13
Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008 Dr. Mark Bezek Superintendent Minnesota’s fastest growing school district Exploding to Imploding

Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

  • Upload
    ekram

  • View
    28

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008. Minnesota’s fastest growing school district. Exploding to Imploding. Dr. Mark Bezek Superintendent. Who we are…. Area Five counties 16 municipalities 174.3 square miles Size Ninth largest district in state - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Association of Metropolitan School DistrictsDecember 19, 2008

Dr. Mark Bezek

Superintendent

Minnesota’s fastest growing school district

Exploding to Imploding

Page 2: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Area

• Five counties

• 16 municipalities

• 174.3 square miles

Size

• Ninth largest district in state

• 12,500+ Pre-K12 learners

• 62,000+ total learners

Who we are…

Page 3: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Community demographics

• Average age: 31

• 27 percent under 18-years-old

• Average income: $68,008

• 70 percent are commuters

• 90 percent have a high school education

Who we are…

Page 4: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we’ve been…

Elk River Area School District K-12 October 1 Student Enrollment

Historic and Projected*

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

15000

199

6-9

7

199

7-9

8

199

8-9

9

199

9-0

0

200

0-0

1

200

1-0

2

200

2-0

3

200

3-0

4

200

4-0

5

200

5-0

6

200

6-0

7

200

7-0

8

200

8-0

9*

200

9-1

0*

201

0-1

1*

201

1-1

2*

Page 5: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

• From 2002 to 2007, district enrollment increased by 2,583 students.

• No district in the state added more students during this period. • The increase is more than the total enrollment of almost 80 percent of all school districts in Minnesota.

• Growth equivalent to FOUR LARGE ELEMENTAY schools.

• Voters did not support bond in 2007.

• Outlook for future bond is not optimistic

Where we’ve been…explosive growth

Page 6: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…Elk River Area School District

K-12 October 1 Student EnrollmentHistoric and Projected*

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

15000

199

6-9

7

199

7-9

8

199

8-9

9

199

9-0

0

200

0-0

1

200

1-0

2

200

2-0

3

200

3-0

4

200

4-0

5

200

5-0

6

200

6-0

7

200

7-0

8

200

8-0

9*

200

9-1

0*

201

0-1

1*

201

1-1

2*

Page 7: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…

• Current average class sizes

Average MaxKindergarten: 24 (24)Grades 1 – 5: 26 (35)Grades 6 – 8: 32 (37)Grades 9 – 12: 32 (39)

• With “Leveled Growth”• We will still need to spend $1.2 million annually to avoid increasing our current class sizes.

• Current average class sizes

Average MaxKindergarten: 24 (24)Grades 1 – 5: 26 (35)Grades 6 – 8: 32 (37)Grades 9 – 12: 32 (39)

• With “Leveled Growth”• We will still need to spend $1.2 million annually to avoid increasing our current class sizes.

Page 8: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…

Budget challenges

• Flat enrollment and faltering economy equals cuts of up to $5 million (4.67 percent) next FY.

• Preliminary analysis…if trend continues $12 million will need to be cut in the next two years.

• Levy renewal passed in 2008…next is 2011…voter tolerance?

• Bond and referenda unlikely in the next three to five years.

Budget challenges

• Flat enrollment and faltering economy equals cuts of up to $5 million (4.67 percent) next FY.

• Preliminary analysis…if trend continues $12 million will need to be cut in the next two years.

• Levy renewal passed in 2008…next is 2011…voter tolerance?

• Bond and referenda unlikely in the next three to five years.

Page 9: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…

Sherburne and Wright County Housing Trends: 2003 - 2008

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Homes Built Foreclosures

Sherburne and Wright County Housing Trends: 2003 - 2008

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Homes Built Foreclosures

Page 10: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…

• We are near the bottom of the 25 largest school districts in Minnesota

in referendum funding.

• We are near the bottom of Metropolitan School Districts in excess levy referendum funding.

• Of the 25 largest school districts in the state, we receive the lowest amount of TOTAL Fund 01 dollars per student (ADM).

• Put another way, we receive $1,000 less (= $12.5 million) than large school districts and the state average.

• We are near the bottom of the 25 largest school districts in Minnesota

in referendum funding.

• We are near the bottom of Metropolitan School Districts in excess levy referendum funding.

• Of the 25 largest school districts in the state, we receive the lowest amount of TOTAL Fund 01 dollars per student (ADM).

• Put another way, we receive $1,000 less (= $12.5 million) than large school districts and the state average.

Page 11: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Where we are…

Of the 25 largest school districts in the state:

• We receive the lowest amount of Fund 01 (Excess Levy) dollars per student (ADM) from local sources.

• $750 less than the large district average and about $400 less than the state average.

• We rank second in the dollars per student spent on debt service.• $1,643 per student (ADM).

• More than $600 higher than the large district average and state average.

Of the 25 largest school districts in the state:

• We receive the lowest amount of Fund 01 (Excess Levy) dollars per student (ADM) from local sources.

• $750 less than the large district average and about $400 less than the state average.

• We rank second in the dollars per student spent on debt service.• $1,643 per student (ADM).

• More than $600 higher than the large district average and state average.

Page 12: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

We’re heading for an implosionELK RIVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

PROJECTED DEFICITS

($12,000,000)

($9,000,000)

($6,000,000)

($3,000,000)

$02008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Best Case Probable Case Worst Case

Page 13: Association of Metropolitan School Districts December 19, 2008

Don’t let us implode