26
BACR Standards: BACR Standards: A Useful Tool? A Useful Tool? Jennifer George / Michelle Jennifer George / Michelle Bull Bull SWL Cardiac and Stroke SWL Cardiac and Stroke Network Network

BACR Standards: A Useful Tool?

  • Upload
    lang

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

BACR Standards: A Useful Tool?. Jennifer George / Michelle Bull SWL Cardiac and Stroke Network. Overview. Background . 2. Our work before the standards. 3. How we have used the standards. 4. Some Issues . 5. Conclusion. Networks. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

BACR Standards: BACR Standards: A Useful Tool?A Useful Tool?

Jennifer George / Michelle BullJennifer George / Michelle BullSWL Cardiac and Stroke SWL Cardiac and Stroke

NetworkNetwork

Page 2: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

OverviewOverview

1. Background

2. Our work before the standards

3. How we have used the standards

4. Some Issues

5. Conclusion

Page 3: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

NetworksNetworks

“Should come together to form local networks of cardiac care,

agreeing detailed locally relevant referral criteria and care

pathways”CHD NSF (2000)

Page 4: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

NetworksNetworks The purpose of a network is to guide The purpose of a network is to guide

and support the services that comprise and support the services that comprise it and the people that use them.it and the people that use them.

Organisations join networks because Organisations join networks because they can do what they need to more they can do what they need to more effectively effectively togethertogether than if they than if they operate alone.operate alone.

National Stroke Strategy 2007National Stroke Strategy 2007

Page 5: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

South West London South West London

Tertiary Centre

• 7 programmes• 1 Tertiary Centre• 4 DGHs• 2 Community Hospitals

• Task group

Page 6: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Work before the Work before the standardsstandards

Baseline AssessmentBaseline AssessmentAimAim: : To create an accurate picture of CR provisionTo create an accurate picture of CR provision To identify any gaps in the current service To identify any gaps in the current service

across SWLacross SWL To use information to determine a work To use information to determine a work

programme for the task group.programme for the task group.

MethodMethod: : All 7 programmes completed the assessment All 7 programmes completed the assessment

which was designed against Chapter 7 of the which was designed against Chapter 7 of the NSF.NSF.

Page 7: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Baseline AssessmentBaseline AssessmentOutcomesOutcomes:: Staffing levels, team make-up and funding were Staffing levels, team make-up and funding were

variable and did not appear to be based on need.variable and did not appear to be based on need. All programmes had a waiting list.All programmes had a waiting list. Current data systems did not allow for assessment Current data systems did not allow for assessment

against NSF goal of 85% of people with diagnosis of against NSF goal of 85% of people with diagnosis of AMI or revasc being offered cardiac rehabilitation.AMI or revasc being offered cardiac rehabilitation.

Next steps: Next steps: An audit to gain an understanding of patient numbers An audit to gain an understanding of patient numbers

and patient movement through each programme.and patient movement through each programme.

Page 8: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Work before the standardsWork before the standards Retrospective AuditRetrospective Audit

AimAim:: Justification of service e.g., referral numbers.Justification of service e.g., referral numbers. Patient flow and movement through programme e.g., Patient flow and movement through programme e.g.,

identify specifics of where they drop out & why.identify specifics of where they drop out & why. BenchmarkingBenchmarking

MethodMethod:: One years worth of dataOne years worth of data Patients with either a diagnosis of MI or after Coronary Patients with either a diagnosis of MI or after Coronary

Artery Bypass Graft, PCI or other intervention (e.g., valve) Artery Bypass Graft, PCI or other intervention (e.g., valve) were included in line with the NSF.were included in line with the NSF.

Hospital admission data was requested from IT departments Hospital admission data was requested from IT departments Data was collected manually by pulling individual patient Data was collected manually by pulling individual patient

files. files.

Page 9: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Assessment & Audit Assessment & Audit OutcomesOutcomes

Each programme provided different services to Each programme provided different services to patients, leading to inequity of provision and patients, leading to inequity of provision and making comparison across the sector difficultmaking comparison across the sector difficult

Agreed there was a need for core elements Agreed there was a need for core elements that a rehab service should include (in line that a rehab service should include (in line with NSF standards and latest evidence)with NSF standards and latest evidence)

Endorsement of the BACR standardsEndorsement of the BACR standards

Page 10: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

The StandardsThe Standards1. A Co-ordinator who has overall responsibility for

the CR service2. A CR core team of professionally qualified staff

with appropriate skills and competences to deliver the service

3. A standardised assessment of individual patient needs

4. Referral and access for targeted population5. Registration and submission to the NACR6. A CR budget appropriate to meet the full service

costs

Page 11: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

The Core ComponentsThe Core Components Lifestyle

Physical activity and exercise: Diet and weight management: Smoking cessation:

Education Risk factor management Psychological status and quality of life Cardio protective drug therapy and

implantable devices Long-term management strategy

Page 12: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

1. A Co-ordinator who has overall responsibility for the CR service

2. A CR core team of professionally qualified staff with appropriate skills and competencies to deliver the service (included in core components section)

3. A standardised assessment of individual patient needs

4. Referral & access for targeted patient population;- Exertional angina - ACS (unstable angina or NSTEMI or STEMI) following

medical/surgical management - Before & after revascularisation - Following any stepwise alteration in CHD condition - Other atherosclerotic disease e.g., peripheral arterial

disease - Stable HF & Cardiomyopathy - Following implantable device interventions

5. Registration and submission to the National Audit for Cardiac Rehabilitation (NACR) database

6. A CR budget appropriate to meet the full service costs

1. Lifestyle

I) Physical activity & exercise: CR should include;

- Risk stratification & baseline assessment of physical activity status & exercise/functional capacity

- Prescription - Staffing levels & state the hours of work;

Specialist Nurse Specialist Physio

Dietician Pharmacist Clinical Psychologist Audit & Clerical

How we used the Standards?

Assessment tool -

Page 13: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

FindingsFindings

Prog 1 Prog 2 Prog 3 Prog 4 Prog 5 Prog 6 Prog 7

Standard 1 (co-ordinator)

Standard 2 (team)

Standard 3(assessment)

Standard 4 (pt groups)

Standard 5(NACR)

Standard 6(Budget)

Not meeting the standard Partially meeting the standard

Totally meeting the standard

Page 14: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

What we did with results What we did with results Sector wideSector wide

Quality assurance roleQuality assurance role NACRNACR Agreed ideal pathway Agreed ideal pathway Increased profile for cardiac rehabIncreased profile for cardiac rehab

Individual ProgrammesIndividual Programmes Development of new servicesDevelopment of new services Supporting programmes through changeSupporting programmes through change

Page 15: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Standard 4Standard 41 2 3 4 5 6 7

Exertionalangina

ACS

Before &after

revasc

Followingstepwise alteration

Other Atheroscleoticdisease

Stable HF &

Cardio-myopathy

Following Implantablee devices

Page 16: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Programme 2Programme 2

Standard 4 - ICD pilot Standard 4 - ICD pilot

Standard 2 - Business case development Standard 2 - Business case development for heart failurefor heart failure

Clinical Clinical leadlead

Specialist Specialist NurseNurse

PhysioPhysio DieticianDietician PharmacisPharmacistt

Clinical Clinical PsycPsyc

Audit & Audit & ClericalClerical

Page 17: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Programme 2Programme 2

Standard 2 – core team development Standard 2 – core team development Regular physiotherapy inputRegular physiotherapy input

Clinical Clinical leadlead

Specialist Specialist NurseNurse

PhysioPhysio DieticianDietician PharmacisPharmacistt

Clinical Clinical PsycPsyc

Audit & Audit & ClericalClerical

Page 18: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

How we used the How we used the standardsstandards

Prog 1 Prog 2 Prog 3 Prog 4 Prog 5 Prog 6 Prog 7

Standard 1 (co-ordinator)

Standard 2 (team)

Standard 3 (assessment)

Standard 4 (pt groups)

Standard 5 (NACR)

Standard 6(Budget)

Not meeting the standard Partially meeting the standard

Totally meeting the standard

Page 19: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Programme 5Programme 5 Standard 5 – web based NACR pilotStandard 5 – web based NACR pilot Standard 4 - PCT secured funding to Standard 4 - PCT secured funding to

develop local community based develop local community based programmeprogramme

Standard 2 - Appropriate staffing Standard 2 - Appropriate staffing levelslevels

Able to advise re appropriate modelAble to advise re appropriate model

Page 20: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

How we used the How we used the standardsstandards

Prog 1 Prog 2 Prog 3 Prog 4 Prog 5 Prog 6 Prog 7

Standard 1 (co-ordinator)

Standard 2 (team)

Standard 3 (assessment)

Standard 4 (pt groups)

Standard 5 (NACR)

Standard 6(Budget)

Not meeting the standard Partially meeting the standard

Totally meeting the standard

Page 21: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Programmes 3 and 4Programmes 3 and 4 Local programme resourced by staff Local programme resourced by staff

from PCT and acute trustfrom PCT and acute trust Plans to move phase 3 to community Plans to move phase 3 to community

as part of review of CNS rolesas part of review of CNS roles Conflict between providers and Conflict between providers and

commissionerscommissioners

Page 22: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Programmes 3 and 4Programmes 3 and 4 Core ComponentsCore Components

Process mappingProcess mapping Peer reviewPeer review Links with other servicesLinks with other services Phase 4 mappingPhase 4 mapping

Standard 2 Standard 2 Skills assessmentSkills assessment

Page 23: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Where the standards have Where the standards have caused debatecaused debate

DefinitionsDefinitions ACS ACS Cardio protective drug therapyCardio protective drug therapy

Staffing levelsStaffing levels BudgetBudget CommissioningCommissioning Annual reviewAnnual review

Who will assess thisWho will assess this ““Programme under development”Programme under development”

Page 24: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

Are they a useful tool?Are they a useful tool? Yes Yes

Useful driver to support development Useful driver to support development work work

Support for programmes undergoing Support for programmes undergoing changechange

Informing commissioningInforming commissioning

Page 25: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

But …….But ……. Need to have strategic commitment Need to have strategic commitment

at local levelat local level

Need higher national profileNeed higher national profile

Need agreement re “enforcement” Need agreement re “enforcement”

Page 26: BACR Standards:  A Useful Tool?

www.southwestlondoncardiacnetwork.nhs.uk

[email protected]@stgeorges.nhs.uk

(020) 8725 2924