Upload
virgil-wood
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Audits of pre-accession funds in the State Audit Office of the Republic of Latvia 2000/2001
Uldis Kremers
Auditor of the Audit Department of the State Economic Activities
SAI of Latvia
What principal audits of pre-accession funds the State Audit Office of the Republic of Latvia has performed in 2000/2001?
What new rules there have been to observe? What has been new in the method? What the key findings of these audits are? What is the co-operation with the European
Court of Auditors? The State Audit Office as the SAPARD Certifying
body in future?
2000
Audit on the PHARE financed agriculture and rural development projects in Latvia 1997-1999
Audit on the PHARE financial assistance received by the SMEs’ support centres in Latvia 1993-2000
2001
New type of audits introduced: audits of PHARE financed projects on the basis of their implementation accordingly the DIS Manual
Projects audited in the Ministry of Economy (PHARE 1997 programme): “Technical Assistance to the Energy Accession Support
Programme” “Implementation of the Energy Emergency Management
System” “Renewable Energy Programme” “Establishment of the State Energy Inspection”
2001
Projects audited in the Ministry of Transport (PHARE 1997 and 1998 programmes): “Continuation of Via Baltica Support: Technical Assistance
in Performing the Feasibility Study for new Crossing of River Daugava in Riga City”
“Navigation Aids in Small Ports: Supply of Harbour Lights, Leading Lights to Small Latvian Ports”
“Supply and Installation of Navigation Aids at Small Ports Follow-on Project”
“Technical Assistance to the Ministry of Transport” “Supply of Rails for Latvian Railways Rehabilitation of
East – West Corridor” “Modernisation of Latvian Railways Rail Welding Workshop
in Riga, Supply and Installation of Equipment”
2001
New audit started in co-operation with the European Court of Auditors: “Commission Aid to the Environment Sector in the
Candidate Countries 1995-2000”
National law National contractual obligations with the
European Communities
Council Regulation No. 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on Economic Aid to certain Countries of Central and Eastern Europe
Council Regulation No. 1231/77 of 21 December 1977 applicable to the General Budget of the European Communities
Framework Agreement between the European Commission and the PHARE partner country
Memorandum of Understanding on the Establishment of the National Fund
Financing Memoranda
DIS
Decentralised Implementation System = legal and administrative framework for the transfer of responsibilities from the European Commission to the partner countries
Stages in Commission’s financed programmes’ implementation: country programming detail programme preparation: strategic plan/work programme detailed project preparation: project identification/design
(Terms of Reference) projects’ implementation: tendering, contracting,
contractor’s action, supervision, performance of payments follow-up/supervision: monitoring, assessment, evaluation, audit
Actors: European Commission, National Technical Aid Coordinator, National Authorising Officer, Treasury (National Fund), Programme Authorising Officers, Finance and Contracting Units, Sector Authorising Officers, line ministries, final beneficiaries, Internal Audit Services, European Court of Auditors and national supreme audit institution
Preliminary study Audit task and Audit plan Audit Audit report Replies from institutions Decision of the Department’s Collegium
Introduction of the PHARE financed projects’ Decentralised Implementation System ensures now a thorough data storage at the national
authorities better accountancy of assistance more supervision of the projects’
performance
The objective of the audit is to assess whether Commission aid in the candidate countries has been well managed and to determine whether it has made an effective contribution to preparing them for accession. 7 PHARE and 1 ISPA projects – the task for the
team of the State Audit Office 9 PHARE and 2 ISPA projects – the task for the
team of the European Court of Auditors
New accents:
Transfer of ECA’s methodology Audit = Training New ideas in drawing up working documents Good definition of risks = Key to detect
problems Audit of a wide range co-financing as well Economy of audit costs
Main audit issues: Projects’ implementation in the framework of
Commission’s and national strategies Capacity of the financed infrastructure Neighbouring towns Assessment of the feasibility studies performed Competition level at the tender, tendering
procedures Time schedule of the project Assessment of the financial management, use of
funds Co-ordination with the national co-financing and
other donors Effectiveness of the project outcomes
Competent authority = Ministry of Finance Current SAPARD Certifying body = audit
company “Arthur Andersen” State Audit Office = expected Certifying body
in future Revision of the law = draft law at the
Parliament Training