Assessment 1 J01 – Land off Main Road, Jacksdale … · • Approximately 1/5 of the area’s boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the northwest. • Development

Assessment 1 J01 – Land off Main Road, Jacksdale

Date: 2/12/14 Surveyed by: LF & JC

Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes

Based on Assessment Matrix and Assessment Criteria (Figures 1 and 2)Check the unrestricted sprawl of settlements

1 • 3 boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• Development of this area would ‘round off’ the existing settlement.

• The area is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the north, east and west and Main Road to the south.

• The area is visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The land is slopes down from the existing settlement in the north towards Main Road in the south.

Prevent neighbouring settlements from merging into one another

1 • Development would not extend beyond the existing urban area and would therefore not reduce the size of the gap between

settlements.

Assist in safeguarding countryside from encroachment

3 • Some inappropriate development – church and graveyard, garden centre and associated car parking and a residential

property.

• In addition to the above the area comprises agricultural fields (currently used for grazing), paddocks, and a farm.

• The area is part urban fringe in character and part open countryside in character.

Preserve the setting and special character of historic settlements

1

• Development of the area will have no adverse impact on the setting and special character of a historic settlement.

Assist in urban regeneration

N/A It is considered that all sites in the Green Belt assist in urban regeneration. This is not considered to be a matter of difference between Green Belt sites and therefore this Green Belt purpose is not scored as part of the Framework.

TOTAL SCORE

6 The score indicates how an area/site performs as a whole when assessed against the 5 purposes of Green Belt (as set out in

Greater Nottingham and Ashfield Green Belt Assessment Framework). In general terms a higher score indicates a stronger

performing parcel of land.

�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��#-.$$

��!��"��#$�%/&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

1

Site

Bo

un

da

ry

Gre

en

Be

lt Bo

un

da

ry

5

46

72

3

1

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��#-.$$

��!��"��#$�%/&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

1

Su

b-S

ite B

ou

nd

ary

Assessment 2 J01 / Site 1 – Land off Main Road, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes



• Development of this site in isolation would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement.

• The site is not well contained. Boundaries are formed by a hedgerow (not on 1835 Sanderson’s map) to the south and post and wire fence to the east.

• The site is visually connected to the existing settlement.




settlements.


1 • Large amount of inappropriate development – church and graveyard.

• The site is urban fringe in character.


1

• Development of the site will have no adverse impact on the setting and special character of a historic settlement.



TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • 1 boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale.


• The site is partially well contained. Boundaries are formed by a mature hedgerow and tress (boundary shown on 1835 Sanderson’s Map) to the east, hedgerow (not shown on Sandersons map) to the south (Garden Centre boundary), and post and wire fence to the west (church cemetery boundary).


• The land is slopes down from the existing settlement in the north towards the Garden Centre in the south.



settlements.


5 • No inappropriate development.

• The site comprises agricultural field.

• The site is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


2 • 2 boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south and west of the site.


• The site is well contained by a mature hedgerow to the east (shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) and a hedgerow and trees to the north (not shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map).


• The land is slopes from the north downwards to Main Road in the south.



settlements.


1 • Large amount of inappropriate development – garden centre and associated car parking.



1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • Small part of the western boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by mature hedgerows to the north, east and west (boundaries shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s Map) and Main Road to the south.

• The site has limited visual connection to the existing settlement.

• The land is slopes down from the north towards Main Road in the south.



settlements.



• The site comprises agricultural field.



1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes




• The site is partially well contained. Boundaries are formed by a mature hedgerow to the west and part of the southern boundary (boundaries shown on the 1835 Sandersons Map) and hedgerows (not shown on the 1835 Sandersons Map) to the south (boundary of farm and residential property within the GB).


• The land is slopes down from the north to south.



settlements.


4 • Limited inappropriate development – paraphernalia associated with a small paddock to the north east of the site.

• The site comprises agricultural fields (currently used for grazing) and a small paddock.

• The site is predominately open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site does not adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale.


• The site is contained to the south by Main Road, weaker field boundaries form the remaining boundaries. Hedgerows to the east and west are shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map, hedgerows to the north are not shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map

• The site is not visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The land gently slopes down from the existing settlement in the north towards Main Road in the south.



settlements.



• The site comprises a farm and paddocks associated with the farm.



1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • 1 boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• Development of this site alone would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement.

• The site is partially well contained. Boundaries are formed by the post and rail fence to the north and hedgerow to the west (boundary shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) and Main Road to the south.


• The land is relatively flat.



settlements.


1 • Large amount of inappropriate development in proportion to the site – half of the site is occupied by a residential property

and its curtilage, and the remainder is paddocks.



1




TOTAL SCORE




�

Assessment 1 J02 – Land off Main Road and Flatts Lane, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • Approximately 1/5 of the area’s boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the northwest.

• Development of this area would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement.

• The area is well contained by Main Road in the north west/north, and by Flatts lane in the north east. The remaining boundaries to the south west and south east are formed by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map.

• The area is visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The land is slopes down towards the existing settlement in the north.


4 • Development would extend beyond the existing urban area of Jacksdale/Westwood, and reduce the existing gap between

Brinsley in the south east from approximately 800m to 500m.


4 • Some inappropriate development – 4 residential properties in the northwest of the area

• In addition to the above the area comprises agricultural fields, a pond, Bagthorpe Brook, agricultural buildings and a plant nursery

• The area is predominantly open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��#-$$$

��!��"��#$�%.&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

2

Site

Bo

un

da

ry

Gre

en

Be

lt Bo

un

da

ry

4

2 3

5

1

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��#-$$$

��!��"��#$�%.&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

2

Su

b-S

ite B

ou

nd

ary

Assessment 2 J02 / Site 1 – Land off Main Road and Flatts Lane, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • A small section of the site’s boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale in the north east.

• Development of this site would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement.

• The site is well contained by Main Road in the northwest. The remaining boundaries are formed by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map. Yew tree farm borders the south western boundary.


• The land is slopes down towards the existing settlement in the north.


2 • Development would extend beyond the existing urban area of Jacksdale/Westwood, and result in a small reduction in the

existing gap between Brinsley in the south east from approximately 800m to 700m.



• The site comprises fields used for grazing, a pond and Bagthorpe Brook.

• The area is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site does not adjoin an existing settlement.


• The site is contained by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map. Yew Tree Farm borders part of the south western boundary.


• The land slopes down towards the existing settlement in the north.


4 • Development would extend beyond the existing urban area of Jacksdale/Westwood, and result in a moderate reduction in

the existing gap between Brinsley in the south east from approximately 800m to 500m.


5 • No inappropriate development

• The site comprises a field used for grazing and is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • The site adjoins the settlement of Jacksdale on one boundary

• Development of this site would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement, and would form a long limb into open countryside.

• The site is contained by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map.




3 • Development would extend beyond the existing urban area of Jacksdale/Westwood, and result in a moderate reduction in

the existing gap between Brinsley in the south east from approximately 800m to 600m.



• The site comprises a field and is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • Only a very small proportion of the site adjoins the settlement of Jacksdale on one boundary.

• Development of this site would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement, and would form a long limb into open countryside.

• The site is contained by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map.








• The site comprises a field with a hay barn and other agricultural outbuildings

• It is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site does not adjoin an existing settlement


• The site is contained by Flatts Lane to the east, Main Road to the north and mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map.







2 • Some inappropriate development – 4 dwellings (including a bungalow named ‘Carlisle Farm’)

• In addition to the above, the site includes 2 large greenhouses and other outbuildings associated with a plant nursery.

• The site is part urban fringe/ part countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�

Assessment 1 J03 – Land between Palmerston Street and Barrow Hills Lane, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


1 • Approximately ½ of the area boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the west.


• The area is well contained by Wagstaff Lane, Selston Road, Barrows Hill Lane, Main Road and Palmerston Street.

• The area is visually connected to the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• The land slopes down from the existing settlement in the north towards Main Road in the south.


4 • Development of the area would extend beyond the existing urban area and result in a reduction in the gap between

Jacksdale and Selston from approximately 500m to 300m


3 • A significant amount of inappropriate development in the south of the area – approximately 80 properties on New

Westwood, 17 properties on Barrows Hill Lane and a further dwelling sited in the allotment gardens area.

• In addition to the above the area comprises 12 agricultural fields, a school playing field and allotment gardens.

• The area is predominantly urban fringe in character to the south and open countryside in character in the north.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��*-$$$

��!��"��#$�%.&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

3

Site

Bo

un

da

ry

Gre

en

Be

lt Bo

un

da

ry

318

FLATTS

LANE

Nu

rsery

32

2

91.7

m

64

52

86

74

126

124

122

124a

97.2

m

Tra

ck

Pa

th(u

m)

1

GP

81.7

m

80.2

m

Path(um

)

Pat

84.7

m

42

BARROWSHILLLANE

3945

85.3

m

LB

75

73

96

TC

B

53

6749

90.2

m

Tra

ck

FB

New

Westw

oo

d

14

GP

78.0

m

31

2

28

7

7a

9

24

50

55

86

77

59

68a

70

Path

(um

)

45

68

51

Tra

ck

Track

Track

LB

21

Selk

irk

Westw

oo

d G

ard

en

s

235

Path

(um

)

73

38

71

59

73a

69

71a

69a

Nurs

ery

School

PALMERSTONSTREET

Pla

y a

rea

LB

Recre

atio

n G

rou

nd

48

Westw

ood

Infa

nt

91

81

PH

44

26

77

42A

14

2

2

105

103

1

We

stw

oo

d CLOSE

1

1

66

KIT

SO

NA

VE

NU

E

79

69

12

129

117

2

11

71

47

141

151

1

158

FIELDVIEW

CLO

SE4

22

15

19

11

CHESHIREWAY

9

RU

TL

AN

DR

OA

D

11

8

15

28

2

30

1

LA

NG

TO

NH

OL

LO

W

111.2

m

Ho

are

s F

arm

Po

ultry

BARROWS

HILL

LANE

111.3

m

Tra

ck

Ho

uses

Def

0.9

1m

RH

Po

nd

GP

93.1

m

95.9

m

CR

Po

nd

Ward

Bd

y

Dis

man

tled

Railw

ay

To

ad

ho

le

Po

nd

Westw

oo

d

Un

ited

Refo

rmed

292

221

75.6m

225298

Ch

urc

h

Shelter The

Hawthornes

211

27

11

2

5

47

(PH

)

Ro

yal O

ak

37

26

14

15

22

207

282

209

SE

LS

TO

NR

OA

D

1

Wo

od

lyn

Ken

nels

2

Barro

ws G

reen

Brid

ge

Fo

ot

93.5

m

CTK

CG

F

160

167

179

WAGSTAFF LANE

193

172

Jacksd

ale

157

153

163

136

157

132

145

84.0

m

Po

nd

122

LB

135

130

Path(um)

CORNWALLCL

2

12

8

Path

9

CUMBERLAND

SHROPSHIRE

ElSubSta

52

131

40

WESTDALEROAD

28

57

5

11

7

2

7

34

29

AVENUE

1

36

33

35

21

22

14

30

19

15

1

2

5

7

4

3

6

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

!��"��#��

��

��

��$

%�&

'�� (��)��%%%$& &*

�+,(

��-�

��+�%%%

!��"��#��

��

��

��$

%�&.'

�� (��)��%%%$& &*

J0

3

Su

b-S

ite B

ou

nd

ary

Assessment 2 J03 / Site 1 – Land between Palmerston Street and Barrow Hills Lane, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


1 • Approximately 3/4 of the site boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the west and south, and New

Westwood in the east.

• Development of this site would ‘round off’ the existing built up area.

• The site is well contained by Main Road, Palmerston Street and the rear curtilages of properties on New Westwood.

• The site is visually connected to the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• The land slopes down from the north towards Main Road in the south.


1 • Development of the site would not extend beyond the existing urban area and would not therefore reduce the size of the

gaps.


3 • Some inappropriate development – 1dwelling (Selkirk) sited in the middle of the allotment gardens, numerous areas which

appear to be used as domestic gardens, plus some storage containers and hard standings.

• In addition to the above the site comprises allotment gardens, and a small amount of scrub land.

• The area is a mix of urban fringe and open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site itself constitutes residential development, but the boundaries do not adjoin existing settlements.

• The site is well contained by existing domestic curtilages.




1 • Development of the area would not extend beyond the existing urban area as the area already constitutes built

development.


1 • A significant amount of inappropriate development – approximately 80 properties on New Westwood.

• The site is urban in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • A very small proportion of the site boundary adjoins Westwood infant School to the south, and the western boundary adjoins

the settlement of Jacksdale.


• The site is contained by Palmerston Street in the west, mature hedgerows/trees on 2 sides, with the eastern site having a weaker boundary formed by a post and wire fence interspersed with mature trees.


• The land is flat.


1 • Development of the site would not extend beyond the existing urban area and would therefore not reduce the existing gap

between settlements.



• The site comprises a school playing field and is predominantly urban fringe in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


2 • Approximately ½ of the site boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the west and north west.

• Development of this site in isolation would not ‘round off’ the existing settlement. (However, taken alongside sites1, 2 and 3, it could be seen to round off the settlement).

• The site is well contained by Wagstaff Lane to the north, Palmerston Street to the west and mature hedgerows (the vast majority of which follow lines indicated on the 1835 Sanderson map)


• The land is slopes down from the existing settlement in the north towards Main Road in the south. It is prominent in the landscape when viewed from Flatts lane in the south.


1 • Development of the site would not extend beyond the existing urban area and therefore no reduction in the existing gap.



• The site comprises 3 agricultural fields, and is open countryside in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • A very small proportion of the site boundary adjoins an existing property on Wagstaff Lane, and one dwelling on Barrows

Hill Lane.


• The site is well contained by Wagstaff Lane, Barrows Hill Lane, and Palmerston Street, together with mature hedgerows forming field boundaries which follow lines as illustrated on the 1835 Sanderson’s map.

• The majority of the site is not visually connected to the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• The land slopes down from the centre of the site to Selston in the north and towards Main Road in the south.


4 • Development of the site would extend beyond the existing urban area and result in a reduction in the gap between

Jacksdale and Selston from approximately 500m to 300m.



• The site comprises 5 agricultural fields and is open countryside in character in the north.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site does not adjoin the existing defined settlement.

• Approximately 1/4 of the site boundaries adjoin the existing residential development at New Westwood (in Green Belt).


• The site is well contained by Barrows Hill Lane to the east, Main Road to the south, New Westwood to the west and by mature hedgerows in the north and northwest (shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map).

• The site is visually connected to New Westwood, but not to the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• The land slopes down towards Main Road in the south.


2 • Development of the site would not extend beyond the existing urban edge at Wagstaff Lane and would not therefore reduce

the gap between Jacksdale and Selston. However, development of the site would reduce the narrow gap between the urban development on Barrows Hill lane and New Westwood.



• The site comprises 2 agricultural fields, along with 2 smaller parcels of grassland.



1




TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site boundaries do not adjoin an existing settlement.


• The site is well contained by Barrows Hill Lane in the east, and by mature hedgerows which follow lines indicated on the1835 Sanderson’s map in the north, west and south.

• The site is not visually connected to the existing settlement of Jacksdale.

• The land slopes down towards Main Road in the south.


2 • The site is already developed with residential properties in the east. Development of the western part would reduce the

narrow gap between this isolated group of dwellings and New Westwood.


2 • A significant amount of inappropriate development in the south of the area – approximately 17 properties on Barrows Hill

Lane .

• In addition to the above the site comprises a paddock and an area used as a small allotment

• The site is predominantly urban fringe in character.


1




TOTAL SCORE




�

Assessment 1 J04 – Land north of Wagstaff Lane and Laverick Road, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


2 • Approximately ½ of the areas boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south.


• The area is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the south, Wagstaff Lane and plantation to the north east, public footpath with hedgerow and plantation (in part) to the northwest, and railway line to the west.

• Parts of the area are visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The area has a varied topography.


3 • The majority of the area would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary.

• The existing gap between Jacksdale and Pinxton to the north is approximately 2km. Development would reduce the size of the gap by approximately 160m, therefore very limited reduction in the size of the gap.

• The gap between Jacksdale and Selston to the north east is approximately 500m. Development would reduce the size of the gap by approximately 150m, therefore a significant reduction in the size of the gap (proportionally).


4 • Limited inappropriate development – 2 residential properties and a residential curtilage (certificate of lawfulness of existing

use approved 17/5/10).

• In addition to the above the area comprises agricultural fields, plantation, woodland and paddocks.



1 • Development of the area will have no adverse impact on the setting and special character of a historic settlement.



TOTAL SCORE




�

��

��!��"��#$�%&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��*-$$$

��!��"��#$�%.&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J04

Site Boundary

Green Belt Boundary

87

96

45

31

2

��

��!��"��#$�%&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��*-$$$

��!��"��#$�%.&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J04

Sub-Site Boundary

Assessment 2 J04 / Site 1 – Land north of Wagstaff Lane and Laverick Road, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • 1 boundary (approximately 1/3 of the site) adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the south, railway line to the west and the edge of the plantation (which is the site).

• The majority of the site is not visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The land slopes upwards away from the settlement.


1 • The site would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary and therefore development would not reduce the size of

the gap between settlements.



• Site comprises plantation, woodland and paddocks.



1 • Development of the site will have no adverse impact on the setting and special character of a historic settlement.



TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


5 • The site does not adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by plantation to the south, east and west, and a mature hedgerow to the north.


• The land slopes upwards form south to north.


1 • The existing gap between Jacksdale and Pinxton to the north is approximately 2km. Development would reduce the size of

the gap by approximately 160m, therefore very limited reduction in the size of the gap.



• The site comprises an agricultural field.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes




• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by plantation to the south east, southwest and northwest and hedgerow to the north east.


• The land slopes gently upwards, south to north.






• The site comprises an agricultural field and a small part of a larger plantation.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the south west, Wagstaff Lane to the south east, plantation, hedgerow (shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) and public footpath to the north east, and woodland to the northwest.



1 • The area would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary and therefore development would not reduce the size

of the gap between settlements.



• The area comprises an agricultural field and paddocks.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes




• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by Wagstaff Lane to the south east, plantation to the north east, hedgerow (shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) and public footpath to the south west.


• The land slopes upwards form south to north.






• The site comprises plantation.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


2 • Two boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south and south east.


• The area is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the south and south east, Wagstaff Lane to the north east, and a water culvert to the north east.


• The land is relatively flat.

• There is a difference in levels between the site and the existing urban area to the south east.






• The site is a grass field.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south east.


• The area is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement and hedgerow (boundary shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) to the south east, Wagstaff Lane and plantation to the north east, and a hedgerow (boundary shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) and public footpath to the south west.

• The southern part of the site (approximately 1/3) is visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The land slopes away from the edge of the settlement.


3 • The gap between Jacksdale and Selston to the north east is approximately 500m.

• The majority of the site would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary. However, where the site does extend beyond the settlement boundary, development would reduce the size of the gap by approximately 150m and result in a moderate reduction in the size of the gap (proportionally).

• The perceived reduction would be greater as this site is open in character and visually prominent.


4 • Limited inappropriate development – 2 residential properties.

• In addition to the above the site comprises agricultural fields.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary (approximately ½ of the site) adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south east.


• The site is contained by a hedgerow (boundary shown on the 1825 Sanderson’s Map) to the north east, north west and south west.


• The land slope down from existing urban area.





3 • Some inappropriate development – residential curtilage (certificate of lawfulness of existing use approved 17/5/10).

• In addition to the above the site comprises agricultural field and paddocks.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • Two boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the south and east of the site.


• The site is well contained by the existing settlement to the south and east and a water culvert to the west. The northern boundary is not well contained by a post a rail fence.


• The land slopes upwards south west to north east.





3 • Some inappropriate development – garden area with play equipment and football nets.

• In addition to the above the area comprises agricultural field.

• The site is predominantly open countryside in character.





TOTAL SCORE




�

Assessment 1 J05 – Land south west of Pye Hill Road and Main Road, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


2 • Approximately ½ of the areas boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the north east.


• The area is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the north east, River Erewash to the west, railway line to the North West and mature hedgerow and trees (in part shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map) to the south.

• Parts of the area are visually connected to the existing settlement.

• The majority of the area is flat.


2 • The vast majority of the area would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary.

• The existing gap between Jacksdale and Ironville to the west is approximately 200 metres. Development would reduce the size of the gap by approximately 20m, therefore very limited reduction in the size of the gap.


4 • Limited inappropriate development – corrugated steel garage/storage shed and a steel container.

• The area comprises fields, scrub land, paddocks, recreation ground, play area/equipment, skate park, woodland and a nature reserve.

• The area is predominantly open countryside in character, with a small element having urban fringe characteristics - recreation ground, including skate park and play equipment.





TOTAL SCORE




�

��

��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��#$�%

&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

�*+' ��,��*-.$$

��!��"��#$�%/&�� '��(��$$$#%�%)

J0

5

Site

Bo

un

da

ry

Gre

en

Be

lt Bo

un

da

ry

CP

&

Bagth

orp

eB

rook

Def

CS

FB

s

CS

ED

Bd

y

Po

nd

71.0

m

Def

152

32

10

9

Nu

rsery 1

5

72.2

m

158

105

a

Po

nd

Sew

ag

e

Pp

g S

ta

85

122

112

87

142

132

97

66

21

42

52

44 70

54

43

64

76

33

WE

ST

MO

RL

AN

DW

AY

Clu

b

St M

ary

's

45

Ch

urc

h

55

Min

ers

Welfa

re

82

47

39

VicSp

orts

Pavilio

n

75.6

m

92

69

77

102

El S

ub

Sta

74.7

m

40

72

62

52

42

MAINROAD

82

37

2

32

12

1

23

35

JacksdalePrimary

andNurserySchool

1

14

MA

RY

S

7

ST

34

Recre

atio

n G

rou

nd

20

12

WA

LK

Pla

y A

rea

Ch

ildre

ns

Nu

rsery

125

108

114

116

100

104

94

113

91

117

121

17

88

13

BA

RK

ER

AV

EN

UE

85

2

3

74

81

Path

75.6

m

69a

69

71

Sh

elte

r

B 6016

Drain

Drain

30

55

22

6

32

61

30a

26

53

51

DERBYSHIRE

46

41

26

37

DIX

IES

TR

EE

T

31

1

WESTDALE

RO

AD

7

97

4

1

94

8

11

3

9

11

14

63

80

12

1

WIL

TS

HIR

E

78

AV

EN

UE

5

1

Su

b S

ta

El

45

59

2

11

50

KE

NT

AV

EN

UE

1

14

RUTLANDROAD

1

HA

MP

SH

IRE

CT

61

12

19

6

45

5

20

9

12

22

60

13

YORKAVENUE

7

177

5a

5

3438

75

31

89

1

75

25

77

65

30

56

31

Rest

Acre

s

79

7

58

Orc

hard

s

46

12

36

14

51

Th

e

62

52

39

45

31

ES

S

30

2

24

WA

GS

TA

FF

LA

NE

14

3

13

EDWARDAVENUE

23

20

25

21

32

13

42

AL

BE

RT

AV

EN

UE

22

33

74

22

47

13

42

Jacksd

ale

32

SE

DG

WIC

K13

ST

RE

ET

57

18

A

8

4a

4b

12

Co

mm

un

ity

Cen

tre

17

64

15

68

11

58

ES

S

6

12

21

20

7

27

1

DRIVE

43

1

18

11

20

31

11a

14

212

15

10

1

2

13

1a

25

War

14

1

32

SELSTONROAD

30

2

26

36

35

49

27

16

24

26 11

75.9m

19

8

PO

15

Po

sts

Su

rgery

17

TC

B

5

29

74.4

m

2a

27a

27

22

8

11

15

5

33

6a

6

B6016

Li b

y

11a

14

Sta

tion

73.8

m

FRANCISCOURT

39

2

8

15

RiverErewash

Path(um

)

25

3

Mem

l

19

1b

2b

2a

11c

1

15

El S

ub

Sta

MA

INR

OA

D

17

Ho

use

1111b

16

26

19a

49

19

17

LA

VER

ICK

RO

AD

38

29

1

11

5

22

37

FR

AN

KLIN

RO

AD

10

32

27

13

11a

Church

Path

64

68

54

4744

59a

61

59

56

75

12

71

72

58

21

52

48

Kn

igh

tsb

ridg

eH

ou

se

Wo

rks

Garage

73.5

m

Path

26

35 32

74.1m

45

21

PYEHILL

ROAD

29

49

Weir

Pla

y A

rea

17

28

RO

AD

11

1

PR

OVID

EN

CE

33

15

61

TopRow

24

Path

77 81

Py

e H

ill

72

NewRow

55

74.1

m

53

Dep

otD

ep

ot

55

Th

eF

acto

ry

3

838

El S

ub

Sta

Shelter

85

LB

1

5

74.1

m

133

MP

MP

133

VIC

TO

RIA

ST

Sta

tion

Sew

ag

e P

um

pin

g

SL

444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 444444444 4

555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 555555555 5

777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 777777777 7333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 333333333 3

222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 222222222 2

666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 666666666 6

111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 1

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

!��"��#��

��

��

��$

%�&

'�� (��)��%%%$* *+

( ��,�

��-�&%%

!��"��#��

��

��

��$

%�&.'

�� (��)��%%%$* *+

Sub-S

ite B

oundary

J0

5

Assessment 2 J05 / Site 1 – Land south west of Pye Hill Road and Main Road, Jacksdale


Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • One boundary (approximately 1/3 of the site) adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the north east.


• The site is well contained by the existing settlement and unmade access track to the north, River Erewash to the south west. The site is not well contained to the south east - boundary formed by a post and rail fence with hedgerow (not shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s Map).


• The site is undulating.





4 • Limited inappropriate development – steel container.

• The site comprises scrub land and an unmade access track.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the north east.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement and Pye Hill Road to the north east, River Erewash to the south west, disused railway embankment to the south east (boundary shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s map). The north western boundary is less well contained by a post and rail fence with hedgerow (boundary not shown on the 1835 Sanderson’s Map).








• The site comprises paddocks.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the east.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the north east, a raised disused railway embankment (boundary shown on the 1835 Sandersons map) to the south east, River Erewash to the south west, and woodland to the south.

• Parts of the site are visually connected to the existing settlement.







• The site comprises a paddock, woodland, recreation ground – including skate park, play equipment and picnic benches.

• The area is predominantly open countryside in character, with a small element having urban fringe characteristics - recreation ground, including skate park and play equipment.





TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the east.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the east, trees to the north and south (edge of woodland on the site) and the River Erewash to the west.

• The site is not visually connected to the existing settlement due to the woodland on site.







• The site comprises woodland and open grass land which form part of the Jacksdale Local Nature Reserve.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


4 • One boundary adjoins the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the north east.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the north east, trees to the north (edge of woodland on site 4), River Erewash to the west and Bagthorpe Brook to the south.


• The site is predominantly flat.






• The site comprises paddocks and stables.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • Approximately ½ of the sites boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the east.


• The site is well contained. Boundaries are formed by the existing settlement to the east, railway line to the northwest, and the River Erewash to the west and south west.


• The site is predominantly flat.


2 • The vast majority of the area would not extend beyond the existing settlement boundary.

• The existing gap between Jacksdale and Ironville to the west is approximately 200 metres. Development would reduce the size of the gap by approximately 20m, therefore very limited reduction in the size of the gap.


4 • Limited inappropriate development – corrugated steel garage/storage shed.

• The area comprises scrub land, paddocks and railway embankment.






TOTAL SCORE




�



Purpose / Impact

Score (1 – 5)

Justification/Notes


3 • Two boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the east and south.


• The site is not well contained.


• The site is raised embankment.






• The site comprises a former railway embankment that is now overgrown.

• The area is surrounded by urban fringe uses - recreation ground, including skate park and play equipment and therefore is more urban fringe in character than open countryside.





TOTAL SCORE




�

Documents

Assessment 1 J01 – Land off Main Road, Jacksdale … · • Approximately 1/5 of the area’s boundaries adjoin the existing settlement of Jacksdale to the northwest. • Development