30
BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST SURETIES SURETIES Philadelphia Surety Claims Association January 15, 2014

BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST SURETIES

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST SURETIES. Philadelphia Surety Claims Association January 15, 2014. Origins of the Bad Faith Claim:. The general common law duty of good faith and fair dealing was transformed into an affirmative claim sounding in tort. Philadelphia Surety Claims Association. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST SURETIES SURETIES

Philadelphia Surety Claims AssociationJanuary 15, 2014

Page 2: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 2

Origins of the Bad Faith Claim:Origins of the Bad Faith Claim:

The general common law duty of good faith and fair dealing was

transformed into an affirmative claim sounding in tort

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 3: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 3

Origins of the Bad Faith Claim:Origins of the Bad Faith Claim:

The new tort was based on the “special relationship” between the

insured and its insurer, which arose out of the unequal bargaining power

at policy inception and during coverage determination

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 4: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 4

Two Model Acts:Two Model Acts:

• Unfair Trade Practices Act

• Uniform Claims Settlement Practices Act

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 5: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 5

The Unfair Trade Practices ActThe Unfair Trade Practices Act

National Association of Insurance Commissions adopt the “UnfairTrade Practices Act” establishing rules to regulate unfair trade practices in the insurance industry.

The scope of the model act appears to cover suretyship. Those states that have adopted the act include suretyship within the scope of regulated insurance activities.

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 6: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 6

The Uniform Claims Settlement Practices ActThe Uniform Claims Settlement Practices Act

National Association of Insurance Commissions later adopts the “Uniform Claims Settlement Practice Act” which was intended to define unfair claims practices with more exactitude.

The model act specifically excludes suretyship. However, not all the states that have adopted the model act have adopted the language excluding suretyship.

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 7: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 7

Two Model ActsTwo Model Acts

Both model acts say they do not create a private cause of action, but that language has not been consistently adopted.

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 8: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 8

What is bad faith?

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 9: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 9

What is bad faith?What is bad faith?

• Refusal to pay a claim without a reasonable basis

• Frivolous and unfounded refusal to pay policy proceeds

• Dishonest purpose or conscious wrongdoing• Unreasonable conduct which the surety knows

to be unreasonable• Failure to investigate for the purpose of

remaining ignorant

Page 10: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 10

What is What is notnot bad faith? bad faith?

• Mere negligence or bad judgment is not bad faith

• Reasonable, but incorrect, interpretation of a policy or law is not bad faith

• Inconsistent claims positions may not be bad faith if there is a reason for a differing position in the current matter

• Delays due to reasonable investigations

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 11: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 11

What arguments work in favor of the claim?

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 12: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 12

Arguments In Favor:Arguments In Favor:

Sureties are just like

insurance companies

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 13: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 13

Arguments In Favor:Arguments In Favor:

Suretyship is referenced

in the regulatory scheme

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 14: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 14

Arguments In Favor:Arguments In Favor:

A bad faith tort claim

is needed to keep

sureties honest

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 15: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 15

Arguments In Favor:Arguments In Favor:

A “special relationship”

exists between

a surety and obligee

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 16: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 16

Arguments In Favor:Arguments In Favor:

Sureties have superior

bargaining power

vis-à-vis obligees

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 17: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 17

Which arguments work

in favor of sureties?

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 18: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 18

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

A surety’s liability

should be no greater than

that of its principal

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 19: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 19

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Surety is a credit accommodation,

not insurance

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 20: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 20

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Insurance spreads risk,

but in suretyship the loss remains

concentrated with the principal

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 21: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 21

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

The mere reference of

suretyship in the

regulatory framework

is not enough

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 22: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 22

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Sureties have the right

to “test the merits”

of a claim

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 23: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 23

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

A tort claim encourages

the payment of meritless

claims and the

overpayment of

questionable claims

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 24: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 24

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Obligees look first

to the principal and

then to the surety, rather

than an insured who

looks only to the insurerPhiladelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 25: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 25

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Because of the tripartite

nature of the relationship, the surety must balance conflicting

interests

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 26: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 26

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Sureties do not have

superior bargaining power

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 27: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 27

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Obligees often are

commercially

sophisticated

(with access to

legal advice)Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 28: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 28

Arguments Against:Arguments Against:

Obligees can negotiate terms into the underlying contract that

discourage delay by the surety (e.g. liquidated damages)

Philadelphia Surety Claims Association

Page 29: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 29

QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?

Feel free to contact:

Patrick Kingsley

Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, LLP

(215) 564-8029

[email protected]

Page 30: BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST  SURETIES

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 30

Thanks