93
1 AXIAL-FLOW MACHINES further concepts Euler Turbine Equations Axial Flow Gas Turbines Axial Flow Compressors Losses / Zweifel Free-Vortex Flow Blade Stresses Re: Peng Ch. #8 & #7

Axial Flow Machines

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Axial Flow Machines

1

AXIAL-FLOW MACHINES further concepts Euler Turbine Equations Axial Flow Gas Turbines Axial Flow Compressors Losses / Zweifel Free-Vortex Flow Blade Stresses Re: Peng Ch. #8 & #7

Page 2: Axial Flow Machines

2

Axial Turbine Cascade Stator

Rotor

Stator

Page 3: Axial Flow Machines

3

TURBINE STAGE STATOR STAGE V1 W1 U ROTOR V2 W2 STATOR

Page 4: Axial Flow Machines

4

AXIAL TURBINE

W2 V1 V2 W1

100 percent reaction 0

U stator rotor

Page 5: Axial Flow Machines

5

TURBINE STAGE FLOW ANGLE TERMINOLOGY

ALPHA (α) ~ STATOR ANGLES BETA (β) ~ ROTOR ANGLES STATOR V1 W1 U ROTOR V2 W2 STATOR

Watch out for notation!

AXIAL DIRECTION

0o

Negative Positive Angle Angle

Page 6: Axial Flow Machines

6

Euler Turbine Equation(s) Torque

T = m ( VU1 r1 – VU2 r2) / gc Power W = m ( VU1U1 – VU2U2) / gc Energy per unit mass ΔE = W / m = ( VU1U1 – VU2U2 ) /gc

ΔE = Δh = change in specific enthalpy

Page 7: Axial Flow Machines

7

Right end: ‘free wheeling’ , runaway condition.

No torque on rotor….no power …no use. Left end: Lots of torque but rotor velocity goes to zero. Since power = torque x angular velocity = 0

Page 8: Axial Flow Machines

8

Parsons Turbines (RN = 50% )

each with φ = ½ V2 W2 V1 W1 U W2 V1 V2 W1 U

Page 9: Axial Flow Machines

9

MAXIMUM UTILIZATION Work per unit mass = W / m = U (VU1 - VU2 ) For maximum work per unit mass: VU2 = 0 i.e. V2 is in axial direction only

Page 10: Axial Flow Machines

10

MAXIMUM UTILIZATION

Work per unit mass = W / m = U (VU1 - VU2 ) W2 V1 W1 V2 = Vx U S R

Page 11: Axial Flow Machines

11

α V2 W2 V1 W1 U

MAXIMUM UTILIZATION AXIAL TURBINE (W/m) = 2U2 / gc V2 = Vx = Va = axial direction

cos α = 2U / V1

Page 12: Axial Flow Machines

12

EXAMPLE An axial-flow turbine has a mean diameter of 40 cm and a flow coefficient (φ = Va/U) of one-half. Flow enters the stator in the axial direction with a velocity of 50 m/s and exits the stator with a nozzle angle (α, measured between V1 and U) of 17 degrees. The fluid flows through the stage with constant axial velocity and produces an output torque of 1600 Nm.

a) Sketch the velocity vector diagram for this stage. b) Calculate the power output of the turbine stage.

c) What is the degree of reaction?

Page 13: Axial Flow Machines

13

V2 = 50 W2 V1 W1

α = 17o

U

Page 14: Axial Flow Machines

14

SOLVING FOR VELOCITY VECTORS: Φ= Va/U = ½ U = 100 m/s VU1 = 50 tan 73o = 164 m/s VU1 = 164 m/s WU1 = VU1 – U V1 = 171 m/s VU2 = 0 WU2 = U = 100 m/s W2 = 112 m/s W1 = 80.85 m/s EULER EQNS: Torque = m (VU1 R1 – VU2R2) m = 1600 / (164)(0.2) = 49 kg/s Power = m (VU1U1 – VU2U2) = (49)(164)(100) = 800 kW DEGREE OF REACTION: VU1 + VU2 R = 1 – = 1 – (163 + 0) / 2(100) = 0.28 = 28% 2U

Page 15: Axial Flow Machines

15

COMPRESSOR STAGE STATOR STAGE V1 W1 U ROTOR W2 V2 STATOR V1

Page 16: Axial Flow Machines

16

AXIAL COMPRESSOR

V1 V2 W1 W2

100 percent reaction 0

U stator rotor ~50% reaction, not a great design

Page 17: Axial Flow Machines

17

High Reaction Axial Compressor

V1 V2 W1 W2

100 percent reaction 0

U stator rotor

Page 18: Axial Flow Machines

18

Low reaction axial compressor

V2 W2

V1 V2 W1 W2

100 percent reaction 0

U stator rotor

Page 19: Axial Flow Machines

19

Turbine and Compressor Performance Unrecoverable Pressure Losses Allied Signal ASE120 Gas Turbine Engine Phoenix, AZ Designed for cogeneration, emergency power and mechanical drive. ~35% thermal efficiency ~10 MW m-dot~34kg/s Texhaust ~500oC Weight ~ 5,000 lb NOx ~ 10-25 ppm

Page 20: Axial Flow Machines

20

(NOT RELATED TO UNRECOVERABLE PRESSURE LOSSES LECTURE) ASE120 engine performance as a function of inlet air temperature Notice that maximum output power decreases about 50% when the air let increases from ~ -20C to +50C (~16,000hp to 8,000 hp)

Ou

tpu

t P

ow

er

(h

p)

-20 Inlet Air Temperature (oC) 50

Power

16,000

8,000

Page 21: Axial Flow Machines

21

Unrecoverable Pressure Losses

Profile drag (and fluid friction) across blades

Annular skin friction

Secondary drag / losses

Tip leakage

Seal leakage

Page 22: Axial Flow Machines

22

IDEAL TURBINE V2 V1 W2 W1 U S R

Page 23: Axial Flow Machines

23

∆CU Actual performance is always less than the ideal theoretical performance due to un-recoverable losses

IDEAL

ACTUAL

Page 24: Axial Flow Machines

24

Turbine Performance: Turbine Flow ~ Nozzle Flow Turbine performance follows the general behavior of ideal flow through a nozzle…Tot max delP ~ den x sq vel (Eqn W 2.12) Incompressible flow, conservation of energy-ss, no change in PE ∆P = Po – Pst = total – static = dynamic pressure Don’t forget gc when using USCS units. Notice the total maximum pressure drop ~ density x velocity2 Mass flow ~ flow area x rho x delP CD ~ discharge coefficient: correction coefficient for ‘real fluids’ with viscosity, friction losses. Usually empirically based, rooted in experiment.

∆P = ½ρC2 / gc

m = A 2ρ∆Pgc ½ CD

“discharge coefficient”

CD = ∑CD

Page 25: Axial Flow Machines

25

PROFILE DRAG ACROSS BLADES In addition to classic profile / skin friction drag….. VIBRATIONS: fluttering / vortex shedding

esp. problem w/ thin blades…fans, some compressors

2FD CD = ρV2A

Page 26: Axial Flow Machines

26

Flow Separation over Compressor Rotor Blades FLOW High Reaction Low Reaction (no separation) (separated flow)

Separation leads to COMPRESSOR LOSSES STALL …losses in efficiency. Separation leads to losses in pressure, enthalpy It is very complicated to accurately predict the conditions in which B.L separation occurs. Therefore, empirically-based ‘rules-of-thumb’ have been developed. As we’ll see, flow separation can be minimized with a ‘cascade’ of blades…..i.e. form flow passages

Page 27: Axial Flow Machines

27

ANNULAR SKIN FRICTION LOSS s = spacing Due to boundary layer formation within the annular flow passage. Empirical correlation.

h

CD’ ~ 0.02 (s/h)

Page 28: Axial Flow Machines

28

SECONDARY DRAG / LOSSES End wall boundary layers are convected inward along the suction side of the blades. Secondary currents are set up in a plane transverse to the flow, dissipating energy. Results in un-favorable flow redistribution, competing vortices, and loss in stagnation pressure. Can be a significant fraction of total P-loss. These currents also take place in the wake regions down stream from the trailing edges of the blades.

Page 29: Axial Flow Machines

29

Secondary Flow in Blade Passages

The constant 0.018 stems from a complex relationship between flow acceleration, aspect ratio (h/c), spacing & pitch. RE: Logan Ch 6 Because the trailing vortices are similar to wing vortices, it is expected that the corresponding drag is proportional to the LIFT COEFFICIENT CL.

CD” = 0.018CL2

Page 30: Axial Flow Machines

30

Wilson Text Effect of aspect ratio (h/c or h/b) on secondary losses.

Page 31: Axial Flow Machines

31

TIP LEAKAGE

TIP LEAKAGE

CD”’ = 0.29 (k/h)CL3/2

The difference in pressure on the two sides of the moving blades results in leakage around the tip. Shroud reduces leakage ~50% k=clearance gap = f(T, rpm, loading) h= blade length CL=lift coefficient

Page 32: Axial Flow Machines

32

Page 33: Axial Flow Machines

33

LOSSES FROM SEALS Pressure changes across casing boundaries are another source of losses. Each place where the rotor penetrates a pressure boundary needs a seal. Typically LABYRINTH SEALS.

GENERATOR LPT1 LPT2 HPT

Page 34: Axial Flow Machines

34

LABYRINTH SEALS

Page 35: Axial Flow Machines

35

Page 36: Axial Flow Machines

36

LABYRINTH SEALS

CD”” = f(∆P, h, ρ, D, ….)

Page 37: Axial Flow Machines

37

Clearances change with thermal expansion, radial stresses, axial stresses, fluid loadings, rotor flex, rotor unbalance, startup/shutdown transients,…. Rotor alignment is critical for rotor seals.

Page 38: Axial Flow Machines

38

UNRECOVERABLE PRESSURE LOSSES (PROFILE, SKIN FRICTION & SECONDARY)

COMPRESSORS, PUMPS & FANS

ΔP stage = ρ U2 φ ψ χ ηstage = ΔPactual / ΔPideal = φχ χ = (R - φδ) / (φ+ δR) + (1 – R - φδ) / (φ + δ(1 – R)) rotor stator φ = flow coefficient = Cx / U ψ = blade loading coefficient = ΔCu / U R =degree of reaction δ = drag to lift ratio U = rotor velocity ΔP = pressure gain

LOGAN P115

Page 39: Axial Flow Machines

39

δ = drag to lift ratio = ∑CD / CL = (CD + CD’ + CD” + CD”’ + CD””) / CL

Page 40: Axial Flow Machines

40

EXAMPLE: Axial compressor with Rn=50% and the velocity vectors shown. The lift and drag coefficients are the same for the rotor and stator and are 1.4 and 0.1, respectively. CD includes all losses. Calculate the stage pressure rise and required energy input if the entering air has a density of 1.2 kg/m3. Each square corresponds to 50 m/s x 50 m/s 50 m/s V1 V2 W1 W2 U stator rotor

Page 41: Axial Flow Machines

41

EXAMPLE (con’t)

ΔP stage = ρ U2 φ ψ χ = ΔPactual U = 300 m/s Vx = 150 m/s VU1 = 50 m/s VU2 = 250 m/s

ψ = (VU1 – VU2)/U = (50-250)/300 = -2/3 (neg=compressor)

φ = Vx/U = 150/300 = 1/2

δ = drag/lift = 0.1/1.4 = 0.071

χ = (R - φδ) / (φ+ δR) + (1 – R - φδ) / (φ + δ(1 – R))

χ = (0.5-0.5x0.071)/(0.5 + 0.071x0.5) + (1-0.5-0.5x0.071)/ (0.5+0.071(1-0.5))

χ = (0.46/0.54) + (0.46/0.54) = 1.7

Page 42: Axial Flow Machines

42

EXAMPLE (con’t)

ΔP stage = ρ U2 φ ψ χ= ΔPactual ΔPactual = (1.2)(300)2 (0.5) (0.66)(1.7) = 60.6 kN/m2

= 60.6 kPa

ηstage = ΔPactual / ΔPideal = φχ = (0.5)(1.7) = 0.85 ΔPactual / ΔPideal = 0.85 = 60.6 kPa/ΔPideal

ΔPideal = 71.3 kPa

Energy per unit mass (Euler Turbine Equation) [W /m]ideal = ( Vu1U1 - Vu2U2 ) / gc

=(300)m/s [50-250]m/s = -60 kJ/kg

[W /m]actual = [W /m]ideal / ηstage = (-60)/(0.85) = -70 kJ/kg

Page 43: Axial Flow Machines

43

FLOW SEPARATION

de Haller Number: dH

dH = Wexit / Win = W2 / W1

dH > 0.72 No Separation Swiss engineer Established criterion for flow separation in compressor cascades (for compressor cascades, RE: Wilson, Ch#4 p.182) But…also sometimes applied to turbine blades as well using V1 & V2

Page 44: Axial Flow Machines

44

De Haller: dH = Wexit / Win > 0.72 no separation dH = W2 / W1 COMPRESSOR V1 V2 W1 W2

U S R

Page 45: Axial Flow Machines

45

De Haller: dH = Wexit / Win > 0.72 no separation dH = W2 / W1 COMPRESSOR V1 V2 W1 W2

U S R Increase W2, Increase dH, decrease potential for separation?

Page 46: Axial Flow Machines

46

Pressure Rise Coefficient (compressor cascade)

Cpr = (Pst,ex – Pst,in)/(Po,in – Pst,in) = rise in static pressure / inlet dynamic pressure

For an ideal compressor Cpr = 1 – (Wex / Win)2

Cpr < 0.5 Consider each stage of a compressor as a compressor The pressure rise at each stage can only increase so much, Limits on pressure rise Cpr ~< 0.5

VELOCITY VECTORS SUMMARY

Page 47: Axial Flow Machines

47

Axial Flow Compressor and Turbine

Page 48: Axial Flow Machines

48

DEGREE OF REACTION

Vu2 Vu1 Rn = ∆hrotor / ∆hstage = (h2 – h3) / (h1 – h3) = ∆Protor / ∆Pstage V2 V1 W2 W1 = (P2 – P3) / (P1 – P3) = 1 – (Vu1 + Vu2) / 2U

(Text eqn 5.8)

Page 49: Axial Flow Machines

49

Zweifel’s Correlation OPTIMUM SOLIDITY

Axial Turbine Cascade Stator

Rotor

Stator

Page 50: Axial Flow Machines

50

Lift and Drag Forces

FL = CL (ρAV2) / 2gc

FD = CD (ρAV2) / 2gc Comments on LIFT and DRAG forces: Lift and drag forces are difficult to model exactly due to complex flow phenomena including: viscous effects, boundary layer separation, etc. Hence, ‘empirically determined correction coefficient’ is typically used. CL and CD are lift and drag coefficients, usually determined empirically. CD typically accounts for both pressure and skin friction drag. ‘A’ is some characteristic area. ‘V’ is some representative velocity: free stream, average or mean velocity, etc.

Page 51: Axial Flow Machines

51

Isolated Flat Plate

Cascade of Blades

S C K=cascade coefficient = f(beta, s/c) S= pitch or spacing C = chord

β CL = 2πsinβ

CLcas=K(CL)

Page 52: Axial Flow Machines

52

Page 53: Axial Flow Machines

53

BLADE SPACING / SOLIDITY (σ = c / s) Is there an option spacing?

Low solidity High solidity Losses by separation ~No separation Losses by skin friction s = pitch or spacing c = chord

s

c

Page 54: Axial Flow Machines

54

Page 55: Axial Flow Machines

55

Page 56: Axial Flow Machines

56

β1

β2 NOTE ERROR IN PENG’S TEXT: PAGE 227

CL = 2(s/b)cos2β2(tan β1 - tan β2) σ = c/s = solidity Wilson 7.4

Page 57: Axial Flow Machines

57

Zweifel (Peng Text, Ch 8 p 227) (Brown Boveri, Swiss, 1945)

CL,op ~ 0.8

Page 58: Axial Flow Machines

58

α = - 30o

β = + 60o

EXAMPLE The spacing (pitch) between turbine or compressor blades influences the machine’s performance.

Shown below is a cascade of blades for an axial compressor. Flow in U c = 12 cm b = 10 cm Flow out

(a) Determine the optimum blade spacing, s = ?

Optimum Spacing

Zweifel Correlation

(b/s) opt = |(2/CL,opt) cos2αex [tanαin – tan αex]| = |(2/0.8) cos 2 (60o) [tan (-30o) – tan (60o)]| = 1.44 thus, s = b/1.44 = 6.94 cm

Page 59: Axial Flow Machines

59

AXIAL TURBINES NUMBER OF BLADES Wind: 1-24 Water: 3-30 Gas / Steam: 11-110 Rotors usually have an even number of blades (for balance) Stators usually have an odd number of blades (for vibration)

Page 60: Axial Flow Machines

60

VORTEX FLOW Radial Equilibrium A tornado is nature’s efficient vortex flow. Characteristic of air / gas at higher velocities (200+ mph ~ 300 ft/s ~ 100 m/s) It pumps air from the higher pressure ground to overhead cloud. We can capture that flow characteristic in the design of axial compressor (and turbine) blade design that encourage free vortex flow.

UF6 Axial Compressor

Tornado

Page 61: Axial Flow Machines

61

Velocity Distribution in a Tornado

R = “eye” of tornado

R

Forced Vortex (rotational) r < R Vu = ωr

Vurn = constant

Free Vortex (irrotational) r > R Vu = ωR2/r

Vur = constant

Page 62: Axial Flow Machines

62

Page 63: Axial Flow Machines

63

Pressure Distribution in a tornado Patm

R -P Minimum pressure is in center of eye. The entire field pressure is sub-atmospheric pressure (AKA Under-pressure)

Page 64: Axial Flow Machines

64

Uniform Circular Motion r

Fc v θ

F = ma

Fc = mac = mv2/r Fc = centripetal force (in +) ac = centripetal acceleration v = tangential speed = vu

θ = angular position (rad) ω = angular velocity (rad/s) ac = centripetal acceleration (m/s2) 2∏ radians ω = dθ/dt =

time for one revolution 2∏ =

2∏r/v

= v/r

ac = d2θ/dt2 = v2/r

Page 65: Axial Flow Machines

65

Radial Pressure Forces on Fluid Element (F=PA) P + dP P + ½ dP P + ½dP P dr r dθ Fc For Radial Equilibrium: The radial components of the pressure forces (F=PA) must be balanced by the centrifugal force on the fluid mass.

Page 66: Axial Flow Machines

66

For Radial Equilibrium

∑Fradial = Fc + ∑FP =0

Free-Vortex Flow: Vur = constant

Page 67: Axial Flow Machines

67

TIP

HUB

Page 68: Axial Flow Machines

68

TIP Vu1 HUB

Constant axial velocity Axial V2 = maximum utilization Cur = const r∆Vu = const

Don’t want hub to fall below 0% rxn

Page 69: Axial Flow Machines

69

Page 70: Axial Flow Machines

70

TIP (RXN) HUB (IMP)

Page 71: Axial Flow Machines

71

Station A is entry to nozzle / stator Station B is entry to blade / rotor Station C is exit from blade Nozzle blade is twisted to give overall free vortex flow. The Blade is straight. Nozzle sets up flow in radial decreasing velocity profile….upon passage over uniform rotor blade, re-establishes uniform vel profile. Illustrates other losses: Wall friction losses (skin friction) and tip-clearance leakage (PsB > PsC)

Page 72: Axial Flow Machines

72

Euler Turbine Equation(s) Torque

T = m ( Vu1 r1 - Vu2 r2) / gc Power W = m ( Vu1U1 - Vu2U2) / gc Energy per unit mass W / m = ( Vu1U1 - Vu2U2 ) / gc

Page 73: Axial Flow Machines

73

TURBINE V2 V1 W2 W1 U S R W ~ Vu1U1 - Vu2U2 V2 V1 W2 W1

Page 74: Axial Flow Machines

74

FORCES & STRESS ON BLADES

“frozen” isochromatic fringes on three-dimensional photoelastic model of gas turbine blade hub.

Page 75: Axial Flow Machines

75

Forces acting on turbine & compressor blades

Fluid forces: Lift & Drag

Centrifugal forces Thermal forces / stresses Fluid forces: Lift & Drag Of special interest are the tangential components of the lift and drag forces

since these forces directly affect the power and efficiency. Produce bending forces / stresses due to changes in fluid pressure and momentum. Total Drag force = pressure drag (form drag, shape drag) + Viscous Drag (viscous drag) Due to complex flows, losses occur. Excitation and vibrations may result from fluctuating pressure gradients. Centrifugal forces Produces radial & bending stresses

(bending when centroids of all cross sections do not lie along a radial line) Limits the design length and rpm Easiest force to model Thermal forces / stresses When its not at a uniform temperature, thermal stresses arise.

Page 76: Axial Flow Machines

76

Lift and Drag Forces RADIAL LIFT AXIAL DRAG V1 Vm V2

Page 77: Axial Flow Machines

77

Lift and Drag Forces FL = CL (ρAV2) / 2gc FD = CD (ρAV2) / 2gc Comments on LIFT and DRAG forces: Lift and drag forces are difficult to model exactly due to complex flow phenomena including: viscous effects, boundary layer separation, etc. Hence, ‘empirically determined correction coefficient’ is typically used. CL and CD are lift and drag coefficients, usually determined empirically. CD typically accounts for both pressure and skin friction drag. ‘A’ is some characteristic area. ‘V’ is some representative velocity: free stream, average or mean velocity, etc.

Page 78: Axial Flow Machines

78

Isolated Flat Plate

Cascade of Blades

S C K=cascade coefficient = f(beta, s/c) S= pitch or spacing C = chord

β CL = 2πsinβ

CLcas=K(CL)

Page 79: Axial Flow Machines

79

Page 80: Axial Flow Machines

80

Page 81: Axial Flow Machines

81

Fluid Forces: Vibration & Excitation Upstream variations in the flow can lead to blade vibrations. Can lead to ‘high frequency’, ‘high cycle’ fatigue.

Page 82: Axial Flow Machines

82

Vibration & Excitation Campbell diagram illustrating example of natural frequencies of a rotor blade. Centrifugal forces on the blade causes the blade to stiffen, ‘centrifugal stiffening’ and increase the natural vibration frequency with rotor rpm.

Page 83: Axial Flow Machines

83

CENTRIFUGAL STRESS ON STEAM TURBINE BLADE R r

CASING

HUB

BLADES

HUB

h

Page 84: Axial Flow Machines

84

Centrifugal Force on Uniform Blade

F = ma Fc = m(ω2r) = ρAh(2πN/60)2[(R + r)/2] Centrifugal Stress (σ = F/A) on Uniform Blade

σmax = ρh (2πN/60)2 (r + R) / 2gc Maximum Stress at Hub of Blade

σmax, hub = ½ ρ (Utip)2 [1-(Rhub/Rtip)2]

Page 85: Axial Flow Machines

85

EXAMPLE: Centrifugal Stress Given: ρ ~ 8,000 kg/m3 ~ 650 lbm / ft3 Uniform density and cross-section h= length of blade = 20 inches = 1.67 ft N= rate of rotation = 1800 rpm r= hub radius = 1.5 ft

σmax = ρh (2πN/60)2 (r + R) / 2gc

σmax = 19,400 psi

Page 86: Axial Flow Machines

86

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE: “Liberated Blade” If a blade ‘broke loose - liberated’, how high could it go? N = 1800 rpm K.E P.E. ½ m V2 = mgH V = centroid velocity

=2π(r+h/2)N/60 = 440 ft/sec = 645 mph H = ½ V2 /g = 3,006 ft

Page 87: Axial Flow Machines
Page 88: Axial Flow Machines

88

Thermal Stresses

σ=Eε ∆L/L= α∆T

Page 89: Axial Flow Machines

89

BLADE COATINGS

“thermal & corrosion protection”

Materials:

• NiCrAlY alloy ( nickel, chromium, aluminum, yttium)

• Zirconia (ceramic, ZrO2)

• Alumina (Al2O3)

• Silicon carbide

Page 90: Axial Flow Machines

90

HOW COATINGS ARE APPLIED Electroplating Plasma spray Vapor-phase deposition Electron beam depositio

Page 91: Axial Flow Machines

91

TE

MP

ER

ATU

RE

BLADE COATINGS FOR THERMAL AND CORRESION CONTROL SUBSTRATE BOND COAT TOP COAT HOT COMBUSTION GASES OPERATING TEMPERATURE SUBSTRATE MELTING TEMPERATURE

Page 92: Axial Flow Machines

92

HIGH TEMPERATURE MATERIALS MATERIAL ~MELTING TEMPERATURE

oF oC

Nickel 2650 1450 Nickel-Chromium Alloy 2100 – 2300 1150 – 1260 Cobalt – Chromium Alloy 2400 – 2550 1315 – 1400 Titanium 3035 1668 Titanium-6Al-4V Alloy 3000 1650 For most metals used in blades, creep becomes significant at about one-half the melting point.

Page 93: Axial Flow Machines

93