54
ASSESSMENT REPORT I . P , SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING on the OLD FORT PROPERTY 55O08'~, 126O22'~ Omineca ~ining Division by G.Belik J.T.Walker J . Knauer / Noranda Exploration Company, Limited (No Personal Liability) May 6 - June 15, 1974 Mining Recorder'.; Office Department of Mines and Petroielrm Resources J IJ1, 2, 9 1974

ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

ASSESSMENT REPORT

I . P , SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND D R I L L I N G

on the

OLD FORT PROPERTY 5 5 O 0 8 ' ~ , 1 2 6 O 2 2 ' ~

O m i n e c a ~ i n i n g D i v i s i o n

by

G . B e l i k J . T . W a l k e r J . K n a u e r

/

N o r a n d a E x p l o r a t i o n C o m p a n y , L i m i t e d ( N o P e r s o n a l L i a b i l i t y )

M a y 6 - June 15, 1974

Mining Recorder'.; Office Department of

Mines and Petroielrm Resources J IJ1, 2, 9 1974

Page 2: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

LOCATION AND ACCESS

CLAIMS AND OWNERSHIP

GEOLOGY

INDUCED P O L a R I Z A T I O N SURVEY & R E S I S T I V I T Y SURVEY

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

DIAMOND D R I L L I N G

CORE LOGGING AND STORAGE

CONCLUS I O N S

Page

n

TABLES

T a b l e 1 - O l d Fo r t Property: D i a m o n d D r i l l H o l e D a t a

REFERENCES

STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS

STATEMENTS OF COST

FIGURES

# I F igu re 1 - L o c a t i o n M a p

# a ~ i ~ u r e 2 - C l a i m M a p showing location of diamond d r i l l holes and core storage

DRAWINGS

% 3 ~ r a w i n ~ No . I P 1 - I . P . response m e a s u r e d i n Pe rcen t Frequency E f f e c t

rawin^ in^ No. I P 2 - A p p a r e n t R e s i s t i v i t y

+5 D r a w i n g No. GC 1 - L rawin^ in^ No. GC 2 -

Page 3: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

DIAMOND DRILLING . on the

OLD FORT PROPERTY

INTRODUCTION L

The mineral claims referred to in this report are located

on Babine Lake, in central British Columbia, approximately 40

miles northeast of of the town of Smithers.

A program of geophysics, geochem and diamond drilling

was completed on certain of these claims to determine the cause

of a large induced polarization anomaly outlined during an earlier

geophysical survey. The work was carried out during the period

of May 6, 1974 to June 15, 1974.

The I.P. survey was conducted under the general supervision

of J.T.Walker, Geophysicist. The Geochemical survey was conducted

under the general supervision of J.D.Knauer, ~eologist/~eochemist,

The general geology and Diamond Drilling was conducted under the

general supervision of G.Belik, Geologist.

LOCATIONAND ACCESS

The claims, comprising what is known as the Old Fort Property,

are situated on the southeast flank of Old Fort Mountain, in the

0 0 Babine Lake area, at approximately 55 08'N, 126 22'W; this is some

40 miles northeast of Smithers and 155 miles northwest of Prince

George.

Access from Smithers is by either air (float plane,

helicopter) or by road to Smithers Landing or Topley Landing and

+ thence by boat. On the property, a rough bulldozer road leads

from ~abine Lake to the main showings and the drill sites, ? 1

L

Page 4: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

Transportation on Babine Lake for the diamond drill and

ancillary equipment was provided by a tug and barge rented from* L

Northwood Pulp and Timber, Limited.

CLAIMS AND OWNEiRSHIP

The recorded owner of the claims is Wesfrob Mines Limited,

The claims are:

Claim Name Record No,

DDT 5 - 14 inclusive 31262 - 31271 inclusive DDT 19 - 40 inclusive 31276 - 31297 inclusive OFF 1 - 8 i.nolusive 31298 - 31305 inclusive OFF 15 - 18 inclusive 31312 - 31315 inclusive RAID 1 - 14 inclusive 31316 - 31329 inclusive

GEOLOGY

The Old Fort property is underlain largely by sedimentary

rocks of the Jurassic Hazelton Group. These consist of greywacke,

argillite and siltstone, with the latter two often containing pyrite

and abundant carbonaceous material, In the vicinity of the RAID 11

and OFF 6 mineral claims, the sediments are intruded by a small

stock of quartz diorite, approximately 2400 feet in diameter, which

encloses a much smaller, elongated core of biotite quartz monzonite.

Radiating outwards from the core are several dyke-like bodies of

biotite feldspar prophyry. A ho-rnfels zone is develop6d in the

sediments and extends westward from the stock towards the summit of

Old Fort Mountain. Chalcopyrite, sparse molybdenite and rare bornite

occur as disseminations, fracture fillings and replacements of mafic

minerals in three small, discontinuous, low-grade zones in the L,

quartz diorite.

Page 5: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 6: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

-3-

INDUCED POLARIZATION and

RESISTIVITY SURVEY 'L

In t roduc t ion

The Induced Po la r iza t ion and R e s i s t i v i t y Survey was ca r r i ed

ou t us ing va r i ab l e frequency I . P . equipment owned by Noranda

Explorat ion Company Limited and manufactured by Sabre E lec t ron ic

Instruments Limited, Burnaby, B.C. A c r e w of four Noranda employees

conducted t h e survey under pa r ty ch ie f Lyndon Bradish, Geophysicist,

during t h e period June 18 - June 22, 1974.

The purpose of t h e survey was t o extend southward and

eastward, an I . P . survey c a r r i e d ou t by Falconbridge Nickel Mines

Limited, during 1971. Seven l i n e s , spaced a t 800 f e e t , were surveyed

f o r a t o t a l of 12.6 miles.

Method

Throughout t h e survey, a dipole,-dipole e lec t rode configuratior

was employed. The d ipole length was 400 f e e t and t h e d ipole spacing

was 400 f e e t (x=400; n = l ) . The ellectrode a r ray and instruments

were moved along t h e survey l i n e s with readings being taken a t 400

f o o t i n t e r v a l s , A t each s t a t i o n "set-up" t h e following measurements

a r e made and recorded:

(1) Current i n t e n s i t y applied t o t h e ground a t t h e cu r r en t e lec t rodes (measured i n mil l iamperes) .

(2) p o t e n t i a l developed between p o t e n t i a l e l ec t rodes (measured i n mil l iamperes) .

( 3 ) Percent Frequency Ef fec t , (measured a s a percent vol tage change with change i n frequency of applied cu r r en t ) .

? 1

&

Page 7: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

-4-

The two frequencies employed f o r t h i s survey were 0.3 Hz

b and 5 HZ.

The apparent r e s i s t i v i t y a t each s t a t i o n i s ca lcu la ted from

t h e cu r r en t and p o t e n t i a l measurements, d ipo l e length i n f e e t and

t he e l ec t rode a r ray constant . The apparent r e s i . s t i v i t y i s expressed

on ohm f e e t divided by 2 7.

Presen ta t ion of Resul ts

The r e s u l t s of t h e induced po l a r i za t i on and r e s i s t i v i t y survey

are p l o t t e d on two plan maps, each a t a s c a l e of 1 inch equals 400

f e e t . Drawing No. I .P "-1 shows the I .P . response measured i n Percent

Frequency E f f e c t and Drawing No. 1 .P. -2 shows the Apparent R e s i s t i v i t y

values. The readings f o r each survey a r e p lo t t ed a t t h e mid-point

between t h e survey g r i d loca t ion of t h e cur ren t and p o t e n t i a l d ipo les ,

I n add i t ion t o t h e r e s u l t s of t h e Noranda survey, t h e f i r s t

separa t ion r e s u l t s of t h e Falconbridge I . P . survey a r e a l so .shown

on both p lan maps.

The r e s u l t s of both surveys a r e contoured with contour i n t e r v a l s

of 3.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10 and 15% Frequency E f f e c t and 25 ohm f e e t .

Discussion of Resul ts

Resul ts of t h e I . P . survey, a s ind ica ted by t h e Percent

Frequency E f f e c t da t a i nd i ca t e no s i g n i f i c a n t anomaly on t h e main

por t ion of t h e g r i d e a s t of T i e l i n e 70E.

The responses ind ica ted on t h e w e s t h a l f of l i n e s 9 2 N and 100s

'L c o r r e l a t e w e l l with t h e anomalous zones ind ica ted by t h e Falconbridge

I survey r e s u l t s .

Page 8: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

Conclusions and ~ecomrnendations

Results of the survey show a continuation of the previously

indicated anomalous zone t o the south-west f o r an addit ional 1600

fee t .

The anomaly deliminted by the 1Q"h frequency e f f e c t contour

and centred on l i n e l O O N a t 8 W warrants fur ther investigation by

d r i l l i n g .

No other work i s indicated by t h i s survey.

Geophysicist

Page 9: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

%I s' -6-

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY:

~ 1 1 s o i l s and stneam sediments were analyzed f o r copper,

*Y zinc and molybdenum i n t he Noranda Exploration Company, Limited

laboratory, located a t 1050 Davie S t r e e t , Vancouver 5 , B .C. ,.Analyst

was Bob Mower.

Samplinq Methods

a. S o i l s

Samples were obtained by digging holes with a shovel t

a depth where the v i s i b l e C Horizon, whenever poss ib le , was

encountered. The B and C Horizons were sampled a t a l l

loca t ions where they w e r e v i s i b l e . Where it was not poss ib le

t o ob ta in both the B and C Horizons, the b e s t sample was

taken depending on what was encountered a t t h a t p a r t i c u l a r

sample s i t e . A number of p r o f i l e s w e r e taken, s ca t t e r ed

throughout t h e g r i d system, where a l l v i s i b l e horizons were

sampled.

The samples were placed i n "Hi Wet Strength Kraf t

3$"x6 1/8" Open End" envelopes and the g r i d s t a t i o n was

marked on the envelopes with i nde l ib l e f e l t pen, S o i l samples

were taken a t 400 foo t i n t e r v a l s along the g r i d l i ne s .

b . Stream Sediments

Samples were obtained by co l l ec t ing the f i n e s t t ranspor ted

mate r ia l ava i lab le - preferably s i l t , from the cen t re por t ion

of t he creek, away from the creek banks. The samples w e r e

L placed i n "Hi Wet Strength 3$"x6 1/8" Open End" envelopes

and the g r id locat ion marked on the envelopes with i nde l ib l e P

&

Page 10: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

f e l t pen. Stream sediments were taken, wherever' poss ib le ,

when a c reek was encountered along t h e g r i d l i n e s .

Laboratory Determination Methods

a . S o i l s

The samples a r e f i r s t placed i n a drying cab ine t f o r a

pe r iod of 24 t o 48 hours. The sample m a t e r i a l i s then

screened and s i f t e d t o o b t a i n a -80 mesh f r a c t i o n .

The determinat ion procedure f o r t o t a l copper, z i n c and

molybdenum i s a s follows:

0.200 grams of t h e -80 mesh m a t e r i a l i s d iges ted i n 2 m l

of HC104 and 0.5 m l of HN03 f o r approximately four hours.

Following d i g e s t i o n , each sample i s d i l u t e d t o 5 m l wi th

demineralized H20. A Varian Techtron Model AA-5 Atomic

Absorption Spectrophotorneter was used t o determine t h e p a r t s

p e r m i l l i o n copper, z i n c and molybdenum content i n each sample,

b. Stream Sediments

The samples a r e f i r s t placed i n a dry ing c a b i n e t f o r a

pe r iod of 24 t o 48 hours. The sample m a t e r i a l i s then screened

and s i f t e d t o o b t a i n a -80 mesh f r a c t i o n .

The de terminat ion procedure f o r so lub le copper and z i n c

i s a s foll.ows:

0.200 grams of t h e -80 mesh m a t e r i a l i s d iges ted wi th 5 m l

of 0.5 NHCl t o a b o i l f o r 25 minutes. The sample i s brought

back t o 5 m l . w i th 0.5 NHCl a f t e r cool ing. A Varian Techtron

Model AA-5 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer was used t o 1

determine t h e p a r t s per m i l l i o n copper and z i n c con ten t i n : L

Page 11: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

each sample.

The determination procedure for t o t a l copper, zinc and "

molybdenum is a s follows:

0.200 grams of the -80 mesh material i s digested i n 2

of HC104 and 0.5 m l of RN03 for approximately four hours.

Following digestion, each sample i s d i lu ted t o 5 m l with

demineralized HzO. A Varian Techtron Model AA-5 Atomic

Absorption Spectrophotometer was used t o determine the

p a r t s per million molybdenum content i n each sample.

The theory of the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer i s

f u l l y described i n the l i t e r a t u r e and w i l l not be described

i n the report .

Presentation of Results

Results of the s o i l and stream sediment surveys a re presented

i n Drawing Nos. GC1 and GC2 of t h i s report . These a r e plan maps of

a sca le 1"=4001 which show copper, molybdenum and zinc i n pa r t s per

million. Anomalous values fo r each element are indicated as shown

i n the legend on Drawings Nos. G C 1 and GC2.

Discussion of Results

Overburden covering the area of t h i s survey is primarily

of g l a c i a l or ig in consist ing of boulder t i l l s and clays. The known

depth of the northwest portion of the gr id averages around 35 f e e t

between scat tered outcrops. From a l l indications the overburden

would appear t o increase i n depth with the decrease i n elevation

t o the southeast.

Page 12: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

- 9-

The r e s u l t s f o r copper, z inc and mol.ybdenum values i n t h e

t s o i l s and stream sediments a r e a s follows:

1. The major i ty of t h e copper and z inc values f a l l wi th in background

ranges. The few s c a t t e r e d values above threshold show no s igni f i .cant

pa t t e rn s .

2. Molybdenum values w e r e a l l i n t h e background range wi th t h e

exception of two s o i l values a t 14N-40E and one stream sediment

va lue a t 10s-57E.

Conclusions

S o i l and stream sediment values obtained wi th in t h e surveyed

a rea show no s i g n i f i c a n t pa t t e rn s

p o t e n t i a l of t h i s property.

t o a i d i.n assess ing t h e economic

Page 13: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

DIAMOND DRILLING

L During t h e pe r iod of May 26, 1974 t o June 15, 1974 ( inc luSive)

6 BQ diamond d r i l l h o l e s , with a t o t a l length of 1101.3 f e e t , were

completed on t h e OFF 3, OFF 4, OFF 5 and DDT 10 mineral claims.

D e t a i l s of t h e ho les a r e summarized i n Table #1,

The d r i l l i n g was performed by H.Allen Diamond D r i l l i n g

Limited, Box 1397, M e r r i t t , B r i t i s h Columbia under c o n t r a c t t o

Noranda Explora t ion Company, Limited.

A Longyear 38 d r i l l r i g was employed f o r bor ing t h e h o l e s ;

access roads and d r i l l s i t e s were prepared wi th a John Deere 350B

t r a c t o r ,

Page 14: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

Table #1

OLD FORT PROPERTY - = + - .

Hole No, L a t i t u d e Depar ture E l e v a t i o n Claim Dip Bear ing Depth S t a r t F i n i s h

D.D.H.1 , 16.065 29.503 2975 OFF 4 -60° 270° 1 3 2 ' 31/5/74 1/6/74

D.D.H.2 11.12s 39.023 2810 OFF 3 -go0 - 250' 2/6/74 5/6/74

D.D.H.4 1.17s 39.693 2950 OFF 3 -go0 - 197' 9/6/74 10/6/74

2825 0

I D.D.H.5 7.08N 44.783 OFF 5 -90 - 4

141.3' 11/6/74 12/6/74 4

I D.D.H.6 0.30N 58.00E 2750 DDT 10 -60° 315O 145 ' 13/6/74 14/6/74

Page 15: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

Logging of the core was carr ied out by G-Belik during $he L

period June 6-7, 11-14, 1974 f o r a t o t a l of 6 days.

The core was placed i n wooden boxes with a capacity of 25

f ee t ; these have been marked with the hole number and the contained

footage and are stored i n racks a t the "Bible Camp", the Noranda

campsite located on DDT 1 2 .

CONCLUSIONS

Economic copper mineralization was not observed i n any of

the core obtained from the s i x holes. It i s f e l t t h a t the induced

polar izat ion anomaly may be adequately explained by the presence

of the graphi t ic material noted i n varying amounts i n tk sediments

intersected i n a11 holes and by the sulphides (pyri te , minor chal-

copyrite and pyrrhot i te) which loca l ly comprise up t o 7% of the -

core.

Geologist

Page 16: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION

I, Gary Belik of the Town of Smithers, Province of

British Columbia do certify that:

1, I have been an employee of Noranda Exploration Company,

Limited since May 1970.

2. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia with

a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology and a Master of

Science Degree in Geology,

3. I am an Associate Fellow of the Geological Association of

Canada and a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining

and Metallurgy.

4. I have held the position of Geologist for Noranda Exploration

Company, Limited since May 1970.

,*"I=1, Gary ~e* Geologist NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (NO Personal Liability)

Page 17: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION

I, James T. Walker of the City of Vancouver, Province of

Br i t i sh Columbia do c e r t i f y tha t :

1. I have been an employee of Noranda Exploration Company,

Limited since May 1958.

2. I am a member of the Canadian I n s t i t u t e of Mining and

Metallurgy, the Br i t i sh Columbia Geophysical Society,

and the Canadian Exploration Geophysical Society.

3 . I have held the posit ion of Geophysicist fo r Noranda

Exploration Company, Limited, Br i t i sh Columbia since

June 1965.

J a e s T. Walker GE; $ physicis t NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (No Personal ~ i a b i l i t y )

Page 18: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATION

I, James D. Knauer of the City of Vancouver, Province of

~ritish Columbia, do certify that:

1. I have been an employee of Noranda Exploration Company,

Limited since August, 1964.

2. I am a graduate of the University of New Mexico with a

Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology.

3. I am a member of the Geochemical Society, the Canadian

Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Association

of Exploration Geochemists.

4. I have held the position of ~eologist/~eochemist for

Noranda Exploration Company, Limited since August 1964.

, , dames D ,- 'knauer ~eologist/~eochemist C' Noranda Exploration Cornpan.

Limited (No Personal Liability)

Page 19: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 20: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 21: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 22: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 23: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 24: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 25: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 26: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 27: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 28: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 29: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 30: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 31: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 32: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 33: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 34: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 35: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 36: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 37: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 38: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 39: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 40: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 41: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 42: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

L REFERENCES:

Page 43: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

NORANDA EXPLORATI ON COMPANY, LI M TED

- " STATEMENT OF COST

PROJECT: OLD FORT OPTION

TYPE OF REPORT: L i n e Prepara t ion

fa) ~ m ~ l o ~ e e s : G. Fenton, D. Kroeger, G. Robertson, R. Whit t ingham

Number o f days: 31

Dates worked: Between May 6 and May 23,, 1974

(b) Average cos t p e r day $24.08

T o t a l t o s t $24.08 X 31 $746.48 .

(c) Cost o f food E accomodation $ . - r ..

(d) Cost o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n

i . Dur ing work p e r i o d

t ype :

c o s t :

. . I I. To and f rom Claims f rom

w i t h i n B.C. -

cos t :

(e) Cost o f a i r c r a f t

i. Fixed wing: . . I I. He1 i c o p t e r :

(f) Cost o f inst ruments

i. Rental : . . I I, Suppl ies

(g) Cost o f geochem ana lys i s ( d e t a i I s a t tached ) : 31 -

(h) Cost o f r e p o r t p repara t ion :

(i) Other: Contract - P. Bland 12.15 l i n e m i les @ 174.44 $21 19.45

? L

&

TOTAL $ 2 ,865 .93 -

Page 44: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 45: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 46: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 47: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

NORANDA EXP,LORATION COMPANY, LIMITED

STATEMENT OF COST

PROJECT: OLD FORT OPTION

TYPE OF P\EPORT: Diamond D r i 11 i n g

'(a) Employees: G. B e l i k , B. Fa i rbank, R. Ho l land , D. Kroeger

Number o f days : 47

Dates worked: Between May 25 and June 19, 1974

(b) Average c o s t p e r day $ 38.76

T o t a l c o s t $ 38-76 X 47 $1,821.72

(c) Cost o f food & accomodation $ 941.74 .

(d) Cost o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n

i. D u r i n g work p e r i o d

t ype :

c o s t :

. . I I. To and f r om Claims f rom

w i t h i n B.C.

cos t :

(e) Cost o f a i r c r a f t

i. F i x e d w ing : . . I I. H e l i c o p t e r :

( f) Cost o f ins t ruments

i. Renta l : . . I I . Suppl i e s

(g) Cost o f geochem anal ys i s ( d e t a i 1s a t t ached ) :

(h) C o s t o f r e p o r t p r e p a r a t i o n :

(i) Other : D r i l l Con t rac t 14,914.20 D r i 11 Suppl ies 89.82 D r i l l Assays 208.00

TOTAL

Page 48: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as t O ~ J P A N Y ' ~ of t h a First P a f i ,

nCOMTRACTORt' of t h e Sec

A . - TI33 CONTR4CTOR COVdNANTS AND AGRE!ZS:

all. h o l e s according t o t h e wishes of t h e Company, bu t should rock cond i t ions prevsnt s u c c e s s f u l compleZion of t h e h o l e , the Cont rac to r i s not ob l iged t o complete t h e samo, bu t s h a l l be pa id f o r such incomplete ho les a t c o n t r a c t rates f o r the completed footage.

3. Cont rac to r w i l l supply a l l necessary equipment, accomodation, and board f o r his crew.

4. Cont rac to r w i l l supply w a t e r a t h i s expense up t o a d i s t a n c e of 2000 f t . o r a v e r t i c a l l i f t of 200 f t . Supplying w a t s r beyond t h e s e l i m i t s t o be re-negot iated.

B. THE C(3F4PANP: COV3NANTS AtSD AGPJES:

1. That payment f o r t h e h e r e i n descr ibed work s h a l l b e $10.00 p e r f o o t f o r cnra d r i l l i n g and $12.00 p e r f o o t f o r drilling overburden.

2. The Cont rac to r w i l l a t h i s expense d e l i v e r t h e d r i l l i n g equiprnsnt, men and camp t o t h e barge.

3 .- From t h e barge and u n t i l t h e d r i l l i s se* up t h e Con t rac to r mag charge wages f o r t h e crew t o t h e Company a t union r a t e s p l u s 15';g.

4. Cementing d r i l l ho les w i l l be charged t o t h e Company a t c o s t p l u s lo$. Cost of l a b o u r being union r a t e s . Cost o f

L 8quipment r e n t a l dur ing cementing 420.00 p e r day.

5. Casing which is non-recoverable w i l l be charged t o t h e Zompany.

Page 49: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING

in use

IN WITNESS kJHEREOF these presents n executed by the pa r t i e s hereto, t h i s 9 3 day o p Ae.?J* 1974,

-

NOUNDA EXPLOWTIONS CO, LTD. H. ALLEN DILVQLUD DELLLING LTD,

Page 50: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 51: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 52: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 53: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING
Page 54: ASSESSMENT REPORT SURVEY, GEOCHEM SURVEY, DIAMOND DRILLING