30
Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer [email protected] www.cancer.qmul.ac .uk Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer [email protected] Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Barts Cancer InstituteRebecca Auer

[email protected]

www.cancer.qmul.ac.uk

Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Page 2: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

WM treatment

• WM1 recently closed

• No other UK trials

• No standard treatment

• Difficult to achieve CR

• New agents

Page 3: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Development pathway

Page 4: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Novel strategies

• Combinations including rituximab and/or bortezomib

• Novel anti-CD20 Abs / proteasome inhibitors• Bendamustine• Novel signal inhibitors Everolimus

Perifosine• Epigenetic modifiers Panobinostat• Immunomodulators IMiDs• Stem cell transplantation

Page 5: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

The BCR study

Page 6: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia is somewhat similar to two other types of cancer, multiple myeloma (plasma cell cancer) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (a group of cancers of lymphocytes).

Page 7: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Bortezomib

plasma cells

Rituximab

B cells

Page 8: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Bortezomib in WM

• Predominantly in phase II trials in the relapsed or refractory setting

• Alone or in combination• Rapid responses• As a salvage treatment option - Fourth

International Workshop on WM treatment recommendations

Page 9: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Rituximab

• Minimal myelosuppression

• Single agent RR 40-50%

• Combination – chemotherapy– IMiDs

Page 10: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Bortezomib & Rituximab in WM

• Barts study in relapsed lymphoma– 9 of 10 patients with WM responded

• 2 studies in USA in untreated WM – BDR twice a week 83% responded– BR once a week 65% responded

Complete response/near-complete response = 22%

Page 11: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

A phase II trial of bortezomib, rituximab and cyclophosphamide in patients with symptomatic, untreated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

• To determine the efficacy and safety of bortezomib, rituximab and cyclophosphamide

• Symptomatic untreated WM

• IV Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15• Oral Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15• IV Rituximab 375 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15, 22 of cycles 2 and 4

– this will be repeated every 28 days for 6 cycles in responding patients.

• 1° endpoint: Response rate• 2° endpoint: Toxicity, complete response rate, duration of response,

speed of response, time to next treatment, progression free survival

Page 12: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Study design

• Run in phase 6 patients

• Multicentre phase 33 patients

• Recruit over 2 years

• 6 centres– Barts, Leeds, Mid-Yorkshire, Heartlands,

King’s, UCH, Plymouth

• Plan to follow on with a phase III– BCR versus FCR

Page 13: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Randomised phase II

FCRBCR v or

DCR

Possibility of s/c bortezomib

Page 14: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Side effects

• Bortezomib neurological

• Rituximab allergic / infections

• Cyclophosphamide low blood counts

Page 15: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Assessments

• Blood tests every cycle• Bone marrow and CT scans at start, midway, at completion

• Blood and BM assays to look for better markers of response

• Research samples to look at some of the genetic & protein changes in WM

Page 16: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Timelines

• Application to CRUK Aug 2010 April 2011

• Decision by CRUK Nov 2010 July 2011• Expectation open May 2011 Jan 2012• Duration recruitment 2 years 2 years• Duration follow up 5 years 5 years

Page 17: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

New proteasome inhibitors

• s/c Bortezomib– less neurotoxicity but as active

• Carfilzomib– phase I data– no grade 3/4 neuropathy– activity

• Marizomib– phase I studies recruiting

Page 18: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Copyright ©2004 American Society of Hematology. Copyright restrictions may apply.

Cartron, G. et al. Blood 2004;104:2635-2642

Main mechanisms of action of rituximab and ways to increase its clinical efficacy

Page 19: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Novel anti-CD20 Abs

• GA101

• Ofatumumab

And other Abs to other proteins eg. Belimumab

Page 20: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Bendamustine

Page 21: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

StiL Group - Rummel

• BR versus R-CHOP first line n=549

– WM n=42– ORR similar BUT CR, PFS, TTNT all

significantly better with BR– Progressive disease in 2/23 BR versus 7/17

R-CHOP– Less grade 3/4 neutropenia with BR

Page 22: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

StiL Group - Rummel

• BR versus FR relapse n=219 – BR higher ORR 83.5% v 52.5%

CR 38.5% v 16.2%– grade 3/4 neutropenia similar

Page 23: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Overactive in WM cells

EverolimusPerifosine

PI3K/Akt/mTOR cell signalling pathway

Page 24: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Everolimus

• Oral

• ORR – 70%– PR 42% MR 28%

• Median PFS and duration response not reached

• Toxicities– Grade 3 or higher in 56%– Lung toxicity in 10%

Page 25: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Perifosine

• Oral

• ORR - 35%

• Median PFS 12.6 months

• Toxicities– cytopenias– GI– Arthritis flare

Page 26: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

IMiDs

Page 27: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

IMiDs

• Thalidomide + rituximab– dose reductions required in all patients – neuropathy

• Lenalidomide + rituximab– study discontinued due to unexpected

clinically significant anaemia

• Pomolidomide

Page 28: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

HDACIEg. Panobinostat

Page 29: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Open studies

Ofatumumab anti-CD20 monoclonal Ab

Panobinostat epigenetic - HDACI

Everolimus + BR mTOR inhibitor

Belimumab monoclonal Ab

Pomolidomide ImiD

Page 30: Barts Cancer Institute Rebecca Auer r.l.auer@qmul.ac.uk  Waldenstrom’s: The Future

Chemotherapy

Biologic agent

Monoclonal Ab

Waldenstrom’s: The Future