1
Correlation with Field Test Roads AASHTO M320 results show an increase in cracking temperature as SBS concentration increases. The ABCD test shows the expected decrease in cracking temperature and increased strength (strain jump). s re Need for Innovation The way asphalt responds to low temperatures is critical to its performance. Low temperature thermal cracking (contraction of the pavement) is a major type of asphalt pavement failure. Millions of dollars is spent annually for pavement repair. To minimize premature failure due to thermal cracking, it is essential to properly grade asphalt binders for the expected climatic environment. Project Overview EZ Asphalt Technology conducted a field validation of the Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD), refined the equipment and analysis software, and conducted a ruggedness test and interlaboratory study with 28 labs. The interlaboratory study evaluated the binder cracking temperature and strength, ease of sample preparation and test procedures, and repeatability at other laboratories. The ABCD system includes a computer to collect data and control the environmental chamber, which cools the asphalt binder samples at a controlled rate. In the ABCD test, the binder sample is placed outside of a 2-inch diameter ABCD ring which has near-zero thermal contraction. The test specimen is placed in a cooling chamber where the temperature is steadily reduced. As the temperature is lowered, the binder specimen contracts and compresses the ABCD ring. The sensors installed inside the ABCD ring measure and record temperatures and strains. When the binder specimen cracks, the strain is relieved abruptly and the temperature at that moment is the ABCD cracking temperature. Project Team EZ Asphalt Technology, LLC 28 laboratories and 11 BBR laboratories Contact Information FHWA, Highways for Life Technology Partnerships Program Julie Zirlin, 202-366-9105 www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl EZ Asphalt Technology Sangsoo Kim, 740-593-1463 www.ezasphalttechnology.com ABCD Cracking Temperature BBR Critical Temperature EXTRAPOLATED L Binder (PG 70-22 SBS) M Binder (PG 76-22 SBS) H Binder (PG xx-0) Average -25.0 o C -24.0 o C -2.1 o C min -26.3 o C -27.0 o C -4.6 o C max -23.2 o C -21.8 o C -0.6 o C Within Lab Var 0.30 0.96 0.21 Betwn Lab Var 0.62 1.78 2.29 INTERPOLATED L Binder (PG 70-22 SBS) M Binder (PG 76-22 SBS) H Binder (PG xx-0) Average -16.8 o C -15.1 o C 1.7 o C min -17.8 o C -15.8 o C -0.4 o C max -16.1 o C -14.7 2.9 o C Within Lab Var 0.06 0.06 0.45 Betwn Lab Var 0.23 0.09 1.38 Data Analysis After the test, the data are analyzed and presented as a graph of strain vs. temperature (each data point recorded at the same time) and a summary table in Excel. The summary table shows cracking temperatures, strain jumps, averages, and standard deviations. Test Roads Coefficient of Determination (R 2 ) Critical Temp vs. Cracking Index of Test R oads ABCD M320 Table 1 M320 Table 2 Elk Co, PA 0.94 0.21 0.95 Lamont 0.92 0.79 0.76 Highway 17 0.80 0.92 0.56 Operator: Enn-Young EZ2-1 EZ2-2 EZ2-3 EZ2-4 Avg Std Dev Crack Temperature (C) -36.4 -37.0 -37.2 -34.8 -36.4 1.07 ABCD Strain Jump ( ) 40.5 41.8 31.2 40.5 38.5 4.91 Test Results Cooling Rate (C/hr) -22.7 -22.7 -22.7 -23.0 -22.8 0.1 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 Microstrain Temperature, C EZ2-1 EZ2-2 EZ2-3 EZ2-4 -46 -44 -42 -40 -38 -36 ABCD Cracking Temperature, C L Binder Average = -41.5C -46 -44 -42 -40 -38 -36 ABCD Cracking Temperature, C M Binder Average = -40.4C -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Lab 1 Lab 2 Lab 3 Lab 4 Lab 5 Lab 6 Lab 7 Lab 8 Lab 9 Lab 10 Lab 11 Lab 12 Lab 13 Lab 14 Lab 15 Lab 16 Lab 17 Lab 18 Lab 19 Lab 20 Lab 21 Lab 22 Lab 23 ABCD Cracking Temperature, C H Binder Average = -12.3C Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD) ith Fi ld T Asp Highways for LIFE Technology Partnerships 2008 Award $225,061 Acceptable Range of Two Tests Acceptable Range of Two Tests Precision: Inter-Laboratory Study Results ABCD Strain Jump Single-Operator Precision 1.9 °C 1.2°C 2.7 °C 15.5 3.5°C 2.1°C 3.9°C 20.4 Multilaboratory Precision ABCD Cracking Temp BBR, Tcr (Interpolation) BBR, Tcr (Extrapolation) Note: Tcr by BBR is based on an assumption that the fracture strength of asphalt binders is a constant. Conclusion Precision of ABCD test is comparable to that of BBR test when it is considered that the variability of fracture strength of asphalt binders is included in ABCD test. An AASHTO provisional specification has been adopted as a result of this work: TP92-Determining the Cracking Temperatures of Asphalt Binder Using the Asphalt Binder Cracking Device. The final report is available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl/partnerships/asphalt.cfm

Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD) Asp · EZ Asphalt Technology, LLC 28 laboratories and 11 BBR laboratories Contact Information FHWA, Highways for Life Technology Partnerships

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD) Asp · EZ Asphalt Technology, LLC 28 laboratories and 11 BBR laboratories Contact Information FHWA, Highways for Life Technology Partnerships

Correlation with Field Test RoadsAASHTO M320 results show an increase in cracking temperature as SBS concentration increases. The ABCD test shows the expected decrease in cracking temperature and increased strength (strain jump).

sre

Need for InnovationThe way asphalt responds to low temperatures is critical to its performance. Low temperature thermal cracking

(contraction of the pavement) is a major type of asphalt pavement failure. Millions of dollars is spent annually for

pavement repair. To minimize premature failure due to thermal cracking, it is essential to properly grade asphalt

binders for the expected climatic environment.

Project OverviewEZ Asphalt Technology conducted a field validation of the Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD), refined the

equipment and analysis software, and conducted a ruggedness test and interlaboratory study with 28 labs. The

interlaboratory study evaluated the binder cracking temperature and strength, ease of sample preparation and

test procedures, and repeatability at other laboratories.

The ABCD system includes a computer to collect data and control the environmental chamber, which cools the asphalt binder samples at a controlled rate.

In the ABCD test, the binder sample is placed outside of a 2-inch diameter ABCD ring which has near-zero thermal contraction. The test specimen is placed in a cooling chamber where the temperature is steadily reduced. As the temperature is lowered, the binder specimen contracts and compresses the ABCD ring. The sensors installed inside the ABCD ring measure and record temperatures and strains. When the binder specimen cracks, the strain is relieved abruptly and the temperature at that moment is the ABCD cracking temperature.

Project TeamEZ Asphalt Technology, LLC 28 laboratories and 11 BBR laboratories

Contact InformationFHWA, Highways for LifeTechnology Partnerships ProgramJulie Zirlin, 202-366-9105www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl

EZ Asphalt TechnologySangsoo Kim, 740-593-1463www.ezasphalttechnology.com

ABCD Cracking Temperature

BBR Critical Temperature

EXTRAPOLATEDL Binder

(PG 70-22 SBS)

M Binder (PG 76-22

SBS)H Binder (PG xx-0)

Average -25.0oC -24.0oC -2.1oCmin -26.3oC -27.0oC -4.6oCmax -23.2oC -21.8oC -0.6oC

Within Lab Var 0.30 0.96 0.21Betwn Lab Var 0.62 1.78 2.29

INTERPOLATEDL Binder

(PG 70-22 SBS)

M Binder (PG 76-22

SBS)H Binder (PG xx-0)

Average -16.8oC -15.1oC 1.7oCmin -17.8oC -15.8oC -0.4oCmax -16.1oC -14.7 2.9oC

Within Lab Var 0.06 0.06 0.45Betwn Lab Var 0.23 0.09 1.38

Data AnalysisAfter the test, the data are analyzed and presented as a graph of strain vs. temperature (each data point recorded at the same time) and a summary table in Excel. The summary table shows cracking temperatures, strain jumps, averages, and standard deviations.

Test Roads

C oefficient of Determination (R2 ) C ritical Temp vs . C racking Index of Tes t R oads

ABCD M320 Table 1 M320 Table 2Elk Co, PA 0.94 0.21 0.95

Lamont 0.92 0.79 0.76Highway 17 0.80 0.92 0.56

Operator: Enn-Young EZ2-1 EZ2-2 EZ2-3 EZ2-4 Avg Std DevCrack Temperature (C) -36.4 -37.0 -37.2 -34.8 -36.4 1.07

ABCD Strain Jump ( ) 40.5 41.8 31.2 40.5 38.5 4.91Test Results Cooling Rate (C/hr) -22.7 -22.7 -22.7 -23.0 -22.8 0.1

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

Mic

rost

rain

Temperature, C

EZ2-1 EZ2-2

EZ2-3 EZ2-4

-46

-44

-42

-40

-38

-36

ABCD

Cra

ckin

g Te

mpe

ratu

re, C

L Binder

Average = -41.5C

-46

-44

-42

-40

-38

-36

ABCD

Cra

ckin

g Te

mpe

ratu

re, C

M Binder

Average = -40.4C

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

Lab

1

Lab

2

Lab

3

Lab

4

Lab

5

Lab

6

Lab

7

Lab

8

Lab

9

Lab

10

Lab

11

Lab

12

Lab

13

Lab

14

Lab

15

Lab

16

Lab

17

Lab

18

Lab

19

Lab

20

Lab

21

Lab

22

Lab

23

ABCD

Cra

ckin

g Te

mpe

ratu

re, C

H Binder

Average = -12.3C

Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD)

ith Fi ld T

AspHighways for LIFE Technology Partnerships 2008 Award $225,061

Acceptable Range of Two Tests

Acceptable Range of Two Tests

Precision: Inter-Laboratory Study Results

AB C DStrain Jump

Single-Operator Precision

1.9 °C 1.2°C 2.7 °C 15.5

3.5°C 2.1°C 3.9°C 20.4

Multilaboratory Precision

ABC DCracking Temp

BBR, Tcr(Interpolation)

BBR, Tcr(Extrapolation)

Note: Tcr by BBR is based on an assumption that the fracture strength of asphalt binders is a constant.

Conclusion

Precision of ABCD test is comparable to that of BBR test when it is considered that the

variability of fracture strength of asphalt binders is included in ABCD test.

An AASHTO provisional specification has been adopted as a result of this work:

TP92-Determining the Cracking Temperatures of Asphalt Binder Using the Asphalt

Binder Cracking Device.

The final report is available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl/partnerships/asphalt.cfm