88
Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 | www.hpccpa.com 1

Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 | 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

1

Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 | www.hpccpa.com

Page 2: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

The Final Tangible Property Regulations

An OverviewPresented by

William C. Harshman

2

Page 3: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Background

• Disputes Between Taxpayers & IRS• IRS has lost many of the disputes• Beginning approximately 3 years ago IRS issued Temp Regulations

− Delayed several times− New Final Regulations effective 1/1/14

3

Page 4: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Five major areas of change

• Treatment of amounts paid for improvements to tangible property• Treatment of expenditures for materials & supplies• Treatment of repair & maintenance expenditures• General rules for capital expenditures• Treatment of amounts paid for purchase/production of tangible

property

4

Page 5: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

New Annual Elections• The final and proposed regulations have many new annual elections including

1. Election to capitalize and depreciate certain materials and supplies (§1.162-3(d) A TP may elect to treat as a capital expenditure and to treat as an asset subject to the

allowance for depreciation the cost of any rotable spare part, temporary spare part, or standby emergency spare part

2. De minimis safe harbor election (§1.162-3(f)(1) A TP with and without an AFS may not capitalize any amount paid in the taxable year for

the acquisition or production of a unit of tangible property nor treat as a material or supply under §1.162-3(a) any amount paid in the taxable year for tangible property if the amount specified meets the rules ($500 and $5,000 per invoice respectively)

5

Page 6: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

New Annual Elections

3. Election to capitalize amounts paid for employee compensation or overhead as amounts that facilitate the acquisition of property (1.263(a)-2(f)(iv)(B))

4. Safe harbor for small taxpayers (1.263(a)-2(h)(1) A TP may elect not to capitalize improvements or repairs to an

eligible building property ) if the total amount paid during the taxable year for repairs, maintenance, improvements, and similar activities performed on the eligible building property does not exceed the lesser of— 2% of the unadjusted basis of the eligible building property; or $10,000

6

Page 7: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

New Annual Elections

7

5. Election to capitalize repair and maintenance costs(1.263(a)-2(n)(1)

A taxpayer may elect to treat amounts paid during the taxable/year for repair and maintenance (as defined under §1.162-4) to/tangible property as amounts paid to improve that property/under this section and as an asset subject to the allowance for depreciation if the taxpayer incurs these amounts in carrying on the taxpayer’s trade or business and if the taxpayer treats these amounts as capital expenditures on its books and records

Page 8: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

New Annual Elections

• Disposition of a portion of an asset (aka partial disposition• election) (§1.168(i)-8(d)(2)• A taxpayer may make an election under this paragraph (d)(2) to• apply this section to a disposition of a portion of an asset• Must make the election by the due date (including extensions) of• the original federal tax return for the taxable year in which the• portion of an asset is disposed of by the TP• This listing does not include the numerous GAA• elections addressed in the PRs

8

Page 9: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

New Provisions Are Not Elections

• Most of the new final and PR TPRs are not elections, but rather are method changes first

Example

For the Safe harbor for routine maintenance on property (1.263(a)-2(i)(1) one has to first have the applicable final TPR method change filed first

• Change procedures for the final TPRs are expected to be issued in October 2013

9

Page 10: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

The Allowed or Allowable Rule

• Points

1. Section 1.1016-3 remains part of the TPRS – the IRS will use this in their audits of Taxpayers to deny depreciation deductions

2. Use 2013 (i.e. tax depreciation schedules as of 12-31-2012) to correct any errors in prior year depreciation, and

10

Page 11: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Errors in Depreciation Fixes

• Cannot fix depreciation errors by “catching up” on prior year errors

• Only filed one return? The taxpayer has not adopted an accounting method, either

Previously filed return can be amended to make the correction, OR

IRS will allow A CAM by filing a 3115 with the current year’s return WITH A 481(a) adjustment on the current year’s return

11

Page 12: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Errors in Depreciation Fixes• Filed two (or more) returns?

The taxpayer HAS adopted an accounting method May only file a 3115 to correct

• Incorrect depreciation deduction due to a mathematical or posting error?

A TP is not considered to have adopted an accounting method regardless of the number of returns that have been filed

So … May only file amended returns for open years

12

Page 13: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Errors in DepreciationGains & Losses

• The rule requiring basis reduction for unclaimed (allowable) depreciation applies for purposes of determining gain or loss When computing depreciation recapture, a TP need not

recapture as ordinary income unclaimed depreciation

• A TP should, however, amend returns for open years to claim any unclaimed depreciation (or to reduce the amount of depreciation claimed in the open years in the case of a negative 481(a) adjustment

13

Page 14: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Depreciation Errors and TPR toCheck for that Need Correction

• Bonus depreciation (if taken on some, but not on all applicable assets – 3115; if not taken but now want to take = need letter ruling to change;

• Improper lives for assets (need 3115)• Depreciation taken on assets now owned or

owned (need 3115)

14

Page 15: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Index of Regulation SectionsTemporary

• 1.162-3T = rules for materials and supplies• 1.162-4T = rules for amounts paid or incurred for repairs and

maintenance• 1.263(a)-1T = general rules for capital expenditures• 1.263(a)-2T = rules for amounts paid or incurred for the acquisition

and production of tangible property• 1.263(a)-3T = rules for amounts paid or incurred for the

improvement of tangible property• Are effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014,

with earlier application permitted

15

Page 16: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Index of Regulation SectionsFinal and Proposed (PRs)

• 1.162-3 = “Materials and supplies”• 1.162-4 = “Repairs” (rules for amounts paid or incurred for

repairs and maintenance)• 1.263(a)-1 = “Capital expenditures; in general”• 1.263(a)-2 = “Amounts paid to acquire or produce tangible

property”• 1.263(a)-3 = “Amounts paid to improve tangible property”

16

Page 17: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Index of Regulation SectionsFinal and Proposed (PRs)

• 1.263(a)-6 = “Election to deduct or capitalize certain expenditures”

• 1.168(i)-1 = GAA• 1.168(i)-8 = Dispositions of MACRS property• Are effective for taxable years beginning on or after

January 1, 2014, with earlier application permitted

17

Page 18: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

CapitalizationFoundation Rules

• Section 263(a) (relating to the capitalization requirement) states that no deduction is allowed for1. Any amount paid out for new buildings or

permanent improvements or betterments made to increase the value of any property, or

2. Any amount expended in restoring property or in making good the exhaustion thereof for which an allowance has been made

18

Page 19: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Background …

• 263(a) Regulations state that capital expenditures include amounts paid or incurred to Add to the value, or substantially prolong the useful

life, of property owned by the TP, or Adapt the property to a new or different use Amounts paid or incurred for incidental repairs and

maintenance of property (as defined by 162 and §1.162-4 (relating to the deduction for ordinary and necessary trade or business expenses) are not capital expenditures under §1.263(a)-1

19

Page 20: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Temporary or FinalRegulations Do Not Change• §263(a)

Which requires TPs to capitalize amounts paid to improve tangible property and

• §263A and the regulations under §263A Which require TPs to capitalize the direct and allocable

indirect costs, including the cost of materials and supplies, to property produced or to property acquired for resale

• §1.471-1 Which requires TPs to include in inventory certain materials

and supplies

• §1016 on “use it or lose it” rule20

Page 21: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Unit of Property (UoP)

• Is a very important element to these and other regulations

• Does the client first need to change its Unit of Property before it makes a method change under the new TPRs?

21

Page 22: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Unit of Property (UoP)• Unit of Property is a very important issued, why?

It is an important criteria in the decision whether a Taxpayer can write off an expenditure as a R& M

• Generally The small the Unite of Property the more likely the expenditure

has to be capitalized

• This issue should almost always be considered in TR issues, most of the time, early• If your current Unit of Property does not match what you

need/want to do-you must ????? an accounting method change to get it corrected (T method 162, F is?)

22

Page 23: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Rules for Determining a UoP§1.263(a)-3T(e) and -3(e) for

FinalFor property other than buildings,• Defines a UoP as consisting of all the components of

the UoP that are based upon the functional interdependent standard, but there are special rules for Plant equipment, network assets, leased property, and

improvements to property Additional rules if

A Tax Payer has assigned different MACRS classes or depreciation methods to components of property, or

Subsequently changes the class or depreciation method of a component

23

Page 24: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Unit of Property (UoP) forBuildings 1.263(a)-3(e)(2)

• Building Structure• Building Systems (9) Defines building systems to include:

1) the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems (HVAC);2) the plumbing systems;3) the electrical systems;4) all escalators;5) all elevators;6) the fire protection and alarm systems;7) the security systems;8) the gas distribution systems; and,9) any other systems identified in published guidance.

24

Page 25: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Building and Structural Components

1.263(a)-3T(e)(2) and 3(e)(2) Final

General rule that the UoP for a building is

• T: comprised of the building and its structural components

• F: each building and its structural components

25

Page 26: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Building and Structural Components

1.263(a)-3T(e)(2) and 3(e)(2) FinalImprovements to a building

• T: Requires that a TP apply the improvement standards separately to the primary components of the building, that is, the building structure or any of the specifically defined building systems

• F: Requires that a TP apply the improvement rules separately to the building structure (a building structure consists of the building and its structural components, other than the structural components designated as building systems) or its building systems (these are separate from building structure, and to which the improvement rules must be applied)

A UoP is a method of accounting

26

Page 27: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Building and Structural Components

1.263(a)-3T(e)(2) and -3(e)(2)Defines the building structure as• T: the building (§1.48-1(e)(1)) and its structural components (§1.48-

1(e)(2)) other than the components specifically enumerated as building systems

• F: each building and its structural components (as defined in §1.48-1(e)(2)) is a single unit of property (“building”)

A cost is treated as a capital expenditure if it results in an• T: improvement to the building structure or to any of the

specifically enumerated building systems• F: improvement to building structure or any of the building systems

27

Page 28: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Building and Structural Components for

Partial Dispositions (1.168(i)-8(d)(2)

• The proposed regulations (PR) change the unit of property rule in Temp Reg. §§1.168(i)-1T and1.168(i)-8T that each structural component of a building, condominium, or cooperative is the asset for tax disposition purposes• The PR provide that a building (including its structural

components), a condominium (including its structural components), or a cooperative (including its structural components) is the asset for disposition purposes

28

Page 29: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Further Review of theFinal TPR Issues

• §1.162-3 Rules for materials and supplies;• §1.162-4 Repairs and maintenance;• §1.263(a)-1 General rules for capital expenditures;• §1.263(a)-2 Rules for amounts paid for the

acquisition or production of tangible property;• §1.263(a)-3 Rules for amounts paid for the

improvement of tangible property

29

Page 30: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Material and SuppliesReg. §1.162-3

• The F TPRs expand the definition of M & S to include property that has an acquisition or production cost of $200 or less (increased from $100), clarify application of the optional method of accounting for rotable and temporary spare parts, and simplify the application of the de minimis safe harbor to M & S

• Add a new definition for “standby emergency spare parts”

• Add a new election to capitalize and depreciate M & S but limit that capitalize choice to only rotable, temporary and standby emergency spare parts

30

Page 31: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Material and SuppliesReg. §1.162-3

• Election to capitalize and depreciate is made on Taxpayer’s timely filed original tax return

• Taxpayer can make that election item by item• Final TPRs coordinate the de minimis rules for unites of property (§1.162-

3(f)) and M & S (Reg. §1.162-3(f))

The Taxpayer must apply the de minimis safe harbor to amounts paid for all M & S, except for those M & S that the Taxpayer elects to capitalize and depreciate

• Non-incidental and incidental M & S rules of the temporary TPRs remain• All final M & S require a method change filing

31

Page 32: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Material and SuppliesReg. §1.162-3

• If a Taxpayer choses to make the election to capitalize and depreciate certain M & S for its tax year 2012 and 2013, the Taxpayer can still make the election by filing an amended return on or before 180 days after the extended due date, even if the return was not extended

• A Taxpayer may choose to apply the temporary M & S rules for §1.162-3T for 2012 and 2013

• See Appendix ????? For Final TPR examples, list 1

32

Page 33: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Repair—Reg. §1.162-4

• Is a simple, straight-forward rule, that is the opposite of capitalization Amounts paid for repairs and maintenance to tangible property are

deductible if the amounts paid are not required to be capitalized under Reg. §1.263(a)-3

• Same rule as from temporary TPRs• A change to comply with this is a change in method of

accounting to which the provisions of §§446 and 481 and the accompanying regulations apply• No examples in Final TPRs

33

Page 34: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f) and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4

• Prior (can apply to 2012 and 2013) de minimis was not a “safe harbor” Taxpayer could deduct certain amounts paid for tangible

property if the Taxpayer had an AFS, had written account policies for expensing amounts under specific dollar amounts, and treated those amounts as expenses on its AFS

Ceiling was the great of 1) 0.1 percent of the Taxpayer’s gross receipts for the tax year as

determined for tax purposes; or

2) 2 percent of the Taxpayer’s total depreciation and amortization expense for the tax year as determined on the Taxpayer’s AFS

34

Page 35: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• Final (can apply to 2012 and 2013 but must apply 2014

and after) de minimis safe harbor Ceiling has been eliminated New safe harbor determined at invoice item level, but same

on policies for books and records If AFS, Taxpayer may rely on the de minimis safe harbor only

if the amount paid for property does not exceed $5,1000 per invoice or per item as substantiated by the invoice

This amount is subject to change by the IRS in future guidance

35

Page 36: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• The de minimis safe harbor has been expanded to include

amounts paid for property having an economic useful life or less than 12 months, provided the amount per invoice or item does not exceed $5,000• A $500per item de minimis rule is also included for taxpayers

without an AFS, but still have to have accounting procedures in place to deduct amounts paid for property costing less than specified amount or amounts paid for property with life of 12 months or less• If cost exceeds $500 per invoice, no portion will qualify for the

safe harbor

36

Page 37: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

37

Page 38: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• Same rule as in the temporary TPRs

The de minimis safe harbor does not precluded a Taxpayer from reaching an agreement with the IRS that the examining agents will not review certain items

• Examining agents do not need to revise their materiality thresholds in accordance with the safe harbor limitation• The de minimis safe harbor is elected annual by including a

statement on the Taxpayer’s tax return for the year elected• An election to use the safe harbor may not be made through the

filing of an application for change in accounting method

38

Page 39: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• For consolidated groups, if a Taxpayer’s financial results are reported on

the AFS for a group of entities, then the group’s AFS may be treated as the AFS of the Taxpayer• A Taxpayer is not required to include in the cost of the property the

additional costs if these costs are not included on the same invoice as the tangible property• However, a Taxpayer electing the de minimis must included in the cost of

the property all additional costs (for example, delivery fees, installation services, or similar costs) of acquiring or producing the property if these costs are included on the same invoice with the tangible property

39

Page 40: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• If an invoice includes amounts paid for multiple tangible property and

the invoice includes additional invoice costs related to the multiple property, then the taxpayer must allocate the additional invoice costs to each property using a reasonable method• The de minimis safe harbor must be applied to all eligible M & S

(other than rotable, temporary, and standby emergency spare parts subject to the election to capitalize or to rotable and temporary spare parts subject to the optional method of accounting for such part(s) if the Taxpayer elects the de minimis safe harbor

40

Page 41: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f)

and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4• Taxpayers that do no elect the de minimis safe harbor must

treat amounts paid for materials and supplies in accordance with Reg. §1.162-3• Taxpayers subject to 263A can not avoid those provision by

using the de minimis• Safe harbor does not apply to inventory, land items it

capitalizes, and the optional method of rotable parts • Safe harbor is deducted as ordinary and necessary expense

41

Page 42: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

De Minimis Safe Harbor-Reg. §§1.162-3(f) and 1.263(a)-1(f) Repairs-Reg. §1.162.4

(Effective Dates)• Except for the de minimis election, changes apply to taxable years on or

after 1-1-14• If doing the de minimis election, it will only apply to transactions after 1-1-

14• Even for the de minimis election, a Taxpayer may choose to adopt to

amounts paid or incurred in taxable years on or after 1-1-12• Transition rule for de minimis election on 2012 and 2013 returns apply

A Taxpayer may choose to apply the temporary de minimis rules for Reg. §1.263(a)-1T for 2012 and 2013

42

Page 43: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Acquire or Produce

Tangible Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-2• Temporary TPRs provided rules for 263(a) to amounts paid

to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal property• These rules are generally retained in the final TPRs

Requirements to capitalize amounts paid to acquire or produce, To capitalize amounts paid to defend or perfect title and The de minimis safe harbor was moved to §1.263(a)-1(f) to reflect

its broader application amounts paid to tangible property, including amounts paid for improves and M & S, except for those subject to 263A

43

Page 44: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3• This final TPR section covers the following sections

a) Provides the requirement to capitalize amounts paid to improve tangible property and provides the general rules for determining whether a unit of property (UoP) is improved

b) Rules for determining the UoP

c) Rules for leasehold improvements

d) Rules for determining improvement costs in particular contexts, including indirect costs incurred during an improvement, removal costs, aggregation of related costs, and regulatory compliance costs

44

Page 45: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3• This final TPR section covers the following sections

h) Safe harbor for small taxpayers

i) Safe harbor for routine maintenance costs

j) Whether amounts are paid for betterments to UoP

k) Whether amounts are paid to restore the UoP

l) Rules for amounts paid to adapt the UoP to a new or different use

m) An election to capitalize R & M consistent with books and records

n) an (o) the treatment and recovery of amounts capitalized under this section

p) and (q) accounting method changes and state the effective/applicability date for the rules of this Section

45

Page 46: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(d)• Requirement to capitalize amounts paid for improvements• A Taxpayer generally must capitalize the related amounts paid

to improve a UoP owned by the Taxpayer• A UoP is improved if the amounts paid for activities performed

after the property is place din service by the Taxpayer −1. Are for betterment to the UoP2. Restore the UoP or3. Adapt the UoP to a new or different use

46

Page 47: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• Determining the UoP• UoP determination is based upon the function interdependence standard• Special rules are provided for:

Buildings Plant property Network assets Leased property (leased buildings and leased property other than building), and Improvements to property

47

Page 48: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• Additional rules are provided if a Taxpayer has assigned

different MACRS classes or depreciation methods to components of property or subsequently changes the class or depreciation method of a component or other item of property.

48

Page 49: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• Determining the UoP − Leased Building• In the case of a Taxpayer that is a lessee of all or a portion

of a building such as an office, floor or certain square footage), the UoP is each building and it structural components or the portion of each building subject to the lease and the structural components associated with the leased portion

49

Page 50: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• An amount is paid to improve a least building property if the amount

is paid for an improvement, to any of the following

Entire building, portion of a building

• Other than a building

All the components that are functionally interdependent comprise a single UoP

50

Page 51: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• Determining the UoP − Other• In the case of plan property, the UoP is further divided into smaller

units comprised of each component (or group of components) that performs a discrete and major function or operation within the functionally interdependent machinery or equipment• In the case of network assets, UoP is determined by the Taxpayer’s

particular facts and circumstances• Leased property OT buildings

UoP may not be larger than the property subject to the lease

51

Page 52: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Amounts Paid to Improve Tangible

Property-Reg. §1.263(a)-3(e)• Determining the UoP − Improvements• An improvement to a UoP is not a UoP separate from the UoP improved• UoP must be treated as a separate UoP if, at the time the UoP is initially

placed in service by the Taxpayer, the Taxpayer has properly treated the component as being within a different class of property

• In any taxable year after the UoP is initially placed in service by the Taxpayer, if the Taxpayer or the IRS changes the treatment of that property (or any portion thereof) to a proper MACRS class or a proper depreciation method (for example, as a result of a cost segregation study or a change in the use of the property), then the Taxpayer must change the UoP determination for that property

52

Page 53: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Improvements to LeasedProperty−Reg. §1.263(a)-3(f)• Taxpayer can apply either the safe harbor for small taxpayers or de

minimis safe harbor to leased property.• A Taxpayer lessee must capitalize the related amounts that it pays to

improve a leased property except to the extent that section 110 applies to a construction allowance received by the lessee for the purpose of such improvement or when the improvement constitutes a substitute for rent• A Taxpayer lessee must also capitalize the related amounts that a lessor

pays to improve a leased property if the lessee is the owner of the improvement

53

Page 54: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Special Rules for DeterminingImprovement Costs−Reg.

§1.263(a)-3(g)Certain costs incurred during an improvement• A Taxpayer must capitalize all the direct costs of an

improvement and all the indirect costs (including, for example, otherwise deductible repair costs) that directly benefit or are incurred by reason of an improvement• Indirect costs arising from activities that do not directly benefit

and are not incurred by reason of an improvement are not required to be capitalized under Section 263(a), regardless of whether the activities are performed at the same time as an improvement

54

Page 55: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Special Rules for DeterminingImprovement Costs−Reg.

§1.263(a)-3(g)Removal Costs−• If a Taxpayer disposes of a depreciable asset, including a partial disposition

under Prop. Reg. §1.168(i)-1e)(2)(ix), and has taken into account the adjusted basis of the asset or component of the asset in realizing gain or loss, then the costs of removing the asset or component are not required to be capitalized• If a Taxpayer disposes of a component of UoP, but the disposal of the

component is not a disposition, then the Taxpayer must deduct or capitalize the costs of removing the component based on whether the removal costs directly benefit or are incurred by reason of a repair to the UoP or an improvement to the UoP

55

Page 56: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for SmallTaxpayers−Reg. §1.263(a)-3(h)• Certain Taxpayers may elect to no apply the capitalization requirements to an eligible

building property if the total amount paid during the taxable year for R & M, improvements, and similar activities performed on the eligible property does not exceed the lesser of−

i. 2 percent of the unadjusted basis (is defined in (h)(5) with special rules for leased property) of the eligible building property; or

ii. $10,000

• “Amount paid” do not include items capitalized under de minimis safe harbor or those amounts deemed not to improve under the safe harbor for routine maintenance

56

Page 57: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for SmallTaxpayers−Reg. §1.263(a)-3(h)

Qualifying Taxpayer−• In general−the term qualifying Taxpayer means a Taxpayer whose

average annual gross receipts for the three preceding taxable years is less than or equal to $10,000,000

Rules for Taxpayers in existence for less than three years Short year−annualize Gross receipts are defined in the F TPRs

57

Page 58: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for SmallTaxpayers−Reg. §1.263(a)-3(h)

Election• Attach a statement to the Taxpayer’s timely filed original

return for the taxable year in which amounts are paid for R & M, improvements, and similar activities performed on the eligible building property providing that such amounts qualify under the safe harbor

58

Page 59: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Small Taxpayers – Reg. §1.263(a)-3(h)

• Safe harbor exceeded

If total amounts paid by a qualifying TP during the year for R & M, improvements, and similar activities performed on an eligible building property exceed the safe harbor limitations, then the safe harbor election is not available for that eligible building property and the TP must apply the general improvement rules

Page 60: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance (RM) Reg.

§1.263(a)-3(i)• An amount paid for RM on a unit of tangible property, or in the case

of a building, on any of the properties is deemed not to improve that UoP

• RM for a building is the recurring activities that a TP expects to perform as a result of the use to keep the building structure/system in its ordinarily efficient operating condition

Page 61: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance

Reg. §1.263(a)-3(i)• RM activities include

The inspection, cleaning, and testing of the building structure or each building system, and

The replacement of damaged or worn parts with comparable and commercially available replacement parts

• RM may be performed any time during the useful life of the building structure or building systems

Page 62: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance

Reg. §1.263 (a)-3(i)• The activities are routine only if performed more than once during

the 10-year period beginning when placed in service• Factors to be considered?

Include the recurring nature of the activity, industry practice, manufacturers’ recommendation, and the TP’s experience with similar or identical property

• With respect to a TP that is a lessor of a building or a part of the building, the TP’s use of the building UoP includes the lessee’s use of its UoP

Page 63: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance

Reg. §1.263(a)-3(i)• RM for property other than buildings is the recurring activities that a

TP expects to perform as a result of the TP’s use of the UoP to keep the UoP in its ordinarily efficient operating condition

• The activities are routine only if, at the time the UoP is placed in service by the TP, the TP reasonably expects to perform the activities more than once during the class life (i.e., the ADS class life) of the UoP

Page 64: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance

Reg. §1.263(a)-3(i)• RM does NOT include

Betterments, replacements where the TP took a loss, sold it, casualty loss, deteriorated to disrepair, new or different use, etc.

Page 65: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of BettermentsReg. §1.263(a)-3(j)

• An amount is a betterment to a UoP only if it:

Ameliorates a material condition or defect that either existed prior

Is for a material addition, including a physical enlargement, expansion, extension, or addition of a major component to the unit of property or a material increase in the capacity

Is reasonably expected to materially increase the productivity, efficiency, strength, quality, or output

Page 66: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of BettermentsReg. §1.263(a)-3(j) (slide 2)

• Application of betterment rules The applicability of each quantitative and qualitative factors to a particular

UoP depends on the nature of the UoP For example, if an addition or an increase in a particular factor cannot be

measured in the context of a specific type of property, this factor is not relevant in the determination of whether an amount has been paid for a betterment to the UoP

An amount is paid to improve a building if it is paid for an increase in the efficiency of the building structure or any one of its building systems (for example, the HVAC system)

Page 67: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of BettermentsReg. §1.263(a)-3(j) (Slide 3)

• Appropriate comparison

In cases in which an expenditure is necessitated by normal wear and tear or damage to the UoP that occurred during the TP’s use of the UoP, the determination of whether an expenditure is for the betterment of the UoP is made by comparing the condition of the property immediately after the expenditure with the condition of the property immediately prior to the circumstances necessitating the expenditure

Page 68: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of RestorationsReg. §1.263(a)-3(k)

• A TP must capitalize as an improvement an amount paid to restore a UoP, including an amount paid to make good the exhaustion for which an allowance is or has been made

• An amount restores a UoP only if it

Is a replacement where TP deducted a loss, taken into account the basis in a sale, casualty loss

Page 69: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of RestorationsReg. §1.263(a)-3(k)

Returns the UoP to its ordinarily efficient operating condition if the property has deteriorated to a state of disrepair and is no longer functional for its intended use;

Rebuilds the UoP to a like-new condition after the end of its class life

Is for the replacement of a part or a combination of parts that comprise a major component or a substantial structural part of a UoP

Page 70: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of RestorationsReg. §1.263(a)-3(k)

• The IRS must have thought that this was an important section as it has 30 examples• Replacement of loss and sold components.• Restoration after casualty loss and casualty event• Restoration in a state of disrepair• Rebuild to a like new condition before and after the end of class life• Not a rebuild to a like-new condition• Replacement of major component or substantial structural part• Repair performed during restoration

Page 71: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of RestorationsReg. §1.263(a)-3(k)

• The IRS must have thought that this was an important section as it has 30 examples – continued

Numerous examples of not and replacement of major component or substantial structural part

Replacement of major component or substantial structural part; windows and floors

Page 72: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Capitalization of Amounts to Adapt Property to a New or

Different Use-Reg §1.263(a)-3(l)• A TP must capitalize as an improvement an amount paid to adapt a

UoP to a new or different use• An amount is paid to adapt a UoP to a new or different use if the

adaptation is not consistent with the TP’s ordinary use of the UoP at the time originally placed in service by the TP• Just like in the sections on betterments, restorations, there are no

accounting method changes required to adopt

Page 73: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Election to Capitalize Repair and Maintenance Costs – Reg

§1.263(a)-3(n)• A TP may elect to treat amounts paid during the taxable year for R &

M to tangible property as amounts paid to improve that property and as an asset subject to the allowance for depreciation if the TP incurs these amounts in carrying on the TP’s trade or business and if the TP treats these amounts as capital expenditures on its books and records regularly used in computing income

Page 74: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Election to Capitalize Repair and Maintenance Costs – Reg.

§1.263(a)-3(n)• A TP that elects to apply this in a taxable year must apply this

paragraph to all amounts paid for R & M to tangible property that it treats as capital expenditures on its books and records in that taxable year

• Any amounts for which this election is made shall not be treated as amounts paid for repair or maintenance under §1.162-4

Page 75: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

• Election

By attaching a statement to the TP’s timely original Federal tax return for the taxable year in which the TP pays amounts applicable

• The statement must be titled “Section 1.263(a)-3(n) Election” and include the TP’s name, address, TP identification number, and a statement that the TP is making the election to capitalize repair and maintenance costs under §1.263(a)-3(n)

Election to Capitalize Repair and Maintenance Costs – Reg.

§1.263(a)-3(n)

Page 76: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Accounting Method Changes for §1.263(a)-3

• A change to comply with this section is a change of accounting to which 446 and 481 and the accompanying regulations apply

• A TP seeking to change to a method of accounting in 1.263(a)-3 must secure the consent of the IRS

Page 77: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Accounting Method Changes for §1.263(a)-3

• Applies to taxable years on or after 1-1-14, except for (h) the safe harbor for small taxpayers, (m) the optional regulatory method, and (n) the election to capitalize R & M apply to amounts paid on or after 1-1-14

• Except for (h), (m), and (n), a TP may choose to apply this section to taxable years beginning on or after 1-1-2012. A TP may choose to apply (h), (m), and (n) to amounts paid in taxable years beginning on or after 1-1-2012

Page 78: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Temporary to Final TransitionNew Elections

• As the final regulations are generally applicable to 1-1-14 and after, several sections of the final permit TPs to adopt certain new final TPR elections for 2012 or 2013, by filing an amended Federal tax return for the applicable taxable year on or before 180 days from the due date including extensions of the taxpayer’s Federal tax return for the applicable taxable year, notwithstanding that the taxpayer may not have extended the due date

Page 79: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Temporary to Final TransitionNew Elections

• Those new elections include those to1. Capitalize and depreciate certain M & S2. De minimis safe harbor3. Election to capitalize amounts paid for employee compensation or overhead

as amounts that facilitate the acquisition of property (1.263(a)-2(f)(iv)(B))4. Safe harbor for small taxpayers (1.263(a)-2(h)(1))5. Election to capitalize repair and maintenance costs (1.263(a)-2(n)(1))6. Disposition of a portion of an asset (aka partial disposition election)

(1.168(i)-8(d)(2))

Page 80: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

The Proposed MACRS Disposition Regulations

• Disposition Rules – address• Structural Components• Partial Dispositions – Assets Not Included in General Asset Accounts (GAAs)• Partial Dispositions – Assets Included in GAAs• Components• Disposition Definition• GAAs – Qualifying Disposition Election

• Basis and Identification of Disposed or Converted Asset• Single Asset Account

Page 81: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Disposition Rules for MACRS

• Structural Components• The proposed regulations (PR) change the rule in Temp Reg. §1.168(i)-

1T and 1.168(i)-8T that each structural component of a building, condominium, or cooperative is the asset for tax disposition purposes• The PR provide that a building (including its structural components), a

condominium (including its structural components), or a cooperative (including its structural components) is the asset for disposition purposes

Page 82: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Disposition Rules for MACRS

• Structural Components• This rule change, if finalized, allows TPs to forgo a loss upon the

disposition of a structural component of a building without making a general asset account election as required under the temporary regulations• A TP desiring to claim a loss on a retired structural component outside

of a GAA is now required to make a partial disposition election• This is a new term and is further described in following slides

Page 83: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Partial Dispositions – Assets Not Included in General Asset

Accounts• The PRs allow a TP to claim a loss upon the disposition of a structural

component (or a portion thereof) of a building or upon the disposition of a component (or a portion thereof) of any other asset (a “partial disposition” of an asset) without identifying the component as an asset before the disposition by making a partial disposition election

Page 84: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Partial Disposition – Assets Not Included in General Asset

Accounts• While the partial disposition rule is generally elective, the rule is

required to be applied to

Disposition due to casualty event

Disposition of a portion of an asset for which gain is not recognized in whole or part under 1031 or 1033

Sale or transfer of a portion of an asset

Page 85: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Disposition Definition

• The proposed regulations define ”disposition” to provide that a disposition of a structural component (or a portion thereof) of a

building only if the partial disposition rule applies to the structural component (or a portion thereof)

Page 86: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

GAAQualifying Disposition Election

• Temporary TPR’s expanded the definition of a qualifying disposition on which gain or loss could be effectively recognized to include the disposition of most assets, including structural components

Page 87: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Basis and Identification of Disposed or Converted Asset

• Temporary Reg. §1.168(i)-1T and 1.168(i)-8T provide that, where it is impracticable from the TP’s records to determine the unadjusted depreciable basis of the disposed-of asset, the TP may use any reasonable method that is consistently applied to the taxpayer’s general asset accounts, multiple asset accounts, or larger assets

• Final retain these rules but explain them better

Page 88: Atlanta and San Francisco | 678-964-4721 |  1

Basis and Identification of Disposed or Converted Asset

• The PRs provide examples of reasonable methods

1. Discounting the cost of the replacement asset to its placed-in-service year cost using the CPI;

2. A pro rata allocation of the unadjusted depreciable basis of the GAA or multiple asset account, as applicable, based on the replacement cost of the disposed-of asset and the replacement cost of all of the assets in the general asset account or multiple asset account, as applicable; and

3. A study allocating the cost of the asset to its individual components