1
, . 184: 115 (1998) LETTER TO THE EDITOR DIAGNOSTIC DISCORD WITH MELANOMA Dr Martin Cook 1 ably discusses numerous important issues and problems surrounding the quality of diagnoses of malignant melanoma. I wholeheartedly agree with Dr Cook that these should be addressed and resolved on a national basis. Sadly, however, Dr Cook makes no mention of the uno cial ‘medico-political hierarchy of cancer’. Skin cancer, including melanoma, received a rightful place in the health of the nation. Since that time, however, melanoma has slipped in the medico-political cancer league table. Currently, unless the cancer in question belongs to a national screening programme or is on a Calman accreditation list, health commissioners show remarkably little interest. To achieve success in any of Dr Cook’s suggestions, melanoma requires urgent reinstatement as a medico- politically important cancer. Unfortunately, however, as with all aspects of health care, dermatologists will then be in direct competition with other colleagues attempt- ing to propagate interests in their own specialist field of cancer. D. N. S Histopathology Department Rotherham Hospital Trust Rotherham S60 2UD, U.K. REFERENCE 1. Cook MG. Diagnostic discord with melanoma. J Pathol 1997; 182: 247–249. AUTHOR’S REPLY I am grateful for Dr David Slater’s supportive comments but I must confess I was unaware of the ‘medico–political hierarchy of cancer’. On the other hand, I appreciate that those neoplasms which a ect organs with a higher profile in the mind of the general public do seem more easily to generate publicity and subsequently funding for diagnostic innovations. Part of the purpose of writing this editorial was to maintain the importance of skin cancer, and melanoma in particular, in the minds of an influential group of the medical profession, namely readers of this journal. If convinced of the importance of melanoma as a tumour with a potentially high mortality and increasing incidence across a wide spectrum of the population, perhaps those readers who have access to Dr Slater’s hierarchy will emphasize in that forum the importance of diagnosis and management of melanoma for the health of the nation. M. G. C Consultant Histopathologist The Royal County Hospital Egerton Road, Guildford Surrey GU2 5XX, U.K. ? 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Author's reply. Diagnostic discord with melanoma

  • Upload
    m-g

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

, . 184: 115 (1998)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

DIAGNOSTIC DISCORD WITH MELANOMA

Dr Martin Cook1 ably discusses numerous importantissues and problems surrounding the quality ofdiagnoses of malignant melanoma. I wholeheartedlyagree with Dr Cook that these should be addressed andresolved on a national basis. Sadly, however, Dr Cookmakes no mention of the unofficial ‘medico-politicalhierarchy of cancer’. Skin cancer, including melanoma,received a rightful place in the health of the nation. Sincethat time, however, melanoma has slipped in themedico-political cancer league table. Currently, unlessthe cancer in question belongs to a national screeningprogramme or is on a Calman accreditation list, healthcommissioners show remarkably little interest. Toachieve success in any of Dr Cook’s suggestions,

melanoma requires urgent reinstatement as a medico-politically important cancer. Unfortunately, however, aswith all aspects of health care, dermatologists will thenbe in direct competition with other colleagues attempt-ing to propagate interests in their own specialist field ofcancer.

D. N. SHistopathology DepartmentRotherham Hospital TrustRotherham S60 2UD, U.K.

REFERENCE1. Cook MG. Diagnostic discord with melanoma. J Pathol 1997; 182: 247–249.

AUTHOR’S REPLY

I am grateful for Dr David Slater’s supportivecomments but I must confess I was unaware of the‘medico–political hierarchy of cancer’. On the otherhand, I appreciate that those neoplasms which affectorgans with a higher profile in the mind of the generalpublic do seem more easily to generate publicity andsubsequently funding for diagnostic innovations.Part of the purpose of writing this editorial was to

maintain the importance of skin cancer, and melanomain particular, in the minds of an influential group of themedical profession, namely readers of this journal. Ifconvinced of the importance of melanoma as a tumour

with a potentially high mortality and increasingincidence across a wide spectrum of the population,perhaps those readers who have access to Dr Slater’shierarchy will emphasize in that forum the importanceof diagnosis and management of melanoma for thehealth of the nation.

M. G. CConsultant HistopathologistThe Royal County HospitalEgerton Road, GuildfordSurrey GU2 5XX, U.K.

? 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.