25
Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL Dr. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi KPMG Distinguished Professor Rutgers Business School - Newark & New Brunswick Director, Rutgers Accounting Research Center & Continuous Auditing & Reporting Lab PhD Student Rutgers Business School - Newark & New Brunswick Duo (Selina) Pei

Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT-XBRL

Dr. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi KPMG Distinguished Professor Rutgers Business School - Newark & New Brunswick Director, Rutgers Accounting Research Center & Continuous Auditing & Reporting Lab

PhD Student Rutgers Business School - Newark & New Brunswick

Duo (Selina) Pei

Page 2: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Roadmap

The Current Accounting Dilemma Information Needs The RT-XBRL Schema RT-XBRL Extensions Directions for the Future

Page 3: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

What are some problems plaguing professionals in the field?

Ball and Brown (1968) found that income numbers encompassed 50% of the information reflected in market measures. Lev (1989) showed using data over a span of 20 years, earnings explained no more than 7% of the variation in stock returns The Financial Times reports in 2009 that 73% of U.S. trading volume can be attributed to high frequency trading (Link)

Page 4: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Some other phenomena observed

Trump tweets about Toyota, its U.S. shares dropped close to 1%, representing $2 billion in market value. Not just Trump, computer algorithms have been created to compile tweets from famous and important people. (Los Angeles Times January 16, 2017)

Page 5: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Some other phenomena observed

Page 6: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

We need a reporting schema…

- Which links more current measures, and measures of a much wider scope - Supports interoperability across the value chain - Standardizes data to facilitate analysis and usage of sophisticated tools - Provides real-time information to satisfy the current trend of information

demands

Page 7: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

We need a reporting schema that also integrates well with current advances in auditing

Figure: Data standardization, Apps, Business Process, and continuous Usage (adapted from Dai, 2017)

Page 8: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

We Need RT-XBRL

ADS Layer Other Standardization Schemes

Internal

External

Structuring Layer

Output System

Page 9: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

So what kind of information may be missing?

- Intangibles (Lev and Sougiannis, 1996; Demerjian et al., 2012; Bonacchi et al., 2015)

- Private information, under-the-table discussions which resulted in the issuance of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Bushee et al., 2004; Bailey et al., 2003)

- Interim information which resulted in introduction of the 8-K and its subsequent iterations (Lerman and Livnat 2010; Carter and Soo, 1999)

- Information which are actually used by current market participants and the market players of the future (algorithms)

- ETF tracking (Avellaneda and Lee, 2010)

- Investor sentiment (Baker and Wurgler, 2006)

- Volume, order book imbalances (Brogaard et al., 2014)

Page 10: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

So what kind of information may be missing?

- SASB metrics - Intellectual property and data privacy

- Integrity and sponsorship

- “The relationships between [an organization’s] various operating and functional units and the capitals that the organization uses or affects” in the International Integrated Reporting Council Framework (2013)

Figure: Integrated Reporting Framework with Information Flows from The International Integrated Reporting Framework

Page 11: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

A more value relevant reporting paradigm to cater to information needs and characteristics of the future

Page 12: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

RT-XBRL is…

- Concept of a widened corporate measurement and assurance network - Multi-sourced information extracted to a database and fitted to a data

standard - A database which supports applications that may be independent,

correlated, integrated or heterogeneous and oblique in nature - Modeled to fit a reporting structure that may be formal and prescribed by a

standard setter (e.g. FASB) or informal based on the different entity stakeholder needs

Page 13: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

RT-XBRL is…

Live XBRL Sheet: Reporting / Monitoring

ADS Layer Other Standardization Schemes

ERP SC

Internal

External

Social Media

Market

IoT

Competitor

Weather

Geolocational Apps

News Metrics

Structuring Layer

Output System Alerts App User App 1

User App 2

Page 14: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

RT-XBRL may…

- Have links to sources to display relevant information (e.g. momentum, share buybacks, recent patents, brand, customer satisfaction)

- Some links could reference specific line items (equipment, contingent liability, etc.)

- Present non-traditional information from exogenous data sources “in-line” with traditional financial information in a reporting format

- Require real-time displays (dashboards) connected to, for example, Bloomberg or the Wall Street Journal

- Calculate and show new bottom line similar to “Value Created” (Lev and Gu, 2016) - Show feeds to internal systems (continuous assurance, exceptions reporting) - For the future:

- Predictive analytics and other research studies could be used to determine what are the most important information sources

- Predictive algorithms could change the information categories based on certain thresholds (i.e. report only changes of more than 5% or equivalent)

Page 15: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Why ADS?

- Compatibility with XBRL (Outlined in ADS Base Standard 2015) - ADS paves way for XBRL Global Ledger (Dalla Via and Garbellotto, 2015)

- Standardization - Automation

- Codifying audit-relevant organizational activities - Supports audit apps which can be integrated with RT-XBRL

- Includes aspects of the value creation cycle: inventory, order to cash, and the general ledger

- Easier for auditors to assure RT-XBRL statements

Page 16: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Conceptualizing “RT” and “XBRL”

- Incorporate descriptive metrics, thresholds, exceptions detection - Periodicity of information gathering and dissemination should be based on

decision usefulness, cost-benefit, and user needs - On the internal end refers to real-time monitoring but not real-time reporting

- XBRL supports tagging and is machine-readable. - RT-XBRL supports cross-referencing between external and internal data sources creating an

interconnected web of information conducive to understanding both the business and the environment in which it operates

Page 17: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

The RT-XBRL approach to monitoring and reporting exceptions

- ADS tagging makes receipts and accounting entries easy to verify - “Filter-like” operations can single out anomalies quicker

- Ex. match purchase order to the invoice received, view all dates, individuals involved, product amount, type of product, purchase order and invoice IDs, and discounts given

- Identify with global and local events as well as upstream and downstream activities which may correlate with the exception

Page 18: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Linking continuous reporting to continuous assurance

MOD – PERF = DELTA IF | DELTA > STDELTA THEN START ALERT

Dependent on the Pulse of Application

(Vasarhelyi et al., 2010)

Page 19: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

An ecosystem of corporate measurement and assurance

Diagram: Audit Ecosystem (modified from Kozlovski, 2017)

Page 20: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Directions for the future: categorization of information types

- Facts and statistics that have significance in explaining trading behavior but may be difficult to collect

- Investor sentiment (Baker and Wurgler, 2006)

- Location (Balakrishnan et al., 1990)

- Weather (Yoon et al., 2017)

- Value should be substantiated through further research or predictive analytics and modeling.

- Social media (Luo et al., 2013)

- Managerial expertise - Attempt made through network theory (Larcker et al., 2013)

Page 21: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Appendices: References

Avellaneda, M., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Statistical arbitrage in the US equities market. Quantitative Finance, 10(7), 761-782. Bailey, W., Li, H., Mao, C. X., & Zhong, R. (2003). Regulation fair disclosure and earnings information: Market, analyst, and corporate responses. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2487-2514. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680. Balakrishnan, R., Harris, T. S., & Sen, P. K. (1990). The predictive ability of geographic segment disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 305- 325. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 159-178.

Page 22: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Appendices: References

Bonacchi, M., Kolev, K., & Lev, B. (2015). Customer franchise—A hidden, yet crucial, asset. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1024-1049. Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2014). High-frequency trading and price discovery. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2267-2306. Bushee, B. J., Matsumoto, D. A., & Miller, G. S. (2004). Managerial and investor responses to disclosure regulation: The case of Reg FD and conference calls. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 617-643. Carter, M. E., & Soo, B. S. (1999). The relevance of Form 8-K reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 119-132. Dai, J. (2017) Three Essays on Audit Technology: Audit 4.0, Blockchain and Audit Apps, PhD Dissertation, Rutgers Business School, Newark, NJ, 07102

Page 23: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Appendices: References

Dalla Via, N., & Garbellotto, G. (2015). Internal Reporting with XBRL Global Ledger. Strategic Finance, 97(4), 46. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229-1248. International Integrated Reporting Committee. (2013). The International Integrated Reporting Framework (Publication). Retrieved August 29, 2017, from International Integrated Reporting Committee website: https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE- INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf Larcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. (2013). Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2), 225-250.

Page 24: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Appendices: References

Lerman, A., & Livnat, J. (2010). The new Form 8-K disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(4), 752-778. Lev, B. (1989). On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 153-192. Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. John Wiley & Sons. Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value- relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138. Luo, X., Zhang, J., & Duan, W. (2013). Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 146-163.

Page 25: Automated Trading and Yearly Reporting: The Need for RT- XBRL

Appendices: References

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2017, February). SASB Conceptual Framework (Publication). Retrieved August 29, 2017, from Sustainability Accounting Standards Board website: http://library.sasb.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/SASB-Conceptual- Framework.pdf?hsCtaTracking=3b37ee09-f32f-4cb3-ae50- 89c55a6eebb4%7C302f7abc-aaba-42a7-ab7d-8a4e22f43900 Yoon, K., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Weather Records as Big Data Audit Evidence. Working Paper.