Upload
christal-rose
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ATLAS Pixel DetectorService Structures and Beampipe
Support• Package design of Insertable Pixel System
– Pixel system is integrated into train of services– Service Supports and Beampipe supports integrated together in Forward
Region– Joined together to Form “PACKAGE”– Assembly of Package on surface is largely European responsibility
• Key Cost Points– Beampipe Supports are a new Pixel responsibility—not fully approved by
US Atlas, but fully accepted as absolutely required—NO WBS in Pixel estimate
– Only limited Service Panel Prototyping occurred in FY03—shift mockup/system testing to ‘04
– Design changes increased cost of service structures and integration responsibilities are increased(ing)
– UNCOSTED: Environmental cooling/sensors; 1/8-Barrel System test in ’04 (completely ignored this)
• Assumptions– MT Staffing for BP and Service Supports is Shared with PST, will ramp up
when Sectors finish– BP support budget will come from US Atlas—does not come from current
pixel budget
ATLAS Pixel DetectorPatch Panel 0
Service Panels
SCT Barrel
TRT Forward
Side C Side A
Service Panels Pixel Detector
TRT Forward
ATLAS Pixel Detector“Package”
Beam Pipe Support Stru
cture
Beam Pipe Support Stru
cture
Pixel Detecto
r
Not Shown
Beam Pipe
Service Panels
ATLAS Pixel DetectorService Panel with PP0 and PP1 Quarter panel
• Cooling connections
• Electrical Connections
• Opto cards, fibers and fiber connections
• Service Support along PST
• Regenerative Heat Exchanger integrated in service quarter panel (SQP)
• Supports PP1 during assembly
ATLAS Pixel Detector2 Hit Service Quarter Panel
• Inner Panel not installed, but need to know far enough in advance to ‘adjust’ lengths of B-Layer and Disk Type 0 Cables
• Service Quarter Panel Structure—Back Bone and Arms shown
Back Bone
Tube Support Arms
ATLAS Pixel DetectorPP0 2-Hit installed on BPSS
• Disk/B-Layer not assembled (Inner Panel)
• Support condition not changed—last armature supports end of Outer Panel
• Inner panel supported on tabs placed on BPSS Assembly
ATLAS Pixel DetectorBPSS Supports Service Panels
• Primary interface to BPSS is ‘Longeron’
• Adequate clearance for beampipe wire given by cooling tubes
• BPSS Adjustor fits through PP1 QP, which is integrated with SQP
• Interface blocks along longeron for SQP ribs Mate with Tube Support Arms
• Mount tabs on Barrel Cruciform support Inner service panel
ATLAS Pixel DetectorPP1 Part of SQP Assembly—tight interface with
BPSS• Routing of tubes
through PP1 set to minimize variety of tubes (same bend profile)
• Sets of Tubes shared per octant
• BPSS Adjustor, and support strut align with SQP during assembly
• Gap between tubes (anti-clocked with adjustors) allows for access to Opto connector(s)
• SQP Backbone not shown—sits in ‘rail cutout’
ATLAS Pixel DetectorPP0—Interface to Detector Services
• PP0 is detector end of SQP Assembly
• 2 hit system has ~6 less PP0 flexes per octant which is number of flexes on inner panel
• Inner panel carries Disk and B-layer services (nominally)
• Can be ‘de-scoped’ but requires decision deadline prior to fabrication of type 0 cables for disk and b-layer, or deciding now to fabricate these ‘long’
ATLAS Pixel DetectorCooling Tubes
• Heat Exchanger integrated into Service Panel
• Requires close-coupling of inlet and outlet (supply/exhaust) tubing within the panel
• Design and routing requires ~5 different bend profiles—these are combined in various ways to get all combinations of tubes
• Cost of Bending tubes in SQP assy estimate—tubing and fittings in cooling tube estimate
ATLAS Pixel DetectorHeat Exchanger Units (Type 1 Tubing run)
• Tube units are pre-assembled into Heat Exchangers
• Tube units are held in service panel support structure
• Blue unit is for Barrel• Red unit is for Disk• Units are loaded as
required by service modularity
ATLAS Pixel DetectorBeampipe Support
Frame
Wires at Z=-848,+848
Fixed Adjustors(no spring)
Top and Side
Sprung AdjustorsSide and bottom(tension limiters)
Wire Adjustors
Cruciform supports
Longerons
Service panelAttachment points
ReinforcingLongerons, Attach Points to PP1
2 Frames – 1 A Side, 1 C SideSingle Frame Shown Here
4 Support Wires, 1 Support Plane
ATLAS Pixel DetectorBeam Pipe Collars
Split Conical Ring Allows Free Placement in Z
Wire Anchor Point
Kapton Heater
Aerogel Insulation
No longer delivered—saves ~$25k
ATLAS Pixel DetectorAdjustor/Tension Limiter
Preload Adjustor Barrel
Limiter Spring
Wire Adjustor Screw
Wire Adjustor Nut
WireCollet &
Nut
Wire
Tension LimiterPlunger
Wire Guide
ATLAS Pixel DetectorSchedule
• Delivery for Beampipe Support and Service panels follows roughly the delivery of the frame components– Delivery January ‘05
• Delivery of Beampipe supports may be requested earlier—need to define actual date in conjunction with Beampipe group
• PRR for BPSS complete in FY ’03, production design complete
• EDIA in ’04 is for fixture ‘adjustments’, mfg procedure definition, and production oversight.
• Service Panels may be required earlier subject to testing requirements as yet undefined
• Prototype Service panel(s) required for System Test in 2nd QTR FY03 Left in from last year—shifted to 2nd QTR ’04
• Service Panel PRR in Dec ‘03
ATLAS Pixel Detector
Costs for Service Panels/Supports
• ETC03 to ETC04 Increase of ~$84k
• Due to Schedule Delay and increased Complexity
• Production moved from FY03 to FY04—materials purchased ‘03
• Prototyping (mockup) still required, shifted to ’04, may still happen in ’03 (24k+15k)
• Labor is .8 FTE in ’04• Did not estimate
‘auxilliary cooling/env sensors/opto-cooling
ETC03 FY03 FY04 TotalPrototyping
Shop/Labor $8k $0k $8kMaterials $73k $0k $73k
ProductionShop/Labor $0k $138k $138kMaterials $43k $0k $43k
Totals $124k $138k $262k
ETC04 FY03 FY04 TotalPrototyping
Shop/Labor $8k $24k $32kMaterials $3k $15k $18k
ProductionShop/Labor $0k $188k $188kMaterials $0k $108k $108k
Totals $11k $335k $346k
ATLAS Pixel Detector
Costs for Beampipe Support
• Added responsibility to Pixel Project—budget to come from Lissaeur’s integration WBS
• Renamed ‘prototype’ to first production unit, built 1-d prototype for April FDR
• EDIA is less than initial Estimate
• No Foreseen cost impact to finalized design
• Production delayed, engineering accelerated—no cost increase, but shift of all production cost to ‘04
• Contingency would require Second ‘production’ structure to be fabricated
• Labor in ’04 is ~0.6FTE• Some of this cost
‘decrease’ is a shift of cost to ‘Insertion’
ETC03 FY03 FY04 TotalPrototyping
EDIA $93k $0k $93kShop/Labor $78k $0k $78kMaterials $10k $0k $10k
ProductionEDIA $0k $24k $24k
Shop/Labor $0k $67k $67kMaterials $0k $12k $12k
Totals $181k $103k $284k
ETC04 FY03 FY04 TotalPrototyping
EDIA $15k $0k $15kShop/Labor $15k $0k $15kMaterials $1k $0k $1k
ProductionEDIA $50k $18k $68k
Shop/Labor $0k $111k $111kMaterials $0k $25k $25k
Totals $81k $154k $235k
ATLAS Pixel DetectorManpower Needs over Mechanics ‘04
• Manpower Requirements over all of Mechanics– PST ~0.6FTE– Service Panels ~0.8FTE– BPSS ~0.6FTE– Insertion ~0.1FTE– Sectors assumed ‘half an FTE’ in ’04
• Manpower is ~2.6FTE• Seems that this is possible with manpower available,
but neglects inefficiency of task switching, PHASING• Also, assumes that all tasks completed in FY’04, some
can trickle into 1st QTR FY’05• Does not include Manpower for PP1, Frame Assy,
Installation/Dry fit