1
Histopathology 2000, 37, 375 Book review Atlas of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Endoscopic Biopsies T S Emory, H A Carpenter, C J Gostout, L H Sobin, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, 2000 ISBN 1–881041–64–6, $125.00 The facility for correlation between clinical and histo- pathology findings is essential for any high quality healthcare service. The majority of histopathology speci- mens do not present any diagnostic problems and can usually be reported with the clinical information given on the request form. However there will be a minority in which discussion between the clinician and histopathol- ogist is vital to arrive at the correct diagnosis, or selection of differential diagnoses. Most histopathology depart- ments run regular clinicopathological meetings and in many countries this is now formalized within accredita- tion processes. Much useful information flows between biopsy takers and interpreters at such meetings but there is a general lack of textbooks that provide similar correlation. This atlas seeks to bridge the gap between clinical gastroenterology and histopathology by providing correlation between images taken at endoscopy and down the light microscope. The images are classified by site and pathological process with side by side presentation of the endoscopic and microscopic images. Many of the light microscopic images are at a low magnification that facilitates comparison with the view down the endoscope. There is brief accompanying text that describes the endoscopic and clinical features. The overall presentation is clear and the quality of the images is high. How might histopathologists benefit from this book? There are a restricted number of macroscopic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract polyps, ulcers and haemorrhages cover the vast majority of abnormalities. However there are a wide range of pathologies that can cause each type of macroscopic lesion and these can only be defined by detailed light microscopy, sometimes with stains additional to haematoxylin and eosin. I am not sure that this atlas provides any additional information for the histopathologist in diagnostic practice. For example, an ulcer in the stomach can be caused by carcinoma, lymphoma, peptic ulcer disease, or infections in immunocompromised hosts. The histopathologist needs to know what pathologies can cause an ulcer but will not attach any diagnostic value to subtle variations in ulcer appearance at endoscopy. This is not a book that I can imagine being used as an everyday reference during the reporting of specimens. However this book does provide an excellent overview of all the diseases in the gastrointestinal tract that give rise to distinct endoscopic abnormalities that generate biopsies. It is thus a valuable book for the trainee histopathologist who needs to get a ‘big picture’ of gastrointestinal pathology that will not be provided by the biased selection of biopsies in routine diagnostic practice. This copy of the atlas will be placed on the shelves of the reporting room in our teaching hospital department and I shall be recommending that all trainees read it during their training in gastrointestinal pathology. S Cross q 2000 Blackwell Science Limited.

Atlas of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Endoscopic Biopsies

  • Upload
    s-cross

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Histopathology 2000, 37, 375

Book review

Atlas of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy andEndoscopic Biopsies

T S Emory, H A Carpenter, C J Gostout, L H Sobin, ArmedForces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, 2000ISBN 1±881041±64±6, $125.00

The facility for correlation between clinical and histo-pathology findings is essential for any high qualityhealthcare service. The majority of histopathology speci-mens do not present any diagnostic problems and canusually be reported with the clinical information given onthe request form. However there will be a minority inwhich discussion between the clinician and histopathol-ogist is vital to arrive at the correct diagnosis, or selectionof differential diagnoses. Most histopathology depart-ments run regular clinicopathological meetings and inmany countries this is now formalized within accredita-tion processes. Much useful information flows betweenbiopsy takers and interpreters at such meetings but thereis a general lack of textbooks that provide similarcorrelation. This atlas seeks to bridge the gap betweenclinical gastroenterology and histopathology by providingcorrelation between images taken at endoscopy and downthe light microscope. The images are classified by site andpathological process with side by side presentation of theendoscopic and microscopic images. Many of the lightmicroscopic images are at a low magnification thatfacilitates comparison with the view down the endoscope.There is brief accompanying text that describes theendoscopic and clinical features. The overall presentationis clear and the quality of the images is high.

How might histopathologists benefit from this book?There are a restricted number of macroscopic lesions inthe gastrointestinal tract Ð polyps, ulcers andhaemorrhages cover the vast majority of abnormalities.However there are a wide range of pathologies that cancause each type of macroscopic lesion and these canonly be defined by detailed light microscopy, sometimeswith stains additional to haematoxylin and eosin. I amnot sure that this atlas provides any additionalinformation for the histopathologist in diagnosticpractice. For example, an ulcer in the stomach can becaused by carcinoma, lymphoma, peptic ulcer disease,or infections in immunocompromised hosts. Thehistopathologist needs to know what pathologies cancause an ulcer but will not attach any diagnostic valueto subtle variations in ulcer appearance at endoscopy.This is not a book that I can imagine being used as aneveryday reference during the reporting of specimens.However this book does provide an excellent overviewof all the diseases in the gastrointestinal tract that giverise to distinct endoscopic abnormalities that generatebiopsies. It is thus a valuable book for the traineehistopathologist who needs to get a `big picture' ofgastrointestinal pathology that will not be provided bythe biased selection of biopsies in routine diagnosticpractice. This copy of the atlas will be placed on theshelves of the reporting room in our teaching hospitaldepartment and I shall be recommending that alltrainees read it during their training in gastrointestinalpathology.

S Cross

q 2000 Blackwell Science Limited.