28
Assessment and management of Aphasia post stroke A/Prof Erin Godecke Senior Research Fellow Speech Pathology School of Medical and Health Sciences Email: [email protected] @ErinGodecke

Assessment and management of Aphasia post stroke

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Assessment and management of Aphasia post

stroke

A/Prof Erin GodeckeSenior Research Fellow Speech PathologySchool of Medical and Health SciencesEmail: [email protected]

@ErinGodecke

Aphasia Management

Screening toolshttp://www.aphasiapathway.com.au/?name=aphasia-screening-tools

When to start treatment and how long should it last?

83%

88%

82%

Treatment provided

• Commenced on average before Day 10 post stroke

• Treatment period 28-32 days

• UC = 9.5h HI = 21.7h

Baseline communication characteristicsUC

n=81UC-Plus

n=81VERSEn=83

WAB - AQ Mean(SD) 42∙4(28∙9) 41(27∙8) 40∙1(28)

Mild (93∙6–62∙6) n(%) 25(31) 23(28) 24(29)

Moderate (62∙5–31∙3) n(%) 24(30) 24(30) 25(30)

Severe (0–31∙2) n(%) 32(40) 34(42) 34(41)

Clock Drawing/Cog Test Median(IQR) 1(3∙5) 1(3) 2(4)

Dysarthria n(%) 31(38) 40(49) 44(53)

Apraxia of Speech n(%) 43(53) 39(48) 46(55)

Well balanced

–Week 12 outcomesUC

(n=70)UC+

(n=75)VERSE(n=72)

Unadjusted p-value

WAB - AQ, Mean (SD) 70 (28.8) 65.1 (30.9) 69.4 (28.8) p=0.55§

Boston Naming Test, Mean (SD)

31∙3 (18∙8) 27∙6 (21∙5) 33∙2 (19∙9) p=0∙27§

Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale, Mean (SD)

3∙6 (0∙8) 3∙3 (0∙9) 3∙3 (0∙8) p=0∙92§

Aphasia Depression Rating Scale, Mean (SD)

5∙0 (3∙8) 5∙3 (3∙5) 5∙8 (4∙2) p=0∙43§

SAEs n 68 63 58 p=0.09†

†Chi-Square Test; §One-way ANOVA

Week 26 outcomesUC

(n=70)UC+

(n=75)VERSE(n=72)

Unadjusted p-value

WAB - AQ, Mean (SD) 75∙7 (25∙3) 70∙8 (29∙2) 72∙7 (28∙9) p=0∙51§

% Maximal Potential Recovery (SD) 61∙7 (25∙8) 54.7 (34∙2) 54∙9 (35∙3) p=0∙37§

Boston Naming Test, Mean (SD) 37∙5 (18.0) 32∙9 (20∙5) 36∙4 (19∙6) p=0∙40§

Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale, Mean (SD)

Aphasia Depression Rating Scale, Mean (SD)

3∙65 (0∙76)

4.76 (3.8)

3∙48 (0∙86)

3.95 (3.37)

3∙53 (0∙80)

4.44 (3.34)

p=0∙50§

p=0.92ǂ

§One-way ANOVA; ǂKruskal-Wallis

Conclusions

• Early intensive therapy is feasible • Early intensive therapy is not harmful• First 40 days: ‘More intensive is not better’

Usual Care aphasia therapy: Started < day 102-3 times per week30-40 minutes per sessionTherapy type to be confirmed

Effect of Total Therapy Amount

Effect of Number of Service Events

Effect of Average Session Length

21

Effect of Average Session Length

VERY EARLY REHABILITATION IN SPEECH (VERSE)

The Results

After controlling for baseline aphasia severity, NIHSS, hospitalsite and total therapy amount:

1.Average Session Length had a significant effect on recovery(p=0.024)

2.On average, increasing the session length by 1 minuteresulted in a 0.33 point higher AQ score at 12 weeks post-stroke

The Results: Interpretation

If 2 participants have the same baseline AQ score and NIHSS scoreand each participant receives a total of 1350 minutes (22.5 hours) oftherapy in the first 12 weeks post-stroke, but

• Participant A receives 30 sessions of 45 minutes eachand

• Participant B receives 45 sessions of 30 minutes each

ThenParticipant A can be expected to achieve 5 points* more on AQ at 12

weeks than Participant B

Chronic recovery

Usual Care +

n = 25 videos

Total number of

tasks

96

Total number of

different tasks

51

Average no.

tasks per

session

3.8

http://www.aphasiapathway.com.au/?name=0-Pathway-Overview

Questions?

Community Aphasia Groups