Basic Tubular Manufacturing, Types, Failure Criteria, And State of Stress

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Tubulares

Citation preview

  • PEGN 361A Basic Tubular Manufacturing and Types

    Failure CriteriaState of Stress in a Tubular

    Appreciation to Maverick Tubularsand Lone Star Steel

  • Tubulars

    Definition of casing and tubing Geometry

    Casing is 4.5 to 20 Tubing is < 4.5

    Use Casing has no production fluid

    flow Tubing has production fluid flow

  • Casing, Tubing, Drill Pipe, Line Pipe Standards

    API ISO

    OD, WPF, Grade, Connection Range

    1 16 to 25 2 25 to 34 3 >34

    Tolerances OD 0.75% thickness no less than 87.5%

    Drift Special drift

    6 8-5/8 12 > 8-5/8

    WPF Nominal

    Plain end Average

    Actual Grade

    Minimum yield point API

    H, J, K, M, N, L, C90, C95, T95, P, and Q

    HCP, HCQ, H2S, LS, USS, etc. Non API

    Connection API

    LTC, STC, BTC, XL Non-API

    Grant Prideco Hydril

  • Manufacturing Processes Seamless Electric Resistance Weld

  • API Seamless

    Seamless pipe is made from solid bars One piece at a time Bars are heated and pierced Pipe is tested and threaded

  • API Seamless Tubular Manufacturing

    Rotary Hearth Furnace

    Cold Billets Charged

    Hot Billets Removed

    Mannesmann Piercing Mill

  • API Seamless Tubular Manufacturing

    Elongator: Elongates the tube and produces desired wall thickness

    Rotary Sizer: Produces final OD size

    Reducing Mill: Reduces the OD of the tube

  • API ERW Method of Manufacturing ERW pipe is made from steel coils Coils are cut to exact width Cut coils are cold formed continuously into tube Edges of strip heated to 2600 degrees Heated edges are fused together Pipe is tested and threaded

  • Close Up of Particular Tube Making Operations

  • Vee

    Weld PointApex

    Pipe

    Heated Strip Edges

    Contacts

    Weld Line

  • Steel Tubular Making

  • Advantages of ERW Oil Country Tubulars Uniform wall thickness from end to end and around the

    pipe circumference. Same amount of metal under the thread root around the

    complete perimeter. Line-up of pipe ends is assured. No unexpected thin wall areas. Uniform strength along length and throughout pipe cross-section. Consistent expansion around the perimeter during mandrel

    expansion or hydroforming.

    Excellent surface quality (ID & OD) that performs well in painting or coating operations.

  • Eccentric Cross SectionCross Section Of Seamless Product

    0.62Eccentricity

    .438 Wall.562 Wall

    .500 Wall.500 Wall

    Center of O.D. Circle andconcentric dotted I.D. Circle(Similar to ERW I.D.)

    Center of solid I.D. Circle(Extreme I.D. possible with Seamless)

  • API Allowable 12.5%

    +12.5%

    +1%

    +1/2%

    -1/2%

    -1%

    -12.5%

    +.005%

    Hot Mill Gauge Control Example

  • North American Pipe Market, 2004 Market Share(Preston Pipe Report)

    Product Welded Seamless

    Oil Country Tubulars 52.2 47.8

    Line Pipe 87 13

  • Tubular Types

    Conductor Surface Intermediate

    Casing Liner Tieback

    Production Casing Liner Tieback

    Tubing

  • MadsonDeep

    Casing Plan

  • Conductor Returns mud to elevated pits Supports weight of other

    casing strings Keeps hole from washing out

    under the rig

  • Surface Casing Protects fresh water Anchors the first blow-out

    prevention equipment Protects hole from

    potentially poor shallow formations

  • Intermediate Casing, Liner, or Tieback Protects holes from abnormally

    pressured zones Low High

    Transition zone

    Protects holes from poor formations Salts Sloughing shales

    A liner is a casing string that terminates below the surface

    A tieback is a casing string that connects a liner to the surface

  • Production Casing, Liner, or Tieback Acts as the conduit for

    production fluid tubing The production tubing fits

    inside the production string

  • Design Steps

    Decide on objectives Identify lifetime loads Satisfy management

    guidelines risk versus cost

    Create criteria Make computations Select casing

  • Decide on Objectives Surface and bottom hole locations Size and number of tubulars Potential for drilling beyond planned total

    depth Setting depths Failure consequences Economics Optimum balance between risk and cost

  • Pipe Loads Load means anything acting upon pipe such as a force,

    tension, compression, bending, pressure, or weight Force is mass times acceleration Tension is when two marks on a pipe diverge upon application of

    a load Compression is when two marks on a pipe converge upon

    application of a load Bending is when a section of pipe has compression on one side

    and tension on the other side Pressure is a force acting over an area. In this case, it is applied

    to a fluid Weight is mass time gravitational acceleration

  • Pipe Load Examples Gravity Friction Contact

    Objects pushing on pipe

    Ledges Bottom of the hole Bridges

    Formation Salt flows

    Applied by rig Pick up Slack off

    Temperature changes

    Weight of other strings Liners Wellhead hangoff

    Weight of surface equipment BOPE Wellhead

    Torsion Dynamic

    Jarring Drilling

    Pressures Internal External Changing fluid densities Evacuation

  • Identify Service Life Loads Loads

    Burst Collapse Tensile

    Backups Burst Collapse Tensile

    Cementing procedures Cement to surface

    Kick scenarios Gas to surface Water to surface Bubble

    Lost circulation

    Buckling Yielding

    Free sections Cemented sections

    Thermal Stimulation EOR

    Margin of overpull Doglegs Salt zones Casing wear Corrosion

    H2S and CO2 Wellhead loads BOPE loads

  • Design Factors Management and engineering

    risk factor (safety or ignorance factor?).

    Varies depending on company and individual.

    Typical values are: Collapse - 1.1. Burst - 1.1. Pipe body tensile -

    1.5. Joint strength tensile - 1.8.

    Determine your own design factors.

  • Criteria Basic design equation is:

    Where Sc is minimum casing strength DF is the design factor L is the load B is the backup

    S DF L Bc b g

  • Casing Collapse 1

  • Casing Collapse 2

  • Casing Collapse 3

  • Casing Collapse 4

  • Casing Collapse 5

  • Casing Collapse 6

  • Failure Comprehensive stress analysis Material Loading

    History Magnitude Duration

    Slowly Rapidly Transient Transient with reversals

    Stress distribution Even Cracks Concentrations

  • Safety Factor

  • Failure Types

    Excessive displacement/deflection

    Plastic deformation (yielding) Fracture Corrosion

  • Typical Stress Strain Diagram

  • Steel Constants

    6

    3 3

    29,000,00011,000,0000.3

    16.7 10

    0.28 484

    E psiG psi

    xF

    lbm lbmin ft

    ====

    = =o

  • Stresses in Pipe

    x

    y

    xzzx

    z

    y

    z

    x

    y

    yx

    yz

    A

    x

    i

    a

    l

    Tangen

    tial

    Radial

  • Stress Equations Lames radial stress

    Lames tangential stress

    Axial stress

    2 2

    1 1i or i ocs cs

    A AD dP PA b A b

    =

    2 2

    1 1i ot i ocs cs

    A AD dP PA b A b

    = + +

    reala bending

    cs

    TA

    = +

  • Effective Tension

    at the point of investigationeff real i i o oT T PA P A= +

  • Bending Stress

    ( )

    ( ) ( )

    2 2

    2 2

    4 4

    2 2

    3,385

    tanh 0.2

    17,135

    or whichever is larger

    eff

    LUBeff

    beam

    LUB beamb

    cs cs

    OD IDOD C TOD IDF

    TOD ID

    F OD C OD ID

    F FA A

    +=

    =

    =

  • Strain Equations

    Radial strain

    Tangential strain

    Axial strain

    ( )r t zr TE

    += +

    ( )t r zt TE

    += +

    ( )z t rz TE

    += +

  • Failure Criteria

  • Failure Criteria

  • Stress Strain Envelope

  • Von Mises Failure Criteria Von Mises Stress is non-existent Von Mises equivalent stress is:

    Helps determine if failure is likely If the Von Mises equivalent stress is greater than the

    yield strength, then the pipe is, by definition, in danger of failure

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2 2 2 2 262

    r t r a t a r t avm

    + + + + +=

  • Stress Analysis Determine the stresses:

    Radial Tangential Axial Bending Von Mises w/o bending Von Mises w/ bending

    Is the pipe at the depth of investigation in danger of failure?

    Total Depth is 10,503 ft in 7-7/8" hole

    Outside Mud Weight is 15.4 ppgfrom 6,400 ft to TD

    Inside Mud Weight is 9.5 ppg

    Surface Casing is 8-5/8" 24 ppf K55 STC @ 2,395 ft

    Pressure is 1,100 psi

    Pressure is 3,850 psi

    Outside Mud Weight is 13.2 ppgfrom 6,400 ft to 2,200 ft

    Inside Mud Weight is 15.4 ppgFloat Collar is at 10,423 ft

    Outside Mud Weight is 10.2 ppgfrom 2,200 ft to surface

    Depth of investigation is 7,500'

    Casing is5.5" 23 ppf N80 LTC from surface to 1,050'5.5" 20 ppf P110 LTC from 1,050' to 6,500'5.5" 23 ppf P110 LTC from 6,500' to 9,110'5.5" 26 ppf P110 LTC from 9,110' to TD

    T = 200 deg FC = 10 deg/100 ft @ DOI

    PEGN 361A Basic Tubular Manufacturing and TypesFailure CriteriaState of Stress in a TubularTubularsCasing, Tubing, Drill Pipe, Line PipeManufacturing ProcessesAPI SeamlessAPI Seamless Tubular ManufacturingAPI Seamless Tubular ManufacturingAPI ERW Method of ManufacturingClose Up of Particular Tube Making OperationsWeld LineSteel Tubular MakingAdvantages of ERW Oil Country TubularsEccentric Cross SectionCross Section Of Seamless ProductHot Mill Gauge Control ExampleNorth American Pipe Market, 2004 Market Share(Preston Pipe Report)Tubular TypesMadson Deep Casing PlanConductorSurface CasingIntermediate Casing, Liner, or TiebackProduction Casing, Liner, or TiebackDesign StepsDecide on ObjectivesPipe LoadsPipe Load ExamplesIdentify Service Life LoadsDesign FactorsCriteriaCasing Collapse 1Casing Collapse 2Casing Collapse 3Casing Collapse 4Casing Collapse 5Casing Collapse 6FailureSafety FactorFailure TypesTypical Stress Strain DiagramSteel ConstantsStresses in PipeStress EquationsEffective TensionBending StressStrain EquationsFailure CriteriaFailure CriteriaStress Strain EnvelopeVon Mises Failure CriteriaStress Analysis