Upload
feoras
View
70
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loads. Authors : Silvia Ortiz Santamaria Angel Martinez Aja. ITP CAPACITIES. DESIGN ,MANUFACTURE and PRODUCT SUPPORT. GAS TURBINE. Rotating components. Static components. Casing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-
section structures under compression loads
Authors : Silvia Ortiz Santamaria
Angel Martinez Aja
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
ITP CAPACITIESDESIGN ,MANUFACTURE and PRODUCT SUPPORT
Rotating components
GAS TURBINE
Casing
NOZZLE
RADIAL STRUCTURES
Static components
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
WHY POST-BUCKLING?Aeronautical structures weight improvement
More reliable structures
Great competitiveness
APPLICATIONSEngine radial structures
Casings for aircraft engines
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
ADVANTAGES
Traditional methodology of post-buckling analysis
particular geometries and load types
Post-buckling analysis using FEM
general methodology for any geometry and load type
Is FEM post-buckling analysis reliable?
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Crippling = Post-buckling
Residual strength analysis after local buckling
CRIPPLING ANALYSIS PROBLEM DEFINITION FOR FEM POST-BUCKLING
VALIDATION
Local buckling
Stable behaviour PP
P
Crippling load
Local buckling load
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
TWO CORNER FORMED CROSS-SECTIONS
X785-C SECTION
LS-160 SECTION
MULTI CORNER FORMED CROSS-SECTION
B2-SHAPE SECTION
Tested specimens from NACA 3784
Material: AlClad2024-T3
CRIPPLING ANALYSIS PROBLEM EXAMPLES ANALYSED
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
CRIPPLING ANALYSIS FEM SIMULATION USING MSC.Nastran
Analysis Steps
1.- FEM using QUAD4 elements
2.- Linear buckling analysis to obtain the column length
representative of the behaviour of an infinite long column.
3.- FEM perturbation of initial geometry with MSC.Patran.
4.- Non-linear static analysis (elasto-plastic material behaviour +
large displacement) to obtain the collapse load/stress.
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
First buckling Mode 9526 psi
X3/16 R
3/16 R
1 1/4
7/8
1/2
Y
t= 0.04
Central Point
X785-C section
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Test Crippling Stress: 30489 psi [Ref. NACA 3784]FEM Crippling Stress: 29700 psi Error = 2,65%
X785-C section
Displacements at crippling point Displacement-Load Curve
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.012
Displacement [in]
Lo
ad [
lbf]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Ave
rag
e st
ress
[p
si]
Theoretical Collapse avg. stress = 30489
FEM Collapse avg.stress = 29700 psiError = 2.65 %
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
5/8
1
R 1/8
R 3/16 t = 0.04
X
Y
Central Point
LS-160 sectionFirst buckling Mode 33830 psi
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Test Crippling Stress: 32400 psi [Ref. NACA 3784] FEM Crippling Stress: 33710 psi Error= 4.0 %
LS-160 section
Displacements at crippling point Displacement-Load Curve
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008
Displacement [in]
Lo
ad
[lb
f]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Av
era
ge
str
es
s [
ps
i]
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Crippling of two corner formed sectionsAl Clad 2024-T3; Ref. NACA 3784
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
5 10 15 20 25
AlClad2024-T3 Test dataRecommended Curve (beta=4)LS160 - NASTRANX785-C NASTRAN
31
cy
2 Et
A÷÷ø
öççè
æhs
cy
f
ss
MSC.Nastran results available crippling test data
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
First buckling Mode 13390 psi
B2-Shape section
0.082
1.198
1.001
0.445
t=0.032
R=3t
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
Test Crippling Stress 27100 psi [Ref. NACA 3784]FEM Crippling Stress 27893 psi Error= 2,9 %
B2-Shape section
Displacements at crippling point Displacement-Load Curve
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009
disp (in)
loa
d (
lbf)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
str
es
s (
ps
i)
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
MSC.Nastran results available Crippling test data
Crippling of multi corner formed sectionsAl Clad 2024-T3;Ref.NACA 3784
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Recommended curve ( beta=4) AlClad 2024-T3 test data
B2-SHAPE NASTRAN
cy
f
ss
2
1
2 ÷÷ø
öççè
æ
Et
A cy
hs
Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable Validation of post-buckling behaviour of unstable cross-section structures under compression loadscross-section structures under compression loads
2002 3RD Worldwide Aerospace Conference and Technology Showcase
CONCLUSIONPost-buckling analysis using finite element method offers a general methodology for
any geometry and load type