37
Astronomical Data Astronomical Data Collection and Collection and Processing of LLPV’s Processing of LLPV’s in GGC’s in GGC’s at the BGSU at the BGSU Observatory Observatory J Leon Wilde J Leon Wilde A Seminar, UT, February 2nd, 2007

Astronomical Data Collection and Processing of LLPV’s in GGC’s at the BGSU Observatory J Leon Wilde TAA Seminar, UT, February 2nd, 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Astronomical Data Astronomical Data Collection and Processing Collection and Processing

of LLPV’s in GGC’sof LLPV’s in GGC’s at the BGSU Observatory at the BGSU Observatory

J Leon WildeJ Leon Wilde

TAA Seminar, UT, February 2nd, 2007

IntroIntro

• Before observing…

• BGSU’s telescope

• CCD Imaging

• Typical observing night

• Image processing

• My Thesis Work

Before observing…Before observing…

• What to look at

• Where to look from

• What instruments?– 0.5 m Reflecting

telescope– CCD imager

The telescopeThe telescope

Incoming starlight

Secondary Mirror

Primary Mirror

Focus on optics

The CCD ImagerThe CCD Imager

• “Charge Coupled Device”

• Si diodes

• KAF-1000E– Specs .pdf for

KAF-1001E

Why use CCDs?Why use CCDs?

• High QE• High Linearity• Large dynamic

range• Uniform response• Low Noise• Digital

Our CCD’s QEOur CCD’s QE

Blue – KAF-1001EBlack – KAF-1401E

CCD Basic DesignCCD Basic Design

• Our CCD– 24x24 micron pixels– 1024x1024 array

Gate Structure/FunctionGate Structure/Function

• Voltage push

• Sends data to onboard amplifier and A/D converter

• Our CCD– Two phase push– Charge transfer

efficiency = 0.99997

CCD illuminationCCD illumination• Frontside

– Photons pass through phasing gates

– QE lower than Bs

• Backside– Etched back– High QE– Hard to make, thus... – More expensive

• Our CCD– Frontside

CCD DrawbacksCCD Drawbacks

• Noise!– Dark current– A/D conversion– CCD flaws– Worked out during processing

• Expensive!– Delicate manufacturing process– Better science means higher standards

Dark CurrentDark Current

• Thermal activity on CCD chip

CCD LinearityCCD LinearityP

ixel

val

ue (

AD

U’s

)

Integration time (seconds)

SBIG ST8Linearity Test

CCD CoatingsCCD Coatings

• CCDs naturally insensitive to blue

• Coatings used– Coronene & Lumogen phosphors– Lumogen better of the two– Lumogen commercially used in highlighters

• Our CCD– “Blue Plus Transparent Gate”

BloomingBlooming

• Our CCD– No anti-blooming

gates– We’re careful!

Typical NightTypical Night• Arrive an hour before sunset

• Get equipment ready

• Take bias frames / flat field frames

• Observe!

• Take more bias / flat fields

• Send images to Dr. Layden’s computer

• Shut equipment down

• Go home!

Image ProcessingImage Processing• Correct the images

– Optics aren’t perfect (dust donuts, vignetting)– CCDs aren’t perfect– Electronics aren’t perfect– Observers aren’t perfect

• “The problem exists between the chair and the computer.”

• “Garbage in, garbage out.”

• Get science from the data– Convert ‘relative’ values into ‘real’ values

• Programs:– IDL and IRAF

Processing…Processing…• Zero (Bias) frame

– Remove floor value– Subtract combined image from data

• Dark frame– Remove dark current– Subtract combined image from data

• Flat field– Remove non-uniformities arising from:

• CCD flaws• Optics flaws

– Divide combined image from data

Processing…Processing…

• Photometry– RR Lyrae Program, getting star magnitudes

versus time

• Pretty pictures– Combine images from different color filters

Pretty picturesPretty pictures

Ring Galaxy AM 0644-741 from Hubble

My Thesis Work:My Thesis Work:Why Study LPV’s?Why Study LPV’s?

• Variability provides distance calibrations

• LPV’s are understudied

• For SIM (Space Interferometry Mission)

BackgroundBackground

• What are they?

Why look in GGC’s?Why look in GGC’s?

• Stars are of the same age

• Stars are at the same distance

• Stars are similar in composition

DetectionDetection

• Acquire data over long enough time

• Process images

• Image subtraction– DAOPHOT, ISIS

GettingGettingthethe

DataData

NGC 6539NGC 6539

• 5 years of data

• [Fe/H] = -0.66

New GGC’sNew GGC’s

• “New” to us!

• Selected from Harris Catalogue– min Dec– max V_hb– Small:

• Core concentration• E(B-V) - Foreground reddening

– Span of [Fe/H]

PROMPT Images!PROMPT Images!

PROMPTPROMPT

• Back to Harris Catalogue

• Tracked down known LPV’s

• Corrected coordinates

PROMPTPROMPT

• NGC 288

PROMPTPROMPT

• NGC 1261

PROMPTPROMPT

• NGC 1851

Next steps…Next steps…

• Our data:– Finish processing / Photometery– Learn DAOPHOT– Perform DAOPHOT on recent data / NGC

6539

• PROMPT data:– Determine best collection method

ReferencesReferences• People

– Dr Andy Layden for his time, Dr John Laird for his books– Mike Smitka– Brian Pohl & Dr. Bruce Carney, UNC Chapel Hill

• Book– Steve B. Howell, 2000, Handbook of CCD Astronomy, Cambridge University Press

• Websites– http://physics.bgsu.edu/~layden/observatory.htm– http://zebu.uoregon.edu/ccd.html– http://www.ccd.com/ccdu.html– http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/oconnell/astr511/lec11-f03.html– http://www.wildealien.com/ccd/

• PowerPoint file available online– http://physics.bgsu.edu/~jlwilde/taatalk-feb07.ppt

• Contacting me:

[email protected]

Thanks for your attention!Thanks for your attention!