Battery BS

7/30/2019 Battery BS

1/31


2/31


3/31

The charge was, not made untilAugusts 17. The definition ofa defendant by Idaho Code isone who has been, charged

with an offense. The definitionof charged says you have toacknowledge the charge. Thatthere is a defendant is a falsity.

I did not identify my self by voice. It is as if I gave permission for the SS#. There is no record of thivoice identification or of any identification by Marsha Ogilvie. I never identified myself to MarshaOgilvie.

Riffel is not qualified to determine what I was wishing or what I was upset about and has not supported his statement reportedly. He does not knoabout my relationships. He does not state the violation of the code and he says she requested to sign a citation for. What exactly is he swearing to.The Idaho penal Codes for perjury say.

18-5401. Perjury defined. Every person who, having taken an oath that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly,before any competent tribunal, legislative committee, officer, or person in any of the cases in which such an oath may by lawbe administered, wilfully and contrary to such oath, states as true any material matter which he knows to be false, is guilty perjury.18-5403. Oath of office -- Portion relating to future duties not included. So much of an oath of office as relates to the futureperformance of official duties is not such an oath as is intended by the two (2) preceding sections.18-5404. Irregularity in administering oath no defense. It is no defense to a prosecution for perjury that the oath wasadministered or taken in an irregular manner.

18-5408. Unqualified statement of unknown fact. An unqualified statement of that which one

does not know to be true is equivalent to a statement of that which one knows to be

false. Looks like perjury to me.18-5409. Punishment for perjury. Perjury is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not less than one (1) or morethan fourteen (14) years. Add the identity theft and we have a serious crime you are all ignoring including the sherriff.

Tony Riffel is the employee and the principal that signs not Sergeant this is a false swearing.He tends the prejudice that Sergeant is his first name, which extends to the order finding cause.

The correct wording is there is probable cause to believe.


4/31

Tony Riffel is supposed to sign not Sgt. T. Riffel. If he wants to do this needs

another certificate from Tony. Eileen Ocano has not properly notarized thisaffidavit. There is a good possibility that is why she will not let me talk to theSherriff. [listen to recordings from Sherriff] She also threatened me on the phonealong with Tony at the onset of this case

He believes there is probable cause to believe to believe the criminal offenses have been committed .

What is he swearing? There are no facts of battery on this affidavit which is why the judge

did not order anything.18-5408. Unqualified statement of unknown fact. An unqualified

statement of that which one does not know to be true is equivalent to astatement of that which one knows to be false.

o police reports, Why did onehow up in discovery unsignednd uncertified along with witnessatements that have redacted

gnatures and do not followodes for redacting signatures.

Who is trying to pull one over one? I do not think I am the one

at needs a mental check.


5/31

Did the judge order anything?She did not order a summons or a warrant; She did not order bonding,

She did not order release on own reco nizance

Clerk/deputy clerk hmmmmWhere is the name of the real clerkWhere is the court seal on this writ.The certificate of service does not say IOM meansprobable cause was, found.It is intentionally misleading. Who is thisClerk/Deputy clerk sending this order not orderinganything to the Prosecutor and where does shehave her authority?

The charge was, not made uAugusts 17. The definition a defendant by Idaho Code ione who has been, chargedwith an offense. The definiof charged says you have toacknowledge the charge. Tthere is a defendant is a fals

Falsities: There is no above-named defendant. The defendancharged or arrested on the 13th, there was no attached documeThere are no facts of Battery on the Affidavit or probable cauthere is a plural option for offense(s) All this tends prejudicemy rights. The judge did not order anything because she did nprobable cause.

Where is Debra A. Hieses printed name. We all know itis Debra Hiese but will an appeals court or a court of

equity. What judge is responsible or this doc?


6/31

Where is the clerks seal on this unordered summons and what gives thisunidentified clerk authority to send a summons that was not ordered by amagistrate and why is she sending it to the Ponderay City Prosecutor.The citation came with this on August 17th. It is falsified. You have to be,charged to be a defendant. You have to know you were charged. I was notcharged on Augusts 15th. Who gives this clerk the authority to threaten me

with arrest?

Who gives this clerk the authority to threatenwith arrest with a summons that was, notordered?

Who is liable for sending this fraudulentsummons?

There is no Ponderay City Prosecutor. I believe every single mistake isintentional.Louis Marshall is the Ponderay City Attorney not the prosecutor.While this may seem minor, it is not. It is a redress, or parole or probation ona more serious crime. He uses postage prepaid because that releases liabilityfor mail fraud.

This clerk did not put anything in IOM for the Ponderay City Prosecutor


7/31

No ISB#, Greenbank, takes, no liability inposition as Assigned Prosecutor. There is noname on letterhead for principal. There is,an, or option for the charge. He has nopersonal first hand knowledge. He merelyrecites the code and gives no facts of Battery.It does not come from the magistratesdivision making it appear a more serious

crime tending prejudice.


8/31

No Bar number. He did this right afterthe arraignment making it appear as if itwas done at the arraignment and itwasnt. Where is the printed name of theMagistrate we all know it is BarbaraBuchannan but what if she dies and Iwant to appeal. This is worthless to me

but an advantage to the court.. DeputyClerk of What? Deputy Clerk who? Sheis, supposed to work under a court seal or

principal


9/31

It does, not even come from an attorney just an office. And it without Bar numbers. And heredacted all the signatures on the supposed witness statements, which is not to code. I have

every reason to believe he is pulling a fast one.


10/31

He knows what my address is. He sent the amended complaint. He does not want to servefraudulent docs in the mail I believe he is making it look like he does not know.. He called mefor two days to come pick these up. I refused them because the certificate of service was notcorrect.


11/31

The crossed out signatures do not follow the rule for the protection order. There is no officer signing it.This came in discovery so the judge has not seen it. Does it look like battery to you. I dont even know

if Melissa wrote it. The signature on the Citation does not match the one I have for Melissa. In ahigher level court this is bull. They were planning on showing up without her. DebraHiese thinks an argument about signatures on court documents is illogical. Theywould not have enough defendants if they had to get personal signatures. None ofthese people would sign anything [probable because they are innocent.] Where is thecase number? Notice how this and Marsha Ogilvies are the same. Christine Peasleydid not see anything. She is the honest one. The format of her doc is different. Youwould think Mellissa Ward would have written something about getting hurt if thiswas a Battery. I do not think it is her signature the big loopies do not match with theone I have. Why is the Officers signature crossed out. That space is where theofficer signs. Same on Ogilvies but not on Peasleys. Ogilvie releases herself from

liability by not having signature. Ward does too and so do the malfeasant prosecutorswho stole my identity to charge me with a pen throwing.


12/31


13/31


14/31

THIS IS A PROPER NOTICEOF HEARING. THE NAME OFMARIE SCOTT IS THE

CLERK SEAL


15/31

He has no legal identifiers on his documents. There is no letterhead or bar number. City attorney of what city? The swornomplaint is the amended complaint from the prosecutor who is not qualified. There are no sworn complaints from any witnesdemanded one at the arraignment. In the objection to quash. In the demand for a sworn complaint.. They just keep giving m

he one from Prosecutor and the judges go along with it. This came from his office not the magistrate division. Scot Campbelvoids putting his name on things when he does not have to. How is he liable on this document in a damage claim. This doc i

made to look like it is from the court. In a higher court, this would appear that this must have been a really serious crime for th

udge to block the witness from testifying. This document is very malfeasant.

City of what


16/31

letter head, no bar numbers. This is not a proper notice of hearing from the Court. Why didnt the clerk of the cond this hearing notice. The certificate of service is designed to avoid mail fraud. Personally hand delivered/mail?eenbank does this on his docs too. Who certified the service? Clerk seal? What entity is the clerk of? What City i

Attorney of? What name is certifying the service.

City Attorney of what?

Inferior record.

JB of whatWhat natural personWhat entityWhat principalThis is an insufficientrecord designed toprejudice violate Rightsand keep the perpetrator

free from liability


17/31

Order of what. This is an incompletetitle. They do everything for a reasonWhere is Debra A. Hieses printedname. This releases her from liability

by rendering an inferior record. Debra

Hiese Participates

Where is the certificate of service? Theinstrument should, have the letterheadand BAR number of the Attorney whomade the Order. It appears to bemoved by the court and not him and isan insufficient record tending prejudiceand wiping out my right to redress orappeal and erasing his liability forfraud and the judges too. It appears asif they are all doing each other favors atthis point as a damage control to themand a violation to Rights. They ALLhave their own interests in mind. They

are ALL tending prejudice.


18/31


19/31


20/31


21/31


22/31

How does one serve something personally by facsimile and mail? Good thing I saved the envelop you need it to report mail fraud by thidocument. These certificates should not, be minimized.This is to avoid liability for mail fraud, which is probably why he hunts me to serve me certain documents he does not want to serve bymail. These notices and motions were, sent in less than 24 hours before I was to appear for a dismissal hearing. I believe he was tryinto prejudice the yet third assigned judge. He did judging by the $5,000 bench warrant that was given in a snow storm and the judge wa15 minutes late. The judge stating he knew where I lived [the incorrect address if given on the Bench warrant.] and I should be thereHow would he know where I was coming from. Then he used the same pre judicial facts to suggest that I be made to get a lawyer.

I am, pretty sure they are trying to prove me incompetent so I cannot sue them without a lawyer. I, think, their liability increases becausthey risk exposure without a lawyer who has taken an oath to them and their profession.

These red and purple seals are only to certify these are true and correct copies of the document contained in thecourt file. They are not clerks seals on the document itself. You have to pay two dollars for every certified

copy. The clerks office is a big business for the Industrial Development Corporation of

Bonner County. They charge us with fraudulent crimes made upon stolen Ids and them makeus pay for the documents we need to defend ourselves against their malice.


23/31


24/31

The BAR number is not pursuant to the RuleHe is releasing his liability for Mail fraud by the personally served by facsimile and mail.This is an inferior record. How can one do that .This motion cannot be fraud so he uses his BAR.


25/31

No BAR numbers or name of Bonner County Prosecuting Attorney.In a superior record this is not sufficient

Greenbank releases himself from liability as only the assigned prosecutor this is not sufficientto prove liability for a redress or appeal.


26/31

It is unlawful for him to sign as a deputy clerk. He does not have to sign as a deputy clerk onthis document. Why did he. This not a sufficient superior court of record.Why did the magistrate sign this document without a printed name. This is an inferior record.There is no record of a hearing at 9:00 Am on December 17. .Why did he sign as himself on the Motion to shorten the time of notice and as deputy clerk onthis doc. He completely leaves his BAR number off. He tells us when his docs are fraudulent


27/31

No Bar number no accountability, no Principal no principals bar number


28/31

Why would the Court be listed on the certificate of service. The court sends the hearingnotices. Why, was this sent by Greenbank, instead of the Court?

,


29/31

This document is, also falsified. Rita: Hutchens is not a defendant. Rita: Hutchens never authorized the use of theSS # that was, used to steal the identity RITA HUTCHENS. Rita: Hutchens was, never held or released on herown recognizance. This is not Rita: The judge did not order anything because she did not find probable cause.There is no such record in this court of record. This Warrant needs to go to the person who put my SS# on thatcitation. And where is the court and or clerk seal? Why is, this a copy shouldnt the real one be filed at the court.

This is not Ritas: address. It was a snow storm. The judge was 15minutes late. A friend of mine had some docs he wanted to givethe judge. The judge stated he knew where rita lived and sheshould be there. He only assumed where I lived and that I wascoming from where I lived and they would not accept the docs myfriend had to give him. Stating they needed to go

Though the clerk. The court house renovation renders a 2 mileseparation between court and clerk normallyone could to this. They all whine about the problem

but never compensate for the People.

This appears as a Felony not coming

the Magistrates Division


30/31

There is no record of hearing for this order. It, is in the court file at the bottom of the file not date stamped nclipped in and not signed by a judge. What is it doing in the file? Everything that goes in that file is datestamped and put in consecutive order. That is Supreme Court Rule.And the rule states 3 days out patient. Not 30 days at the place of their choosing by whatever means. This isevil and psychopathic. He is trying to claim jurisdiction over my intellect. This is a severe violation of

privacy etc. Where is the affidavit from the mental health professional to warrant this malfeasance andvindictiveness? What gives Shane Greenbank the authority to determine my mental capacity as he did in hismotion? This is why I did not show up for the hearing on December 17th. I finally said enough. The officiain this county do not protect me. I have to protect my self. This appears like a Felony not coming from the

Magistrate Division.


31/31

Documents

Battery BS