Upload
ilya
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Assessment and the Curriculum. Department Chair Workshop. CIA relationship. How do your students experience the curriculum?. Discrete experiences. Sequenced and outcomes focused. How does learning take place?. Developmental Assessment View of learning over time. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
It all starts with clear expectations for learning
Over the course of the major, what do you expect students to learn?• Broad statements about exit
behaviors• No more than 5-6 broad outcomes• Define by proficiency/expected level
CORE COMPETENCIES
ADVANCED PERFORMER
SOLID PERFORMER
BASIC PERFORMER
UNDER-PERFORMER
THEORETICAL CONTEXT OF
POLITICS
Has an excellent grasp of theory in various contexts and can apply theory to understand past, present and possible future outcomes. Understands the importance of theory as a tool as well as the normative and ethical components of politics.
Has a solid understanding of the theoretical foundations of politics. Realizes the value of theory for making sense of the past and present and predicting future outcomes, and is aware of the normative and ethical components of political science.
Has a general sense of what theory in its various incarnations is and why it is important, but cannot understand or apply sophisticated theoretical arguments or concepts. Has vague sense of the normative and ethical components of the discipline.
Does not understand the content or the utility of theory. Cannot apply theoretical constructs to contemporary or historical problems. Does not understand normative or ethical components of the discipline.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF
POLITICS
Uses history as a framework for understanding contemporary politics. Has a well-developed understanding of patterns and their disruption as a critical part of the discipline.
Comprehends historical trends in both American and international political life. Makes connections between contemporary political life and its historical antecedents.
Has a general understanding of history and its relevance to contemporary politics. Thinks of history in broad outlines instead of specific factors that contribute to contemporary political life.
Has little sense of historical trajectory and fails to make connections between the contemporary world and the past.
Identify what assessment milestones and tools to use.
Look for existing assessments in program courses that most students take throughout the program.
• i.e. introduction to …
• Capstone
• Research paper
• Field based learning project
• Internship
Political Science Assessments
The Political Science Department uses multiple methods of assessment as outlined below.
Student Portfolio
In the senior capstone course (84-401) students produce a formal (bound) portfolio of what they consider to be their best work in the major accompanied by reflective statements on their political science career at UWO and on each paper chosen for inclusion in the portfolio.
Political Science Assessments
Major Research Paper
In the senior capstone course (84-401) students produce and present a major research paper that demonstrates qualitative and/or quantitative research methods and analytical writing abilities (examples of such assignments is appended).
Graduating Senior Survey
The Political Science Department also uses a graduating senior survey to gain insight about the department’s ability to facilitate student achievement of the learning goals, about what parts of the program worked best for students, and what parts of the program could be strengthened.
Political Science alignment
CORE COMPETENCIESCOURSE/PROGRAM
COMPONENT ASSESSMENT FORMAT
Theoretical Context of Politics
84-101,105,115,24584-401
Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field
Text (ETS)
Historical Context of Politics
84-101,105,11584-401
Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field
Text (ETS)
Contemporary Politics 84-101,105,11584-401
Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field
Text (ETS)
Civic and Global Engagement 84-401 Portfolio Reflections
Analytical Ability 84-101,105,115,24584-401
Pre/Post Tests, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field Text (ETS)
Written and Oral Communication
Skills84-401 Portfolio Reflections, Capstone
Paper, Capstone Presentation
Sample processANALYSIS OF RESULTS FEEDBACK MECHANISMS
The Political Science Department offers two sections of the capstone course each year. Instructors are asked to compile assessment related measures from the portfolio, major paper and presentation, and the major field and internal test. Instructors are also asked to solicit student comments about program and compile anecdotes about students’ post graduate plans. These measures, along with all other assessment measures indicated above, are discussed at an annual faculty retreat each summer. Results are also used for required reporting on assessment and student achievement. Because the Department is small, these discussions can result in immediate curricular actions.
Alignment of Findings
Assessment Method/Context
Results? What do results tell us about learning?
Program Response/Change
Sample FindingsBased on prior discussions of student learning outcomes,
the following changes were underway before 2009-2010: offer the senior capstone course (PS401) every semester offer the research methods course (PS245) every semester in a
small class sizeadvise students to take PS245 early in career (sophomore year) to
increase ability to apply methods related skills to student research
The following changes were discussed at the 2009 summer retreat and implemented over the course of 2009-2010:
increase upper division offerings during interim to reduce time to degree
alternate between American Politics focused faculty and Comparative Politics International Relations focused faculty.
increase political theory sub-field offerings design and implement a civil engagement emphasis/minor to
improve student achievement of learning goals
Curriculum characteristicsOrganization of the Curriculum
Sequence-Are courses sequenced in a way to assist students to develop knowledge and skills?
Articulation-How are courses related to one another? How does each course build upon or support learning from the previous course?
Coherence-Is there a logical consistency of a set of well understood principles throughout the curriculum?
Curriculum Characteristics
Rigor-Are students challenged? Are students meeting expectations put forth by the faculty?
Integration-Can students incorporate knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes into their own lives?
Learning Process-Can you identify areas where students have significant challenges with their learning? Where students are successful?
Assessment GuidelinesI. Program Goals and Intended Student Learning
Outcomes
II. Assessment Methods/Tools for Learning Outcomes
III. Analysis of Results Feedback Mechanisms
IV. Interpretation of Assessment Results
V. Assessment Results Used to Inform Change