Upload
hridimamalik
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Audit Framework
1/1
Slide 1
July 2008
Priority List clearly identified.
Priorities reflect primacy of BCR analysisalongside objective framework
Relationship to State-funded policies/projectsclear i.e. prioritisation reflects all ideas, not justthe unfunded.
Accurate and justifiable Cost-Benefit Analysis
has been used to appraise options. CBA is comprehensive and includes wider
economic, environmental and social impacts.
A full range of option types have beenidentified for each deficiency/problem.
Those options have been objectivelyassessed, without some options having beenruled out early or favoured.
For each deficiency, analysis of why thoseproblems have developed
Covers both immediate and underlying causes(e.g. not just lack of investment, but causes ofunderinvestment, e.g. regulatory environment).
Accurate and objective assessment of theecon/envt/soc impacts of those problems.
Priorities identified which reflect the scale ofimpacts.
A list of specific problems clearly identified,including network or geographical location.
Those problems accurately quantified anddefined, including an assessment of futuretrends.
Formalised, comprehensive, and agreedgoals/targets.
Quantified, objective and specific goals/targets.
Components required
BCRs provide the bestavailable objective evidenceas to how well solutions willimpact on goals but not thewhole story.
An understanding of theimpact of solutions on all goalsis essential to understand howthe portfolio will achieve thosegoals.
Looking at a range of optionsrather than relying on earlyjudgements is more likely toidentify the best solutions.
Understanding the causesallows effective and targetedsolutions to be created.Infrastructure not the onlycause of problems.
Understanding thecosts/impact of deficienciesallows the worst problems tobe identified and prioritised.
Specificity re inadequacies isessential in order to taketargeted and therefore moreeffective action.
A performance benchmark isneeded against which theadequacy of infrastructure can
be assessed.
Rationale
Identification of policy and project priorities from the list of solutions, onan objective basis. The objective basis should give primacy to theBenefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) of policies, but could include broaderconsiderations set out in a transparent framework - such asportfolio/package issues, deliverability, risk, and affordability.
7. Solution prioritisation[2]
Use of cost-benefit analysis to assess those options/solutions. Theappraisal should incorporate the full range of economic, environmentaland social impacts (including agglomeration and trade impacts, carbonimpacts, noise, and social amenity) so that the impact on all societysgoals is measured and understood as far as is possible.
6. Solution assessment
Development of a full range of interventions that might address the issue- e.g. pricing, regulatory, better use, packages/systems, capacityincreases, informed by the Problem Analysis completed at Stage 4.
5. Option generation
Objective policy and economic analysis of why these deficiencies exist
i.e. what is the underlying cause (depending on the sector, reasonscould include market failure, government failure, capital restrictions,etc.). This should include an assessment of non-infrastructure reasonsfor the problem e.g. land use patterns, peaky demand; oreducation/business hours.
4. Problem analysis
Objective and quantified appraisal of the economic, environmental andsocial costs of those deficiencies, so that the most damagingdeficiencies can be identified and prioritised.
3. Problem assessment
Objective, specific, evidence-based, and data rich identification ofdeficiencies with the condition, operation and services provided byinfrastructure that may hinder the achievement of those economic,environmental and social goals.
2. Problem identification[1]
Definition of the fundamental economic, environmental and social goalsthat society seeks to achieve, for example: sustained economic growthand increased productivity, lower carbon emissions and lower local
pollution, greater social amenity and improved quality of life.
1. Goal definition
DescriptionStage
Infrastructure Australia Audit Framework: