146
Role Capability Detailed description of capability or attribute Documentation Goal

ATDD Tools Comparison

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ATDD Tools Comparison

Canoo WebTest

Role Capability Detailed description of capability or attribute http://webtest.canoo.com

Documentation Goal

Allow web application testing to be a

Page 2: ATDD Tools Comparison

Role Test Runner

Role Reporting How test results are reported

The means of choosing and invoking the tests to be run

Runs via HTTP

XML, HTML, soph

Page 3: ATDD Tools Comparison

Role Test Editor How the tests are edited

Role Repository How the tests are stored

Role Database

any xml editor or ide

No

How tests can load or query a database used by the SUT

No

Page 4: ATDD Tools Comparison

Role SUT Interface DriverThe means of interacting with the System Under Tests

HtmlUnit

Page 5: ATDD Tools Comparison

Role Language The language for expressing tests

Database Load data Test data can be loaded from a database

Java, Groovy

Possible

B11
Language for expressing test scripts and the interpretter for it --aa-ftt August 23, 2009 1:59:33 PM
Page 6: ATDD Tools Comparison

Database Clean data What does this mean? (Rick)

Implementation Native Language

Implementation Java Accessible

Implementation .Net Accessible

Interface Access to API and/or GUI or Web UI

Possible

XML

Ability to invoke Java methods in target code base

yes

Ability to invoke .NET methods in target code base ?

API/WebUI/DesktopGUI

WebUI

Page 7: ATDD Tools Comparison

Interface Other interfaces for driving SUTs

Issues

Language Data-driven

Language Keyword-Driven

Language

Other drivers/fixtures

Yes

Yes

Programming Language is used to write tests

Page 8: ATDD Tools Comparison

Language Fluent/Literate

Language Tabular

Language

?

No

Multiple levels of Abstraction - available

Yes

Page 9: ATDD Tools Comparison

Language ?Not sure what this means? (Rick)

Language

Language

Language

Misc Maturity How mature is the tool?

Multiple levels of Abstraction - in same test

Yes

variables as arguments of keywords

Does this also mean that abstractions for keywords can have parameters? (Rick)

Yes

variables can hold values returned by sut

Yes

Free-form commentary interspersed with tests

In line comments just like code comments are entered with //

commentsVery matur

Page 10: ATDD Tools Comparison

Misc OpenSource Is there a free version with source code?

Misc Commercial Is there a paid version?

Misc Use tool to test itself

Misc One-button Install

Misc

Misc Mixed Auto/Manual What does this mean? (Rick)

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Mixed Auto/Manual Install

No

No

Page 11: ATDD Tools Comparison

Misc

Misc

Process

Process

Reporting Tagging/Categories

Setup/Teardown of Context

Possible

Use tool to test itself - exceptions ?

Acceptance Test Driven development

Possible

Encourages communication

Not s

Page 12: ATDD Tools Comparison

Reporting Summary

Reporting

Reporting See screen captures

Reporting

Reporting

Yes

Clickthrough to failures

Yes

Yes

Aggregate test results

Yes

Side-by-side.What does this mean? Seems very specific - is it a useful distinction? (Rick) ?

Page 13: ATDD Tools Comparison

Repository Builtin

Repository SCM-Friendly

Repository Storage format

Test Editor Record Tests

Test Editor Refactor

Test Editor Refactor

Test Editor Builtin keyword help

No

Yes

xml

No

No

Updating tests automatically (from results? (Rick))

No

No

Page 14: ATDD Tools Comparison

Test Editor Keyword Completion

Test Editor

Test Editor "Grammar-checker"

Test Editor "Quick-Fix"

Test Editor Run test from editor

Test Editor Interactive execution

Test Runner Command line

No

Argument Completion

No

Indicate when keywords mispelled or wrong args

xml editor

No

No

NoYes

Page 15: ATDD Tools Comparison

Test Runner GUI/Browser Can run with a GUI or browser

Test Runner

Test Runner

Test Runner e.g. GUI vs Browser

Test Runner e.g. Different browsers; with/without DB

------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------

No

Run one test or many

Yes

Run subsets of tests based on Tagging/Categories

Possible?

Run same tests via different interfaces

Yes

Run same tests against different configurations

Yes

Page 16: ATDD Tools Comparison

Concordion Cucumber JBehave

http://www.concordion.org http://wiki.github.com/asl http://jbehave.org/

Create a safety net for refactoring by separating the test intention (written in plain English) from the test implementation (written in Java), so the latter can change, as the system's design evolves, while the former catches regression bugs.

Most other testing frameworks mix together the test intention with its implementation.

Write business scenarios in structured English.

Write user stories and acceptance criteria (scenarios) in plain-text files in any language.

Page 17: ATDD Tools Comparison

HTML written to a configurable location

JUnit (for the Java version of Concordion anyway)

Command line, Rake, IDE

Ant, Maven, JUnit, custom

Console, HTML, XML, PDF, custom

Console, HTML, XML, text, "stats", custom

Page 18: ATDD Tools Comparison

HTML / text editor Any text editor

With source code File system/SCM

Within Java fixture code

Any text editor, RubyMine, NetBeans

Anywhere - stories are loaded via StoryLoader implementations - in classpath, from local or remote URL.

Using ORM (ActiveRecord, Hibernate)

Steps classes can use any Java framework. DbUnit is commonly used.

Page 19: ATDD Tools Comparison

Indirectly through a Java fixture AnythingAnything you can invoke from a Java class.

Page 20: ATDD Tools Comparison

Gherkin (plain text)Instrumentation within HTML (for test case); and Java (for test implementation)

Pluggable plain-text StoryParser. Default implementation is regex-based.

Within the Java fixture code you can do anything you like

Several options. Before hooks. Background

Various @Before* and @After* annotated methods can be called. Inside those methods, any java framework for data loading can be invoked - DbUnit is commonly used.

Page 21: ATDD Tools Comparison

DbUnit - as above

Java, .NET, Ruby, Python

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes, from fixture code

Use DatabaseCleaner (Rails)

Ruby, Java, Scala, Groovy, Javascript, Clojure, Ioke, .NET

Java or any other language that you can access via Java API, e.g. groovy, jruby, jython, rhino.

Yes - http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cuke4duke

Yes - http://wiki.github.com/richardlawrence/Cuke4Nuke

Requires Java/.NET interop

Yes, Selenium-based Steps already exist.

Page 22: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

No Yes Yes - i18n'd keywords

No

Test is plain text, Execution framework is Java

Page 23: ATDD Tools Comparison

Plain language Yes

Supported, but not required Yes

Yes

Tabular input and output supported in different ways.

Page 24: ATDD Tools Comparison

Singhal

Scenario Outline

Yes Yes, in Step Definitions Yes, in Steps class

Yes

Mature (since 2006) Mature Mature

Variables as arguments of fixture methods

Variables are matched with text in story. Default implementation is regex-based

Yes - use # for comments

Yes - use !-- for comments

Page 25: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Yes

No No

Yes Yes Yes

No gem install cucumber jar file(s) / maven

N/A

N/A

Page 26: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes, within Java fixture code Before and After hooks

Yes ?? Yes

Yes Yes Yes

Yes Indeed Yes

Yes @foo @bar No - planned for 3.1

@Before* and @After* hooks (multiple levels)

Automatic generation of breadcrumbs based on naming conventions

Page 27: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Yes - customizable

No No

Through user-contributed plugin

As per JUnit Yes Yes - customizable

N/A ? ?

When run in IDE via JUnit / TestNG

Possible - see watir example

Possible - example exists

Page 28: ATDD Tools Comparison

No ?

Yes Yes yes

HTML Plain text + code (Java)

No No

No No No

No No No

No --lang help ?

Anything - implementation of StoryLoader

Plain text + code (several languages)

With Selenium, for Selenium-based Steps

Page 29: ATDD Tools Comparison

No In RubyMine No

No In RubyMine No

No Abillity to do dry-run

No No

Yes Depends on editor

No No

Yes, as per JUnit Yes Yes

Yes, from JUnit which is built into most Java IDEs

When run in IDE via JUnit/TestNG

Page 30: ATDD Tools Comparison

No

Yes Yes Yes

Possibly Yes --tags @foo No - planned for 3.1

No Yes Ant/Maven/IDE

No Yes --profile

------------------- -------------------

Yes - Watir, WebDriver, Celerity compatible

Yes - whatever you want to add to Steps class - Selenium/WebDriver classes exist

Createable - not part of framework

Page 31: ATDD Tools Comparison

FitLibrary Fitness-Slim GreenPepper

http://sourceforge.net/projects/fitlibrary/ http://www.greenpeppersoftware.com

Detailed requirements in terms of business rules, objects and processes, test automation, table-based DSL

Use Automated Functional Testing as an "Executable Specification" mechanism that optimize requirement communication between customers/users/field experts and the developers team. All this in order to build the right software, the one needed.

Page 32: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitness

As annotated tables, like Fit Fitness

Yes: FolderRunner + batch running + with FitNesse

From a Wiki (XWiki, Confluence), from JIRA or from the IDE (Eclipse & Visual Studio plugin). Runner versions for Java, .Net and Ruby). Using continuous integration with Maven, Nant, MS Build.

HTML in WIKI (Confluence, XWiki), JIRA or on disk (HTML)

Page 33: ATDD Tools Comparison

FitNesse, Excel, html editor Fitness Confluence, XWiki

FitNesse pages or files Fitness Confluence, XWiki, local disk

Yes No No

Page 34: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes, optionally with an adapter Yes

Multiple SUT configuration for a test suite. Configuration managed within the WIKI

Page 35: ATDD Tools Comparison

table DSL, with some plain text Yes

Yes No

Plain text with fixture in Java, .Net and Ruby

Page 36: ATDD Tools Comparison

Java, .NET, Ruby

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

API

Java JVM, .net, Python, Smalltalk, JavaScript. Reference implementation in Java.

Through API of language. Java fixtures/drivers for Swing, web/ajax (SpiderFixture)

Page 37: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No

shell, email, PDFs, XML, web services, mocking web services, templating

Page 38: ATDD Tools Comparison

Not in a programming language sense Yes

Usually, but also has plain-text form Yes

Yes

Yes. Procedural abstraction with defined actions with parameters, OO abstraction with classes (to organise defined actions and to make distinctions between different cases), business rule abstractions with multi-defined actions

Page 39: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes No

Yes No

Yes, any HTML Yes

maturemature. commercial offering since 2005 with support

Page 40: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes All runners are opensource

No Pay for Server and technical support

Yes, extensively Yes

No, not when used with FitNesse No

N/A

?? don't understand the point of this row N/A

Yes, by running part of a storytest, but this is a little inconvenient

Page 41: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Page 42: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes, with SpiderFixture with Firefox No

Yes Yes

? Don't understand this row ?

Page 43: ATDD Tools Comparison

Various repositories are used ?

Yes Yes

FitNesse pages, html, xls Wiki page, html

No No

No No

? Don't understand this row No

No No

Page 44: ATDD Tools Comparison

No No

No No

No No

No n/a

Yes, with FitNesse Yes

No No

Yes Yes

Page 45: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

------------------- -------------------

Page 46: ATDD Tools Comparison

GUIdancer Jubula PyWinauto

http://www.guidancer.com http://www.eclipse.org/jubula

http://pywinauto.openqa.org/

Same goals as Jubula, but with added extras for professional use (code coverage, TestStyle, Mylyn integration, reporting)

Functional acceptance testing (black-box) throughthe GUI to test programs as the end user will see them.

Removal of programming effort from acceptance testing.

Use in agile processes (tests created in parallel with development).

Page 47: ATDD Tools Comparison

See Jubula

Yes: Tests can be started from a command line, which can be called by e.g. Ant or CI tools

See Jubula. Additionally, long term BIRT trends can be generated from results.

In client itself (as summary table and full report tree).Also as HTML and XML reports.

Page 48: ATDD Tools Comparison

See Jubula.

Yes Yes

See Jubula. Additionally, Mylyn tasks can be used for context-based working. There is also a Test Style module for best practices for test structure etc.

In "Test Case Editor": tests can be added (referenced), removed and altered (e.g. order, names, components, data)

Tests are stored in a database. Projects can be exported as XML files for version control

Page 49: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Page 50: ATDD Tools Comparison

See Jubula

See Jubula

Tests are written using pre-existing modules of test functionality.Test modules can be renamed so that tests can be read in natural language

Via an external script called from the test

Page 51: ATDD Tools Comparison

See Jubula

Java Java

Yes Yes

No No

See Jubula

Via an external script called from the test

Java Swing, SWT/RCP, WebUI, GEF

Page 52: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No No

Page 53: ATDD Tools Comparison

n/a n/a

No No

See Jubula

Yes - abstraction from data and actual componentsin the application.

Page 54: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

See Jubula

mature

Comments can be written for each test case

mature (Jubula consists of core features of GUIdancer)

Page 55: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes No No

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No, professional version of Jubula

Page 56: ATDD Tools Comparison

See Jubula

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Setup needs to be specified once as reusablemodule. Teardown can either be specified or the application can be restarted.

Page 57: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

? ?

Page 58: ATDD Tools Comparison

No No

Yes Yes

database/xml database/xml

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No No

Yes Yes

Page 59: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Page 60: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

No No

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

------------------- ------------------- ------------------

One test can be run per command line client at a time

One test can be run per command line client at a time

Page 61: ATDD Tools Comparison

Robot Framework Sahi-Java Selenium Web Testing Tool

http://robotframework.org http://sahi.co.in http://seleniumhq.org

Robot Framework is a generic keyword-driven test automation framework for acceptance level testing and acceptance test-driven development (ATDD)

Provide a Java interface to Sahi

Selenium tests web apps on any OS in any browser with any language.

Page 62: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Java Yes

Yes Out of scope for an automation toolJUnit reports for Java

Page 63: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Java IDE Selenium IDE. For RC:Vim, Emacs, etc.

No Git, Svn, CVS, Perforce

No And database

Files that can be stored to version control.

Yes http://code.google.com/p/robotframework-dblibrary/()

Page 64: ATDD Tools Comparison

Driver independent Yes

Page 65: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Java All of them

Yes Yes. Tests are in a programming language.

Page 66: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes. Tests are in a programming language.

Python All of them

Jython Yes Yes

IronPython No Yes

Pluggable API, WebUI API/WebUI

Java + Javascript

Page 67: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Tests are code.

Yes No Yes (Selenium IDE)

Yes

Page 68: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Tests are code.

Yes No Yes (Selenium IDE)

Yes Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Page 69: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes Yes Same as above

Yes Yes As above

matureStable releases since 2008

Page 70: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

No

Yes Yes

Yes Not yet. :-)

Yes No Yes

Yes Yes

Page 71: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes

Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes In what way? To whom?

Multiple No Tests are code in a programming language.

Needs to be coded

Page 72: ATDD Tools Comparison

1-page Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes

Yes

No

Depends on Driver ("Tool")

Yes. Tests are code in a programming language.

Yes. Tests are code in a programming language.

Page 73: ATDD Tools Comparison

No Why?

Yes Yes How could it not be?

Txt, html, tsv, rest Java Anything you want

No In next release Yes (Selenium IDE)

Yes with Robot IDE Java IDE Use an IDE like Eclipse

No No Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

Page 74: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

No Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

No

Yes Yes Yes

Plug-in (private, possibly open-sourced)

Yes, Selenium IDE. For RC, use an IDE like Eclipse

Page 75: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Yes, Selenium IDE

Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

Multiple No Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes No Use an IDE like Eclipse

Yes Yes Use an IDE like Eclipse

------------------- ------------------- -------------------

Depends on implementaton

Page 76: ATDD Tools Comparison

SWAT (Simple Web Automation FEST Trace Analyst Fitnesse

http://ulti-swat.wikispaces.com http://fest.eas http://fitness.org

Build on Fitnesse to improve it

http://www.traceanalyst.com

Functional test of Swing and JavaFX UIs. Intended users: developers and testers

Requirements Traceability & Project Progress Monitoring

Page 77: ATDD Tools Comparison

No n/a Yes

No Yes

Any (JUnit, TestNG)

From test runner

Yes, HTML, XML, Excel

Page 78: ATDD Tools Comparison

No n/a Yes

No No n/a Yes

No No n/a No

Java IDE, text editor

Page 79: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Page 80: ATDD Tools Comparison

Java, (.Net in future) Yes

Yes N/A n/a

Java or any JVM-based language

Page 81: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes N/A n/a Possible

C# Java Java Java

No Yes Yes Java

Yes No In Future Yes

WebUI API APIYes (custom connectors)

Page 82: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitnesse n/a Yes

Fitnesse No n/a Yes

Doesn't work when Fitnesse run as a service

Depends on test runner

Page 83: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitnesse Yes n/a Possible

Fitnesse No n/a Yes

Fitnesse Yes n/a Possible

Page 84: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitnesse Yes n/a Possible

Fitnesse Yes n/a No

Fitnesse Yes n/a No

Fitnesse n/a Yes

beta

Java or any JVM-based language

Swing: mature, JavaFX: development just started

Page 85: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes No Yes

No No Yes

Yes Yes No Yes

Yes No Yes

N/A N/A

N/A

Ant task & Maven plugin, Bamboo Plugin

Yes, depending on test runner

Page 86: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Not the editor Yes No

Fitnesse Yes Yes

Fitnesse Yes Yes Yes

Fitnesse n/a Yes

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes (create your own categories)

Yes, depending on test runner

Page 87: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitnesse Yes Yes

Fitnesse No Yes

Yes No N/A

Yes

?

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes, screenshots for test failures

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes, depending on test runner

Page 88: ATDD Tools Comparison

Fitnesse No n/a Wiki

Yes n/a Somewhat

n/a Wiki

Yes No n/a No

Planned Java IDE n/a Minimal (Rename/move)

Planned Java IDE n/a No

Planned Java IDE n/a No

Page 89: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Java IDE n/a No

Yes Java IDE n/a No

Fitnesse Java IDE n/a No

Fitnesse Java IDE n/a No

Fitnesse Java IDE n/a Yes

Fitnesse No n/a No

Fitnesse Yes n/a Yes

Page 90: ATDD Tools Comparison

Browser No n/a Browser

Fitnesse n/a Yes

Fitnesse n/a Yes

No n/a

n/a

------------------- ----------------- ------------------- -------------------

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes, depending on test runner

Yes, support for different Operating Systems

Page 91: ATDD Tools Comparison

Twist

http://www.thoughtworks-studios.com/twist

Twist is a collaboration platform in which business users can express testing intent (similar to requirements) in simple english and technical users can render these english statements executable using the inbuilt power of the IDE and supported variety of languages. Through this Twist promotes the notion of software specifications also becoming executable tests. Twist supports multiple industry standard drivers that can be used to implement test intent.

Page 92: ATDD Tools Comparison

Interactive HTML reports stored in a configurable location

Yes any Java Driver. The 2.1 version comes bundled with Sahi, Selenium to test Web Applications, Frankenstien to drive Java Swing applications and SWTBot for Eclipse/SWT based applications

Page 93: ATDD Tools Comparison

Tests can be stored in any SCM

Through a JDBC driver

Through an inbuilt editor called "Scenario Editor" which support refactoring and reuse

Page 94: ATDD Tools Comparison

Interact using any Java Driver. The 2.1 version comes bundled with Sahi, Selenium to test Web Applications, Frankenstien to drive Java Swing applications and SWTBot for Eclipse/SWT based applications

Page 95: ATDD Tools Comparison

Java and Groovy

Possible using Java libraries

Page 96: ATDD Tools Comparison

Possible using Java libraries

Java or Groovy

Yes

No

Pluggable

Page 97: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

It supports DSL so use any keywords you like

Java and Groovy

Use any java driver, Version 2.1 onwards comes bundled with Sahi, Selenium, Frankenstein, SwtBot

Currently, does not support any windows thick client applications. Currently support only Eclipse as an IDE

Page 98: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Supported

Yes, through Extract Concepts

Page 99: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes, through Extract Concepts

Twist Tests supports parameters

No (Can be done in underlying Java code and a context object)

Yes, definitely

mature

Page 100: ATDD Tools Comparison

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Twist supports Automated, Manual and Hybrid Test execution

Installation process automated, can be also installed as an Eclipse Plugin

Page 101: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Multiple

Page 102: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Yes

Yes. Captures screenshots on failures

Yes

Yes

Page 103: ATDD Tools Comparison

No, just add subclipse and you are done

Yes

Text based wiki files

Yes provided the driver supports recording

Yes

Yes

Automatically evolves as you write scenarios and leverages on IDE capability to provide the support.

Page 104: ATDD Tools Comparison

Quick assist and auto complete for DSL

Yes

Argument validation, and general syntax validation is possible

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Page 105: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes, Eclipse IDE

Yes

Multiple

Possible

Yes

-------------------

Page 106: ATDD Tools Comparison

Watin (Web Application Testing In .Net) (Fire)Watir (Web Application Testing in Ruby)

http://watin.sourceforge.net/documentation.html http://watir.com

Automated testing that doesn't hurtAutomate tests with Internet Explorer and FireFox using .Net

Page 107: ATDD Tools Comparison

Use any test runner

Test runner and through Logger class

Page 108: ATDD Tools Comparison

.Net IDE SciTE

No

No

Page 109: ATDD Tools Comparison

DOM/JS DOM/JS

Page 110: ATDD Tools Comparison

.Net languages Ruby

Page 111: ATDD Tools Comparison

C# Ruby

No

Yes

API

Page 112: ATDD Tools Comparison

Depends on test runner Roo

No Roo

Yes Yes

Page 113: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Yes (Page and Control model)

Page 114: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

.Net

.Net

Page 115: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Depends on the test runner

Depends on the test runner

Page 116: ATDD Tools Comparison

Depends on the test runner

Yes

Yes

Yes

Depends on test runner

Page 117: ATDD Tools Comparison

Depends on test runner

Depends on test runner

Screencapture functionality available

Depends on test runner

Depends on test runner

Page 118: ATDD Tools Comparison

No

Yes, plain text

Depends on test runner

.Net IDE

.Net IDE

Yes

Page 119: ATDD Tools Comparison

.Net IDE

.Net IDE

.Net IDE

.Net IDE

Yes SciTE

Yes (run tests in debug mode in .Net IDE) IRB

Yes Yes

Page 120: ATDD Tools Comparison

Yes

Yes, but depends on how the tests are setup

Depends on test runner

Yes

Yes (IE, FireFox)

------------------- -------------------

Page 121: ATDD Tools Comparison

White

http://white.codeplex.com

Automate all windows applications except browser, if they support UIAutomation.Provide the driver to test and let the programming language of choice do the rest.

Page 122: ATDD Tools Comparison

Depending on the tool

Any .net testing tool/any .NET language

Page 123: ATDD Tools Comparison

.net language IDE

source control

n/a

Page 124: ATDD Tools Comparison

yes

Page 125: ATDD Tools Comparison

.net language

yes

Page 126: ATDD Tools Comparison

C#

No/NA

Yes

Win32, WPF, WinForm, Silverlight (in IE) and SWT

Page 127: ATDD Tools Comparison

Value Interpretation Example

Yes

No Tool does not support this functionality

Possible

N/A Not applicable to this kind of tool

<Toolname> Refer to the column for <Toolname>

The tool doesn't support it directly but it can be done in some way.

See Fitness for the editing environment for Fitness-Slim