Upload
joan-brooks
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BHCG MONITORING AFTER SINGLE DOSE METHOTREXATE TREATMENT OF TUBAL ECTOPIC PREGNANCY : IS THE DAY 4 BHCG NECESSARY? A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Dr Monique Atkinson, Dr Sarika Gupta, Dr Therese McGee
Westmead Hospital
BACKGROUND
Observing a minimum 15% fall in bHCG between Day 4-7 is the most commonly employed monitoring regime overall success rate with one dose is 70-75% Success improves to 90% with 2 doses but only
15-20% of women require a second dose
THE QUESTION IS.....
Why perform the Day 4 blood test if no decisions to
give a second dose of MTX are made until Day 7?
Is there an alternative?
UpToDate says a 25% fall in bHCG Day 1-7is as good as 15% fall Day 4-7 in predicting theneed for additional doses of MTX
Would be great if it were true, but is it?
Truthfully, no data exists (even in UpToDate) toevaluate this
So we decided to investigate.....
THE ANSWER IS.....
AIMS
To determine the optimal monitoring regime after single dose methotrexate therapy in tubal ectopic pregnancy management
Compare traditional monitoring regimen (i.e. 15% fall bHCG day 4-7 after treatment) with other regimens previously described in the literature 25% fall bHCG day 0/1-7 Any fall bHCG day 0/1-4 20% fall bHCG day 0/1-4 Any fall bHCG day 0/1-7 (a novel regimen
proposed by Westmead Hospital)
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study
Data collected on all women who received MTX in EPAC from 1st January 2010-15th October 2013 based on pharmacy records
Medical file and hospital electronic results were reviewed
METHODS
Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria
• US diagnosed EP• Pre treatment bHCG <6000 IU/L
• Pregnancy of unknown location (PUL)• Missing critical bHCG levels • Women whose EP may reasonably have resolved with expectant management*
*bHCG fallen by >10% prior to therapy OR *Solitary low bHCG <1000 IU/L prior to MTX administration with no plateau or rise in level
METHODS
Note...
Prior to August 2012 day of administration at our institution was designated Day 0
Thereafter it was designated Day 1 in keeping with most published regimens
This degree of variation in nomenclature of the day of administration exists in the literature, hence both groups of women were included in our analysis
METHODS
What we reviewed
bHCG on Day 0/1, Day 4, Day 7
Other bloods pre-treatment and Day 7 Hemoglobin Platelets Neutrophils liver function tests
METHODS
Study Outcomes
*EP resolved without requiring surgical intervention
EP resolved with either one or two doses of MTX
1. Incidence of treatment success* for each regime
2. Comparison of treatment success incidence between regimes
3. Ability of each regime to appropriately select women for second doses of MTX
RESULTS
Pharmacy records identified 142 eligible files After exclusions (mostly PULs), 88 files
remained for review In terms of methotrexate administration
55 women were designated Day 0 33 women were designated Day 1
In terms of follow up bloods 80 were collected on Day 4/7 8 were collected +/- 1 day either side
RESULTS
Outcome 1: Incidence of treatment success 92% of all cases (n=81/88) resolved without
surgery
8% (7/88) progressed to surgery 1 case of significant hemoperitoneum (tubal rupture Day
17)
6 cases with no rupture or significant hemoperitonem Indications for surgery: rising bHCG (2), severe pain after 2
doses MTX, anxiety (2), mis-diagnosis (E Coli pyelopehritis)
Complications No cases of clinically significant toxicity 6/88 (7%) had >2 x elevations in LFTs, all
spontaneously resolved
FIRSTLY
All regimens appropriately predict cases that don’t
require surgery (positive predictive value) andcorrectly identify those women who require
surgery(specificity)
SECONDLY
Some regimes overselected women forsecond doses of MTX including:
Day 0/1-7 25% fall (yes, the UpToDate one) Day 0/1-4 falls (any fall and 20% fall)
Any fall Day 0/1-7 and 15% fall Day 4-7 regimes
are significantly more selective so that fewerwomen need additional MTX
BUT
The novel regime ‘any fall bHCG between Day 0/1-7’ effectively predicts treatment
successand avoids the extra blood test on Day 4
So we propose it gets a gold medal.
WHY YOU SHOULD BELIEVE US
Study strengths Large sample size (other studies only 40-50
persons) Only US proven ectopics with plateaued or rising
bHCG were included
Study limitations Retrospective analysis (can’t measure pt anxiety) Using surgery as an endpoint to define treatment
success can be problematic as some indications for surgery vary between institutions such as patient anxiety and consultant response to borderline bHCG reductions
CONCLUSION
All regimes have good PPV (predict surgery avoidance) and specificity (don’t miss the need for surgery)
Some regimes overselect women for 2nd dose MTX
Of the two best regimes that correctly select women for surgery without overselecting them for additional doses of MTX, the Day 0-7 regime provides convenience and cost advantages by eliminating the need for Day 4 bHCG testing
REFERENCES ACOG Practice Bulletin. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. American College ofObstetricans and Gynecologists. PB No. 94, June 2008. Agostini A, Blanc K, Ronda I, Romain F, Capelle M, Blanc, B. Prognostic value of human chorionic gonadotropin changes aftermethotrexate injection for ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(2):504-506. Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R and Sammel M. The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing ‘singledose’ and ‘multidose’ regimens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:778-84. Barnhart K, van Mello NM, Bourne T, Kirk E, Van Calster B, Bottomley C, Chung K, Condous G, Goldstein S, Hajenius PJ, Mol BW, Molinaro T, O’Flynn O’Brien KL, Husicka R, Sammel M, Timmerman D. Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement ofnomenclature, definitions and outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95(3):857-866. Kirk E, Condous G, Van Calster B, Haider Z, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, Bourne T. A validation of the most commonly used protocol topredict the success of single-dose methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2007;22(3):858-863. Lipscomb
GH,Givens VM, Meyer NL, Bran D. Comparison of multidose and single-dose methotrexate protocols for the treatment of ectopic
pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1844-8. Lipscomb GH. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clinical Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):424-432. Murray H, Baakdah H,
BardellT, Tulandi T. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Canadian Med Assoc J. 2005;173(8):905-912. Nguyen Q, Kapitz M, Downes K, Silva C. Are early human chorionic gonadotropin levels after methotrexate therapy a predictor ofresponse in ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:630.e1-5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist. The management of tubal pregnancy. RCOG Green Top Guideline No. 21. 2010
Skubisz, M, Lee J, Wallace EM, Tong S. Decline in bHCG levels between days 0 and 4 after asingle dose of methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy predicts treatment success: a retrospectivecohort study. BJOG 2011;118:1665-1668.
Skubisz M, Dutton P, Duncan W, Horne A, Tong, S. Using a decline in serum hCG betweendays 0-4 to predict ectopic pregnancy treatment success after single-dose methotrexate: a retrospective
cohortstudy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;13:30. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Buster JE. Outpatient chemotherapy for unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1989Mar 51(3):435-8 Stovall TG, Ling FW, Gray LA. Single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol.1991 May;77(5):754-7. Stovall, T.G, Ling, F.W. Single-dose methotrexate: an expanded clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168 (6Pt 1):1759-1765. Tanaka T, Hayashi H, Kutsuzawa T, Fujimoto S, Ichinoe K. Treatment of interstitial ectopic pregnancy withmetho-trexate: report of a successful case. Fertil Steril 1982;37:851-852 Tulandi T. Methotrexate treatment of tubal and interstitial ectopic pregnancy. UpToDate (online) as accessedMarch 2012 until the present (February 2014).