment, , Mp

pp rr Mn= Mp – (Mp 0.7Fy Sx )( - pp / rr - - pp)

> > rr Mn= Fcr Sx

Page 54: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary LRFD Beam DesignCheck Shape: If the shape is non

compact because of the flange, (calculate slenderness parameter)

pp Full plastic moment, , Mp

pp rr Mn= Mp – (Mp 0.7Fy Sx )( - pp / rr

- - pp)

> > rr Mn= Fcr Sx

Page 55: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary LRFD Beam Design 3. Find Moment - Lateral Torsional Buckling

AISC F2-1 AISC F2-

2

Mn = Fcr Sx <= Mp

AISC F2-3

AISC F2-5Lp = 1.76 ry yFE /

Lr AISC F2-6 AISC 16.1-48

Page 56: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary LRFD Beam Design4. Check shear in the web

AISC G2-3

AISC G2-1

AISC G2-3 and AISC G2-3

yFE /h/tw = 2.24

Most cases with W shapesfv = 1 and Cv = 1,

fv = 0.9

Page 57: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary LRFD Beam Design5. Check deflection.

Page 58: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Summary

• Local buckling is not an issue for most beams for A992 beams

• Effective bracing is provided at ends to restrain rotation about the longitudinal axis.

• Effective bracing reduces Lb and prevents twist of the cross section and/or lateral movement of the compression flange.

• Cb is important in economical design when plastic moment is not developed

Page 59: Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo

Works Cited

• Segui, William T. 2007. Steel Design. 4th ed. Thompson Engineering.

• Steel Construction Manual, 13th ed. AISC, 2005.

• CE 405: Design of Steel Structures –Dr. A. Varma