arX

iv:1

201.

2189

v1 [

astr

o-ph

.SR

] 1

0 Ja

n 20

12Draft version August 25, 2018Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11

CHARACTERIZING THE COOL KOIs III. KOI-961: A SMALL STAR WITH LARGE PROPER MOTION ANDTHREE SMALL PLANETS

Philip S. Muirhead,1,2 John Asher Johnson,1,14 Kevin Apps,3 Joshua A. Carter,4,5 Timothy D. Morton,1 DanielC. Fabrycky6,5, J. Sebastian Pineda,1 Michael Bottom,1 Barbara Rojas-Ayala,7 Everett Schlawin,8 KatherineHamren,6 Kevin R. Covey,8,5 Justin R. Crepp,1 Keivan G. Stassun,9, 10, 11 Joshua Pepper,9 Leslie Hebb,9 Evan N.

Kirby,1,5 Andrew W. Howard,12 Howard T. Isaacson,12 Geoffrey W. Marcy,12 David Levitan,1 TanioDiaz-Santos,13 Lee Armus,13 James P. Lloyd8

(Dated:)Draft version August 25, 2018

ABSTRACT

We present the characterization of the star KOI 961, an M dwarf with transit signals indicative ofthree short-period exoplanets, originally discovered by the Kepler Mission. We proceed by comparingKOI 961 to Barnards Star, a nearby, well-characterized mid-M dwarf. By comparing colors, opticaland near-infrared spectra, we find remarkable agreement between the two, implying similar effectivetemperatures and metallicities. Both are metal-poor compared to the Solar neighborhood, have lowprojected rotational velocity, high absolute radial velocity, large proper motion and no quiescent Hαemission–all of which is consistent with being old M dwarfs. We combine empirical measurements ofBarnard’s Star and expectations from evolutionary isochrones to estimate KOI 961’s mass (0.13 ±

0.05 M⊙), radius (0.17 ± 0.04 R⊙) and luminosity (2.40 × 10−3.0±0.3 L⊙). We calculate KOI 961’sdistance (38.7 ± 6.3 pc) and space motions, which, like Barnard’s Star, are consistent with a highscale-height population in the Milky Way. We perform an independent multi-transit fit to the publicKepler light curve and significantly revise the transit parameters for the three planets. We calculatethe false-positive probability for each planet-candidate, and find a less than 1 % chance that any one ofthe transiting signals is due to a background or hierarchical eclipsing binary, validating the planetarynature of the transits. The best-fitting radii for all three planets are less than 1 R⊕, with KOI 961.03being Mars-sized (RP = 0.57 ± 0.18 R⊕), and they represent some of the smallest exoplanets detectedto date.Subject headings: Stars: individual (Barnard’s Star, KOI 961) — Stars: low-mass — Stars: funda-

mental parameters — Stars: late-type — Planetary Systems

1. INTRODUCTION

In February of 2011 the Kepler Mission announced 997stars that show light curves consistent with the pres-ence of transiting planets (Borucki et al. 2011). Manyof the Kepler Objects of Interest, or KOIs, host planet-candidates that are terrestrial-sized, and represent

1 Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology,1200 East California Boulevard, MC 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125,USA

2 Email: philm@astro.caltech.edu3 75B Cheyne Walk, Surrey, RH6, 7LR, United Kingdom4 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden

Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA5 Hubble Fellow6 UCO/Lick, University of California, Santa Cruz CA 950647 Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural

History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024,USA.

8 Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, 122 SciencesDrive, Ithaca, NY 14583, USA

9 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University,Nashville, TN 37235, USA

10 Fisk University, Department of Physics, 1000 17th Ave. N.,Nashville, TN 37208

11 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department ofPhysics, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139

12 Astronomy Department, University of California, Berkeley,CA 94720, USA

13 Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology,1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

14 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), CIT Mail Code100-22, 770 South Wilson Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91125

some of the smallest exoplanets detected around main-sequence stars if they are confirmed. Morton & Johnson(2011) found that many of the planets have low a prioriprobabilities of being false positives, and careful follow-up studies will validate the planetary nature of many ofthe transit signals.KOI 961 (Kepler ID: 8561063) is particularly interest-

ing: an M dwarf star with large proper motion (µ = 431± 8 mas/yr, Lepine & Shara 2005) and transit signalsindicative of three exoplanets, all with orbital periodsof less than 2 days. The inferred radii of the planet-candidates depends directly on the assumed radius ofthe host star. Unfortunately, the stellar parameters ofKOI 961 are highly uncertain. Borucki et al. (2011)listed an effective temperature of 4188 K and a radiusof 0.68 R⊙ based on photometric analysis from the Ke-pler Input Catalog (KIC, Batalha et al. 2010). However,Brown et al. (2011) warned that the stellar radii listed inthe KIC have uncertainties of 30 to 50%, and that theradii for M dwarfs are particularly untrustworthy. As-teroseismology studies of Kepler objects by Verner et al.(2011) also indicate biases in the surface gravity and ra-dius estimates in the KIC.Typically, M dwarf masses and radii are estimated

by combining stellar luminosity with reliable mass-luminosity relations (e.g. Delfosse et al. 2000) and mass-radius relations predicted by stellar evolutionary models(e.g. Baraffe et al. 1998), often with corrections to ac-

2

count for discrepancies between measured and predictedradii (e.g. Torres 2007). Unfortunately, KOI 961 doesnot have a parallax measurement in the literature, whichis necessary to estimate its luminosity and hence mass.In a previous paper (Muirhead et al. 2011b, hereafter

Paper 1), we acquired a K-band spectrum of KOI 961 aspart of a survey of low-mass KOIs. The spectrum con-firmed that it is a dwarf and not a giant based on theshallowness of the CO absorption band, and we reportedan effective temperature of 3200 ± 50 K and an over-all metallicity ([M/H]) of -0.33 ± 0.12 using the spec-troscopic indices and calibrations of Rojas-Ayala et al.(2011, hereafter RA11). KOI 961 was the coolest Mdwarf in our survey, and it is likely the least massiveKOI in the February 2011 Kepler data release. We in-terpolated the effective temperature and metallicity ofKOI 961 onto the 5-Gyr Solar-metallicity evolutionaryisochrones of Baraffe et al. (1998), providing a stellar ra-dius estimate of 0.19 R⊙ and a mass estimate of 0.16 M⊙.The stellar parameters derived for the low-mass KOIs inPaper 1 are spectroscopic, and are more accurate thanthe KIC values, but depend strongly on the accuracy ofevolutionary isochrones for low-mass stars.In this paper we present measurements of the stel-

lar parameters of KOI 961 by direct comparison to awell-studied low-mass star: Barnard’s Star, or Gl 699.Barnard’s Star is the second nearest main-sequence starsystem to the Sun at a distance of 1.824 ± 0.005 pc(van Leeuwen 2007). Discovered by Barnard (1916), his“Small Star with Large Proper Motion” is classified as anM4 dwarf (Reid et al. 1995), and Leggett (1992) showedthat Barnard’s Star’s kinematic and photometric prop-erties are consistent with an “old disk-halo” star. It haslow projected rotational velocity (V sin(i) < 2.5 km s−1,Browning et al. 2010), infrequent Hα flaring with no Hαemission during quiescence (e.g. Paulson et al. 2006) andlies below the average main sequence (Giampapa et al.1996); all of which are consistent with an old, metal-poor M dwarf. Being nearby, Barnards Star is among themost studied and best characterized M dwarfs despite itsextreme dissimilarity to the Sun. It has an empirically-measured stellar radius using optical long-baseline inter-ferometry (Lane et al. 2001), a carefully measured bolo-metric luminosity (Dawson & De Robertis 2004), and anaccurate Hipparcos parallax, which, when combined withphotometry and the empirically-derived mass-luminosityrelations of Delfosse et al. (2000), provides an accuratemeasurement of its mass.RA11 report metallicities for Barnard’s Star of [M/H]

= -0.27 ± 0.12 and [Fe/H] = -0.39 ± 0.17, and an ef-fective temperature of 3266 ± 29 K. The same methodswere used to measure similar values of KOI 961. Thismotivates a side-by-side comparison of the two objects,for the purpose of measuring the stellar parameters ofKOI 961. In Section 2, we perform a qualitative compar-ison of the two stars’ spectra, finding them to be verysimilar. We also compare various spectroscopic indicesand argue that KOI-961 is slightly metal-poor comparedto Barnard’s Star, yet shares its effective temperature,consistent with the K-band measurements.In Section 3 we perform a more quantitative assess-

ment of KOI-961’s stellar properties relative to Barnard’sStar. We start with empirical measurements of the mass,radius and luminosity of Barnard’s Star and appeal to

stellar evolution models to estimate the relative differ-ence between the two stars’ physical parameters. In thismanner we find that KOI-961 is slightly smaller and lessmassive than Barnard’s Star. We also estimate KOI-961’s distance and space motion and show they are con-sistent with a high scale-height, or “thick-disk,” popula-tion in the Milky Way.In Section 4 we refit transit curves for the three planets

using the public Kepler data, revise the transit param-eters, and revise the planet parameters, finding that allthree are sub-Earth-sized. In Section 5 we calculate thefalse-positive probability for the transit signals based ona priori statistics of eclipsing binaries and seeing-limitedimages, historical images, and the high-resolution opti-cal spectrum of KOI 961, and we validate the planetary-nature of the transits. In Section 6 we discuss the massesand dynamical configuration of the three planets. In Sec-tion 7 we discuss the implications given that KOI 961 ismetal-poor, and one of only a few mid-M stars surveyedby the Kepler Mission.

2. COMPARISON OF OBSERVABLES

2.1. Photometry

Digital photometric measurements of KOI 961 includegriz photometry from the KIC (Batalha et al. 2010)and 2MASS JHK photometry (Cutri et al. 2003). Dig-ital photometric measurements of Barnard’s Star in-clude UV BRI photometry by Koen et al. (2010) and2MASS JHK photometry. The 2MASS J- and H-bandmagnitudes of Barnard’s Star are near the saturationlimit (Skrutskie et al. 2006), and produce colors thatare inconsistent with the spectral type from Reid et al.(1995). With this in mind, we used the JCIT- and HCIT-band measurements of Barnard’s Star by Leggett (1992),which we converted to 2MASS J and H magnitudes us-ing the transformations of Carpenter (2001).We obtained Johnson B- and V -band and Cousins Rc-

band measurements of KOI 961 with the Hereford Ari-zona Observatory (HAO) 11-inch telescope on UT 2011November 17, using standard star fields from Landolt(1992) for calibration. Three Landolt (1992) star fieldswere used containing a total of 45 total stars with accu-rate B- and V -band photometry, and 40 stars with ac-curate Rc-band photometry. We acquired 108 B- andV -band measurements of reference stars, and 94 RC -band measurements to calibrate the measurements ofKOI 961. Gary (2007) describes the calibration proce-dures for HAO photometric measurements. The mea-surements and uncertainties are listed in Table 1, alongwith available 2MASS J , H and KS measurements.Figures 1 and 2 show J-KS vs V -KS and J-H vs. H-

KS for a sample of nearby M dwarfs, with Barnard’sStar and KOI 961 indicated. The V -KS color is sensitiveto both effective temperature and metallicity (Leggett1992; Johnson & Apps 2009). In Johnson et al. (2011,hereafter Paper 2) we identified the metallicity sensitivityof J-KS. The J-H vs. H-KS color-color regime has alsobeen shown to distinguish metallicities and ages of Mdwarfs, and we include the population designations ofLeggett (1992) in Figure 2: young disk (YD), young-olddisk (Y/O), old disk (OD), old disk-halo (O/H) and halo(H).Barnard’s Star and KOI 961 show remarkable agree-

3

TABLE 1Photometry of KOI 961

Band Magnitude System

B 17.96 ± 0.14 Johnson1

V 16.124 ± 0.055 Johnson1

RC 15.055 ± 0.051 Cousins1

J 12.177 ± 0.021 2MASS2

H 11.685 ± 0.018 2MASS2

KS 11.465 ± 0.018 2MASS2

aObtained with the HAO 11-inch telescope.bCutri et al. (2003); Skrutskie et al. (2006)

2 4 6 8 10V - Ks

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

J -

Ks

2 4 6 8 10V - Ks

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

J -

Ks

KOI 961Barnard‘s Star

Fig. 1.— Color-color plot showing J-KS vs V -KS for starswithin 20 pc with V − K ≥ 3.0 (spectral types later than K7),trigonometric parallax uncertainty of ≤ 5% (van Leeuwen 2007;van Altena et al. 2001), V error of ≤ 0.1 (Koen et al. 2010) and2MASS J and KS uncertainties of ≤ 0.05 (Cutri et al. 2003;Skrutskie et al. 2006). Note the difference in scales for the twoaxes. Included are Barnard’s Star (black circle) and KOI 961 (redsquare), which are both at the lower edge of the distribution, ow-ing to their low metallicity. The similar V -KS and J-KS colors forthe two stars indicate similar effective temperature and metallic-ity (e.g. Leggett 1992; Johnson & Apps 2009), consistent with theK-band measurements in Paper 1 and by RA11.

ment in both color-color plots. This indicates that KOI961 and Barnard’s Star have similar effective temper-atures and metallicities, and are metal-poor comparedto the Solar neighborhood, consistent with the K-bandspectroscopic measurements in Paper 1 and by RA11.KOI 961 has a slightly bluer V -Ks color (0.33 ± 0.04),which can be due to either higher effective temperatureor lower metallicity. Medium-resolution optical spec-troscopy of the the stars indicates the latter, and wediscuss this in the following section.

2.2. Medium-Resolution Optical Spectroscopy

We observed KOI 961 on UT 22 July 2011 with theDouble Spectrograph on the Palomar Observatory 200-inch Hale Telescope: a two-channel (Red/Blue), low-to-medium resolution spectrograph (Oke & Gunn 1982).We used settings that provided spectral coverage from5300 A to 10000 A in the red channel, with 10 A-wideresolution elements. At the time, the efficiency of thered channel limited the usable spectral coverage to 5300to 8000 A. The blue channel exposure containes signifi-cantly less signal, so we do not include those data. We

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5H - Ks

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

J -

H

H

O/H

OD

Y/O

YD

Fig. 2.— Color-color plot showing J-H vs. H-KS for nearbyM dwarfs, Barnard’s Star (black circle) and KOI 961 (red square).As in Figure 1 we use J and H values from Leggett (1992) forBarnard’s Star out of concern for saturation effects. We includethe population designations of Leggett (1992), which relate to thespread in metallicity: young disk (YD), young-old disk (Y/O), olddisk (OD), old disk-halo (O/H) and halo (H). Both KOI 961 andBarnard’s Star are in old and metal-poor populations.

observed the white dwarf standard BD +284211 at thesame airmass to calibrate the throughput and telluricabsorption in the raw spectrum. We used a theoreticalspectrum of BD +284211 from Stone (1977) for the cal-ibration. We used available dome lamps for flat-fieldingand wavelength calibration, and reduced the data usingthe NOAO doslit package, written in IRAF. The finalspectrum has a signal-to-noise ratio of roughly 350 at6500 A.Dawson & De Robertis (2004) combined spectra of

Barnard’s Star taken over many wavelength regimes inorder to accurately measured the star’s bolometric lumi-nosity. We show a region of their combined spectrumand our spectrum of KOI 961 in Figure 3. The spec-tra are strikingly similar, aided by the fact that theyhave similar resolution. To quantitatively compare them,we calculated the spectroscopic indices of the Palomar-Michigan State University Nearby-Star SpectroscopicSurvey (PMSU, e.g. Reid et al. 1995; Hawley et al. 1997;Gizis et al. 2002). We used the band definitions and in-dex formula introduced by Reid et al. (1995), who alsoreport the indices for Barnard’s Star.Table 2 lists the PSMU spectroscopic indices for

Barnard’s Star from Reid et al. (1995), our calculationsusing the Dawson & De Robertis (2004) spectrum ofBarnard’s Star, and our calculations using our spectrumof KOI 961. The difference between our calculated in-dices for Barnard’s Star and the Reid et al. (1995) val-ues is likely due to the spectra having different resolution.The standard deviation in the difference between our cal-culated indices of Barnard’s Star and the PMSU indicesis 0.05, which we used to estimate the uncertainty in theindices.KOI 961 has very similar CaH indices to Barnard’s

Star, but systematically higher TiO indices, indicatingweaker TiO absorption. TiO absorption has long beenthe standard for spectral typing of M dwarfs, and issensitive to stellar effective temperature (e.g. Reid et al.1995). However, Lepine et al. (2007) showed that TiO

4

5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000Wavelength [Angstroms]

Rel

ativ

e F

lux

[erg

cm

2 s-1 A

-1]

5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000Wavelength [Angstroms]

Rel

ativ

e F

lux

[erg

cm

2 s-1 A

-1]

TiO TiOCaH

Na HαCaOH CaH

KOI 961

Barnard‘s Star

Fig. 3.— Comparison of moderate-resolution optical spectra ofKOI 961 and Barnard’s Star. Red: Double Spectrograph spec-trum of KOI 961. Black: Spectrum of Barnard’s Star fromDawson & De Robertis (2004). The spectra were renormalized,and the spectrum of Barnard’s Star is offset for comparison. Thestars have remarkably similar spectra indicating similar spectraltype and metallicity. To quantitatively compare the stars we mea-sured the PMSU spectroscopic indices (see Table 2 and Figure 4).Neither spectrum shows Hα emission, but Barnard’s Star is knownto have infrequent Hα flaring (Paulson et al. 2006).

is sensitive to both temperature and metallicity, andshowed that CaH is a better diagnostic for effective tem-perature and spectral type. The relationship betweenTiO and CaH for nearby stars, Barnard’s Star and KOI961 is illustrated in Figure 4, showing CaH2 + CaH3 vs.TiO5 [see Figures 1, 3, 6 and 8 of Lepine et al. (2007)].KOI 961 and Barnard’s Star have similar CaH2 + CaH3values within their uncertainties, indicating similar effec-tive temperature. The position of KOI 961 to the right ofBarnard’s Star implies lower metallicity, consistent withthe slightly bluer V -K color.The Lepine et al. (2007) TiO and CaH relations are

diagnostics for estimating the relative differences in ef-fective temperature and metallicity, and useful for dis-tinguishing dwarfs from subdwarfs. They were not cal-ibrated to empirical metallicity or effective temperatemeasurements. For calibratedmeasurements, we used theK-band spectroscopic indices of RA11.

2.3. Medium-Resolution Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Figure 5 shows the near-infrared spectra of KOI 961and Barnard’s Star from the observational programs ofPaper 1 and RA11. Both spectra were obtained withTripleSpec on the Palomar Observatory 200-inch HaleTelescope (Herter et al. 2008). We reduced the KOI 961spectrum with the SpexTool program, modified for Palo-mar TripleSpec (Cushing et al. 2004, ; M. Cushing, priv.comm.) and used spectra of nearby A0V stars for telluricremoval and flux calibration with the xtellcor pack-age (Vacca et al. 2003). The RA11 spectrum was re-duced using a custom package written by P.S.M., basedon the reduction package for the TEDI instrument, de-scribed in Muirhead et al. (2011a). We supplemented theBarnard’s Star spectrum with an additional observationtaken on UT 19 October 2011. The supplemental obser-vation was taken using an observing sequence allowingfor more reliable Y -band data reduction.

TABLE 2Comparison of PMSU Spectroscopic Indices.

Index — Barnard’s Star — KOI 961

1 2

TiO 1 0.75 0.85 0.85TiO 2 0.64 0.63 0.75TiO 3 0.68 0.73 0.81TiO 4 0.64 0.62 0.71TiO 5 0.41 0.39 0.52CaH 1 0.74 0.84 0.77CaH 2 0.39 0.45 0.42CaH 3 0.66 0.68 0.67CaOH 0.37 0.45 0.54ζTiO/CaH

3 1.37 1.87 1.26

ζTiO/CaH4 1.43 2.02 1.33

aValues from Reid et al. (1995).bValues calculated in this work using the spectrum from

Dawson & De Robertis (2004). Comparing the values toReid et al. (1995), we estimate 1-σ uncertainties of 0.05 for all in-dices.cThe ζTiO/CaH index is introduced in Lepine et al. (2007).dWe also report the ζTiO/CaH index using the coefficients from

Dhital et al. (2011).

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2TiO5

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0C

aH2

+ C

aH3

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2TiO5

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0C

aH2

+ C

aH3

KOI 961

Barnard‘s Star

Fig. 4.— PMSU spectral indices CaH2 + CaH3 vs. TiO5[see Figures 1, 3, 6 and 8 of Lepine et al. (2007)], including allstars with values reported in the PMSU survey (Reid et al. 1995;Hawley et al. 1997), two estimates for Barnard’s Star (two blackcircles, see text), KOI 961 (red square), and the mean fit to theSolar-metallicity disk dwarfs from Lepine et al. (2007, dashed line).KOI 961 has matching CaH depths but shallower TiO depths com-pared to Barnard’s Star. Using the interpretation Lepine et al.(2007), this indicates that KOI 961 has similar effective temper-ature but slightly lower metallicity compared to Barnard’s Star,consistent with the K-band measurements from RA11 and Paper1.

Figure 5 shows spectra for Y -, J-, H- and K-bands.The throughput calibration in Y and J bands is incom-plete, so we continuum normalized by fitting a quadraticfunction to the spectrum within each of the bands andthen dividing by the fit. Regions between the bands areheavily obscured by telluric lines. The strong correspon-dence between the stars’ spectral shapes and line-depthsfurther reinforces the conclusion that they have similar

5

1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10Wavelength [µm]

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

Con

tinuu

m N

orm

aliz

ed F

lux

1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10Wavelength [µm]

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

Con

tinuu

m N

orm

aliz

ed F

lux

Y BandKOI 961

Barnard‘s Star

FeH Ca Ι

1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30Wavelength [µm]

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Con

tinuu

m N

orm

aliz

ed F

lux

J Band

Na Ι K Ι K Ι

Mg Ι

Fe Ι

Ti Ι

Pa β

Mn Ι

Al Ι

1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75Wavelength [µm]

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

Ren

orm

aliz

ed F

lux

[erg

cm

2 s-1 A

-1]

H Band

Al Ι

Mg Ι

H2O

2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4Wavelength [µm]

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Ren

orm

aliz

ed F

lux

[erg

cm

2 s-1 A

-1]

K Band

COCO

CO

Ca ΙNa Ι

Fig. 5.— Comparison of medium-resolution near-infrared spectraof KOI 961 (red) and Barnard’s Star (black). 1st Panel: Y -bandTripleSpec spectra of both stars. 2nd Panel: J-band TripleSpecspectra of both stars. The Y - and J-band spectra have each beencontinuum normalized by a 2nd degree polynomial because of in-complete throughput calibration. 3rd Panel: H-band spectra ofboth stars. 4th Panel: K-band spectra of both stars. The H andK-band spectra of Barnard’s Star were each multiplied by a nor-malization factor to match KOI 961. Notice the strong agreementin line depths (we identified the lines using Cushing et al. 2005),and the similar spectral shape inH and K bands. The strong corre-spondence further reinforces the conclusion that they have similareffective temperatures and metallicities.

effective temperatures and metallicities.

2.4. High-Resolution Optical Spectroscopy

We obtained high-resolution optical spectra of KOI 961with the HIgh Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES)on the Keck I Telescope (Vogt et al. 1994) on UT 9 Oc-tober 2011. We exposed for 1060 seconds using settingsthat achieved a resolving power of 55000 from 3630 to8900 A, and a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 at 6400 A.Barnard’s Star is currently monitored for orbiting ex-

oplanets as part of the California Planet Search, a preci-sion radial-velocity survey using an iodine absorption cellfor calibration (e.g. Johnson et al. 2010b). We combined

all of the spectra taken of Barnard’s Star over the courseof the survey using regions that are not contaminated bymolecular iodine absorption. The result is a spectrumwith an average signal-to-noise ratio of roughly 2500.Figure 6 shows the HIRES spectra of KOI 961 and

Barnard’s Star in molecular bands corresponding to se-lect PMSU indices, including Hα. The correspondenceis remarkable; however, unlike the moderate-resolutionspectrum in Figure 3, the HIRES spectra are contin-uum normalized within each order using a quadratic fit.This will hide differences in the bulk depths of molecularbands, which are more apparent at moderate resolution.Nevertheless, the striking similarity attests to the pres-ence of similar molecular opacities, which are a strongfunction of abundance and temperature in M dwarfs.Like the moderate-resolution spectra, neither star showsHα emission. West et al. (2004) and West et al. (2008)showed that the fraction of mid-to-late M dwarfs withHα-emission decreases with height above the galacticplane, and the lack of Hα in either star indicates thatthey are part of an old, high disk-scale-height popula-tion, consistent with their low-metallicities. West et al.(2008) estimate the activity lifetime of M4 dwarfs to be4.5 ±0.5

1.0 Gyr, providing a lower limit on the ages of KOI961 and Barnard’s Star.

2.4.1. Projected Rotational Velocity

upper limit to the projected rotational velocity ofBarnard’s star, finding Vsin(i) ¡ 2.5 km/s.Browning et al. (2010) report upper limit to the pro-

jected rotational velocity of Barnard’s star, findingV sin(i) < 2.5 km s−1. This value represents the lowestV sin(i) measurable given the resolving power of HIRES.KOI 961 shows no appreciable rotational broadeningcompared to Barnard’s Star, indicating similar slow rota-tion. To quantify the rotational broadening, we followedthe approach of Browning et al. (2010).For each of the spectral regions in Figure 6, we

cross-correlated the spectrum of Barnard’s Star with arotationally-broadened version of itself, using a convo-lution kernel of specified V sin(i). We did this for sev-eral V sin(i) values from 0.1 to 10 km s−1. We fittedGaussian functions to the central peaks of the result-ing cross-correlation functions (XCFs), and recorded thefull-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of each fit. Fig-ure 7 shows the resulting XCF FWHM vs. V sin(i) ofthe rotational kernels for the six spectral regions (solidblue lines). This provides a calibration to convert XCFFWHM into V sin(i) for each spectral region.We then cross-correlated the spectrum of Barnard’s

Star with KOI 961, and interpolate that value onto theFWHM-V sin(i) curves for each spectral region (dashedred lines in Figure 7). The mean V sin(i) for the six re-gions if 2.9 km s−1, and the standard deviation is 0.4km s−1, showing that both Barnard’s Star and KOI 961are slowly rotating. We caution that this V sin(i) valueshould be treated as an upper limit rather than an abso-lute measurement, since this is near the resolving powerof HIRES, and we estimate that upper limit to be onesigma higher than the mean: 3.3 km s−1.Assuming the inclination of the rotational axis of the

star is 90 degress, and the 0.17 R⊙ stellar radius calcu-lated in the following section, we calculated the rotation

6

6715 6720 6725 6730Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

6715 6720 6725 6730Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

KOI 961Barnard‘s StarTiO 1

7080 7085 7090 7095Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

TiO 3

7120 7125 7130 7135Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

TiO 4 and 5

6820 6825 6830 6835 6840Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

CaH 2

6960 6965 6970 6975Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

CaH 3

6555 6560 6565 6570Wavelength [Angstroms]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Con

t Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

Hα

Fig. 6.— Comparison of HIRES spectra of KOI 961 (red) and Barnard’s Star (black) for select molecular bands identified in Reid et al.(1995) and H-α. The spectra are continuum normalized within each spectral region. The spectra are remarkably similar, and neither showsappreciable rotational broadening. The discrepancy in TiO3 (top right) is attributed to errors in the normalization of the spectra, as theTiO3 region is close to the edge of a HIRES order. Neither spectrum shows Hα emission, which has been shown to correlate with galacticdisk height and age for M dwarfs (West et al. 2004, 2008); however, Barnard’s Star is known for occasional Hα flaring (e.g. Paulson et al.2006).

period of KOI 961 to be greater than 2.6 days. Suchslow rotation is consistent with KOI 961 being an oldermid-M dwarf (> 1-2 Gyr, Figure 12 from Irwin et al.2011a); however, the low V sin(i) measurement does notconstrain the age as well as the lack of H-α (> 4.5 Gyr),or the kinematic properties (see Section 3).

2.4.2. Absolute Radial Velocity

Without the iodine cell, the wavelength-solution ofHIRES can be accurately calibrated to 0.1 km s−1 usingthe telluric A and B bands (Chubak et al. 2012). Usingthe telluric calibration, we measured the radial veloc-ity difference between KOI 961 and Barnard’s Star bycross-correlating the wavelength-calibrated spectrum ofKOI 961 with an iodine-free “template” HIRES spectrumof Barnard’s Star taken as part of the California PlanetSearch. Applying the difference to a previously measuredabsolute radial velocity of Barnard’s Star (Vr = -110.85± 0.23 km s−1, Marcy & Benitz 1989), we measured theabsolute radial velocity of KOI 961 to be -84.48 ± 0.2km s−1.

3. ESTIMATION OF STELLAR PARAMETERS FOR KOI 961

The qualitative similarities between KOI 961 andBarnard’s Star are striking. However, to accurately es-timate the stellar parameters of KOI 961–in particularmass, radius and luminosity–we must use quantitative,

2 4 6 8 10Vsini [km/s]

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

XC

F F

WH

M [p

ixel

s]

2 4 6 8 10Vsini [km/s]

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

XC

F F

WH

M [p

ixel

s]

KOI 961Vsin(i) < 3.3 km/s

Fig. 7.— Cross-correlation full-width-at-half-maximum (XCFFWHM) vs. V sin(i). Solid blue lines: XCF FWHM for Barnard’sStar cross-correlated with a rotationally-broadened version of itselffor each of the six spectral regions in Figure 6. Dashed red lines:XCF FWHM for KOI 961 cross-correlated with Barnard’s Star,interpolated onto the the blue lines to measure V sin(i).

calibrated measurements. For this purpose, we used theK-band metallicity and effective temperature measure-ments of the two stars from RA11 and Paper 1, whichare consistent with the qualitative observations of Sec-tion 2. Table 3 summarizes the K-band measurements.In Paper 1, we interpolated the K-band measurements

7

TABLE 3Comparison of Measured Parameters with K-band Spectra

Parameter Barnard’s Star KOI 961

Teff 3266 ± 29 K1 3200 ± 65 K[M/H] -0.27 ± 0.12 -0.33 ± 0.12[Fe/H] -0.39 ± 0.17 -0.48 ± 0.17

aThe K-band Teff measurements are calibrated using the BT-Settl-2010 model stellar atmospheres (Allard et al. 2010). The un-certainty in Teff is calculated using Monte Carlo simulations ofnoise in a measured spectrum. However, the uncertainty in thecalibration itself is not currently included.

of effective temperature and metallicity onto evolution-ary isochrones to estimate the stellar parameters of low-mass KOIs, including KOI 961. However, empirical mea-surements of low-mass stellar parameters and predictionsfrom evolutionary isochrones show significant discrepan-cies, particularly with regard to stellar radius and ef-fective temperature (Ribas 2006; Torres 2011). In thispaper, we use evolutionary isochrones to estimate thedifferences in stellar parameters between Barnard’s Starand KOI 961. By differencing the interpolated param-eters, systematic offsets in the models or measurementsare significantly reduced. We then apply those differ-ences to the empirical parameters of Barnard’s Star toestimate the parameters of KOI 961, and correspondinguncertainties. By “empirical,” we mean measurementsthat do not depend on stellar evolutionary models.

3.1. Summary of Empirical Measurements of Barnard’sStar

Unlike most known M dwarfs, Barnard’s Star is brightenough to have a reliable parallax measurement fromthe Hipparcos satellite (van Leeuwen 2007), providing ab-solute photometric magnitudes for the bands describedin Section 2.1. Delfosse et al. (2000) derived mass-luminosity relations for M dwarfs using nearby M-dwarfeclipsing binary systems; of their relations, the MKCIT

-mass relation has the lowest residuals with the least de-pendence on stellar metallicity (see Figure 3 from theirpaper). We calculated MKCIT

by combining the KCIT

measurement reported in Leggett (1992) with the Hip-parcos parallax. Using the empirical MKCIT

-mass rela-tion of Delfosse et al. (2000), we calculated a stellar massof 0.158 M⊙ for Barnard’s Star.Delfosse et al. (2000) do not report the systematic un-

certainty in the MKCIT-mass relation. To estimate the

uncertainty in the relation, we calculated the root-mean-square (RMS) of the residuals between MKCIT

of thecalibration stars and those of the relation, and found itto be 0.18 magnitudes. This is much larger than the un-certainty in MKCIT

of Barnard’s Star, and will dominatethe uncertainty in its measured mass.We estimate the uncertainty in the mass of Barnard’s

Star using a Monte Carlo approach. We recalculated themass of Barnard’s Star for 500 instances of MKCIT

, eachwith noise added, drawn from a Gaussian distributionof standard deviation of 0.18 magnitudes. The resultingstandard deviation of the mass distribution is 0.013 M⊙.The radius of Barnard’s Star has been measured

previously using optical long-baseline interferometry.Lane et al. (2001) reported a radius of 0.201 ± 0.008 R⊙

for Barnard’s Star, using observations with the Palomar

Testbed Interferometer. The uncertainty in the stellarradius comes from a combination of measurement errors,uncertainty in the angular size of the calibrator stars anduncertainties in the adopted limb-darkening parameters.Segransan et al. (2003) recalculated the radius using adifferent set of limb-darkening coefficients, and reporteda radius of 0.196 ± 0.008 R⊙ for Barnard’s Star, consis-tent with Lane et al. (2001) to within the quoted uncer-tainty. This shows that the interferometrically measuredstellar diameter is robust against assumptions about thelimb darkening and strengthens our confidence that thisradius measurement represents an accurate measurementof the true radius of Barnard’s star.Finally, Dawson & De Robertis (2004) combined and

calibrated available spectra of Barnard’s Star across op-tical and infrared wavelengths to accurately measure itsluminosity [(3.46 ± 0.17) × 10−3 L⊙], which, when com-bined with the radius measurement, provides an empiri-cal measurement of the star’s effective temperature (3134± 102 K). This agrees remarkably well with the effectivetemperature measured using K-band in RA11 of 3266 ±

29 K. The quoted uncertainty for the effective tempera-ture measured in RA11 only accounts for measurementerrors in the K-band spectrum, and not systematic ef-fects from errors in the calibration.

3.2. Perturbation Analysis

To estimate the difference in mass, radius and lumi-nosity between Barnard’s Star and KOI 961, we inter-polated the K-band measurements of stellar effectivetemperature and metallicity onto the 5-Gyr isochronesof Baraffe et al. (1998). We use the Baraffe et al.(1998) models because, unlike other sets of evolution-ary isochrones, they include grid points with stellar ef-fective temperatures below 3200 K for sub-solar metal-licity. The Baraffe et al. (1998) isochrones are availablein two metallicities, [M/H] = 0.0 and -0.5, which bracketthe measured metallicities of Barnard’s Star and KOI961. The [M/H] = -0.5 isochrones are only available fora mixing-length parameter (α) of 1 and for a Heliumabundance ([Y]) of 0.25, so we choose the [M/H] = 0.0isochrones with those same parameters. To test the ef-fect of age on the parameter estimation, we repeated thecalculations using 10-Gyr isochrones. The resulting stel-lar parameters were only marginally different comparedto the uncertainties, a consequence of the slow evolutionof M dwarfs.Figure 8 shows stellar radius and stellar mass

vs. effective temperature for the 5-Gyr isochrones ofBaraffe et al. (1998) and the interpolated location ofBarnard’s Star and KOI 961 based on the K-band mea-surements. We applied the difference in mass, radius andluminosity between the model interpolants to the em-pirical measurements of Barnard’s Star to estimate thevalues for KOI 961.To estimate the uncertainties in KOI 961’s parameters,

we interpolated onto the isochrones 500 Monte Carlo sim-ulations of the K-band Teff and [M/H] measurements,each with random noise added. The noise is drawn froma normal distribution with standard deviation of 100 Kfor Teff and 0.12 dex for [M/H]. We then calculated thestandard deviation of the distribution in the resultantradii, masses and luminosities. We chose to inflate themeasurement uncertainties in Teff to 100 K to account

8

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30S

tella

r R

adiu

s [R

Sun]

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30S

tella

r R

adiu

s [R

Sun]

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

[M/H]

KOI 961Barnard‘s Star

3600 3400 3200 3000 2800Stellar Effective Temperature [K]

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

Ste

llar

Mas

s [M

Sun]

Fig. 8.— Top Panel: Stellar radius vs. effective temperature.Bottom Panel: Stellar mass vs. effective temperature. Colors de-note metallity, [M/H]. Lines: The 5-Gyr evolutionary isochrones ofBaraffe et al. (1998) for [M/H] = 0.0 and [M/H] = -0.5. Large col-ored circle and square: Interpolated position of Barnard’s Stars andKOI 961, respectively, based on K-band measurements of metal-licity and effective temperature. Small colored circles and squares:Monte Carlo simulations of noise in the K-band measurements,used to estimate the error in the mass, radius and luminosity of theinterpolated values. Black circle: Empirically measured values forBarnard’s Star and uncertainties. Black square: Our estimate forthe radius and effective temperature of KOI 961, found by applyingthe difference in interpolated values to the empirical measurementsof Barnard’s Star.

for potential errors in the calibration. For [M/H] weused an uncertainty of 0.12 based on the calibration un-certainty calculated in Rojas-Ayala et al. (2010). Thisprovides uncertainties in the interpolated masses, radiiand luminosities of KOI 961 and Barnard’s Star, which,when added in quadrature, provide the uncertainty inthe difference between the stars’ parameters. We thenadded in quadrature the uncertainties in the differencesto the empirical measurements of Barnard’s Star, whichprovides the uncertainty of KOI 961’s parameters. Table4 lists the empirical measurements of Barnard’s Star andour estimated values for the stellar parameters of KOI961 and their uncertainties.We calculated the space motion of KOI 961 by combin-

ing the proper motion measurements of Lepine & Shara(2005) with our estimated distance and measured radialvelocity. Figure 9 shows a Toomre diagram of nearbyG- K- and M-type primary stars with measured trigono-metric parallaxes greater than 100 mas. Using the pop-ulation definitions of Fuhrmann (2004), it is clear thatboth Barnard’s Star and KOI 961 have kinematic prop-erties consistent with the “thick disk”, containing starswith ages of 7 to 13 Gyr (Feltzing & Bensby 2008). Weacknowledge that the presence of a thick disk in theMilky Way is controversial, however the difference in

TABLE 4Barnard’s Star and KOI 961 Stellar Parameters

Parameter Barnard’s Star KOI 961

(empirically measured) (this work)

R⋆ 0.199 ± 0.006 R⊙1 0.17 ± 0.04 R⊙

M⋆ 0.158 ± 0.013 M⊙2 0.13 ± 0.05 M⊙

L⋆ (3.46 ± 0.17) × 10−3 L⊙3 2.40 × 10−3.0±0.3 L⊙

4

Teff 3134 ± 102 K3 3068 ± 174 KMK,CIT 8.21 ± 0.035,6 8.55 ± 0.35MKS

8.22 ± 0.035,7 8.53 ± 0.35d 1.824 ± 0.005 pc 7 38.7 ± 6.3 pcU -134 ± 1 km s−1 50 ±10 km s−1

V 18 ± 1 km s−1 -70 ± 1 km s−1

W 27 ± 1 km s−1 -59 ± 8 km s−1

V sin(i) < 2.5 km s−18 < 3.3 km s−1

aWeighed mean of Lane et al. (2001, 0.201 ± 0.008 R⊙) andSegransan et al. (2003, 0.196 ± 0.008 R⊙)bCalculated using the MK,CIT-mass relations of Delfosse et al.

(2000).cDawson & De Robertis (2004)dSince luminosity is a strong power of the effective temperature

and radius, the distribution of interpolated Monte Carlo luminosi-ties is asymmetric. Therefore, we quote the error in the inferredluminosity of KOI 961 in the exponent, equivalent to the standarddeviation of the log of the resultant luminosity distribution.eParallax from van Leeuwen (2007)fLeggett (1992)g2MASS, Cutri et al. (2003)hBrowning et al. (2010)

-200 -100 0 100V [km s-1]

0

50

100

150

200

(U2 +

W2 )1/

2 [km

s-1] Barnard‘s Star

KOI 961

Halo

Thick Disk

Thin Disk

Fig. 9.— Toomre Diagram of G- K- and M-type primary starswith measured trigonometric parallaxes > 100 mas. We includethe thin and thick disk boundaries defined by Fuhrmann (2004).Barnard’s Star (red circle) and KOI 961 (blue square) are indicatedand have space velocities consistent with thick-disk stars. We cor-rected for the solar motion using the values of Francis & Anderson(2009): U = 7.5 + -1.0, V = 13.5 + 0.3, W = 6.8 + -0.1 km/s.

stellar kinematics as a function of disk scale-height thegalactic disk is firmly established (e.g. Bovy et al. 2011).The kinematic properties, metallicities, Hα emission andV sin(i) measurements of KOI 961 and Barnard’s Starare all consistent with an old, high disk-scale-height stel-lar population.

3.3. Consistency Check on GJ 1214

As a consistency check of our methods, we performedan identical perturbation analysis on GJ 1214, a low-mass star with a transiting Super-Earth: GJ 1214 b

9

(Charbonneau et al. 2009). Carter et al. (2011b) mea-sured multiple transit light-curves of GJ 1214 b and cal-culated the mean density of the star using the fitted tran-sit parameters (e.g. Seager & Mallen-Ornelas 2003). GJ1214 has a parallax measurement by van Altena et al.(1995) and 2MASS JHK photometry. Combining themass-MK relation of Delfosse et al. (2000) with thetransit-derived stellar density, Carter et al. (2011b) re-ported a stellar mass of 0.157 ± 0.012 M⊙ and a stel-lar radius of 0.210 ± 0.007 R⊙ for GJ 1214 (MethodA from their paper). The stellar radius was largerthan estimated using photometric relationships from theBaraffe et al. (1998) evolutionary isochrones, which theyalso report as R⋆ = 0.179 ± 0.006 R⊙ (Method B fromtheir paper).RA11 report a stellar effective temperature of 3245

± 31 K and metallicity ([M/H]) of 0.15 ± 0.12 for GJ1214 using the K-band spectroscopic indices. With aneffective temperature similar to Barnard’s Star and KOI961, as well as available K-band measurements, GJ 1214provides a valuable opportunity to test our perturbationanalysis.15

We proceed assuming Solar-metallicity for GJ 1214,since we cannot interpolate the super-SolarK-band valueof [M/H] = +0.15 onto the isochrones of Baraffe et al.(1998). Using the same perturbation procedure used forKOI 961, and the K-band effective temperature mea-surement, we calculate a a stellar mass of 0.17 ± 0.05M⊙ and a stellar radius of 0.21 ± 0.04 R⊙ for GJ 1214.The values are remarkably consistent with the resultsof Method A by Carter et al. (2011b) to within our es-timate uncertainties. Incorporating the K-band metal-licity measurement of GJ 1214 would result in a largerradius had we used super-Solar metallicity isochrones,but not by greater than ∆R⋆ = 0.1 R⊙ (see Figure 8):still well within the estimated uncertainty. We concludethat the perturbation analysis is an effective method fordetermining accurate stellar parameters of M dwarfs inthe absence of parallax measurements.

4. TRANSIT PARAMETERS

Now we turn to a discussion of the transits detectedaround KOI 961. Borucki et al. (2011) reported tran-sit parameters (period, duration, impact parameter andplanet-star radius ratio) for the three planet-candidatesorbiting KOI 961. However, the published radius andimpact parameter for KOI 961.02 are inconsistent: theimpact parameter and planet-to-star radius ratio in-dicate that the transit should not occur (b/R⋆=1.29,RP /R⋆=0.194). With this in mind, we chose to per-form an independent fit to the public Kepler data for thethree planet-candidates. In the following section, we use

15 Other possible test stars include the short-period M dwarfeclipsing-binaries CM Draconis and KOI 126, which have sim-ilar effective temperatures to Barnard’s Star and KOI 961 (∼3000 K) and highly accurate mass and radius measurements(Lacy 1977; Metcalfe et al. 1996; Morales et al. 2009; Carter et al.2011a). However, it has been suggested that mutual magnetic in-teractions in short-period M dwarf binaries introduce discrepanciesin the mass-radius-effective temperature relationships as comparedto single field M dwarfs (Chabrier et al. 2007), and recent obser-vational evidence supports this scenario (Kraus et al. 2011). Also,measuring the K-band Teff and [M/H] indices of individual stars inunresolved, short-period eclipsing binaries is challenging and hasnot yet been done. Therefore, we believe GJ 1214 is the best testobject.

the resulting parameters to calculate the probability thatthe transit signals are not planetary in nature, and wefind this probability is less than 1% for all three signals.Therefore, in this section, we refer to them as planetsrather than candidates.We use Levenberg-Marquardt least-square minimiza-

tion to refit the light curve of KOI 961 and determine re-vised transit parameters for all three planets. This task iscomplicated by a number of simultaneous transits of twoor more planets. For these situations, we assume that thetotal loss of light is the superposition of the losses com-puted individually for each planet. We do not attemptto model the short brightening in the light curve as aresult of the possible mutual alignment of three or morebodies [as described by (Ragozzine & Holman 2010)].In principle, one could describe the transit model for

each planet with three minimal parameters: the planetto star radius ratio, the orbital inclination, and the in-stantaneous separation of planet and star, normalized tothe stellar radius: a/R⋆. Additionally, we may specifythe ephemeris and period for each planet and parame-ters describing the radial brightness profile of the star.In the case of KOI-961, each individual transit durationis comparable to the integration time for the long cadenceKepler data. As a result, there exists a near exact de-generacy between these three minimal parameters. For-tunately, the normalized instantaneous separation can beconstrained given our knowledge of the star if we are will-ing to assume the orbits of all three planets are circular.In this case, a/R⋆ is specified in terms of the mean stel-lar density and the orbital period. For our fitted transitmodels, we assume circular orbits and apply the meanstellar density calculated from the stellar mass and ra-dius determinations in Section 3.We report in Table 4 the best-fitting radius ratios and

their errors along with the best-fitting impact parame-ter subject to the assumption of circular orbits and thespecified mean stellar density. In Figure 10, we show theKepler light curve for each planet after folding the dataon the best-fitting linear ephemeris and after having re-moved the transit profiles of the remaining two planets.We also plot representative best-fitting transit models –both the convolved and the continuous profile – for a fewimpact parameters. The corresponding, best-fitting ra-dius ratios for each impact parameter are listed in eachpanel. High impact parameter solutions (& 1), as listedfor KOI-961 in Borucki et al. (2011), are disfavored bythe data under these constraints for all three planets. Asa result, we determine a significantly smaller radius ratiofor all three planets than previously reported.Combining the best fit transit parameters with our new

stellar parameters, we report the planets’ physical radii,equilibrium temperatures and corresponding uncertain-ties in Table 4. All three planets have radii smaller thanthe Earth’s, and KOI 961.03 is 1.07 ± 0.33 times theradius of Mars. The uncertainties in the planet radiiare dominated by the uncertainties in the stellar radius.To calculate the equilibrium temperatures of the planets,we scaled the equilibrium temperature of Earth at 255K–which assumes a 30% albedo and 100% re-radiationfraction–to the semi-major axes of the planetary orbitsand the luminosity of KOI 961 and propagated the un-certainties in those parameters.

10

TABLE 5KOI 961 Transit Parameters and Planet Parameters

KOI t0 [BJD - 2454900] Period [days] a [AU] RP /R⋆ b [R⋆] RP [R⊕] Teq [K]

961.01 103.48329 ± 5.4×10−4 1.2137672 ± 4.6 ×10−6 0.0116 0.0419 ± 0.0018 0.711 ± 0.049 0.78 ± 0.22 519 ± 52961.02 66.86952 ± 4.2×10−4 0.45328509 ± 9.7 ×10−7 0.0060 0.0395 ± 0.0011 0.520 ± 0.068 0.73 ± 0.20 720 ± 73961.03 66.7847 ± 1.3×10−3 1.865169 ± 1.4×10−5 0.0154 0.0307 ± 0.0019 0.681 ± 0.085 0.57 ± 0.18 450 ± 45

Minutes Since Mid−Transit

Nor

mal

ized

Flu

x

0.997

0.998

0.999

1.000

1.001961.01

b = 0.9b = 0.6b = 0

r = 0.056r = 0.039r = 0.035

0.997

0.998

0.999

1.000

1.001961.02

r = 0.060r = 0.041r = 0.036

−60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60

0.997

0.998

0.999

1.000

1.001961.03

r = 0.041r = 0.029r = 0.026

Fig. 10.— Kepler light curves for each planet after folding thedata on the best-fitting linear ephemeris and after having removedthe best-fitting transit profiles of the remaining two planets. We in-clude representative best-fitting light curves – both the convolvedand the continuous profile (solid lines and dotted lines, respec-tively) – for three impact parameters: 0 (red), 0.6 (green) and 0.9(blue). The corresponding, best-fitting radius ratios for each im-pact parameter are listed in each panel. High impact parametersolutions (& 1), as listed for KOI-961 in Borucki et al. (2011), aredisfavored by the data under these constraints, evidenced by thepoor match between the solid blue curve and the Kepler data atthe start and end of each folded light curve.

5. THE PLANETARY NATURE OF THE TRANSITS

It is conventional to call transit signals candidates untilthe planets are dynamically confirmed, either by radialvelocity or transit timing measurements. However, wedo not have Doppler spectroscopy for KOI 961 and thetransit signals show no obvious timing variations. For-

Impact Parameter

1220

1240

1260

1280

χ2

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Bes

t−fit

Rad

ius

Rat

ioKOI−961.01DOF = 1208

3250

3300

3350

3400

χ2

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Bes

t−fit

Rad

ius

Rat

ioKOI−961.02DOF = 3209

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

790

795

800

805

810

815χ2

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Bes

t−fit

Rad

ius

Rat

ioKOI−961.03DOF = 785

Fig. 11.— The measured fitting statistic, χ2, versus the mod-eled impact parameter for each planet (black). In all cases largeimpact parameters are disfavored by the K epler photometry, andin the case of planets .01 and .03, the light curves provide stronglower constraints on the impact parameter. We include the best-fitting planet-to-star radius ratio for each impact parameter (red),illustrating the small spread in radius ratios across the minimumof the χ2 vs. impact parameter curve. The best-fitting impactparameters and radius ratios are listed in Table 4.

tunately, given that there are three transit signals, eachwith a period of less than 2 days, it would require anextremely contrived scenario to account for all of themby non-planetary means. In the following section wequantify the probability that each of the signals may bean astrophysical false positive, demonstrating that thisprobability is low enough to consider all three planetsvalidated. We also discuss the constraints on potentialdiluting third light in the aperture, which would lead tounderestimating the planetary radii.

5.1. Observational constraints on false positivescenarios

Photometric signals that appear to be transiting plan-ets may be caused by astrophysical scenarios other than

11

a planet orbiting the target star. In this work, we con-sider a false positive to be any scenario different froma planet transiting a star in the KOI 961 system. Thismay be either an eclipsing binary or a transiting planetaround a chance-aligned background star or an eclipsingbinary that is physically bound to KOI 961 in a hierar-chical triple system. Each of these scenarios involves thepresence of another star within the Kepler aperture ofKOI 961.We constrain the properties of such a star using

archival and recently acquired imaging data, which weshow in Figure 12. The large proper motion of KOI 961allows us to use digitized images from the Palomar Ob-servatory Sky Survey (POSS; Minkowski & Abell 1963;Reid et al. 1991) to rule out the presence of any contami-nating object up to 4.8 magnitudes fainter than KOI 961in the blue-sensitive plates, anywhere within the Keplerapertures used in the Borucki et al. (2011) data release.We also use both publicly available J-band UKIRT data(Lawrence et al. 2007) and a HIRES guider camera im-age we obtained using Keck I (equivalent of combined R-and V -band response), which allows us to constrain thepresence of blends within a few arcseconds of the currentposition of KOI 961.In addition, the HIRES spectrum of KOI 961 con-

strains the presence of any potentially blending com-panion through the absence of noticeably contaminatinglines. The symmetry of the cross-correlation profile of thespectrum with that of Barnard’s Star reveals that KOI961 has no companion of comparable brightness (∆V∼1;or mass ratio q ∼ 0.75) with velocity separation >2 kms−1 (e.g. Howard et al. 2010).16

Using the methods of Morton & Johnson (2011), whichuse simulations of Galactic structure and stellar evolu-tion to estimate the sky density of background stars,we determine that there is a probability of about 0.13for there to be a chance-aligned star undetected by thePOSS images or the Keck guider image anywhere withinthe Kepler apertures used for the Borucki et al. (2011)data release. To determine the extent to which the aboveobservations constrain hierarchical triple scenarios, wesimulate a population of stellar binary companions withmass ratio, period, and eccentricity distributions typi-cal of local multiplicity surveys (Raghavan et al. 2010;Tokovinin et al. 2010), and assign magnitudes to eachcompanion based on the models of Baraffe et al. (1998).We then place each simulated companion at a randompoint on its orbit (using a uniform distribution of meananomaly) and use the resulting projected separation (as-suming a distance of 40 pc), relative velocity, and mag-nitude difference to determine whether it would be ob-servable given our observations. We find that 59% ofcompanions to KOI 961 would have eluded detection. As-suming an overall 40% binary fraction for M dwarfs (e.g.Fischer & Marcy 1992; Covey et al. 2008), this yields aprobability of 0.24 that KOI 961 has a undetected com-panion.

5.2. False Positive Probability

16 Incidentally, this observational constraint also eliminates thefalse positive scenario (not discussed in the text) in which one ofthe transit signals is caused by a similar-mass binary companionto KOI 961 with a grazing eclipse.

KOI 961

(a) POSS-I blue, 1951

KOI 961KOI 961

(b) POSS-I red, 1951

KOI 961

(c) POSS-II blue, 1995

KOI 961

(d) POSS-II red, 1991

KOI 961

(e) HIRES Slit Viewer (thiswork), 2011

R = 0.25"

(f) HIRES Slit Viewer close-up of KOI 961

Fig. 12.— Images of KOI 961 from the Palomar Observatory SkySurvey (POSS, panels a, b, c and d, e.g. Minkowski & Abell 1963;Reid et al. 1991) and from the HIRES slit-viewer (this work, pan-els e and f). Panels a through e are roughly 1 arcminute on eachside and show the large proper motion of KOI 961 over 60 years.The magenta circles indicate the current (2011) position of KOI961 and have diameters of 6′′, roughly equal to the point-spread-function of Kepler (Bryson et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010). We alsoinclude the apertures used by Kepler for flux extraction of KOI961 during quarters 1, 2 and 3, which we obtained from the Mul-timission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (greenoutlines). We rule out the presence of a contaminating star < 4.8magnitudes fainter than KOI 961 using the POSS 1 blue-sensitiveimage. We use the POSS images and HIRES slit-viewer image tolimit potential false-positive scenarios for the transit signals.

Calculating the false positive probability (FPP) for aparticular transit signal requires comparing the proba-bilities of astrophysical false positive scenarios with anassumed probability of the planet hypothesis. To thisend, we calculate the probability that each of the po-tentially blending scenarios discussed above might be aneclipsing system mimicking a planet-like transit signalaround KOI 961.Direct application of the exact results of

Morton & Johnson (2011) is not appropriate forthese signals, because the transit shape does not imme-diately rule out grazing eclipses. As we show in Section10, the 29.4-minute observing cadence of the publicKepler data strongly affects the apparent shape of thelight curve, including its depth (see Figure 10). Instead,we extend the methods of Morton & Johnson (2011)tailored to the specifics of the KOI 961 system.

12

TABLE 6False Positive Probabilities for KOI 961

BGEB1 HEB2 BGpl3 FPP4

961.01 9.7e-05 3.8e-05 5.4e-04 6.7e-04961.02 2.8e-04 1.5e-05 1.1e-03 1.4e-03961.03 1.1e-03 1.2e-03 1.1e-03 3.4e-03

aBackground eclipsing binarybHierarchical eclipsing binarycTransiting planet around a background stardTotal false positive probability

Fig. 13.— The probability density as a function of observed transit duration and depth for realistic populations of the three astrophysicalfalse positive scenarios discussed in the text as well as the bona fide planet scenario. We choose a statistically representative sample ofconfigurations and model the light curves using Mandel & Agol (2002), convolved with a 29.4 minute cadence, assuming all circular orbits.Included in these density plots are only those scenarios in which secondary eclipses would not be detectable in the KOI 961 light curve.The observed transit signals of KOIs 961.01, 961.02, and 961.03 are marked (with durations scaled to match the period of 961.01, whichwas the basis for the population simulations), and do not fall within a high-likelihood region for any of the false positive scenarios. Therelative probability for each planet to be caused by each scenario is the product of the prior and likelihood for that scenario.

The FPP for any of the three signals may then be writ-ten as follows:

FPP = 1−πplLpl(δ, T )∑

i

πiLi(δ, T ), (1)

where the index i represents each of the false positive sce-narios and the planet hypothesis, Li(δ, T ) is the proba-bility density function (PDF) for the given scenario eval-

uated at the specific depth and duration of the observedsignal (the “likelihood”), and πi is the a priori probabil-ity of each scenario existing.The a priori probability for each scenario has two com-

ponents: first, that the particular blending star config-uration exists; second, that it eclipses and can mimica planet around KOI 961. For the background eclips-ing binary (BGEB) scenario, we assume that a chance-aligned star has a 50% chance of being a binary, and a10% chance of that binary being on a short-period or-

13

bit (Raghavan et al. 2010), using < 50 days as a defini-tion of “short-period” to allow convenient comparison toplanet occurrence studies. Using 0.18 as a conservativeaverage eclipse probability (corresponding to the graz-ing eclipse probability of two 0.5 R⊙ stars orbiting eachother with a 1.2 day period), this gives a probability of0.13×0.50×0.1×0.18 = 1.1×10−3 that there is a BGEBwithin the Kepler apertures of KOI 961. In addition, thebinary must not show a secondary eclipse in the dilutedlight curve. We determine by inspection that a signalwith a depth of 5× 10−4 would have been detectable byKepler, and so we use that as a conservative limit forthe maximum depth of any putative diluted secondaryeclipse. We find that this disqualifies 39% of BGEBs,resulting in πBGEB = 6.9× 10−4.To estimate the prior probability of a hierarchical triple

eclipsing binary (HEB) system, we assume that a poten-tial companion to KOI 961 has a 40% chance of hav-ing a companion of its own, a 20% chance of that com-panion being on a short orbit [we conservatively usea higher short-orbit probability for a hierarchical sys-tem than for an isolated binary motivated by the ob-servation that many close binaries have distant com-panions (Tokovinin et al. 2006)], and an eclipse proba-bility of 0.10 (corresponding to two 0.15 R⊙ stars in a1.2 day orbit). Furthermore, we simulate a populationof HEBs according to a flat mass ratio distribution andfind that only 2.3% of HEB scenarios have diluted sec-ondary eclipses shallower than 5× 10−4. This results inπHEB = 0.24× 0.40× 0.20× 0.10× 0.023 = 4.4× 10−5.For the background transiting planet hypothesis

(BGpl), we assume an overall 40% occurrence rate forplanets with periods < 50 days (Howard et al. 2010,2011; Bonfils et al. 2011), and an average transit prob-ability of 0.13 (corresponding to a planet orbiting a 0.5R⊙ star in a 1.2 day period), giving πBGpl = 6.8× 10−3.These same assumptions (except for a transit probabilityof 0.07 corresponding to the radius of KOI 961) yield ana priori probability for the bona fide KOI 961 transitingplanet hypothesis of πpl = 0.40× 0.07 = 0.028. We notethat we have assumed isotropically oriented orbits for allthe eclipse and transit probabilities we have used. Thismay not necessarily be the case for multiple planet sys-tems (orbits may be coplanar) or for hierarchical systems(orbits of a hierarchical binary may be aligned with theplane of the planets), but assuming isotropic orientationfor all orbital planes is a conservative approach.To calculate the likelihood factors for each of the sce-

narios, we simulate the expected population of lightcurves following Mandel & Agol (2002), allowing for allimpact parameters (including grazing eclipses), includinglimb darkening, and accounting for the effects of the 29.4-minute observing cadence. In contrast to the BLENDERprocedure (Torres 2011; Fressin et al. 2011a,b), we donot fit false positive light curves to the data; insteadwe choose the scenarios to simulate according to their apriori probability of existence, which we determine us-ing the methodology of Morton & Johnson (2011). Thisallows us to directly extract the joint PDF of durationand depth for each scenario, taking care to include onlythose light curves with undetectable diluted secondaryeclipses. We also create the same distribution for theplanet scenarios, assuming a population of planets with

a radius distribution dN/dRp ∼ R−2p from 0.4 to 20

R⊕, and accounting for the mass and radius errors ofKOI 961. The result is exactly analogous to Figure 5 ofMorton & Johnson (2011) extended into the duration di-mension. “Duration” and “depth” for our purposes hereare determined by inspection, not by any fitting proce-dure; “duration” is the total time the transit model fluxspends below unity, and “depth” is simply the minimumvalue of the model light curve during primary transit.These values correspond to what one would naively callduration and depth from inspecting a real light curve byeye; they have no direct physical significance except forproviding a convenient, model-independent way to pa-rameterize a light curve. We then evaluate the PDFs atthe duration and depth of each of the three candidatesignals (integrating over errors in both dimensions) toobtain each of the likelihood factors (i.e. the “probabil-ity of the data given the model”). The simulations weuse to create the PDFs are all based on the period ofKOI 961.01, so in order to evaluate the likelihoods for961.02 and 961.03 at the proper locations we scale theirtrue durations by a factor of (P/1.21d)1/3. Figure 13illustrates each of these PDFs and shows the likelihoodvalue for each candidate for each scenario.Table 6 lists the normalized probabilities

(πiLi/∑

πiLi) for each of the false positive sce-narios for each of the candidates as well as the overallFPP. The total false positive probabilities for 961.01,961.02, and 961.03 are 6.7 × 10−4 (∼1 in 1500),1.4 × 10−3 (∼1 in 700), and 3.4 × 10−3 (∼1 in 290),respectively. We note that these calculations have usedconservative assumptions at every stage. In particularwe have ignored the fact that the ensemble evidenceof the Kepler planet sample points to coplanaritybeing common among close-in, tightly packed planetarysystems (Lissauer et al. 2011); if we properly accountedfor this effect, the planet prior for each of the candidateswould increase (corresponding to an increased transitprobability), leading to correspondingly lower FPPs. Wetherefore consider all three candidates in the KOI 961system to be statistically validated planets, according tothe standards set in the literature by the Kepler team.

5.3. Misclassified planet probability

We note that even though we have demonstrated allthree transit signals in the KOI 961 system to be ofplanetary origin, there is still some probability of theirradii being underestimated due to the presence of dilut-ing flux within the aperture. Specifically, there are threesub-scenarios that are encompassed by the “planet in theKOI 961 system” scenario:

(a) KOI 961.0x orbits KOI 961, which is a single star.

(b) KOI 961.0x orbits the primary component of KOI961, which is an unresolved binary star system.

(c) KOI 961.0x orbits the secondary component of KOI961, which is an unresolved binary star system.

We calculated in the previous subsection that there wasa 24% chance of KOI 961 having an undetected binarycompanion, giving scenario (a) a probability of 0.76. Wethen assume that if KOI 961 is a binary, there is equal

14

probability for a planet to be orbiting either component,giving both (b) and (c) probabilities of 0.12. Using thesame binary companion simulations discussed above, wecalculate the effect this has on the radii of the planets,according to the following:

Rp,true = Rp,inferred

(

1 + 10−0.4∆MKep)

12 , (2)

where Rp,true is the true planet radius, Rp,inferred is theradius inferred assuming the star is single, and ∆MKep

is the magnitude difference between the two components(which would be negative if the planet is orbiting thefainter star). As each binary companion in our simula-tion has an assigned Kepler magnitude, we can turn thisputative population into a probability distribution func-tion for the true planet radius, which we plot in Figure14 for KOI 961.01. 73% of the probability mass remainsbelow 1 R⊕, compared to 84% of probability mass for the(a) scenario probability distribution alone. The planets961.02 and 961.03 have analogous probability distribu-tions, with lower mean values, so we conclude that thepossibility of a binary companion does not alter our con-clusions of the sub-Earth-sized nature of the KOI 961planets. The resulting uncertainties in the planet radiidue to mischaracterization are similar to the quoted un-certainties in Table 4, which were calculated assumingscenario (a) and dominated by errors in the stellar pa-rameters. Therefore, we proceed assuming the uncertain-ties in Table 4.

6. MASSES, DYNAMICS AND ARCHITECTURE

We do not currently have measurements of the plan-ets’ masses, as KOI 961 is faint (V = 16.1 ± 0.055) andthe expected radial-velocity semi-amplitudes are small:K = 1.1, 1.25 and 0.33 m s−1 for KOI 961.01, 961.02and 961.03 respectively. In Figure 15 we show a plan-etary mass-radius diagram with theoretical predictionsfor cold spheres composed of pure iron, rock (Mg2SiO4)and water-ice, interpolated from Table 1 of Fortney et al.(2007), and we show potential masses for KOI 961’s threeplanets. Planetary bodies are unlikely to be dominatedby elements that are heavier than iron; therefore, thepure iron mass-radius relation provides firm upper limitsto the planet masses. We report 1σ upper limits of 2.73,2.06 and 0.90 M⊕ for KOI 961.01, .02 and .03 respec-tively. With such low-masses, we believe it is unlikelythat the planets could retain gaseous atmospheres withscale-heights that are a significant fraction of the planets’opaque radii. The range of possible gaseous scale-heightsfor a specified radius, surface gravity and equilibriumtemperature provide a lower-limit on the planets masses;however, we leave this calculation for a future paper.To consider the dynamical effects in this multiple-

planet system, we assume a stellar mass 0.14 M⊙, andthe 1-σ upper limits on planetary masses. We consideredcoplanar orbits, as this is highly likely due to the multi-transiting nature of this system (Lissauer et al. 2011).In the following calculations we also assume near circularorbits. The eccentricity damping timescale due to tidesraised on the planets due to the star is (Wu & Goldreich2002) :

τe =2

63πPQ′Mp

M⋆(a

R⋆)5, (3)

where Q’ is a parameter that is . 103 for terrestrialbodies (Mardling & Lin 2004). Using measured valuesfor P , a, M⋆, and R⋆, and assuming a terrestrial densityto estimate Mp, all the planets have short eccentricity-damping timescales compared to the age of the system (>4.5 Gyr based on H-α), even the outermost planet (τe ≃0.1 Gyr). This justifies the assumption of circular orbitsin modeling the present-day dynamics of the system.Given the very low-mass planets we have inferred, and

the distances from strong mean-motion resonances, wewould not expect large transit timing signatures. We per-formed 3-body numerical integrations to determine simu-lated transit times using the method of Fabrycky (2010).Each simulation had two planets – their perturbationswere considered pairwise. The strongest interaction wasbetween KOI-961.01 and KOI-961.03, with peak-to-peakdeviations from a linear ephemeris of 0.7 minutes and2.6 minutes, respectively. Other pairs showed less than1 second of deviation. Although KOI-961.03’s deviationmay be detected in the full Kepler data set, we expectother interactions to be undetectable.We also investigated the long-term stability of this sys-

tem. First, we compute the separation in number ofHill spheres (Chambers et al. 1996) between the innertwo planets and between the outer two planets: theyare 19.5 and 9.6, respectively. According to Gladman(1993), pairs of planets are Hill stable (i.e. orbits thatare initially circular may not cross) if this value is greaterthan 3.46. When three-planet systems are considered,the stability boundary moves to larger separation; forinstance, Chambers et al. (1996)[fig. 3] shows instabilityis possible in ∼ 106 orbits if the Hill separation betweenpairs of planets in three-planet systems is 6. For ourcase, scaling relations suggest that stability should easilybe achieved in this three-planet system (Chambers et al.1996). Moreover, Lissauer et al. (2011) integrated three-planet systems with precession mimicking the generalrelativistic effects, including a model for KOI-961 withmuch larger mass ratios than we suggest. They foundstability for over 10 billion orbits. Future work couldconsider precession due to tidal and rotational effects andinitially non-circular orbits.

7. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

The Kepler Mission has demonstrated unprecedentedphotometric precision over long time baselines, openingup opportunities to study planets with radii compara-ble to the Solar System terrestrial planets (Borucki et al.2011; Howard et al. 2011). However, a transit light curvedoes not provide a direct measure of a planets radius, butinstead gives only the ratio of planet and stellar radii.Thus, the precision of the Kepler transit light curvescannot be fully exploited without precise and accurateknowledge of the stellar radii of the host stars.This problem is particularly acute for the planetary

system around KOI-961. Because the host star is anM dwarf, the photometry-based stellar properties in theKepler Input Catalog suffer from large systematic errors.However, we have taken advantage of two opportuni-ties afforded by the nature of this star. First, we findthat KOI-961 is a near twin to a nearby, well-studied M-dwarf. By performing a differential analysis with respectto Barnards star, we find that KOI-961 is also a smallstar with large proper motion. Second, the high proper

15

Fig. 14.— The probability distribution for the radius of KOI 961.01, accounting for potential binary star configurations of KOI 961 thatcould introduce diluting flux within the Kepler aperture. Scenario (a) is that KOI 961 is a single star (probability 0.76), scenario (b) is thatKOI 961 is a binary with the planet transiting the brighter component (probability 0.12), and scenario (c) is that KOI 961 is a binary withthe planet transiting the fainter component (probability 0.12). The planets 961.02 and 961.03 have analogous probability distributions.

0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00Planet Mass [MEarth]

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Pla

net R

adiu

s [R

Ear

th]

0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00Planet Mass [MEarth]

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Pla

net R

adiu

s [R

Ear

th]

.01 .02

.03

IronRockIce

Solar System

Fig. 15.— Planetary Mass vs. Radius showing the ±1σ valuesfor the KOI 961 planetary radii and the range of possible masses.We show theoretical models for cold spheres composed of pureiron, rock (Mg2SiO4) and water-ice, interpolated from Table 1 ofFortney et al. (2007). We also include Solar System bodies Mer-cury, Mars, Venus and Earth, from left to right (black triangles).Planetary bodies are unlikely to contain significant amounts of el-ements that are heavier than iron, so we use the pure iron mass-radius contour to place upper limits on the masses KOI 961.01(red), .02 (green) and 0.3 (blue).

motion greatly facilitates the validation of the planetarysystem based on examination of historic imaging data.We find that there are no potential eclipsing binaries atthe current position of KOI-961 up to 4.8 magnitudesfainter.Using revised and refined stellar parameter for KOI-

961 we perform a reanalysis of the transit light curves,confirming the three signals at the periods reported byBorucki et al. (2011). We revise the impact parameters

and transit depths for all three planets. The transitdepths combined with our estimate of the stellar radiusyield planet radii that are all less than the radius of theEarth. We measure radii of 0.78 ± 0.22 R⊕ for KOI961.01, 0.73 ± 0.20 R⊕ for KOI 961.02, and 0.57 ± 0.18R⊕ for KOI 961.03.Incorporating all available observational constraints on

the presence of potential blends (both chance-alignmentand hierarchical), we are able to establish that the tran-sit signals are indeed planets in the KOI 961 system.We also quantify the probability that KOI 961 might bea binary with planets transiting either of the two com-ponents (which would lead to an underestimate of theplanet radii), and find that this probability is low enoughto remain confident that we have not drastically misclas-sified the planets. Follow-up adaptive optics imaging ofKOI 961 will be able to put even tighter constraints onthis possibility.As a planet-hosting star, KOI 961 provides an impor-

tant data point for the study of the planet-metallicityrelationship in the context of low-mass stars andterrestrial-sized planets. The planet-metallicity cor-relation was originally discovered for Sun-like F, Gand K-type stars, and correlated the stellar metal-licity to the likelihood of hosting a Jovian-massplanet (e.g. Santos et al. 2001; Fischer & Valenti 2005;Johnson et al. 2010a). Recently developed methods forestimating the metallicities of M dwarfs have shownthat M-dwarf planet-hosts are also systematically metal-rich (Johnson & Apps 2009; Rojas-Ayala et al. 2010;Schlaufman & Laughlin 2010; Neves et al. 2011). Beingsignificantly metal-poor, KOI 961 represents an outlierin the context of these studies, but it is not clear thatthe planet-metallicity correlation extends to stars whichhost Earth-mass and smaller exoplanets. Recent analy-sis by Mayor et al. (2011) of radial-velocity detected ex-

16

oplanets indicates that the correlation may not apply tostars which only host planets less-massive than Neptune.However, there is evidence that the planet-metallicitycorrelation is important for small-planets around low-mass stars, based on a comparison of the KOIs to Ke-pler field stars by Schlaufman & Laughlin (2011). Thediscovery of KOI 961, and the studies of Mayor et al.(2011) and Schlaufman & Laughlin (2011), strongly mo-tivate further investigations of the planet-metallicity cor-relation for low-mass planets around low-mass stars.The detection of the planetary system around KOI

961 is remarkable since it is one of only a few dozenmid-to-late M dwarfs currently observed by Kepler. Fig-ure 16 shows the r-K distribution for all targets cur-rently observed by Kepler, and KOIs in Borucki et al.(2011). We have removed all objects with J - K >1.0, as these are likely distant giant stars with signif-icantly reddened colors (see Figure 1). KOI 961 is thereddest dwarf KOI from the Borucki et al. (2011) release,and is also likely the least massive KOI. Only 27 dwarfstars observed by Kepler have r-K greater than KOI961’s value of 4.444. Combined with the low probabilityof a planetary system being geometrically aligned suchthat a transit is observed (only 13% in the case of KOI961.01), Kepler’s discovery of planets around KOI 961could be an indication that planets are common aroundmid-to-late M dwarfs, or at least not rare. This would beconsistent with the results of Howard et al. (2011), whoused the Kepler detections to show that the frequencyof sub-Neptune-size planets (RP = 2-4 R⊕) increaseswith decreasing stellar effective temperature for stars ear-lier than M0. Results from on-going exoplanet surveysof M dwarfs such as MEarth (e.g. Irwin et al. 2011b),and future programs such as the Habitable Zone PlanetFinder (e.g. Mahadevan et al. 2010; Ramsey et al. 2008)and CARMENES (Quirrenbach et al. 2010), will shedlight on the statistics of low-mass planets around mid-and later M dwarfs.

We would like to thank Peter Dawson, who providedthe multi-wavelength spectrum of Barnard’s Star. Wewould like to thank Sarah Ballard and Michael Line forthe thoughtful discussions concerning the paper. Wewould like to thank Bruce Gary of Hereford Arizona Ob-servatory for taking the B,V and RC photometric mea-surements of KOI 961.This work includes observations taken at the Palomar

Obervatory 200-inch Hale Telescope granted by CornellUniversity. The TripleSpec spectrograph was built atCornell and delivered to Palomar as part of the Cornell-Caltech-Palomar arrangement. This work includes ob-servations taken at the W. M. Keck Observatory andPalomar Observatory granted by the California Instituteof Technology. Some of the Palomar 200-inch Telescopetime was provided by NASA/JPL. We thank MelodieKao, Matthew Giguere and Ming Zhao for assisting withthe Keck observations.J.A.C, K.R.C., D.C.F. and E.N.K. acknowledge sup-

port for this work from the Hubble Fellowship Pro-gram, provided by NASA through Hubble Fellow-ship grants HF-51267.01-A, HST-HF-51253.01-A, HF-51272.01-A and HST-HF-51256.01-A, awarded by theSpace Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7r - K

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

N S

tars

Kepler Targets

KOIs from B11

KOI 961

Fig. 16.— Distribution of r-K for the Kepler targets from the Ke-pler Input Catalog (black, Batalha et al. 2010; Brown et al. 2011)and for the KOIs (red, Borucki et al. 2011), with a bin width of0.25. We have removed all objects with J - K > 1.0, as these arelikely distant giant stars with significantly reddened colors. KOI961 is one of only a few dozen mid-to-late M dwarfs being observedby Kepler.

the AURA, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.K.G.S., J.P. and L.H. acknowledge support through theVanderbilt Initiative in Data-intensive Astrophysics andNSF grants AST-0849736 and AST-1009810.This paper includes data collected by the Kepler mis-

sion. Funding for the Kepler mission is provided by theNASA Science Mission directorate. Some of the datapresented in this paper were obtained from the Multi-mission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute(MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Uni-versities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASAcontract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HSTdata is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science viagrant NNX09AF08G and by other grants and contracts.The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) is

operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of theScience and Technology Facilities Council of the U.K.The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space

Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grantNAG W-2166. The images of these surveys are based onphotographic data obtained using the Oschin SchmidtTelescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK SchmidtTelescope. The plates were processed into the presentcompressed digital form with the permission of these in-stitutions.The National Geographic Society - Palomar Observa-

tory Sky Atlas (POSS-I) was made by the CaliforniaInstitute of Technology with grants from the NationalGeographic Society. The Second Palomar ObservatorySky Survey (POSS-II) was made by the California In-stitute of Technology with funds from the National Sci-ence Foundation, the National Geographic Society, theSloan Foundation, the Samuel Oschin Foundation, andthe Eastman Kodak Corporation. The Oschin SchmidtTelescope is operated by the California Institute of Tech-nology and Palomar Observatory.

17

REFERENCES

Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2010, ArXiv e-printsBaraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998,

A&A, 337, 403Barnard, E. E. 1916, AJ, 29, 181Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Bryson, S. T., Haas,

M. R., Brown, T. M., Caldwell, D. A., Hall, J. R., Gilliland,R. L., Latham, D. W., Meibom, S., & Monet, D. G. 2010, ApJ,713, L109

Bonfils, X., Delfosse, X., Udry, S., Forveille, T., Mayor, M.,Perrier, C., Bouchy, F., Gillon, M., Lovis, C., Pepe, F., Queloz,D., Santos, N. C., Segransan, D., & Bertaux, J.-L. 2011, ArXive-prints

Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown,T. M., Bryson, S. T., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.,Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, III,T. N., Geary, J. C., Gilliland, R., Gould, A., Howell, S. B.,Jenkins, J. M., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G. W.,Rowe, J., Sasselov, D., Boss, A., Charbonneau, D., Ciardi, D.,Doyle, L., Dupree, A. K., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J., Holman,M. J., Seager, S., Steffen, J. H., Tarter, J., Welsh, W. F., Allen,C., Buchhave, L. A., Christiansen, J. L., Clarke, B. D., Desert,J.-M., Endl, M., Fabrycky, D., Fressin, F., Haas, M., Horch, E.,Howard, A., Isaacson, H., Kjeldsen, H., Kolodziejczak, J.,Kulesa, C., Li, J., Machalek, P., McCarthy, D., MacQueen, P.,Meibom, S., Miquel, T., Prsa, A., Quinn, S. N., Quintana,E. V., Ragozzine, D., Sherry, W., Shporer, A., Tenenbaum, P.,Torres, G., Twicken, J. D., Van Cleve, J., & Walkowicz, L.2011, ArXiv e-prints

Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., & Hogg, D. W. 2011, ArXiv e-printsBrown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A.

2011, ArXiv e-printsBrowning, M. K., Basri, G., Marcy, G. W., West, A. A., &

Zhang, J. 2010, AJ, 139, 504Bryson, S. T., Tenenbaum, P., Jenkins, J. M., Chandrasekaran,

H., Klaus, T., Caldwell, D. A., Gilliland, R. L., Haas, M. R.,Dotson, J. L., Koch, D. G., & Borucki, W. J. 2010, ApJ, 713,L97

Carpenter, J. M. 2001, AJ, 121, 2851Carter, J. A., Fabrycky, D. C., Ragozzine, D., Holman, M. J.,

Quinn, S. N., Latham, D. W., Buchhave, L. A., Van Cleve, J.,Cochran, W. D., Cote, M. T., Endl, M., Ford, E. B., Haas,M. R., Jenkins, J. M., Koch, D. G., Li, J., Lissauer, J. J.,MacQueen, P. J., Middour, C. K., Orosz, J. A., Rowe, J. F.,Steffen, J. H., & Welsh, W. F. 2011a, Science, 331, 562

Carter, J. A., Winn, J. N., Holman, M. J., Fabrycky, D., Berta,Z. K., Burke, C. J., & Nutzman, P. 2011b, ApJ, 730, 82

Chabrier, G., Gallardo, J., & Baraffe, I. 2007, A&A, 472, L17Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. 1996, Icarus,

119, 261Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., Burke, C. J., Nutzman,

P., Buchhave, L. A., Lovis, C., Bonfils, X., Latham, D. W.,Udry, S., Murray-Clay, R. A., Holman, M. J., Falco, E. E.,Winn, J. N., Queloz, D., Pepe, F., Mayor, M., Delfosse, X., &Forveille, T. 2009, Nature, 462, 891

Chubak, C., Marcy, G., Fischer, D., J., W., Johnson, J. A.,Isaacson, H., & Howard, A. 2012, submitted to PASP

Covey, K. R., Hawley, S. L., Bochanski, J. J., West, A. A., Reid,I. N., Golimowski, D. A., Davenport, J. R. A., Henry, T.,Uomoto, A., & Holtzman, J. A. 2008, AJ, 136, 1778

Cushing, M. C., Rayner, J. T., & Vacca, W. D. 2005, ApJ, 623,1115

Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116,362

Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., Beichman, C. A.,Carpenter, J. M., Chester, T., Cambresy, L., Evans, T., Fowler,J., Gizis, J., Howard, E., Huchra, J., Jarrett, T., Kopan, E. L.,Kirkpatrick, J. D., Light, R. M., Marsh, K. A., McCallon, H.,Schneider, S., Stiening, R., Sykes, M., Weinberg, M., Wheaton,W. A., Wheelock, S., & Zacarias, N. 2003, VizieR Online DataCatalog, 2246, 0

Dawson, P. C. & De Robertis, M. M. 2004, AJ, 127, 2909Delfosse, X., Forveille, T., Segransan, D., Beuzit, J.-L., Udry, S.,

Perrier, C., & Mayor, M. 2000, A&A, 364, 217Dhital, S., West, A. A., Stassun, K. G., Bochanski, J. J., Massey,

A. P., & Bastien, F. A. 2011, ArXiv e-prints

Fabrycky, D. C. Non-Keplerian Dynamics of Exoplanets, ed.Seager, S., 217–238

Feltzing, S. & Bensby, T. 2008, Physica Scripta Volume T, 133,014031

Fischer, D. A. & Marcy, G. W. 1992, ApJ, 396, 178Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659,

1661Francis, C. & Anderson, E. 2009, NA, 14, 615Fressin, F., Torres, G., Desert, J.-M., Charbonneau, D., Batalha,

N. M., Fortney, J. J., Rowe, J. F., Allen, C., Borucki, W. J.,Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Ciardi, D. R., Cochran, W. D.,Deming, D., Dunham, E. W., Fabrycky, D. C., Gautier, III,T. N., Gilliland, R. L., Henze, C. E., Holman, M. J., Howell,S. B., Jenkins, J. M., Kinemuchi, K., Knutson, H., Koch,D. G., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G. W.,Ragozzine, D., Sasselov, D. D., Still, M., Tenenbaum, P., &Uddin, K. 2011a, ApJS, 197, 5

Fressin, F., Torres, G., Rowe, J. F., Charbonneau, D., Rogers,L. A., Ballard, S., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson,S. T., Buchhave, L. A., Ciardi, D. R., Desert, J.-M., Dressing,C. D., Fabrycky, D. C., Ford, E. B., Gautier, III, T. N., Henze,C. E., Holman, M. J., Howard, A. W., Howell, S. B., Jenkins,J. M., Koch, D. G., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Marcy,G. W., Quinn, S. N., Ragozzine, D., Sasselov, D. D., Seager, S.,Barclay, T., Mullally, F., Seader, S. E., Still, M., Twicken,J. D., Thompson, S. E., & Uddin, K. 2011b, ArXiv e-prints

Fuhrmann, K. 2004, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 3Gary, B. L. 2007, Society for Astronomical Sciences Annual

Symposium, 26, 23Giampapa, M. S., Rosner, R., Kashyap, V., Fleming, T. A.,

Schmitt, J. H. M. M., & Bookbinder, J. A. 1996, ApJ, 463, 707Gizis, J. E., Reid, I. N., & Hawley, S. L. 2002, AJ, 123, 3356Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247Hawley, S. L., Gizis, J. E., & Reid, N. I. 1997, AJ, 113, 1458Herter, T. L., Henderson, C. P., Wilson, J. C., Matthews, K. Y.,

Rahmer, G., Bonati, M., Muirhead, P. S., Adams, J. D., Lloyd,J. P., Skrutskie, M. F., Moon, D., Parshley, S. C., Nelson,M. J., Martinache, F., & Gull, G. E. 2008, in Society ofPhoto-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) ConferenceSeries, Vol. 7014, Society of Photo-Optical InstrumentationEngineers (SPIE) Conference Series

Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A.,Wright, J. T., Bernat, D., Henry, G. W., Peek, K. M. G.,Isaacson, H., Apps, K., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., Valenti,J. A., Anderson, J., & Piskunov, N. E. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1467

Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M.,Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G.,Dunham, E. W., Gautier, III, T. N., Van Cleve, J., Cochran,W. D., Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Torres, G., Brown,T. M., Gilliland, R. L., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A.,Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ciardi, D., Fressin, F., Haas, M. R.,Howell, S. B., Kjeldsen, H., Seager, S., Rogers, L., Sasselov,D. D., Steffen, J. H., Basri, G. S., Charbonneau, D.,Christiansen, J., Clarke, B., Dupree, A., Fabrycky, D. C.,Fischer, D. A., Ford, E. B., Fortney, J. J., Tarter, J., Girouard,F. R., Holman, M. J., Johnson, J. A., Klaus, T. C., Machalek,P., Moorhead, A. V., Morehead, R. C., Ragozzine, D.,Tenenbaum, P., Twicken, J. D., Quinn, S. N., Isaacson, H.,Shporer, A., Lucas, P. W., Walkowicz, L. M., Welsh, W. F.,Boss, A., Devore, E., Gould, A., Smith, J. C., Morris, R. L.,Prsa, A., & Morton, T. D. 2011, ArXiv e-prints

Irwin, J., Berta, Z. K., Burke, C. J., Charbonneau, D., Nutzman,P., West, A. A., & Falco, E. E. 2011a, ApJ, 727, 56

Irwin, J. M., Quinn, S. N., Berta, Z. K., Latham, D. W., Torres,G., Burke, C. J., Charbonneau, D., Dittmann, J., Esquerdo,G. A., Stefanik, R. P., Oksanen, A., Buchhave, L. A., Nutzman,P., Berlind, P., Calkins, M. L., & Falco, E. E. 2011b, ArXive-prints

Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R.2010a, PASP, 122, 905

Johnson, J. A. & Apps, K. 2009, ApJ, 699, 933

18

Johnson, J. A., Gazak, J. Z., Apps, K., Muirhead, P. S., Crepp,J. R., Crossfield, I. J. M., Boyajian, T., von Braun, K.,Rojas-Ayala, B., Howard, A. W., Covey, K. R., Schlawin, E.,Hamren, K., Morton, T. D., & Lloyd, J. P. 2011, ArXiv e-prints

Johnson, J. A., Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bowler, B. P.,Henry, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Apps, K., Isaacson, H., &Wright, J. T. 2010b, PASP, 122, 149

Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., Batalha, N. M., Brown,T. M., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran,W. D., DeVore, E., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, T. N., Geary,J. C., Gilliland, R. L., Gould, A., Jenkins, J., Kondo, Y.,Latham, D. W., Lissauer, J. J., Marcy, G., Monet, D., Sasselov,D., Boss, A., Brownlee, D., Caldwell, J., Dupree, A. K., Howell,S. B., Kjeldsen, H., Meibom, S., Morrison, D., Owen, T.,Reitsema, H., Tarter, J., Bryson, S. T., Dotson, J. L., Gazis, P.,Haas, M. R., Kolodziejczak, J., Rowe, J. F., Van Cleve, J. E.,Allen, C., Chandrasekaran, H., Clarke, B. D., Li, J., Quintana,E. V., Tenenbaum, P., Twicken, J. D., & Wu, H. 2010, ApJ,713, L79

Koen, C., Kilkenny, D., van Wyk, F., & Marang, F. 2010,MNRAS, 403, 1949

Kraus, A. L., Tucker, R. A., Thompson, M. I., Craine, E. R., &Hillenbrand, L. A. 2011, ApJ, 728, 48

Lacy, C. H. 1977, ApJ, 218, 444Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340Lane, B. F., Boden, A. F., & Kulkarni, S. R. 2001, ApJ, 551, L81Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., Edge, A. C., Hambly,

N. C., Jameson, R. F., Lucas, P., Casali, M., Adamson, A., Dye,S., Emerson, J. P., Foucaud, S., Hewett, P., Hirst, P., Hodgkin,S. T., Irwin, M. J., Lodieu, N., McMahon, R. G., Simpson, C.,Smail, I., Mortlock, D., & Folger, M. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599

Leggett, S. K. 1992, ApJS, 82, 351Lepine, S., Rich, R. M., & Shara, M. M. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1235Lepine, S. & Shara, M. M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1483Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., Steffen, J. H.,

Ford, E. B., Jenkins, J. M., Shporer, A., Holman, M. J., Rowe,J. F., Quintana, E. V., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson,S. T., Caldwell, D. A., Carter, J. A., Ciardi, D., Dunham,E. W., Fortney, J. J., Gautier, III, T. N., Howell, S. B., Koch,D. G., Latham, D. W., Marcy, G. W., Morehead, R. C., &Sasselov, D. 2011, ApJS, 197, 8

Mahadevan, S., Ramsey, L., Wright, J., Endl, M., Redman, S.,Bender, C., Roy, A., Zonak, S., Troupe, N., Engel, L.,Sigurdsson, S., Wolszczan, A., & Zhao, B. 2010, in Society ofPhoto-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) ConferenceSeries, Vol. 7735, Society of Photo-Optical InstrumentationEngineers (SPIE) Conference Series

Mandel, K. & Agol, E. 2002, ApJ, 580, L171Marcy, G. W. & Benitz, K. J. 1989, ApJ, 344, 441Mardling, R. A. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 614, 955Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., Udry, S., Segransan, D.,

Pepe, F., Benz, W., Bertaux, J. ., Bouchy, F., Dumusque, X.,Lo Curto, G., Mordasini, C., Queloz, D., & Santos, N. C. 2011,ArXiv e-prints

Metcalfe, T. S., Mathieu, R. D., Latham, D. W., & Torres, G.1996, ApJ, 456, 356

Minkowski, R. L. & Abell, G. O. The National GeographicSociety-Palomar Observatory Sky Survey, ed. Strand, K. A.(the University of Chicago Press), 481–+

Morales, J. C., Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Torres, G., Gallardo, J.,Guinan, E. F., Charbonneau, D., Wolf, M., Latham, D. W.,Anglada-Escude, G., Bradstreet, D. H., Everett, M. E.,O’Donovan, F. T., Mandushev, G., & Mathieu, R. D. 2009,ApJ, 691, 1400

Morton, T. D. & Johnson, J. A. 2011, ApJ, 738, 170Muirhead, P. S., Edelstein, J., Erskine, D. J., Wright, J. T.,

Muterspaugh, M. W., Covey, K. R., Wishnow, E. H., Hamren,K., Andelson, P., Kimber, D., Mercer, T., Halverson, S. P.,Vanderburg, A., Mondo, D., Czeszumska, A., & Lloyd, J. P.2011a, PASP, 123, 709

Muirhead, P. S., Hamren, K., Schlawin, E., Rojas-Ayala, B.,Covey, K. R., & Lloyd, J. P. 2011b, ArXiv e-prints, Paper 1

Neves, V., Bonfils, X., Santos, N. C., Delfosse, X., Forveille, T.,Allard, F., Natario, C., Fernandes, C. S., & Udry, S. 2011,ArXiv e-prints

Oke, J. B. & Gunn, J. E. 1982, PASP, 94, 586

Paulson, D. B., Allred, J. C., Anderson, R. B., Hawley, S. L.,Cochran, W. D., & Yelda, S. 2006, PASP, 118, 227

Quirrenbach, A., Amado, P. J., Mandel, H., Caballero, J. A.,Mundt, R., Ribas, I., Reiners, A., Abril, M., Aceituno, J.,Afonso, C., Barrado Y Navascues, D., Bean, J. L., Bejar,V. J. S., Becerril, S., Bohm, A., Cardenas, M. C., Claret, A.,Colome, J., Costillo, L. P., Dreizler, S., Fernandez, M.,Francisco, X., Galadı, D., Garrido, R., Gonzalez Hernandez,J. I., Guardia, J., Guenther, E. W., Gutierrez-Soto, F.,Joergens, V., Hatzes, A. P., Helmling, J., Henning, T., Herrero,E., Kurster, M., Laun, W., Lenzen, R., Mall, U., Martin, E. L.,Martın-Ruiz, S., Mirabet, E., Montes, D., Morales, J. C.,Morales Munoz, R., Moya, A., Naranjo, V., Rabaza, O.,Ramon, A., Rebolo, R., Reffert, S., Rodler, F., Rodrıguez, E.,Rodrıguez Trinidad, A., Rohloff, R. R., Sanchez Carrasco,M. A., Schmidt, C., Seifert, W., Setiawan, J., Solano, E., Stahl,O., Storz, C., Suarez, J. C., Thiele, U., Wagner, K.,Wiedemann, G., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Del Burgo, C.,Sanchez-Blanco, E., & Xu, W. 2010, in Society ofPhoto-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) ConferenceSeries, Vol. 7735, Society of Photo-Optical InstrumentationEngineers (SPIE) Conference Series

Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., Latham, D. W.,Marcy, G. W., Mason, B. D., Gies, D. R., White, R. J., & tenBrummelaar, T. A. 2010, ApJS, 190, 1

Ragozzine, D. & Holman, M. J. 2010, ArXiv e-printsRamsey, L. W., Barnes, J., Redman, S. L., Jones, H. R. A.,

Wolszczan, A., Bongiorno, S., Engel, L., & Jenkins, J. 2008,PASP, 120, 887

Reid, I. N., Brewer, C., Brucato, R. J., McKinley, W. R., Maury,A., Mendenhall, D., Mould, J. R., Mueller, J., Neugebauer, G.,Phinney, J., Sargent, W. L. W., Schombert, J., & Thicksten, R.1991, PASP, 103, 661

Reid, I. N., Hawley, S. L., & Gizis, J. E. 1995, AJ, 110, 1838Ribas, I. 2006, Ap&SS, 304, 89Rojas-Ayala, B., Covey, K. R., Muirhead, P. S., & Lloyd, J. P.

2010, ApJ, 720, L113—. 2011, ArXiv e-printsSantos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2001, A&A, 373, 1019Schlaufman, K. C. & Laughlin, G. 2010, A&A, 519, A105+—. 2011, ArXiv e-printsSeager, S. & Mallen-Ornelas, G. 2003, ApJ, 585, 1038Segransan, D., Kervella, P., Forveille, T., & Queloz, D. 2003,

A&A, 397, L5Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D.,

Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R.,Chester, T., Elias, J., Huchra, J., Liebert, J., Lonsdale, C.,Monet, D. G., Price, S., Seitzer, P., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick,J. D., Gizis, J. E., Howard, E., Evans, T., Fowler, J., Fullmer,L., Hurt, R., Light, R., Kopan, E. L., Marsh, K. A., McCallon,H. L., Tam, R., Van Dyk, S., & Wheelock, S. 2006, AJ, 131,1163

Stone, R. P. S. 1977, ApJ, 218, 767Tokovinin, A., Hartung, M., & Hayward, T. L. 2010, AJ, 140, 510Tokovinin, A., Thomas, S., Sterzik, M., & Udry, S. 2006, A&A,

450, 681Torres, G. 2007, ApJ, 671, L65—. 2011, ArXiv e-printsVacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP, 115,

389van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D. 1995, The general

catalogue of trigonometric [stellar] parallaxes, ed. van Altena,W. F., Lee, J. T., & Hoffleit, E. D.

—. 2001, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1238, 0van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653Verner, G. A., Chaplin, W. J., Basu, S., Brown, T. M., Hekker, S.,

Huber, D., Karoff, C., Mathur, S., Metcalfe, T. S., Mosser, B.,Quirion, P.-O., Appourchaux, T., Bedding, T. R., Bruntt, H.,Campante, T. L., Elsworth, Y., Garcıa, R. A., Handberg, R.,Regulo, C., Roxburgh, I. W., Stello, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard,J., Gilliland, R. L., Kawaler, S. D., Kjeldsen, H., Allen, C.,Clarke, B. D., & Girouard, F. R. 2011, ApJ, 738, L28

19

Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., Bresee, L., Brown, B.,Cantrall, T., Conrad, A., Couture, M., Delaney, C., Epps,H. W., Hilyard, D., Hilyard, D. F., Horn, E., Jern, N., Kanto,D., Keane, M. J., Kibrick, R. I., Lewis, J. W., Osborne, J.,Pardeilhan, G. H., Pfister, T., Ricketts, T., Robinson, L. B.,Stover, R. J., Tucker, D., Ward, J., & Wei, M. Z. 1994, inSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)Conference Series, Vol. 2198, Society of Photo-OpticalInstrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed.D. L. Crawford & E. R. Craine, 362–+

West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., Bochanski, J. J., Covey, K. R., Reid,I. N., Dhital, S., Hilton, E. J., & Masuda, M. 2008, AJ, 135, 785

West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., Walkowicz, L. M., Covey, K. R.,Silvestri, N. M., Raymond, S. N., Harris, H. C., Munn, J. A.,McGehee, P. M., Ivezic, Z., & Brinkmann, J. 2004, AJ, 128, 426

Wu, Y. & Goldreich, P. 2002, ApJ, 564, 1024