16
Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua Observations Kuan-Man Xu NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, USA What are the relative roles of small and large convective cloud clusters during the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) life cycle? How are the size distributions of convective cloud clusters changed during the MJO life cycle? How much are physical properties changed from one MJO phase to another? 6/10/2016 Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO 1 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160007454 2020-07-12T13:55:44+00:00Z

Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Background Noises versus IntraseasonalVariation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective

Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua Observations

Kuan-Man Xu

NASA Langley Research Center

Hampton, VA, USA

What are the relative roles of small and large convective cloud clusters duringthe Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) life cycle?

• How are the size distributions of convective cloud clusters changed duringthe MJO life cycle?

• How much are physical properties changed from one MJO phase toanother?

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

1

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160007454 2020-07-12T13:55:44+00:00Z

Page 2: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) Life Cycle

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

2

Convective cloud clusters are organized into varioussizes and highly variables during the MJO life cycle.

Our hypothesis is that the largest ones contribute tothe intraseasonal variations while the small ones arejust the background noises.

Page 3: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Tropical cloud cluster sizes (Chen et al. 1996)

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

3Eq

uiv

. clu

ster

rad

ius

(km

)

235K

220K

195K208K

with brightness Temp. < 208 K

Dec 24, 1992, 11:30 GMT Dec 25, 1992, 11:30 GMT

Page 4: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Cloud object methodology

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

4

A contiguous patch of cloudy regions

with a single dominant cloud-system

type; no mixture of different cloud-

system types

The shape and size of a cloud object is

determined by

the satellite footprint data

the footprint selection criteria

The identified cloud objects of different

types can be further categorized by the

large-scale atmospheric conditions

based on the Madden-Julian Oscillation

(MJO) index in this study

Wielick and Welch (1986)

Xu et al. (2005, 2007, 2008); CERES level-2 data

Page 5: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Cloud object selection criteria for different cloud regimes

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

5

Xu, K.-M., et al. (2015): Cloud Object Analysis of CERES Aqua Observations of Tropical and Subtropical Cloud Regimes. Part I: Four-year Climatology. J. Climate (conditionally accepted)

Page 6: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Climatology (4 yr) of low- and upper-level cloud object areas

Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

6

Cu, Sc and Oc cloud typesoccur at preferred locations

Cumulus over open ocean Overcast near the coasts Rarely over ITCZ regions

or land

Only cirrostratus (t < 10;overcast) is abundant

They are associated withdeep convection

Deep convection occursover ITCZ and SPCZ; andless frequently over land

This Study

Page 7: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Data sets used in the analysis

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

7

Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Single Scanner Footprints (SSF)1. Four year data on Aqua: July 2006 – June 20102. 25S to 25N latitudinal band only 3. Deep convective and cirrostratus types only

Real-time Multivariate MJO (RMM) index (combined EOFs of u850, u200 and OLR)1. The days with amplitudes of (RMM12+RMM22)1/2 > 1 are used; 934 (out of 1461)

days2. All frequencies of occurrence shown later are normalized by 116.75 days

020406080

100120140160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

MJO phase

Nu

mb

er o

f d

ays

Page 8: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Areal coverage of DC and cirrostratus cloud objects

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

8

Color bar denotes number of footprints per 5x5 grid mesh; ~ 0-20% areal coverage

Page 9: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Size distributions of DC and cirrostratus cloud objects

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

9

1. Very different size distributions between DC and cirrostratus cloud objects2. The size distributions are similar for objects smaller than medium sizes for all phases3. Phases 3-6 show more frequent appearance of the largest cloud objects

Page 10: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Size distribution changes for small & large cloud objects

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

10

-20

0

20

40

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

MJO phase

Change in Diameter (km)

DC CS

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Relat ive changes in footprint numbers

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Relat ive changes (%) in number of objectsDC-S

DC-L

CS-S

CS-L

Page 11: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

11Variations of cloud and radiative properties--all MJO phases

Instead of the entire PDFs for each phase, we will show the deviations of PDF from the all-phase PDFs to examine the variations with the MJO phase.

Deep convective Cirrostratus

Page 12: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Deep convective cloud object properties, I: SST, OLR, Ht

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

12

Large Small

Page 13: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Deep convective cloud object properties, II: Optical props

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

13

Large Small

Page 14: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Cirrostratus cloud object properties, I: SST, OLR, Ht

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

14

Large Small

Page 15: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Cirrostratus cloud object properties, II: Optical properties

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

15

Large Small

Page 16: Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals ... · Background Noises versus Intraseasonal Variation Signals: Small vs. Large Convective Cloud Objects from CERES Aqua

Summary

Q: What are the relative roles of small and large convective cloudclusters during the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) life cycle?

• How are the size distributions of convective cloud clusters changedduring the MJO life cycle?

• How much are physical properties changed from one MJO phase toanother?

The contrasts between the suppressed and active phases are not as pronounced as previously thought (MJO schematics); e.g., there is abundant deep convection during the depressed phases in regions outside of the Indian-maritime Continent.

There is almost no variation in the size distributions in the small ranges, but large variations in the large ranges, from one MJO phase to another.

The frequency of occurrence for the large cloud objects changes with MJO phase strongly; ~20-30% range & phase lag between deep convective and cirrostratus; increased mean cloud object diameters during the mature phases.

Although changes in the properties within each cloud type with the MJO phase are relatively small (i.e., compared to all-phase differences between the large and small sizes), those associated with the large-size cloud objects are marginally greater than those of the small-size cloud objects.

6/10/2016Cloud Regimes within a Composite MJO

16