Upload
ashanti
View
35
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cormac Reynolds DS2-T2 Team. Astronomical Data Simulations. Overview. Re-cap of the DS2-T2 goals Potted highlights from each of the WPs Simulations Framework and Collaboration. Aperture Array and FPA Modelling, Plus a Configuration Study. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Astronomical Data SimulationsAstronomical Data Simulations
Cormac Reynolds DS2-T2 Team
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
OverviewOverview
• Re-cap of the DS2-T2 goals• Potted highlights from each of the WPs• Simulations Framework and Collaboration
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Aperture Array and FPA Modelling,Aperture Array and FPA Modelling,Plus a Configuration StudyPlus a Configuration Study
Abstracted model of telescope from Tile and Network Simulations
Simulated Skies from a number of science groups (line, continuum, polarization)
Produce simulated u,v data/images for scientific analysis
Telescope based on aspects of SKA Reference Design – SKADS Benchmark Specification
Simulated skies (DS2-T1)
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
AA and FPA SimulationsAA and FPA Simulations
• Need to describe in simulations software• Requires full “measurement equation” for phased arrrays
– Pointing errors– Bandpass shape & stability [f(,)]– Sensitivity [f(,)]– Beam shape and stability [f(,)]– Polarization purity [f(,)]– ionosphere
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
AA Beam - SundaramAA Beam - Sundaram
• EMBRACE beam– HPBW ~ 16 arcmin
• depends on elevation
• Pointing error – linear rise and fall
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
PPP – Ultimate FoV Limit to PPP – Ultimate FoV Limit to Polarization Purity - CarozziPolarization Purity - Carozzi
• There is a limit to polarization purity as a function of look-direction elevation angle
• This limit is due to aberrations arising from u,v projection of low-elevation sources
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
FPAs & Beam forming - FPAs & Beam forming - BoomsmaBoomsma
+ =
By changing the (complex) weights for each element, one can optimise the beam pattern. For example: reducing sidelobes
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Attempt to maximise the Spatial Dynamic Range
Spatial dynamic range (SDR) – the ratio between largest and smallest adequately imaged scales – it measures, effectively, brightness sensitivity of an array on all scales.
SDR reflects a number of aspects of array design, including the type of primary receiving element (antenna), signal processing, and distribution of antennas/stations.
Array configuration: SDR can be expressed as a function of a „gap“, Δu/u, between adjacent baselines (u1,u2):
Δu/u = (u2 – u1)/u2 (u2 > u1)
Uniform sensitivity is provided by Δu/u = const
Configuration Studies -Lal
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Figures of MeritFigures of Merit
Shortest spacings, a few 10s of metres ~degree Longest spacings (5000m) ~arcseconds
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
PreliminariesPreliminaries
Observing direction, RA 00:00:00Dec +90:00:00
A RUN of 12 hrs
An arbitrary choice of source model Observing
1.4 GHz
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Generate test array (X,Y) for logarithmic (equiangular) spiral array configuration
Project this array on Earth’s surface and determine (Lat, Lon, Z)
Choose an appropriate input source model RUN glish scripts in aips++ to obtain visibilities Import these visibilities into AIPS and perform
the mapping using IMAGR task. Determine the “figures of merit”
MethodologyMethodology
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
The behaviour of figures of merit and hence the SDR does not seem to have a simple dependence on Δu/u.
The uv-gap parameter can be used to relate the (u,v)-coverage to the characteristics of the map.
These empirical solutions can be implemented into any proposed configuration.
We plan to use the SDR FoM to quantify imaging performance of: KAT / MEERKAT, ASKAP, SKA – Phase I
Limitations of CLEAN deconvolution algorithm Need new algorithms and parallelisation.
ResultsResults
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Ionosphere - van BemmelIonosphere - van Bemmel
• How to design SKA so that ionospheric corruptions are calibratable
• Determine the number and sensitivity of stations needed so that the free parameters related to the description of the beams and ionosphere can be determined with sufficient signal to noise that high dynamic range maps can be made
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Simulated source + calibration distortions using 74 MHz data
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
• Method– Peeling produces phase corrections per array element for
several viewing directions– Fit an Ionosphere phase screen model to these phase
corrections– The model allows for interpolation of the phase corrections to
other viewing directions– We adopted the polyhedron method for imaging, calculating
one phase correction per array element per time interval for each facet within the FOV.
• First conclusions• Encouraging first results, with some improvement over the
existing field-based calibration by Cotton et al. (2004)• Performance of new method is very dependent on the choice
of model functions
SolvingSolving
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
3 x 2.5 degree VLA-B 74 MHz field with field-based calibration applied
Same field with new calibration method applied
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
NextNext• Finalize work on solver
– Investigate more base functions– Apply to longer baselines: GMRT (150 MHz) and VLA
• Use DS2-T1 model skies
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
DS2-T2 <=> DS2-T1DS2-T2 <=> DS2-T1• Take sky model, corrupt, return to T1 for analysis
– Sky simulations: galore!– Turning them into a Global Sky Model (GSM)
• Arbitrary parameterizations (e.g. trees)– Making corrupted data-sets– Recovering the sky again (calibration)
• Tricky...
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Various simulation effortsVarious simulation efforts
• LOFAR– dipole and station beams (S. Yatawatta)– ionosphere (M. Mevius, J. Anderson)– Local Sky Model (LSM) (everybody...)
• WSRT (J. Noordam)• SKADS
– model skies (everybody...)– ionosphere (I. van Bemmel)– AA beams, pointing errors (S. Sundaram)– FPA beams (T. Willis, R. Boomsma)
• DIGESTIF (R. Boomsma, T. Oosterloo)
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
How to make things How to make things just fit just fit together?together?
• TDL is a good basis for exchanging trees• The ME provides a mathematical framework
– someone makes a sky model– someone else makes a tree for computing Jones matrices – at least you know how to plug them together (mathematically)
• But we still have a software problem– different styles, different conventions
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Simulations Framework - Simulations Framework - SmirnovSmirnov
Configurable catalogue
parserZ-Jones
ionosphere
E-JonesBeam
G-JonesGain
...
Ideal visibilities
Differential/Corrupted Vis. (for calibration...)
AlternateZ-Jones
...
AlternateJones
AlternateG-Jones
AlternateE-Jones
Note that order of Jones terms is significant...
Array config andobservation setup
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Simulations - SiameseSimulations - Siamese
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Cormac Reynolds2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007