27
Presenters Rogeair D. Purnell Bri C. Hays A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services. A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success. To start…. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Presenters

Rogeair D. Purnell

Bri C. Hays

A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success

Assessing and Mitigating

Disproportionate Impact

in Matriculation Services

Page 2: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

To start…By a show of hands, how many of you would say that your knowledge about and familiarity with disproportionate impact can be described as follows:

A.I know everything there is to know

B.I know just enough to get in trouble

C.I know barely anything at all

2Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 3: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Session Objectives• Define disproportionate impact• Outline how to access and analyze available

data• Highlight promising mitigation strategies

3Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 4: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

ENSURING STUDENT EQUITY

Why the focus on disproportionate impact?

4

Page 5: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Advancing student success• Student Success Taskforce

• Focus on Strengthening Support for Entering Students

• Student Success Act of 2012• “Refocus” core matriculation services so that

more students are receiving these services while requiring colleges to use common assessments and an accountability scorecard

• Student Support (Re)defined• 6 support success factors

5

Page 6: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

DEFINING THE TERM

What is disproportionate impact?

6

Page 7: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Definition (CA Ed code 55502 (d), Title

5)

Disproportionate impact occurs when the percentage of persons from a particular racial, ethnic, gender, age or disability group directed to a particular service or placement based on an assessment instrument, method, or procedure at a rate that is significantly different from the representation of that group in the population of persons being assessed, and discrepancy is not justified by empirical evidence demonstrating that the assessment instrument, method or procedure is a valid and reliable predictor of performance in the relevant educational setting

7Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 8: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

In Simpler Terms…Condition where some students’ access to key resources and supports and ultimately their academic success may be hampered by inequitable practices, policies and approaches to student support

8Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 9: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

CALCULATING THE MAGIC RATIO

How can I determine whether disproportionate impact is a concern?

9

Page 10: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Assessing for Disproportionate ImpactSample Research Questions:

•Do male and female students access counseling services in different proportions relative to their representation on the campus?•Are younger students more likely to complete an orientation course?•If a student is older (26 years or older), is s/he more likely to assess into basic skills level math?•Is race/ethnicity associated with lower success rates in prerequisites in certain fields of study?

10Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 11: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

The 80 Percent RuleThe benchmark for the ratio of selection or participation rates between a minority group and the reference (majority) group

Disproportionate Impact (<80%) =the access (or placement or success) rate for

the given group÷

the rate of the reference group

11Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 12: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

RESOURCES TO HELP EXPLORE & MONITOR

What if I need help to assess disproportionate impact as it relates to matriculation services?

12

Page 13: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Guide’s Focus

Matriculation Services:designed “to increase community college

student access and success” Admissions Assessment and Placement Orientation Counseling and Advising (education planning) Follow-up (evaluation of student progress) Prerequisites

13Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 14: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Guiding Questions ● Where is disproportionate impact an issue?● What strategies and approaches have

colleges successfully implemented to mitigate it?

● What data can be accessed to explore the issue?

● What relevant analyses can be conducted to monitor changes in disproportionate impact?

● How can colleges use this information for action planning and improvement?

14Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 15: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Guide Outline• Context• Available data• Relevant analyses

• Guidelines for data analysis (80% rule)

• Sample data tables

• Highlighted areas for analysis

• Additional research questions• Promising strategies and approaches• Action planning for improvement

15Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 16: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Context: Matriculation ServiceAccess and OutcomesService When could DI be an issue?

Admissions Late registration

Assessment Placement decisions

Orientation Session attendanceCourse enrollment / completion

Counseling & Advising Completion of ed planAccess to counseling

Follow-up Early alert warningAcademic probation

Prerequisites Restricted access to courses w/ prereqsRetention and persistence in field of study

16Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 17: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Available Data

17Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 18: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Relevant Analyses: 80% Rule

18Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 19: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Calculation: Steps 1 and 2

1. Disaggregate the target population of students by gender, age, and ethnicity and calculate percentages for each group (e.g., 50% female, 50% male)

2. Calculate the percentage of students within each group that received a particular service, placed into a course or level, or met the prerequisite skill level for a course

19Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 20: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Calculation: Steps 3 to 5

3. Identify the majority or reference group and use that group’s percentage as the benchmark

4. To obtain the ratio, divide the percentages for each other student group (minority group) by that of the majority or reference group

5. Highlight any group with a ratio of less than 0.80 or 80% = disproportionate impact

20Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 21: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Example: The 80 Percent Rule

1. The majority ethnic group is White students

2. 60% of White students accessed the service

3. 60% would serve as the reference rate

4. Divide minority group’s rate by 60% (reference rate)

5. So, if 50% of Hispanic/Latino students accessed the service, divide 50 by 60 to obtain the ratio for Hispanic/Latino students (50 ÷ 60 = 83%).

Since the ratio for Hispanic/Latino students is

greater than 80%, there is no evidence of disproportionate impact for this group

21Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 22: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Sample Data Table: Orientation

EthnicityFall 2010 First-Time

StudentsReceived Orientation

ServicesRatio

African American 240 8% 120 50% 83%

American Indian/ Alaskan Native

30 1% 12 40% 67%

Asian 300 10% 144 48% 80%

Filipino 120 4% 50 42% 70%

Latino 930 31% 465 50% 83%

Multi-Ethnicity 180 6% 104 58% 97%

Pacific Islander 30 1% 15 50% 83%

Other, non-white 120 4% 72 60% 100%

White 1,050 35% 630 60% 100%

Total/Overall 3,000 100% 1,612 54% --

22Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Shaded group represents the reference groupBolded rows identify groups for which disproportionate impact has occurred

Page 23: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Promising Strategies & Approaches

23Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Service Strategies & Approaches

Admissions No late registration

Assessment High school transcript data

Orientation Student success courses

Counseling & Advising

Online degree audit

Follow-up Mandatory counseling / success course

Prerequisites Accelerated pathways

Page 24: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Action Planning: Questions for Consideration• How are you monitoring disproportionate impact?• What other factors may have contributed to the

findings?• Who is or needs to be involved in this effort?• How often should available data be examined to

note progress or a need for additional changes?• Which groups of students are likely to be affected

and/or targeted?• What kind of training or professional development

is needed?

24Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 25: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Q & A

25Disproportionate Impact| RP Group Conference | April 2013

Page 26: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

For more information

Check the RP Group website for updates! www.rpgroup.org

Rogeair D. PurnellRP Group, Senior [email protected]

Bri C. HaysSD Mesa College, Campus [email protected]

26

Page 27: Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact in Matriculation Services

Thank You!

27