56
BA105: BA105: Organizational Organizational Behavior Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion Week 6: Discussion

BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

BA105: BA105: Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Behavior

Professor Jim LincolnProfessor Jim Lincoln

Week 6: DiscussionWeek 6: Discussion

Page 2: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

2

The nature of culture

Fuzzy, ephemeral, intuitive• “No one can define the HP way. If it weren’t fuzzy,

it would be a rule” (HP Vice President)

– Emotional, charismatic, spiritual • Takes “emotional intelligence” to navigate

– Holistic and enveloping

Page 3: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

3

The Berkeley Way

“It's invisible but omnipresent. Most know it exists but few can actually define it. Newcomers are perplexed by it. Confronting it head on can be dangerous.”

“The name of this nebulous creature? It's known on campus as "The Berkeley Way" -- an unwritten code of conduct that governs how people go about their business.”

The Berkeleyan, February 16, 2000

Page 4: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

4

Where did the concept of organization culture come from?

• Discovery of Japanese management in 80’s– William Ouchi: Theory Z.– Peters and Waterman: In Search of Excellence– Richard Pascale and Anthony Athos: The Art of

Japanese Management.– Ezra Vogel: Japan as No. 1.– James Abegglen and George Stalk: Kaisha

Page 5: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

5

What is culture?• Shared values, norms, beliefs/understandings

– Manifested in:• Ritual, ceremony, tradition

• Folklore, heroes, legends, stories

– Channeled through:• Informal networks

• Logos, slogans, PR, advertising, annual reports, websites

Page 6: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

6

Southwest Airlines’ Values

Value 1: Work should be fun…it can be play…enjoy it

Value 2: Work is important…don’t spoil it with seriousness

Value 3: People are important…each one makes a difference.

It used to be a business conundrum: “Who comes first? The employees, customers, or shareholders?” That’s never been an issue to me. The employees come first. If they’re happy, satisfied, dedicated, and energetic, they’ll take real good care of the customers. When the customers are happy, they come back. And that make the shareholders happy.”

Herb Kelleher

Page 7: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

7

Cisco’s core values

• Dedication to customer success

• Innovation and learning

• Partnerships

• Teamwork

• Doing more with less

Page 8: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

8

How the culture paradox works:strong values motivation

‘`Most businesses focus all the time on profits, profits, profits…I have to say I think that is deeply boring. I want to create an electricity and passion that bonds people to the company. You can educate people by their passions, especially young people You have to find ways to grab their imagination. You want them to feel that they are doing something important.. I’d never get that kind of motivation if we were just selling shampoo and body lotion.”

– Anita Roddick, founder of The Body Shop

Page 9: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

9

Kyocera:“Respect the divine and respect people”

“Our goal is to strive toward both the material and spiritual fulfillment of all employees in the Company, and through this successful fulfillment, serve mankind in its progress and prosperity. We are scientists constantly directing our efforts toward perfecting our technology. But we must not forget that complete process of living requires devotion to humanity as well as to science, to the emotional as with the rational, and to love equally with reason. Just as a family unites in a common bond of support and affection, let us all unite in a bond of love and respect.”

Page 10: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

10

Is making money a value?

The culture paradox:– An organization whose core values transcend making

money will make the most money

“Profits are to a corporation much like breathing is to life. Breathing is not the goal of life, but without breath, life ends. Similarly, without turning a profit, a corporation, too, will cease to exist.”

Dennis Bakke, CEO, AES Corporation

Page 11: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

11

Other core organizational values

• Customer service (IBM, Nordstrom)

• Innovation, creativity (3M, Intel, HP)

• Competitiveness, aggressiveness (GE, Motorola, Pepsi)

• Social responsibility (Ben and Jerry’s; Levi’s; The Body Shop; Working Assets)

• Quality (Japanese companies; Ford?)

Page 12: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

12

Strong vs. weak cultures

– Strong: Consistent, persistent, intense, shared, crystallized, consensual, consequential

– Weak: Vague, fragmented, inconsistent, transitory, politicized, conflictual

Page 13: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

13

Dimensions of culture strength

Complacent

“country club” culture

Strong, organization-wide culture

Absence of culture

(anomie)

Subcultures

IntensityS

har

ing

Page 14: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

14

Subcultures

• Around departments, occupations, divisions, demographics

• Source of in-group cohesion, out-group competition, conflict, and politics

• Is the overall organization culture strong enough to subsume subcultures?

Page 15: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

15

Page 16: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

16

Strong culture companies as cults, tribes, cloisters, churches, the military What do the Branch Davidians and Microsoft have

in common? Give up? Both organizations are cults. No joke. The only difference is one is religious (Davidians), while the other (Microsoft) is corporate. So says David Arnott, author of Corporate Cults: The Insidious Lure of the All-Consuming Organization (AMACOM).

Both are classified as cults because the members

of these organizations are cut off from the real world and are obsessed with achieving the mission of their leaders. For the Davidians, it was the charismatic David Koresh; for Microsoft, it's the world's richest man, Bill Gates.

Bob Weinstein, March 5, 2000

Page 17: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

17

Apple as tribe

“Apple is a lot like a tribe, with folklore handed down from generation to generation. The question is how can we channel it? We are trying to shift away from folk heroes and individualism in the organization, but we have selected people for this in the past, and we don’t punish that kind of behavior. 

--Apple executive

Page 18: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

18

The church of IBM"IBM, more than any other big company, has institutionalized its beliefs the way a church does. They are expounded in numerous IBM internal publications to ensure that employees know what's expected of them. And they are reflected in codes of behavior…(S)alespersons wear dark business suits and white shirts; that's no longer a strict regulation but most IBM salesmen continue to dress that way

....the result is a company filled with ardent believers..

The IBM culture is so pervasive that, as one nine-year former employee put it, 'leaving the company is like emigrating."

Secrecy is one of IBM's hallmarks. One IBM watcher told Tim, if you understand the Marines, you can understand IBM."

Page 19: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

19

What does culture do? It provides:

• Motivation and commitment

• Vision and direction

• Coordination and alignment

• Ease of communication

Page 20: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

20

Engineer-ing

Manufac-turing

Marketing

General Manager

Product A Culture

Culture may align and coordinate functional, product, or regional divisions

Page 21: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

21

Can culture help the bottom line?

• Lower cost– Fewer formal control systems

• Better quality/productivity/customer service• Culture as branding

– Apple, Southwest, Saturn, Japanese firms

• Culture as sustainable competitive advantage– Hard-to-imitate capabilities

Page 22: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

22

Culture as Honda’s (Sony’s) competitive advantage and Toyota’s (Matsushita’s) competitive disadvantage

Honda executives say Toyota's aggressive moves don't concern them, arguing that their giant rival will have difficulty emulating Honda's unique culture. "All Toyota is doing is aping us and letting their money talk," says Ken Hashimoto, a senior Honda R&D executive.

Some of Honda's fears are already playing out. Toyota, in spite of its

often-ridiculed "country boy" image, has been proving that it can successfully woo young car buyers, thanks to designers such as Takao Minai. Mr. Minai languished for a long time in Toyota's hierarchical culture but had a sudden leap in responsibilities two years ago. Under Mr. Okuda's guidance, the ponytailed 36-year-old amateur video jockey took charge of developing a dream car for male twentysomethings. Based on a sketch by another young designer, the 11-member team designed a small car shaped like a really clunky box. Toyota dubbed it "bB," short for black Box.

Page 23: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

23

Are there downsides to strong culture?

• Rigidity/inertia

• Homogeneity

• Overconformity

• Narrowness/intolerance/xenophobia

• Extremism/obsessiveness

• Provincialism/insularity

• Goal displacement; ends-means inversion

Page 24: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

24

SAS Institute

“Some people say that SAS Institute reeks of paternalism or a plantation mentality in a world otherwise dominated by marketlike labor market transactions. For instance, an article in Forbes stated, “More than one observer calls James Goodnight’s SAS Institute, Inc., “the Stepford software company” after the movie The Stepford Wives. In the movie people were almost robotlike in their behavior, apparently under the control of some outside force. Another article noted “The place can come across as being a bit too perfect, as if working there might mean surrendering some of your personality.”

O’Reilly and Pfeffer: Hidden Value.

Page 25: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

25

Strong culture spells homogeneity at P&G

Few corporate cultures are as dominant as the "Procter Way." "It's such a strong culture, they really want sameness," says Ms. Beck, who later worked as a brand manager for Dunkin Donuts and as a vice president for Burger King. "The way women think and the way we do business has some inherently different qualities to it," Ms. Beck says. "In retrospect, there was a gender aspect to [P&G's culture] that was not intentional, but was very, very real.“

WSJ, 9/9/98

Page 26: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

26

“…at one point product features became the religion, not the vision. This drove prices up and closed out individuals (as customers).

--Apple executive

Page 27: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

27

Enron’s “culture of corruption” or the absence of culture?

The report (by three Enron non-executive directors) into the collapse of Enron, once one of America's top ten public companies, confirmed outsiders' suspicions about how badly the firm was run. The management’s aims, the directors concluded, were to minimise taxes, maximise apparent profits and, in some cases, to line their own pockets. The directors' report was described by Senator Byron Dorgan, who is leading another investigation into the company’s collapse, as “devastating”, adding that “this is almost a culture of corporate corruption.”

--The Economist, 2/12/02

Page 28: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

28

The critique of 1950’s corporate culture: Overconformity and alienation

• William H. Whyte’s The Organization Man

(Doubleday, 1956)

• The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit

(20th Century Fox, 1956)

Page 29: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

29

The Organization Man(A)s more and more lives have been encompassed by the

organization way of life, the pressures for an accompanying ideological shift have been mounting. The pressures of the group, the frustrations of individual creativity, the anonymity of achievement: are these defects to struggle against--or are they virtues in disguise? The organization man seeks a redemption of his place on earth--a faith that will satisfy him that what he must endure has a deeper meaning than appears on the surface. He needs, in short, something that will do for him what the Protestant Ethic did once. And slowly, almost imperceptibly, a body of thought has been coalescing that does that.

(I)t could be called an organization ethic, or a bureaucratic ethic; more than anything else it rationalizes the organization's demands for fealty and gives those who offer it wholeheartedly a sense of dedication in doing so--in extremis, you might say, it converts what would seem in other times a bill of no rights into a restatement of individualism.

But there is a real moral imperative behind it, and whether one inclines to its beliefs or not he must acknowledge that this moral basis, not mere expediency, is the source of its power. Nor is it simply an opiate for those who must work in big organizations. The search for a secular faith that it represents can be found throughout our society--and among those who swear they would never set foot in a corporation or a government bureau.

Page 30: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

30

Class business: exams next week

• Essay (Tuesday, March 2)– Exam case: People Express (in reader)– You will analyze a case (announced Thursday)

that deals with structure, culture, and leadership• One or more exam questions will guide your

analysis

– Two example exams are now on the website – Bring bluebooks

Page 31: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

31

• Objective: Thursday, March 4– 25-30 true-false, multiple-choice questions over

required reading, lecture, and discussion material

• I will hold extended office hours on Thursday (3:30-5:30) and Friday (12-3PM).

Page 32: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

32

Class business: Agenda

• Team project proposal due• Lecture loose ends• Mary Kay video• Body Shop case

– What is the culture of the Body Shop and where did it come from?

– How (and how effectively) did TBS manage its culture? – Was the Body Shop’s penchant for modelling itself on the

opposite of standard cosmetic industry practice a matter of core values or smart business strategy?

– Is the story of the Body Shop chiefly one of culture or one of leadership?

• Discuss upcoming exams

Page 33: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

33

Evaluation

The essay exams will be evaluated approximately as follows:

– Grasp & use of case issues and details: 30 %

– Analysis and creativity: 30 %– Logic and coherence; writing: 10 %– Application of course materials: 30 %

Page 34: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

34

Preparing for essay examUse congruence model as problem-solving framework:

– Analyze problems. Examine: • Immediate causes • Prior causes• Interactions of causes

Note: a “problem” can be sustaining success

– Solve problems by applying OB levers: Structure, culture, leadership – Consider:

• Alignment/congruence issues. Fit to:– Other levers (tasks, HR systems.)– Environment– Strategy

Note: CHANGE may require temporary misalignment

– Propose solutions that are:

• Feasible• Avoid negative spillovers; unintended consequences

Page 35: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

35

Strategy (diversification; innovation)

Input

Environment(Competition, change)

Resources(munificence)

History (age, conditions at founding)

OutputSystems

Unit

Individual

InformalOrganization

(Culture, leadership, networks, politics)

Tasks (technologies, work flows)

People(ability, skills, motivation, biases)

FormalOrganization

(job titles, departments,

reporting hierarchy, IT & HR systems

Organizational Design

Page 36: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

36

Managing & changing culture:

Step I: Study it • Be culturally savvy (vs. clueless): pay attention

• Do a culture audit:– Find key informants

• oral histories with tribal elders• map genealogies• learn folklore

– Be a “fly on the wall”• Ethnography & participant observation

– Study texts• Annual reports, websites, advertising

– Do value surveys

Page 37: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

37

Step II: understand its causes • Leader/founder

– Family ownership• Long history

– P&G• Society

– Asia/Europe• Region

– Northern California/Manhattan/South– community– Small town vs. big city

• Amana, Cummins, Corning, Chase, Citibank

• Product– Apple, Coke

• Industry– High tech/railroads/advertising

• Structure – Functional/divisional; mechanistic/organic

Page 38: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

38

Step III: Align/realign the organization

– People– Formal organization

• Structure

• Information/incentive systems

– Strategy

Page 39: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

39

Apple’s product-driven culture

“Here’s the most interesting thing about our culture-- we are what we make. I’ve never seen an organization where the personality of the organization is so intertwined with the personality of the product--individualistic, pure, uncompromised, ahead of everyone else, so elegant it can’t fail. We are the Macintosh here.”

Apple Marketing Manager

Page 40: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

40

Aligning people

• Selection and socialization (buy or make)

• First, selection:– Select for fit or “misfit” to the culture

• Intensive screening

Page 41: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

41

Selection at Microsoft

In 1999, the average age of the more than 31,000 Microsoft employees was only 34, and raw intelligence matters more than judgment or experience in determining who gets hired. Craig Mundie, senior vice president for consumer strategy, described Microsoft "as a company full of a lot of high IQ people who have relatively no experience."

Page 42: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

42

Selection at Apple

Sculley came to a company renowned for its exciting and countercultural work environment, where employees often wore T-shirts that proclaimed “working 90 hours a week and loving it.” Sculley described apple as “the Ellis Island of American business because it intentionally attracted the dissidents who wouldn’t fit into corporate America.”

Harvard Business School Press

Page 43: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

43

Selecting for “bad fit” at HP(Wall Street Journal interview with former CEO Lew Platt)

WSJ: Did you feel constrained running a company that had legendary founders and a culture enshrined in a book?

Platt: A little bit. There were certain constraints. There were certain traditions they wanted upheld.

WSJ: Give me an example.Platt: They were very conservative -- heavy investment in R&D, little debt. I was

asked not to question those things.WSJ: Ms. Fiorina is a woman, a nonengineer and an outsider -- all firsts for H-P.

What should we read into that?Platt: They wanted someone who could bring change, someone with a higher

visibility. Most H-P people are pretty low-key. David [Packard] and Bill [Hewlett] were that way. I'm that way. Carly comes in without some of those constraints. She will question some of the thinking that I, as a 33-year employee, couldn't.

Page 44: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

44

Aligning people

• Socialization– Focus on firm-specific values and tacit skills– Invest heavily in training, including OJT– Mentoring– Participation– Rites of passage

• “Humiliating-inducing experiences”

Page 45: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

45

Selection and socialization at P&G

Job candidates must pass a battery of tests measuring aptitude and leadership skills. Once hired, employees are schooled in all things Procter, even attending training seminars known as P&G College. Memos, written in a distinct P&G style, are valued over meetings. Employees are expected to have facts and data at their fingertips -- opinions and intuition are frowned upon.

Juelene Beck, who worked as P&G beverage brand assistant

from 1984 to 1986, says supervisors once questioned whether a trendy haircut and suit were "appropriate" for P&G. During performance reviews, she says, she was asked why she preferred sailing to socializing with co-workers.

Page 46: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

46

Cultural integration of acquisitions through mentoring at Cisco

“Cisco’s acquisition identification process emphasizes cultural compatibility…Cultural integration includes the use of integration teams who explain and model Cisco’s values, the holding of orientation sessions, and the assignment of ‘buddies.” The buddy system involves pairing each new employee with a seasoned Cisco veteran of equal stature and similar job responsibility. The buddy offers personalized attention better suited to conveying the Cisco values and culture.”

O’Reilly and Pfeffer, Hidden Value

Page 47: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

47

Hell Camp: Extreme resocialization

“Founded nine years ago in the foothills of Mt. Fuji, Hell Camp claims to have subjected some 100,000 Japanese salarymen to 13 days of speed drills, speechifying and hazing rituals. Its main message-- “100 liters of sweat; 100 liters of tears” was designed to counteract a growing fear among Japan’s corporate and government elite that the nation’s workers are becoming too “Americanized”, too soft. The school’s solution, for nearly $3000 a pop: to crush the individual ego with mindless and humiliating exercises and then rebuild it with a modern version of the Samurai code of selfless servitude called bushido.”

“Japanese-style camp for managers is lost in translation in U. S.: Hazing rituals and obeisance don’t make it in Malibu even among freeloaders. WSJ, March 1, 1988.

Page 48: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

48

(Re)Align the organization

– Structure

Page 49: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

49

Ford: Changing culture by restructuring

Since the hard-charging 51-year-old executive took over in January (1999), he has picked up the whole organization by the lapels and shaken it. His goal? To reinvent the 96-year-old industrial giant as a nimble, growth-oriented consumer powerhouse for the 21st century, when a handful of auto giants will battle across the globe.

That's why Nasser has declared war on Ford's stodgy, overly analytic culture. In its place, he envisions a company in which executives run independent units--cut loose from a stifling bureaucracy and held far more accountable for success and failure. And with a consumer focus at the heart of his retooled Ford, he's banking on a future in which designers, engineers, and marketers someday will do a far better job of anticipating the wants and needs of car buyers.

Page 50: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

50

HP: Too much culture –structure alignment David Packard and his co-founder Bill Hewlett gave their

company a strong corporate culture, the “HP way”—based on how they had done business from the one-car garage where the company was born in 1939. In order not to lose the entrepreneurial spirit of a small firm, they created a new “product group” whenever an existing one grew too big.

By the 1990s, this philosophy and structure had become drawbacks. The HP way had become a recipe for inward focus and bureaucratic paralysis. The company had become a collection of 130 independent product groups that tried harder to meet their own financial targets than to find any common thread. It was no surprise, then, that HP was late to the Internet party—even though it had the technology in its labs. While Sun Microsystems and IBM were busy marketing themselves as dot.com revolutionaries, HP was still focusing on hardware. Worse, it underinvested in the Unix operating system, which has become an e-commerce workhorse, focusing instead on Windows NT.

Page 51: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

51

Carly Fiorina’s culture-structure realignment at HP

Most dramatically, she launched a plan to consolidate H-P's 83 businesses into only 12. She also aligned the reduced number of divisions into two "front-end" groups that would focus on customer activities, such as marketing and sales, and two "back-end" organizations devoted strictly to designing and making computer and printer products.

Old-time H-P executives were shocked. "I was a deer caught in the headlights when she described the front and back end," says Carolyn Ticknor, who now presides over the merged printer unit. Several of these executives protested that employees weren't ready for a major reorganization.

Some executives fretted that managers wouldn't wield "real" authority if they couldn't control both product development and marketing. "It took some of the glory, if you wish, out of the job," says Mr. Perez, the departed executive.

Consternation rippled through the ranks. Managers who had long aspired to run their own autonomous units, known as P&Ls, short for profit & loss, suddenly saw most of those jobs disappear.

WSJ, 8/22/2000

Page 52: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

52

Changing the symbolism of structure

• Southwest– People Department– Culture Committee

• Executive ranks at Chumbo Corp.– Grand Pooh-Bah– Web Goddess– Director of Something

Page 53: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

53

(Re)align the organization

– HR systems• Career design• Long-term employment• Job rotation• Compensation design

– Reward group & long-term performance– Reward conformity with core values

» Innovators head new product divisions at 3M and HP

– Maintain equity, keep inequality low

Page 54: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

54

Aligning rewards at Cisco

“Chambers is adamant about rewards being tied to customer satisfaction. He ties the compensation of all managers to measures of customer satisfaction– really listening to the customer. “We are the only company of anywhere near this size that does it.”

O’Reilly and Pfeffer: Hidden Value

Page 55: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

55

Excessive culture-HR alignment at Penney’s

To alter such deep-bred customer perceptions (that Penney’s clothes are unfashionable) would require a feat of Herculean proportions, but Penney's, with a notoriously insular corporate culture, is averse to itinerant, superhero types. Of the company's top managers above the senior vice president level, only two have not spent their entire careers there.

"The norm is to be there your whole career, several are even second generation," said Lucille Klein, who left as fashion director of Penney's women's division three years ago, but still consults with the company. "It leads to tunnel vision, like the Penney's way of doing things is the only way."

Page 56: BA105: Organizational Behavior Professor Jim Lincoln Week 6: Discussion

56

Culture takeaways

• Culture is an extremely powerful force in every organization– It can lead to either success or to failure

• Culture may be “soft” but it can be managed and changed– It does take time, commitment, and consistency