Upload
random73
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A report of test results for candidate mark and space filters, for my planned build of the W2PAT Terminal Unit.
Citation preview
Audio Filters for Classic Radioteletype Application
D.R. Sentz
Started July 11, 2015
A long time ago I acquired several of the "phone company" type
toroid transformer/inductors that are commonly referred to as
44/88 millihenry or 22/88 millihenry toroids. I still have four
of them available for use. Radioteletype (RTTY) hobby articles
refer to these toroids as being very useful for the mark and
space tone filters in homebrew "terminal units" (TUs). The
classic ham radio RTTY signaling conventions were;
1. High frequency (HF) RTTY
Modulation Frequency-Shift-Keying (FSK)
Shift 850 Hz
Mark signal nominal RF carrier frequency
Space signal RF carrier 850 Hz
2. Very High frequency (VHF) RTTY
Modulation Audio-Frequency-Shift-Keying (AFSK)
Shift 850 Hz
Mark signal 2125 Hz
Space signal 2975 Hz
A single terminal unit design can employ two filters, one for
each of the VHF AFSK tone frequences, and then employ a
"reversing switch" to choose the HF signaling mode or the VHF
signaling mode. If the inductor is exactly 88 millihenrys, then
the capacitor to go with it, for the 850 Hz shift "standard"
mark and space tone frequencies, should theoretically be as
follows;
Tone Filter Capacitor
2975 Hz 0.0325 uF
2125 Hz 0.0637 uF
I do not have an audio signal generator, but I can still easily
breadboard the audio filters, and use a "select-in-test"
procedure to arrive at the proper capacitor choices. The
procedure requires only the following equipment, that I have;
Short-wave U.S.Army receiver model R-174
Fluke digital multimeter model 79
8 ohm to 500 ohm audio transformer, and 600 ohm headphones
clip leads, misc.
Procedure- Before starting, let the receiver stabilize (i.e.,
"warm up") for a little while, say 15 to 30 minutes.
1. Set the receiver function switch to "CAL". Tune to 1800 kHz
so that you hear the beat tone. The receiver has a built-in
200kHz crystal-controlled calibrator.
2. Apply the receiver's audio output to the series resonant test
circuit via the step-up transformer and a 10kohm isolation
resistor, as shown in the figure above.
3. Refer to the figure for the following substeps;
Disconnect the circuit under test at "X".
Set the multimeter to "Hz"
Tune the tone frequency to about 2 kHz
Set the multimeter to AC voltage
Adjust the receiver's volume control to get an amplitude reading between 1 and 2 volts. Recheck the tone frequency
after this adjustment.
4. Connect the circuit under test at "X". Tune the receiver to
vary the audio tone frequency to get the best "null", or minimum,
AC voltage across the circuit under test. Record the magnitude
of the minimum voltage. It is important to distinguish between
the true null and the normal roll-off of the amplitude as the
tone frequency increases or decreases. Use the headphones to
help out with identifying the true null.
5. Do not change the tone frequency after finding the null.
Disconnect the filter under test at the "X". Leave the
multimeter attached to the resistor. See drawing on previous
page.
6. Switch the multimeter to "Hz" and measure the frequency and
magnitude of the audio tone. Record this reading as the measured
series-resonant frequency of the filter.
If you can't get a stable frequency reading then the volume
control on the receiver may have been set too low. Turn it up
some and try this step again (You may not have to repeat the
whole procedure). I found that a 1 volt rms tone is fine for the
multimeter to make a good measurement of the frequency.
There is, in theory, no difference between series and parallel
resonance frequency of a tuned circuit. The nulling method
should be more accurate than a "peaking" method.
July 15, 2015- Filter Testing went very well, considering the
crude nature of my set-up. Here are the results.
2975Hz- Theoretical .0325 uF
Capacitor selected:
Marked Measured I.D.
#1 .033 .0323 Yellow Tubular 100V
Theoretical Resonance at 2985 Hz
Measurements with Red 88MHy Toroid;
1000Hz 1.77 volts 653mV - 8.7dB
2000Hz 2.95 volts 373mV -18.0dB
2500Hz 3.08 volts 179mV -24.7dB
2972Hz 1.44 volts 50mV -29.2dB, photo
2973Hz 1.6 volts 54mV -29.4dB, -0.85 dB from peak
2975Hz 1.85 volts 50mV -31.4dB
3053Hz 1.7 volts 52mV -30.3dB
3200Hz 2.37 volts 64mV -31.4dB
3500Hz 1.89 volts 96mV -25.9dB
4000Hz 1.50 volts 134mV -21.0dB
Series Connected Red 88mHy Toriod and .0323uF
2125Hz- Theoretical .0637 uF
Capacitors Selected;
Marked Measured I.D.
#1 .022 .0193 Yellow Tubular 200V
#2 .022 .0234 Green 50V
#3 .022 .02215 Yellow Tubular 400V
Total .06485 High by .00115uF 1.8%
Theoretical Resonance at 2107 Hz
Measurements with Green 88MHy Toroid;
2125Hz 1.8 volts 48mV -31.5dB photo
2125Hz 2.6 volts 50mV -34.3dB cannot explain 3dB diff.
----
625Hz 1.35V 430mV - 9.9dB
1000Hz 1.09V 186mV -15.4dB
2125Hz 2.6 V 50mV -32.0dB (avg. two measurements)
2500Hz 2.60V 94mV -28.8dB
3000Hz 2.28V 166mV -22.8dB
Series Connected Green 88mHy Toroid and .06485uF
This data, coarse as it is, looks fine for single-section
series-resonant LC circuits. Now I have confidence that these
are good-enough parts for the two parallel-resonant tone filters.
Here are some photos from the testing activity;
Input Tone Frequency = 2972 Hz
Filter#1 2972 Hz Input Tone Amplitude = 1.44 Volts
Filter#1 2972 Hz Output Amplitude = 50 millivolts
Input Tone Frequency = 2125 Hz
Filter#2 2125 Hz Input Tone Amplitude = 1.825 Volts
Filter#2 2125 Hz Output Amplitude = 48 millivolts