View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Background of the Early Background of the Early Communication Indicator for Communication Indicator for
Infants and ToddlersInfants and Toddlers
Dale Walker, Judith Carta, and Dale Walker, Judith Carta, and Charles GreenwoodCharles Greenwood
This WorkThis Work Early Childhood Research Institute Early Childhood Research Institute
on Measuring Growth and on Measuring Growth and DevelopmentDevelopment
Other partners:Other partners:– University of MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota– University of OregonUniversity of Oregon
Developing Developing indicatorsindicators toward a set toward a set of nationally validated child of nationally validated child outcomes from birth to age 8 years outcomes from birth to age 8 years to produce a comprehensive to produce a comprehensive performance measurement system performance measurement system
University of KansasUniversity of KansasECI Development Project Staff ECI Development Project Staff
for Children birth to 3 yearsfor Children birth to 3 years::
Judith Carta, Charles Greenwood & Dale Judith Carta, Charles Greenwood & Dale WalkerWalker
With: Jane Atwater, Gayle Luze,With: Jane Atwater, Gayle Luze,
Deborah Linebarger, Carol Leitschuh,Deborah Linebarger, Carol Leitschuh,
Ken Parsley, Annessa Staab and Gabe Cline Ken Parsley, Annessa Staab and Gabe Cline
Objectives of Training:Objectives of Training:
Understand the background of the ECI and Understand the background of the ECI and this type of assessmentthis type of assessment
Learn how to administer and score the ECI Learn how to administer and score the ECI and how to become a certified administratorand how to become a certified administrator
Understand how to use ECI data for Understand how to use ECI data for monitoring individual progress and monitoring individual progress and evaluating programsevaluating programs
Learn about the website and how to enter Learn about the website and how to enter datadata
Learn how to train othersLearn how to train others
Current Focus on Current Focus on Outcomes-Based Program Outcomes-Based Program EvaluationEvaluation
More emphasis needed on child More emphasis needed on child outcomesoutcomes
Programs (and individual staff Programs (and individual staff members) need to know when members) need to know when they are making a difference in they are making a difference in moving children toward moving children toward outcomesoutcomes
Most available Most available approaches to program approaches to program evaluation:evaluation: Not linked to individual child Not linked to individual child
progress on outcomesprogress on outcomes Child data not used in making Child data not used in making
program decisionsprogram decisions– Not frequent enough Not frequent enough – Not accessible enoughNot accessible enough
Indicators of child Indicators of child progress are needed to progress are needed to determine if children are determine if children are growing in their growing in their development development
What’s an Indicator?What’s an Indicator?What is an Individual What is an Individual Growth and Development Growth and Development Indicator (IGDI)?Indicator (IGDI)?
What’s an indicator?What’s an indicator?
Way of monitoring progress toward Way of monitoring progress toward outcomes: knowing whether you outcomes: knowing whether you are on-trackare on-track
Tells you when a change is neededTells you when a change is needed If you make changes, helps you If you make changes, helps you
“see” the results“see” the results
Helpful features of the Helpful features of the thermometer indicator:thermometer indicator:
Quick measureQuick measure Gives instant informationGives instant information Tells a lot about an important Tells a lot about an important
general outcome: Health Statusgeneral outcome: Health Status Can repeat it frequentlyCan repeat it frequently Measures intervention resultsMeasures intervention results
PediatriciaPediatrician’s n’s
Standard Standard Growth Growth Charts: Charts:
Height and Height and Weight Weight
IndicatorsIndicators
Features of growth chartsFeatures of growth charts
Easy to doEasy to do Relatively inexpensiveRelatively inexpensive RepeatableRepeatable Can indicate potential problem and Can indicate potential problem and
effectiveness of an interventioneffectiveness of an intervention
General Outcome General Outcome MeasurementMeasurement
Not a new concept in educationNot a new concept in education– Recognized in special education Recognized in special education
practice and researchpractice and research– Reading Rate (CBM)Reading Rate (CBM)– DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic
Early Literacy Skills)Early Literacy Skills)
Outcomes and Indicators to Outcomes and Indicators to Assess Progress Assess Progress
OutcomesOutcomes are general, socially are general, socially desired abilities/capabilitiesdesired abilities/capabilities IndicatorsIndicators are sensitive markers of are sensitive markers of progress progress
–Way of seeing if children (and programs) Way of seeing if children (and programs) are moving toward outcomes.are moving toward outcomes.–Share features of other effective Share features of other effective indicators:indicators:–Quick, easily repeatable, provide quick Quick, easily repeatable, provide quick feedbackfeedback–Show change easilyShow change easily
Expressive Expressive CommunicationCommunicationGeneral OutcomeGeneral Outcome
One of 15 general child outcomes One of 15 general child outcomes validated by a national sample of validated by a national sample of parents (n=351) and professionals parents (n=351) and professionals (n=672)(n=672)
Expressive communication was most Expressive communication was most highly rated outcomehighly rated outcome
Others include, social, movement, Others include, social, movement, problem-solving and adaptive behaviorsproblem-solving and adaptive behaviors
Expressive Meaning Expressive Meaning OutcomeOutcome
““The child uses gestures, The child uses gestures, sounds, words, or sentences sounds, words, or sentences to convey wants and needs or to convey wants and needs or to express meaning to to express meaning to others.”others.”
General ECI General ECI Administration: How it’s Administration: How it’s DoneDone
Administration ProceduresAdministration Procedures– Toy-play setting with familiar adultToy-play setting with familiar adult– 6 minute assessment sessions6 minute assessment sessions– Adult’s role is to facilitate play and Adult’s role is to facilitate play and
follow child’s leadfollow child’s lead– Set-up/clean-up/put awaySet-up/clean-up/put away
Alternate Toy FormsAlternate Toy Forms Observational Observational
Recording ProceduresRecording Procedures frequency of frequency of communicative behavior (key skill communicative behavior (key skill elements) tallied to get rate of total elements) tallied to get rate of total communicationcommunication
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Toy Form A: House
Toy Form B: Barn
Vocalizations Multiple WordsSingle Words
Total Communication
Gestures
Key Skill Elements
What does the ECI Measure?
Recording Recording ExampleExample
Expressive Communication ECI CODING SHEET
Gestures Vocalizations Single Word Utterances
Multi-Word Utterances
Total
:00
G
I
V
II
W
I
M
IIIIII
IIIII IIIII
1:00
G V W M
2:00
G V W M
3:00
G V W M
4:00
G V W M
5:00
G V W M
Child ID 502 Wave:_______8_____ Test Date:_________________
Assessor:_Annessa____
Coder: _Gabriel_________ Circle one: Barn / House
Location: _____Testing Room_________ Reliability Y N Primary Coder Name: ________________
How we know it works: Using How we know it works: Using the ECI for individual and the ECI for individual and program monitoringprogram monitoring
How we know it worksHow we know it works Does it grow?Does it grow? Is it reliable?Is it reliable? Is it valid?Is it valid? Is it predictive?Is it predictive? Individual progress monitoringIndividual progress monitoring Program evaluationProgram evaluation
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Age Cohort (0-12)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ra
te p
er
Min
ute
Gestures Vocalizations Words MulWord
How Did Key Skill Elements Grow How Did Key Skill Elements Grow over 9 Months for Children in Their over 9 Months for Children in Their 1st Year?1st Year?
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Age Cohort (13-24)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Rat
e pe
r M
inut
e
Gestures Vocalizations Words MulWord
How Did Key Skill Elements How Did Key Skill Elements Grow for Children in their 2Grow for Children in their 2ndnd
Year of Life?Year of Life?
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Age Cohort (25-36)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Monthly Occasions
Rat
e pe
r M
inut
e
Gestures Vocalizations Words MulWord
How Did Key Skill Elements Grow For How Did Key Skill Elements Grow For Children in Their 3Children in Their 3rdrd Year of Life? Year of Life?
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Did Total Communication Did Total Communication Grow and Differ by Age Grow and Differ by Age
Cohort?Cohort?
0
5
10
15
20
Month
1
Month
2
Month
3
Month
4
Month
5
Month
6
Month
7
Rat
e pe
r M
inut
e
0-1 years1-2 years2-3 years
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Did we detect differences Did we detect differences for children with for children with disabilities?disabilities?
0
5
10
15
20
Month
1
Month
2
Month
3
Month
4
Month
5
Month
6
Month
7
Rat
e pe
r M
inut
e
DisabilityNo Disability
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Does this approach work?Does this approach work?
Is it sensitive to growth?Is it sensitive to growth?Scores show change over time as children age and Scores show change over time as children age and develop develop 0 – 12 mos: M = 4.8; 13 – 24 mos. M = 8.3; 0 – 12 mos: M = 4.8; 13 – 24 mos. M = 8.3; 25 – 36 mos. M = 11.7 25 – 36 mos. M = 11.7
Is it reliable? Is it reliable? Trained observers agree on what communication Trained observers agree on what communication they record. (90% overall)they record. (90% overall)
Is it valid?Is it valid?ECI indicators correlate with standardized and ECI indicators correlate with standardized and parent report measures. (PLS; CCM)parent report measures. (PLS; CCM)
Is it predictive?Is it predictive?ECI indicators correlate with preschool literacy and ECI indicators correlate with preschool literacy and communication indicators.communication indicators.
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
How the ECI is used for How the ECI is used for Progress Monitoring: Progress Monitoring: Levels of Growth Levels of Growth Assessment Assessment
Bench Marking (quarterly – every 3 months)Bench Marking (quarterly – every 3 months)– All children assessedAll children assessed– Who is making or not making expected progress?Who is making or not making expected progress?– Who needs additional support?Who needs additional support?– How is the program doing?How is the program doing?
Strategic Monitoring (monthly)Strategic Monitoring (monthly)– Is more support accelerating growth? Is more support accelerating growth? – Is a change in intervention supports needed?Is a change in intervention supports needed?
Intensive Care Monitoring (weekly)Intensive Care Monitoring (weekly)– Is growth accelerating?Is growth accelerating?– Is a change in intervention supports needed?Is a change in intervention supports needed?
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
IGDIs ESAs
IGDI Decision Making IGDI Decision Making ModelModel
Monitor
Identify/Validate Need
For Intervention
Generate Intervention
Strategies
ImplementIntervention
EvaluateIntervention
Effectiveness
Monitor
Families
Outcomes©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Framing Intervention Framing Intervention Solutions: Ruling out, Solutions: Ruling out, Ruling inRuling in
History with child?History with child? Medical issues?Medical issues? Family/caregiver concerns?Family/caregiver concerns? What child knows and does?What child knows and does? Settings, activities, routines, Settings, activities, routines,
curriculum?curriculum? Challenges to implementing Challenges to implementing
intervention?intervention?©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
IdentificationIdentification
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
Age at Test
Wei
ghte
d C
omm
unic
atio
n R
ate
per
Min
ute
Child 1 Norm -1SD +1SD
Intervention
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 46
Weeks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Rat
e P
er M
inut
es
Communications per Minute Expected Growth
Expected Growth
The ECI Tells Us When to Intervene and The ECI Tells Us When to Intervene and Whether or Not Intervention Is Working Whether or Not Intervention Is Working or Program is Effectiveor Program is Effective
Baseline Intervention Modified Intervention
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
How Approach is Used to How Approach is Used to Inform Decision-Making at Inform Decision-Making at Individual LevelsIndividual Levels
Home visitors use individual child data Home visitors use individual child data to monitor child progressto monitor child progress
Use child data to evaluate Use child data to evaluate effectiveness of interventions and effectiveness of interventions and programprogram
Use child data to plan with parent(s) Use child data to plan with parent(s)
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Effects of Individual Effects of Individual InterventionsInterventions
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
ECI Testings
To
tal C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Rate
Identification Weekly Baseline Intervention(Child 207)Monthly
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
How Approach is Used to How Approach is Used to Inform Decision-Making at Inform Decision-Making at Program and State Levels Program and State Levels
ECI data available to State Head Start/Early ECI data available to State Head Start/Early Head Start Administrators, intervention staff Head Start Administrators, intervention staff and familiesand families
Program administrative staff, Early Head Program administrative staff, Early Head Start Coordinator and SRS use ECI for :Start Coordinator and SRS use ECI for :– Program EvaluationProgram Evaluation– Program PlanningProgram Planning– Quality ImprovementQuality Improvement– Inform Public and Funding Sources about EHS Inform Public and Funding Sources about EHS
ProgressProgress©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Monitoring ProgramsMonitoring Programs Program data aggregated up from individual Program data aggregated up from individual
datadata Assess all or some children in a programAssess all or some children in a program Measure every 3 months: (6, 9, 12, etc.)Measure every 3 months: (6, 9, 12, etc.) Each child has a growth trajectory (rate of Each child has a growth trajectory (rate of
growth and mean level)growth and mean level) Calculate the average (or program) trajectory Calculate the average (or program) trajectory
(rate of growth and mean level)(rate of growth and mean level) Children below expected rate of growth - assess Children below expected rate of growth - assess
monthly and provide (ramp up) intervention.monthly and provide (ramp up) intervention. Continue monthly progress monitoring and Continue monthly progress monitoring and
continue intervention decision makingcontinue intervention decision making
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Growth in Expressive Communication
-5
0
5
10
15
20
253 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
Age at Measurement
Exp
ress
ive
Com
mun
icat
ion
Rat
e
Norm
P1
P2
P3
P1 = Growing at .31 responses per monthP2 = Growing at .51 responses per monthP3 = Growing at .60 responses per month
©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project
Program ProgressProgram Progress Overall Child Rate of GrowthOverall Child Rate of Growth
– Ave. Slope of Communications for individual Ave. Slope of Communications for individual children and groups of children in programschildren and groups of children in programs
– Mean Communications at different periods of Mean Communications at different periods of development for individuals and groups of children development for individuals and groups of children
Child Growth Rate Child Growth Rate – By GenderBy Gender– By IFSP StatusBy IFSP Status– By Language StatusBy Language Status
Staff OperationsStaff Operations– Staff Qualifications SummaryStaff Qualifications Summary– Interobserver Agreement SummaryInterobserver Agreement Summary
Better assessment can lead Better assessment can lead to improvements in to improvements in interventionintervention
Can give practitioners a focus for Can give practitioners a focus for their effortstheir efforts
Can help interventionists “see” Can help interventionists “see” when they’re making a differencewhen they’re making a difference
Can help practitioners know more Can help practitioners know more quickly when a change is necessaryquickly when a change is necessary
Can help directors understand when Can help directors understand when programs need improvementsprograms need improvements
SourcesSources Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., & Carta, J. J. (2002). Assessment of intervention Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., & Carta, J. J. (2002). Assessment of intervention
results with infants and toddlers IV. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), results with infants and toddlers IV. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Best Practices in School PsychologyPractices in School Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1230). Washington DC: National (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1230). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychology.Association of School Psychology.
Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Greenwood, C. R., Luze, G. J., Cline, G., Kuntz, S., & Leitschuh, C. (2002). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in movement for infants and Developing a general outcome measure of growth in movement for infants and toddlers. toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationTopics in Early Childhood Special Education..
Luze, G. J., Linebarger, D. L., Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, Luze, G. J., Linebarger, D. L., Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, C., & Atwater, J. B. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in C., & Atwater, J. B. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in expressive communication of infants and toddlers. expressive communication of infants and toddlers. School Psychology Review, School Psychology Review, 30(330(3), 383-406.), 383-406.
McConnell, S. R. (2000). Assessment in early intervention and early childhood McConnell, S. R. (2000). Assessment in early intervention and early childhood special education: Building on the past to project into the future. special education: Building on the past to project into the future. Topics in Early Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20Childhood Special Education, 20, 43-48., 43-48.
McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas, & J. in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV.Best practices in school psychology IV. (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1230). (Vol. 2, pp. 1219-1230). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychology.Washington DC: National Association of School Psychology.
Priest, J. S., McConnell, S. R., Walker, D., Carta, J. J., Kaminski, R. A., McEvoy, M. Priest, J. S., McConnell, S. R., Walker, D., Carta, J. J., Kaminski, R. A., McEvoy, M. A., Good, R. H., III, Greenwood, C. R., & Shinn, M. R. (2001). General growth A., Good, R. H., III, Greenwood, C. R., & Shinn, M. R. (2001). General growth outcomes for children: Developing a foundation for continuous progress outcomes for children: Developing a foundation for continuous progress measurement. measurement. Journal of Early Intervention, 24 (3), Journal of Early Intervention, 24 (3), 163-180163-180..
Carta, J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Kaminski, R., Good, R., McConnell, S. R., & McEvoy, M. (2002). Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs): Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs): Assessment that guides intervention for young children. In M. Ostrosky & E. Horn Assessment that guides intervention for young children. In M. Ostrosky & E. Horn (Eds.). (Eds.). Assessment: Gathering meaningful information. The Young Exceptional Assessment: Gathering meaningful information. The Young Exceptional Children Monograph SeriesChildren Monograph Series #4. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. #4. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.