30
Asphalt Concrete Characterization for Pavement Designs Ludomir Uzarowski, Ph.D., P.Eng., Golder Associates Ltd., ON Adjunct Professor, University of Waterloo, ON CUPGA Edmonton, November 28, 2010

Asphalt Concrete Characterization for Pavement Designs · PDF fileAsphalt Concrete Characterization for Pavement Designs ... (AASHTO T 182) Lottman Test ... Modified Lottman (AASHTO

  • Upload
    hathu

  • View
    243

  • Download
    8

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Asphalt Concrete Characterization

for Pavement Designs

Ludomir Uzarowski, Ph.D., P.Eng., Golder Associates Ltd., ON

Adjunct Professor, University of Waterloo, ON

CUPGA Edmonton, November 28, 2010

INTRODUCTION

Flexible (asphalt) pavement

design methods

Asphalt concrete testing

Fundamental

Permanent deformation

Fatigue

Low temperature cracking

Moisture damage

Frictional characteristics

Summary

EXISTING PAVEMENT DESIGN METHODS INADEQUATE

Existing pavement design methods

are very limited

Even AASHTO 93 based on road

tests performed in the late 1950’s

Do not effectively deal with high

traffic volumes, new materials and

complex deterioration patterns

MEPDG?

Extensive experience in HMA

characterization available in Canada

Universities

DOT’s and other agencies

Consultants and contractors

PAVEMENT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Experience-based Standard sections

Do not require any specific HMA

characterization

Assume HMA mix meets specification

requirements

Empirical AASHTO 93

Layer coefficient

Theory-based (mechanistic

empirical) MEPDG

• Dynamic modulus

• Performance modeling

AASHTO 93 Pavement Design Guide

SN = a1D1 + a2D2m2 + a3D3m3

a1 = 0.4 [log10{EAC/435}] + 0.44

MECHANISTIC - EMPIRICAL

MEPDG

Dynamic modulus

• Measured – Level 1

• Predicted from mix

characteristics – Level 2

• Default – Level 3

Pavement performance

modeling

• Rutting

• Bottom-up fatigue cracking

• Top-down cracking

• Low temperature cracking

ASPHALT LAYERS CHARACTERIZATION

Existing pavement

Field testing

• Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)

Cores

Laboratory testing

• Gradation, asphalt cement content

• Strength, volumetrics?

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Pavement distress mechanisms

Permanent deformation (rutting)

Fatigue cracking

Low temperature cracking

Moisture- induced damage

Frictional characteristics

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Permanent deformation and

fundamental tests

Fundamental

• Uniaxial and triaxial creep, repeated

loading and strength tests

Empirical

• Marshall test

• Hveem test

Simulative tests

• Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA)

• Hamburg Wheel Rut Tester (HWRT)

• French Laboratory Rutting Tester

(FLRT)

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Fundamental

Uniaxial and triaxial creep and

repeated loading tests

Rutting resistance

Mainly research

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

FundamentalSimple Performance Test (SPT)

• Flow time

• Flow number

Dynamic modulus

Resilient modulus

Evaluates the modulus of the

mix under various temperatures

and traffic loads

-10, 4, 21, 37 and 54°C

25, 10, 5, 1, 0.5 and 0.1 Hz

AASHTO TP 62-07

Higher frequencies = fast

moving traffic

Lower frequencies = slow

moving or static traffic

Modulus is a function of the

stress and strain experienced

DYNAMIC MODULUS TESTING

DYNAMIC MODULUS RESULTS

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Empirical

Marshall test• Marshall stability

• Flow

Hveem test

SUPERPAVE

Selection of asphalt cement

Performance grade of asphalt cement

Selection of aggregate and gradation

design

Consensus properties

Source properties

Blend design

Mix design

Asphalt cement content

Moisture susceptibility

Performance

No strength or other performance test

SUPERPAVE

SUPERPAVE

SUPERPAVE

SUPERPAVE

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Simulative tests

Asphalt Pavement

Analyzer (APA)

• Rutting resistance• Fatigue

• Moisture susceptibility

• AASHTO TP 63-09

• Dry of wet test

• Steel wheel on pressurized

rubber hose

• Temperature controlled

chamber

• 8000 cycles

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Simulative tests

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA)

• Rutting resistance– Typical requirement – not more than 5 mm after

8000 cycles

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Simulative tests

Hamburg Wheel Rut

Tester (HWRT) Rutting resistance

Moisture susceptibility

Wet test

Steel or rubber wheels

Load 710 N

Temperature controlled chamber

(typical testing temperature 50ºC)

Average wheel speed 1.1 km/h (53

2 wheel passes per minute)

10,000; 15,000; or 20,000 passes

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Simulative tests

French Laboratory Rut

Tester (FLRT) Rutting resistance

Only dry test

- Testing required by MTQ on medium to high

volume roads

- Pneumatic tire (400 mm diameter, 80 mm wide)

- Tire pressure 600 30 kPa

- Average wheel speed 1Hz

- Load 5000 50 N

- Temperature controlled chamber (typical

testing temperature 60ºC)

- Rutting monitored at 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and

10,000 passes

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Fatigue testing

Fatigue cracking considered mainly

due to underdesigned pavement

structure

PGAC selection

Fatigue HMA mix testing

Diametral test

• Nottingham Asphalt Tester (NAT)

Flexural fatigue beam test

• Interlaken

• MTS

Fatigue testing

Four Point Flexural Bending Beam

Test

ASTM D 7460-08

Cyclical loading applied at a

constant strain (or stress) until

stiffness decreases significantly

Strain 300 to 700 µε

Temperature 21°C

Fatigue life - failure point when

stiffness decreases by 50%

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Low temperature cracking

PGAC selection

Temperature Stress Restrained Specimen

Test (TSRST)

AASHTO TP10

Samples are hold at a constant length and

cooled at a rate of -10°C/hour

As the temperature drops, samples are

maintained in its original height until failure

The force is monitored and recorded

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Moisture susceptibilityBoiling Water Test (ASTM D3625)

Static Immersion Test (AASHTO T 182)

Lottman Test (NCHRP 246)

Tancliff Test (NCHRP 274)

Modified Lottman (AASHTO T 283)

Superpave

• Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR)

min 80%

Retained stability

• Minimum 70%

ASPHALT CONCRETE LABORATORY TESTING

Frictional characteristicsField testing

• Locked wheel trailer

• Griptester

• British Pendulum Tester

Laboratory testing

• There are not good methods available

• Aggregate polishing characteristics

– Polished Stone Value in the U.K.

• Mixes not oveasphalted

• Coarse texture

• Open-graded friction mixes

SUMMARY

Existing pavement design methods are

very limited

Do not effectively deal with high traffic

volumes, new materials and complex

deterioration patterns

There are number of good HMA

characterization tests available

Extensive experience with these tests by

some agencies and companies in Canada

Use them when required

High volume roads, bus and high truck traffic

routes

New technologies and materials

THANK YOU!

[email protected]

(905) 723-2727