Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Assessing your Organisation’sProject Management Capability
from Theory to Practice
Harold AinsworthPROJECT MANAGERS NETWORKPROJECT MANAGERS NETWORKPROJECT MANAGERS NETWORKPROJECT MANAGERS NETWORK
Presentation Outline
1 The Capability Maturity Model (CMM) - software
2 Attempts at a PM Maturity Model based on CMM
3 Benefits of Project Management
4 Other Material on Best Practices in PM
5 Current PMI Research - OPM3
6 Building an interim Model
7 Future Scenarios
Why the level of interest in ProjectWhy the level of interest in ProjectWhy the level of interest in ProjectWhy the level of interest in ProjectManagement byManagement byManagement byManagement by organisations organisations organisations organisations? –? –? –? –
Projects are about accountabilityProjects are about accountabilityProjects are about accountabilityProjects are about accountability
“Project Management in the future will be“Project Management in the future will be“Project Management in the future will be“Project Management in the future will be
a multi-faceted disciplinea multi-faceted disciplinea multi-faceted disciplinea multi-faceted discipline
which which which which recognises recognises recognises recognises Project ManagersProject ManagersProject ManagersProject Managers
for the value they bringfor the value they bringfor the value they bringfor the value they bring
to the corporate bottom lineto the corporate bottom lineto the corporate bottom lineto the corporate bottom line
instead of a cost instead of a cost instead of a cost instead of a cost centre centre centre centre …”…”…”…”
Future of ProjectManagement
Linda Kretz, 20/20 Solutions quoted in “In Search of Excellence in Project Management”,by Harold Kerzner
The Capability MaturityModel for Software
Defect prevention, changing processesOptimising(continuous improvement)
Quantitative processesManaged(predictable process)
Process management, training, managementcoordination, peer reviews
Defined(standard and consistentprocess)
Requirements, planning, tracking,sub-contract management, quality assurance,configuration management
Repeatable(disciplined process)
None specifiedInitial(ad hoc, heroics)
Key Process for Each LevelLevel
From the CMM Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Operational Definition of theCapability Maturity Model (CMM)
Maturity Levels
Key Process Areas
Common Features
Key Practices
contain
Organised by
contain
From CMM Technical Report Software EngineeringInstitute, CMU www.sei.cmu.edu
Project ManagementMaturity Model – PM3 (1)
Databases. Cost – schedule integration.Integration across enterprise.
5. Adaptive
Models used. Historical experience used.Standard templates.
4. Managed
Planning is based on models. Improvedintegration and management of constraints.
3. Organised
First but haphazard efforts to introduce projectdisciplines. Schedule not derived from disciplinedplanning methodology.
2. Abbreviated
Each project viewed as unique and autonomous.1. Ad hoc
DescriptionLevel
From: R Remy, “Adding focus to improvement efforts with PM3”, PM Network, July, 1997
Project Management Maturity Model – PM3 (2)
Management and control of projects in a multiproject environment.
Project performancemanagement
Human factors and project culturalenvironment.
Leadership & management
CategoriesArea
From: R Remy, “Adding focus to improvement efforts with PM3”, PM Network, July, 1997
To assess maturity there are 8 areas and 51 sub categories
Examples of other areas are Problem-risk opportunity management,
multi project management, management information ….
Paradoxically, many companies that “live
or die” on the success of projects only
score a maturity level of 1 or 2.
Many of these organisations have been
successful because of extraordinary
individual efforts …. Finding their supply of
heroes diminished and past successes hard
to repeat, many are now striving to
systemise project management
Quote from Ron Remy of PM3
Value of Project Management
Research Results:
show that organisations who were moremature at project management, had bettercost performance index
ie Actual costs v’s planned cost
BUT Actual schedule v’s planned schedule
Not proven yet
from “The Benefits Of Project Management” C W Ibbs & Y H Kwak, PMI, 1997
Cost index
Overall PM Maturity rating
Line of Best fit
Best Practices ofProject Management
! Project management and the organisation
! Personnel related issues
! Costing and performance tracking
! Methods and procedures
From: "Best Practices of PM Groups in large functional organisations - Results ofthe Fortune 500 PM Benchmarking Study", F Toney & R Powers, PMI, 1997
Six Components of Excellence
! Integrated Processes
! Culture
! Management Support
! Training and Education
! Informal Project Management
! Behavioural Excellence
From: Harold Kerzner - "In Search of Excellence in Project Management"
Project ManagementCompetence
! Competent project professionals
! Project team competence
! Organisational projectcompetence- processes, culture- training, resources etc
From J D Frame, “Building Project Management Competence – 1999
by PMI
1st Wave - define PM maturity model
2nd Wave - assessment method
‘sister project’ - PM competency model
Organisational ProjectManagement MaturityModel Research (OPM3)
(www.pmI.org/opm3/)
OPM3 Research
" Will consider• Assessment of existing models
• Literature search/review
• Field survey of organisations
• Requirements for model design phase
" And attemptTo build a model which describes the collectionof capabilities and other qualities that combineto yield organisation project success.
OPM 3
PMI Conference ’98 – Open sessionidentified these capabilities to beconsidered:
• PM Methodologies and Processes
• Human Resource Factors
• Organisation Support Structure for Projects
• Alignment of Projects to Business Strategy
• Organisation Learning
Project ManagementCompetencies
PM ‘nuts &bolts’
PeopleManagement
‘make it happen’ Leadership &Client Mgt
• PMBOK
• Tools• Emotional Intelligence
• Team Building
• Persuasion
• Listening• Results driven
• Tolerates change and paradox
ProjectManagement
Competencies
A Project ManagementCapability Assessment Model
People & TeamDevelopment
ProjectManagementProcesses andSupport
OrganisationLearning
CorporateControls
PASTPASTPASTPAST
• ISO certification for organisations ISO certification for organisations ISO certification for organisations ISO certification for organisations
• CMM assessments for software companies CMM assessments for software companies CMM assessments for software companies CMM assessments for software companies
• PMP certification for individuals PMP certification for individuals PMP certification for individuals PMP certification for individuals
FUTUREFUTUREFUTUREFUTURE
• P M maturity assessments for organisations P M maturity assessments for organisations P M maturity assessments for organisations P M maturity assessments for organisations
Future scenariosFuture scenariosFuture scenariosFuture scenarios
will Project Management maturity will Project Management maturity will Project Management maturity will Project Management maturity assessment be worthwhile?assessment be worthwhile?assessment be worthwhile?assessment be worthwhile?
Depends on:Depends on:Depends on:Depends on:
• rigour of assessment rigour of assessment rigour of assessment rigour of assessment
• but allows for it to be implemented in but allows for it to be implemented in but allows for it to be implemented in but allows for it to be implemented in various waysvarious waysvarious waysvarious ways
• why organisations undertake assessment why organisations undertake assessment why organisations undertake assessment why organisations undertake assessment
A Question to considerA Question to considerA Question to considerA Question to consider