23
www.a-sporg Auto/Steel Partnership: Advanced High-Strength Steel Research and Development This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Dr. Roger A. Heimbuch Auto/Steel Partnership Project ID: lm_23_heimbuch

Auto/Steel Partnership: Advanced High-Strength Steel ... · Advanced High-Strength Steel. Research and Development. ... Nucor Corporation, ... Auto/Steel Partnership: Advanced High-Strength

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

www.a-sporg

Auto/Steel Partnership:Advanced High-Strength Steel

Research and Development

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information

Dr. Roger A. HeimbuchAuto/Steel Partnership

Project ID: lm_23_heimbuch

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

• Overview of the Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP)

• Strategy

• Overview of Advanced High-Strength Steel Research and Development

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

MEMBERS OF A/SP - Chartered in 1987

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

MISSION STATEMENT

The Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP) leverages the resources of the automotive, steel and related industries and is an organization dedicated to:

• Developing solutions where steel is the "competitive material of choice" in a changing automotive market;

• Using inter-company and inter-industry cooperative programs to ensure the success of the member companies;

• Resolving, proactively, governmental regulatory agency requirements and customer needs

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY

To achieve the Vision, the Auto/Steel Partnership:

• Evaluate, prioritize and completes projects that meet the vision

• Communicates the technical results and benefits to the automotive industry

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

THE PARTNERSHIP LINKAGES

Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors

Corporation

ArcelorMittal, Nucor Corporation,

Severstal North America, United States Steel Corp

AISI, IISI, WorldAutoSteel

Consortia Partnerships

Department of Energy (DOE)

Contractors Academia

CANMET NSFNational Laboratories

Auto/SteelPartnership

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

FreedomCAR GOALS

FreedomCAR Goals:

• Mass Reduction (50%)• Affordable Cost (less to +5%)• Durability/Life (same)• Recyclability• Develop/Transfer Technology

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

ULSAB SERIES OF PROJECTS

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

USAMP/DOE FUNDING

• A/SP approached USAMP for funding

• DOE agreed to fund steel projects based on potential shown by ULSAB Projects

• USAMP/DOE support is about $18 million/year

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

timeToday

(Application Feasibility)Tomorrow

(Technical Feasibility)far out

(Concept Feasibility)

tech

nolo

gic

risk

Concept Feasibility

Technical Feasibility

Demonstrated Feasibility

Strategic Alignment -ties into Vision

TechnologyPlanningProcess

Input intoOEM’s or Supplier’s cone

USAMP CONE STAGES

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

OVERALL STRATEGY

STEEL

MaterialsManufacturing

Design

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

STEEL STRATEGY - GAPE

long

atio

n (%

)

Tensile Strength (MPa)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 600 1200300 900 1600

MART

MildBHBH

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting Enabling On-Going

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting

Lightweight ChassisStructures

Future GenerationPassenger Compartment

Validation

Mass EfficientArchitecture for Roof

Strength (MEARS)

Enabling On-Going

Benchmarking

Mass Compounding

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting

Lightweight ChassisStructures

Future GenerationPassenger Compartment

Validation

Mass EfficientArchitecture for Roof

Strength (MEARS)

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Stamping

Hydroforming Materialsand Lubricants

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Joining Technologies

Joining StrategySteering Committee

AHSS ApplicationGuidelines

Enabling On-Going

Benchmarking

Mass Compounding

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting

Lightweight ChassisStructures

Future GenerationPassenger Compartment

Validation

Mass EfficientArchitecture for Roof

Strength (MEARS)

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Stamping

Hydroforming Materialsand Lubricants

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Joining Technologies

Fatigue Characteristics

Strain Rate Characterization

Tribology

Joining StrategySteering Committee

AHSS ApplicationGuidelines

Enabling On-Going

3rd Generation of AHSS (NSF)

Benchmarking

Mass Compounding

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting

Lightweight ChassisStructures

Future GenerationPassenger Compartment

Validation

Mass EfficientArchitecture for Roof

Strength (MEARS)

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Stamping

Hydroforming Materialsand Lubricants

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Joining Technologies

Fatigue Characteristics

Strain Rate Characterization

Tribology

Joining StrategySteering Committee

AHSS ApplicationGuidelines

Technology Transfer

Enabling On-Going

3rd Generation of AHSS (NSF)

Benchmarking

Mass Compounding

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP PROJECT PORTFOLIO

Lightweighting

Lightweight ChassisStructures

Future GenerationPassenger Compartment

Validation

Mass EfficientArchitecture for Roof

Strength (MEARS)

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Stamping

Hydroforming Materialsand Lubricants

Advanced High-StrengthSteel Joining Technologies

Fatigue Characteristics

Strain Rate Characterization

Tribology

Joining StrategySteering Committee

AHSS ApplicationGuidelines

Technology Transfer

Enabling On-Going

3rd Generation of AHSS (NSF)

Benchmarking

Mass Compounding

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

A/SP TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

SUCCESS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES

Time

Mas

s R

educ

tion

Opp

ortu

nity

0%

20%

10%

With Steel Strategy & DOE Support

30%

40%

50%

1970 1990 2000 2010 20201980 2030

MILD STEELS

CONV HSS

AHSS

Without DOE Support

AHSS withMASS

COMPOUNDING

TechnologyDecision

FreedomCAR GOAL

3rd GENERATION

w w w a – s p o r g 2009 DOE Merit Review

FreedomCAR & A/SP GOAL ALIGNMENT

FreedomCAR:• 50% Mass Reduction• Affordable Cost• Life/Durability• Develop/Transfer

Technology• Recyclability

Auto/Steel Partnership:• 40% Mass Reduction• Affordable Cost• Life/Durability• Develop/Transfer

Technology • Recyclability