Upload
bernard-garrison
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Basic Impact Evaluation Basic Impact Evaluation CourseCourse
Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102)Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102)
World Bank InstituteWorld Bank InstituteAttacking Poverty ProgramAttacking Poverty Program
23-04-21 2
ContentContentModule 1: Introduction
Module 2: Monitoring and Evaluation Definitions
Module 3: Monitoring and Evaluation: Tools to Measure Progress
Module 4: Evaluation: General Characteristics
Module 5: Questions and Criteria for Evaluations
Module 6: Evaluation Methods and Techniques
Module 7: Evaluation: Quality and Standards
Module 8: Stages in the Evaluation Process
Module 9: Contribution of Program Evaluation to Poverty Reduction
Module 10: Available Resources
Module 11: Developing a Training Workshop for Evaluators
Module 12: Evaluation of the Workshop
Module 1 - IntroductionModule 1 - Introduction
23-04-21 4
Overview of the ModuleOverview of the Module
• Opening remarks/introduction• Introductions/expectations• Individual test/questionnaire• Workshop objectives• Program and case studies• Nature and values of the workshop• Practical considerations
Opening Opening Remarks/IntroductionRemarks/Introduction
23-04-21 6
Introduction of ParticipantsIntroduction of Participants
• First name and surname
• Organization
• Function / profession
• Project, program and evaluation
experience
• Topics of interest in the workshop
23-04-21 7
Individual Test/QuestionnaireIndividual Test/Questionnaire
• This questionnaire is designed for your personal use. The questionnaires will not be collected.
• Fill out the questionnaire. (5 min)• Keep it. It will give you a more
concrete sense of your progress at the end of the workshop.
23-04-21 8
Purpose of the WorkshopPurpose of the Workshop
• To contribute to the improvement of public programs’ efficiency, more specifically poverty reduction programs
23-04-21 9
Overall ObjectiveOverall Objective
• To prepare national partners for the design and implementation of quality evaluations in their countries and for the transfer of program evaluation principles and techniques
23-04-21 10
Operational Objectives• At the end of this workshop, participants:
– Will have been made aware of the value of evaluations as well as of the contribution to development of current evaluation practices
– Will know general program evaluation principles, the range of evaluation methods and techniques, as well as the process that must be followed and the conditions that must be met to ensure the quality of the results that are obtained
– Will know the aspects that are specific to the evaluation of the impacts of poverty reduction programs
– Will have practiced, individually and in groups, on specific cases, some aspects of program evaluation
– Will know where to find methodological resources and information on evaluation
– Will have thought about the role their institution can play in the transfer of evaluation practices, by providing training in particular
23-04-21 11
From Objectives to Modules
Make participants more aware of the value
of evaluation
and familiarize them with how it is
being transferred
Make participants understand: Overall principles, methods
and techniques, processes,
determinants of quality, and specifics of evaluation in the context of poverty
reduction(provide opportunities for practice on specific
examples)
Indicate where to
find additional resources
in evaluation (methods,
case studies, general
information)
Reflect together on the
role each institution can play
To prepare national partners for the design and implementation of quality evaluations in their countries and
for the transfer of program evaluation principles and techniques
23-04-21 12
Nature of the WorkshopNature of the Workshop
• Adult training– An adult learns when he / she talks, acts
and becomes involved• We remember approximately:
– 10% of what we read– 20% of what we hear– 30% of what we see– 50% of what we see and hear– 80% of what we say– 90% of what we put into practice*
23-04-21 13
Nature of the WorkshopNature of the Workshop• Adult training
– Refers to his/her experiences, shares them, takes a step back, thinks, achieves a deeper understanding and broadens his / her knowledge
Workshopactivities
1 – First-hand experience
3 - Generalization ofthe experience
4 - Application
Adult learning cycle
2 - Reflection onthe experience
• Sharing of experiences• Methodological presentations• Group discussions and reflection• Practical Exercises
23-04-21 14
General FormatGeneral Format
• General notions• Practical exercises on the concepts that need to
be understood (short exercises in plenary sessions)
• Small group exercises on the use of several concepts
• Group study, with as much open discussion as possible, of a " poverty " case study
• Creative thinking (what role for my institution)• Practical group exercise on design
50% methodological presentations
50% reflection, sharing of ideas and group exercises
23-04-21 15
AgendaAgendaMonday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9:00
9:30
10:00 Reflection in 2 sub-groups: What role for
your institution?10:30 Quality of an evaluation Report
11:00
11:30
12:00
12:30
1:00
1:30
2:00 Reflection in 3 sub-groups:
2:30 1. Evaluation needs in your country?
3:00 2. Is there a demand?
3:30
4:00
4:30
5:00
5:30
Welcome, Presentation, Agenda
Definitions (evaluation and monitoring)
Specific aspects of the evaluation of the
contribution of projects or programs to poverty reduction: introductory debate and in-depth
exploration
Workshop evaluation, conclusions and closing
remarks
Report and conclusions: Evaluation’s dynamics
Practical exercise in 3 sub-groups and report
Report on exercise in plenary session
Lunch Break Lunch Break
Evaluation methods and techniques
(presentation with examples and discussion)
Exercise in sub-groups: Design of an evaluation for a specific program Presentation of the
evaluation of a poverty-reduction program’s contribution Exercise in 3 sub-groups and report. Comparison with real case
Reflection in 2 sub-groups: Design of a
training workshop for evaluators*
Evaluation: An instrument of progress
The process
Lunch Break Lunch Break Lunch Break
Broad characteristics of evaluation (presentation
and discussion)
Methods and techniques: Conclusions
Available resources on evaluation
Questions and criteria (presentation with
examples & discussion)
Determinants of quality: Review
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9:00
9:30
10:00 Reflection in 2 sub-groups: What role for
your institution?10:30 Quality of an evaluation Report
11:00
11:30
12:00
12:30
1:00
1:30
2:00 Reflection in 3 sub-groups:
2:30 1. Evaluation needs in your country?
3:00 2. Is there a demand?
3:30
4:00
4:30
5:00
5:30
Welcome, Presentation, Agenda
Definitions (evaluation and monitoring)
Specific aspects of the evaluation of the
contribution of projects or programs to poverty reduction: introductory debate and in-depth
exploration
Workshop evaluation, conclusions and closing
remarks
Report and conclusions: Evaluation’s dynamics
Practical exercise in 3 sub-groups and report
Report on exercise in plenary session
Lunch Break Lunch Break
Evaluation methods and techniques
(presentation with examples and discussion)
Exercise in sub-groups: Design of an evaluation for a specific program Presentation of the
evaluation of a poverty-reduction program’s contribution Exercise in 3 sub-groups and report. Comparison with real case
Reflection in 2 sub-groups: Design of a
training workshop for evaluators*
Evaluation: An instrument of progress
The process
Lunch Break Lunch Break Lunch Break
Broad characteristics of evaluation (presentation
and discussion)
Methods and techniques: Conclusions
Available resources on evaluation
Questions and criteria (presentation with
examples & discussion)
Determinants of quality: Review
23-04-21 16
Values to be Shared During the Workshop• Simplicity – we no longer have
responsibilities or wear a specific hat• What is discussed here will remain among
us. The content of our discussions will not be reported. Everyone can express his/her views freely
• Openness, critical thinking, tolerance• Everyone must participate actively in order
to be both an actor and a beneficiary over these few days spent working together
• Focus on participants’ concrete concerns and experiences, remain down to earth
23-04-21 17
Practical ConsiderationsPractical Considerations
• Schedules• Rooms• Breaks• Lunches• Format• Questions?