29
B C Vincent Parrillo Strangers to These Shores Chapter Four Dominant-Minority Relations

B C Vincent Parrillo Strangers to These Shores Chapter Four Dominant-Minority Relations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

BC

Vincent ParrilloStrangers to These Shores

Chapter Four

Dominant-Minority Relations

BC

Minority-Group Responses

• Dominant and Minority Groups respond in a variety of way depending on:

• Prevailing cultural patterns

• Racial differences

• Ethnic differences

• Sociohistorical (time) period

BCMinority-Group Responses

• Depends on:

• Minority’s perception of its power resources– Determines the responses they make

• Responses include– Avoidance, … Deviance, … Defiance, …

Acceptance, … Negative self-image

BCAvoidance

• A way of dealing with discrimination, …a way to leave one’s problems behind

• Cluster into small sub-communities, … a miniature version of a familiar world– A safe place to live with others like them– Accused of being clannish– Accused of not wanting to assimilate into

American culture

BC

Avoidance Cont.

• Asian groups followed this example

• Clustered together in “China Towns”

• Limited residential choices

• Limited occupational choices– Not competitive with white Americans

• Other minorities who practiced avoidance– Blacks (African Americans), … Irish, …

Chinese, … Japanese, .. Mexican Americans, … consider Los Angeles, …

BCDeviance

• A discriminated group may find it difficult to identify with the core’s norms, values and culture.

• Shaw and McKay’s Social Disorganization Theory– Immigration & settlement in Chicago– Study of the city’s immigrants by generation– As immigrants assimilate they deviate less

BC

Deviance Cont.• American criminal justice system has been

subjective in handling violations by immigrants

• Disparities in fair and equal treatment of the poor compared to the upper classes

• Police likely to assume the poor and minorities are guilty

• Under-representation on juries, ..minorities• Disparities in affording legal services and

sentencing

BC

Defiance• A minority group may openly challenge to

eliminate discriminatory practices if:– They are sufficiently cohesive– Aware of its economic or political power

• Gain in structural assimilation– Re. Milton Gordon’s, Seven Stages of

Assimilation

• Defiance, by minority, may be violent or not– Riots of 1863, 1963, and 1992

BCAcceptance

• Minority’s may accept their situation, … accommodation– May be resentful, but accept their social

position

• Native Americans

• Blacks (African Americans)

• Mexicans (Chicanos)

• Japanese, … Relocation camps

• Jews

BC Consequences of Minority Group Status

• Negative Self-image– A common consequence of prejudice and

discrimination

• Difficult to remain optimistic and determined in the face of constant negative experiences, … interactions

• A function of social structure, … time, and:– Race, … Religion, … Ethnicity, … Gender, …

• Cooley’s “Looking Glass Self”

BCThe Vicious Circle (Cycle)

• The Vicious Circle• Gunnar Myrdal, … Cumulative Causation

– Prejudice and discrimination perpetuate each other

• The “Cycle:” A discriminatory action in job acquisition, … advancement, …– Discrimination

• Leads to a minority’s reaction, ..condition, poverty

• Reinforces prejudice of minority inferiority

BCVicious Circle Cont.

• Leads to justification of prejudice and more discrimination– Completes the circle and leads to continued

poverty and further discrimination

• If minorities are made welcome, they in turn will react in a positive manner

• If made unwelcome they will react in a negative manner

BC

Minority Group Marginality

• Robert E. Park: “Marginal Minorities”– A minority attempting to enter the

mainstream culture– Not gaining full acceptance by the core– No longer a full member of ethnic culture

• Causes the individual an great deal of strain– Confined to live between to cultures and not

a true member of either

BC

Marginality Cont.• Children of immigrants find themselves

caught between two worlds– A second and third generation phenomenon

• Marginality is an example of cultural conflict caused by a clash of cultural (ethnic) values

BCMiddleman Minorities

• Hubert Blalock: “Middleman Minorities”• The dominant core places middleman

minorities in an intermediate position between the lower and higher classes– They forge a mediating commerce link

between minorities and dominant core group

• Serve as a buffer groups between the two– Experience hostility from both the lower and

upper classes– Example: Koreans in Los Angeles

BC

Dominant Group Responses• Legislative Controls

• Laws to regulate and restrict immigration in favor of NW Europeans

• Restrictions on educational opportunities

• Restrictions of voting rights, to maintain political control (Blacks mainly)

• Other countries: South Africa (Apartheid), Australia (Restricted Asian Immigration)

BC

Segregation

• Spatial segregation: Physical separation of a minority from the rest of society, … a policy of containment

• Areas of separation:– Residential, … education, … public facilities, .

Occupations

• May be “institutionalized”

• May be overt of covert, de jure or defacto

BC

Segregation Cont.

• Social segregation: Involves confining participation in social, service, political, and other types of activities

• Dominant group excludes the outgroup from meaningful primary-group interaction– May be voluntary or involuntary, … mostly

involuntary

• Frequent interaction may lessen prejudice, but interaction is often severely controlled

BC

Expulsion

• To eject a minority group from a territory or country

• England, … Gypsies in the 16th century

• Spain, … The Moors in early 17th century

• British, … Acadians from Nova Scotia in the mid 18th century

• Americans, … Cherokee from Georgia in 1838, “The Trail of Tears”

BC

Xenophobia

• Def. The undue fear of, or contempt of strangers or foreigners

• Often reflected in print, speeches, sermons, legislation, and violent actions

• Examples in the United States– The Wild Irishman– The French radicals– Immigrants in general (except NW Europe)

• Related to Ethnocentrism

BCEthnocentrism

• One’s group is seen as the center of everything, others are defined negatively

• Encourages the creation of negative stereotypes, …in turn invites prejudice

• Results in discrimination

• Escalates to ongoing institutional discrimination

• Becomes a normal social behavior, … a part of the normative culture

BC

Annihilation

• The killing of all men, women, and children of a particular group

• Goes back to ancient times

• Examples in more recent times– The British, … the Tasmanians– The Portuguese in Brazil, … infected natives

with smallpox– Germans, … The Jewish holocaust– Others: … ?

BCHate Groups and Hate Crimes

• In the past, U.S., … the Know-Nothings• Mid-19th century and beyond, …Ku Klux

Klan• The rise of hate groups usually occurs in

times of economic stress• Florida contains the largest number of

hate group (48), … California (35)• Hate crimes: Criminal offense against a

person, .. “bias against,”…race, …religion, … sexual orientation, … ethnic group

BCExploitation

• Usually members of a dominant group exploit a subordinate (minority) group

• Power-differential Theory: S. Lieberson• Intergroup relations depend on the relative

power of the migrant and indigenous group

• Each group strives to maintain its own culture and institutions

• The “Dominant” group will control the interaction and the subordinate group

BC

Internal Colonialism Theory

• Robert Blauner: Integrated elements of caste, racism, ethnicity, culture, and economic exploitation into a single theory

• Theorized that the treatment of Native Americans, Blacks, and Mexicans resembled a colonial like relationship much like the European colonies of non-Western peoples– Not as a colony, but “internal colonialism”

BC

Internal Colonialism Cont.

• These groups were ghettoized into colonial like communities– Reservations, … Ghettos, … Barrios

• Their culture is transformed

• Their colony is controlled by external forces– Politically, … economically, … socially

• They are relegated to subordinate status

• Interactions reinforce exploitation

BC

Split-Labor Market Theory

• Edna Bonacich: Ethnic antagonism results from a combination of economic exploitation and economic competition– A wage differential for competing groups

• Ethnic antagonism is based not on ethnicity or race but on the conflict between higher-paid and lower-paid labor

• See Figure 4.3 for a summary

BC

Limitation to These Theories

• Power Differential Theory– Only offers one variable to explain conflicts

between dominant and subordinate groups

• Internal-Colonialism Theory– Applies to only three groups at best– It doesn't explain relations with other groups

• Split-Labor Market Theory– Doesn’t address other sources of conflict,

discrimination, and prejudice, … only wages

BC

Key terms• Annihilation• Avoidance• Cumulative causation• Defiance• Exploitation• Expulsion• Internal-Colonialism• Marginality

• Middleman Minorities• Negative Self-image• Paternalism• Power-differential• Social segregation• Spatial segregation• Split-labor-market• Vicious circle• Xenophobia