-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
1/15
International Journal of Water Sciences
Assessment of Spring Chinook SalmonHabitat Suitability in the
San JoaquinRiver Using a 2-D Depth-Averaged ModelRegular Paper
Lubo Liu1,*and Joaquin Ramirez1
1 Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, Lyles College
of Engineering, California State University Fresno, Fresno, US*
Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]
Received 9 Sep 2013; Accepted 22 Nov 2013
DOI: 10.5772/57437
2013 Liu and Ramirez; licensee InTech. This is an open access
article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0),
which permits unrestricted use,distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
!"#$%&'$ )*+ ,&- ./&012- 324+% 3+#$/%&$2/-
5%/6%&7
8,.3359 :%/42;+# &;1 #&
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
2/15
)*+ %24+% 2# '%1'2&< @/% $*+ :%/:&6&$2/- &-;
#1%424&"2 #&
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
3/15
121.0 120.8 120.6 120.436.9
37.0
37.1
37.2
37.3
37.4
Longitude,oW
Lat
itude,
oN
Mariposa Bypass
San Joaquin River
Eastside Bypass
Reach 4B1
Reach 4B2
SDP
SWA
EBM
FFB
Reach 4A
Reach 5
J2
J1
5 miles
Alt1/2/3
Alt1/3
Alt1
Alt2
Alt2/3
Alt1/2/3
Alt3
North
!"#$%& ()e+/6%&:*2' 7&: #*/?2-6 $*+ %+&'*+# 2-
$*+ 7/;+
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
4/15
,$&$2/- B+#'%2:$2/- ,$&$2/- KB 3+&'*b'/-@
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
5/15
!
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
6/15
*E;%/;E-&72' '/-;2$2/-# &@@+'$2-6 #&
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
7/15
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000Upstream condition: Discharge at SDP
(a)
Discharge(cfs)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
50
60
70
80Downstream condition: WSE at FFB
(b)
Julian days, 2011
WSE(ft)
!"#$%& /) ^/1-;&%E '/-;2$2/-#j 8&9 d:#$%+&7
'/-;2$2/-j B2#'*&%6+ &$ $*+ ,.3 -+&% B/# 5&
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
8/15
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000
2000
4000(a)
SJR Discharge at SWA
Discharge(cfs)
observed
modeling
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 20090
100
110
120SJR WSE at SWA
Julian days, 2011
WSE(ft)
observed
modeling
!"#$%& 0)=/7:&%2#/- /@ /"#+%4+; &-; 7/;+
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
9/15
01&-$2@2+; 1#2-6 $*+ *&"2$&$ ,12$&"2
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
10/15
)*+ %+:%+#+-$&$24+ 4&@+9AB7 C
3100
01DE
01D0
016E
0160
01FE
01F0
014E0140
01EE
01E0
015E
0150
01CE
01C0
%&'.+0
*., G7?=-A9H %; '?97>@+9AB7 2
3100
01DE
01D0
016E
0160
01FE
01F0
014E0140
01EE
01E0
015E
0150
01CE
01C0
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*-, G7?=-A9H %; '?97>@+9AB7 C
0120
0134
0135
0132
01300106
0104
0105
0102
0100
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*/, (789: %; '?97>@+9AB7 3
3100
01DE
01D0
016E
0160
01FE
01F0014E
0140
01EE
01E0
015E
0150
01CE
01C0
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*+, G7?=-A9H %; '?97>@+9AB7 3
!"#$%& 4),:&$2&< ;2#$%2"1$2/- /@ ,12$&"2
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
11/15
0120
0134
0135
0132
0130
0106
0104
0105
0102
0100
%&'.+0
*7, (789: %; '?97>@+9AB7 2
0120
0134
0135
0132
0130
0106
0104
0105
0102
0100
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*@+9AB7 C
3100
01DE
01D0
016E
0160
01FE
01F0
014E
0140
01EE
01E0
015E
0150
01CE
01C0
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*+, G7?=-A9H % ; '?97>@+9AB7 3
0120
0134
0135
0132
0130
0106
0104
0105
0102
0100
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*/, (789: %; '?97>@+9AB7 3
!"#$%& 5),:&$2&< ;2#$%2"1$2/- /@ ,12$&"2
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
12/15
;/?-#$%+&7 P,QI 2$ 2# -+'+##&%E $/ 2;+-$2@E &-E
'%/##D
'/%%+ '?97>@+9AB7 2
300 -IJK
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
* '?97>@+9AB7 C
E100 I
5100 I
C1E0 I
C100 I
21E0 I
2100 I
31E0 I3100 I
01E0 I
%&'.+0
*., (789: '?97>@+9AB7 2
E100 I
51E0 I
5100 I
C1E0 I
C100 I
21E0 I
2100 I31E0 I
3100 I
01E0 I
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*-, (789: '?97>@+9AB7 C
E100 I
51E0 I
5100 I
C1E0 I
C100 I
21E0 I
2100 I31E0 I
3100 I
01E0 I
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*+, (789: '?97>@+9AB7 3
300 -IJK
%&'
$%&'&()* +,-%&&
*/, G7?=-A9H B7-9=> '?97>@+9AB7 3
!"#$%& (6),:&$2&< ;2#$%2"1$2/- /@ ;+:$* &-;
4+
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
13/15
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
(a)NN
C
(Velocity)
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
(b)NNC
(Depth)
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
(c)
Lag time (Hours)
NNC
(Overall)
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
!"#$%& (() =/%%+
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
14/15
\261%+ GG #*/?# $*+ '/%%+ 4&-/?
,&
-
8/13/2019 Assessment of Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat
Suitability in the San Joaquin River Using a 2D Depth Averaged
Mo
15/15
YaZ r12-- )5 8SHHN9 )*+ +*&42/1% &-; Q'/
