Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Asia Central Bank Watch ― Nov ’19: Dovish Pause or Policy Wall?―
A flurry of rate cuts has been driven by global manufacturing downturn amid elevated
trade uncertainties. And the slew of easing witnessed globally has entailed both Taylor-
type responses to growth-inflation triggers as well as precautionary “insurance cuts”.
Riding on the tailcoats of a Fed’s rate cuts (cumulative 75bps rate cuts since July), Asian
central banks have been emphatically, albeit unevenly, dovish; from the RBI’s 135bp rate
cuts by the RBI to a measured 25bp fine-tuning by the BNM.
And with monetary easing mostly front-loaded most central banks are approaching policy
limits (some more than others, of course). Especially if the global economy finds a gentle
bottom amid de-escalation in US-China trade tensions.
But even if not, central banks cannot be the only game in town given wider risks
associated with; currency stability; fiscal slippage, financial stability and/or “liquidity trap”
impediments. And so, even if downside risks to growth emerge, there is a fine line between
resuming from a dovish pause and inevitably hitting a policy wall.
27 November 2019 Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
Asia & Oceania Treasury Department
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.20% 4.20%
-- - 4.35% 4.20% 4.00% 4.00% 3.80% 3.70% 3.60%
India RBI 2.0 - 6.0% 6.50% 6.25% 5.75% 5.40% 5.15% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Korea BoK 1.5 - 2.5% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Singapore MAS* 1.0 -2.0%
"Slightly" steepen
S$NEER slope (~1%
p.a)
Malaysia BNM 2.0 - 3.0% 3.25% 3.25% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Indonesia BI^ 2.5 - 4.5% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 5.25% 5.00% 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
Thailand BoT 1.0 - 4.0% 1.75% 1.75% 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Philippines BSP** 1.0 - 3.0% 4.75% 4.75% 4.50% 4.00% 4.00% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75%
Vietnam SBV 2.0 - 6.0% 6.25% 6.25% 6.25% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
Australia RBA 2.0 - 3.0% 1.50% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 0.75% 0.75% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50%
^ PBoC instituted a new rate to be the effective prime rate (that inherently sets a floor on commercial interest rates). This is seen as a complementary policy tool.
Status Quo
PBoC
Country End 2018Inflation
Target
Central
Bank
2019
1.5 - 3.5%
* The MAS conducts monetary policy via FX. Specifically it adopts a trade-weighted SGD appreciation at "modest and gradual" (estimated to be 2% per annum)
BI shifted to the 7 Day repurchase rate as the benchmark rate in August 2016. This by default constituted 125 bps reduction from the last policy rate
** BSP instituted an interest rate corridor policy in June 2016. The new effective policy rate is the overnight reverse repurchase rate.
2020
Status Quo Status Quo
Slightly reduce S$NEER
slope (~0.5% pa)
China
Vishnu Varathan
Head, Economics & Strategy
Zhu Huani
Market Economist
2
Executive Summary
G3: A Dovish Pause, in line with expectations of bottoming global demand
appears to be shaping up. But downside risks and dovish reflexes may dominate.
EM Asia: Rash of rate cuts emboldened by “insurance” bias leaves more
constrained and uneven scope to ease; as financial stability priorities emerge.
PBoC: Chronic slowdown squares with an easing bias; effected through drip-
feed of calibrated rate cuts and liquidity management; not CNY devaluation.
RBI: Aggressive rate cuts (of 135bp) appear a tad stretched amid inflation
rebound. But credit logjam and confidence deficit may prompt a measured cut.
MAS: Calibrated reduction of S$NEER slope in the context of an assumed soft
landing in 2020 set the stage for a wait and watch stance into 2020.
BNM: One more 25bps rate cut may still be on the table for 2020; even as BNM
has prioritized financial stability (to hold in Oct-2019).
BI: Two more rate cuts in 2020, contingent on a fairly accommodative Fed setting
and benign inflation; though fiscal slippage and IDR stability are limiting factors.
BoT: Chronic inflation undershoot and stubborn THB strength accommodate
another 25bp cut in for 2020; complemented with THB tempering macro-measures.
BSP: With inflation looking adequately subdued and the BSP with sufficient
levers to tweak liquidity, measured rate cuts into 2020 are on course.
SBV: Set to continue prioritizing VND stability; supplemented by liquidity
easing to buffer against growth risks; especially as inflation creeps higher.
RBA: A brief pause with one more rate cut in early-2020 to safe-guard against
negative jobs-consumption knock-on; risks; as inflation remain benign.
BoK: Persistent external headwinds, and stretched fiscal offset means that the
BoK could easily justify at least one more rate cut; and sooner rather than later.
Country
Next
meeting
Current
rate Last change Quantum
6M
cumulative
change
1Y
cumulative
Change
Real rate
(3mma)
Latest
inflation
(3mma)
Inflation
target^
Australia 03 Dec 0.75% 10/2019 -25 bps -75 bps -75 bps -1.0% 1.7% 2-3%
China N/A 4.35% 10/2015 -25 bps 0 bps 0 bps 1.2% 3.2% 1.5-3.5%
India 05 Dec 5.15% 10/2019 -25 bps -85 bps -135 bps 1.2% 4.0% 2-6%
Indonesia 19 Dec 5.00% 10/2019 -25 bps -100 bps -75 bps 1.7% 3.3% 2.5-4.5%
Korea 29 Nov 1.25% 10/2019 -25 bps -50 bps -25 bps 1.4% -0.2% 1.5-2.5%
Malaysia 22 Jan 3.00% 05/2019 -25 bps -25 bps -25 bps 1.8% 1.2% 2-3%
Philippines 12 Dec 4.00% 09/2019 -25 bps -75 bps -50 bps 2.9% 1.1% 2-4%
Thailand 18 Dec 1.25% 11/2019 -25 bps -50 bps -25 bps 0.9% 0.3% 1-4%
Vietnam N/A 6.00% 09/2019 -25 bps -25 bps -25 bps 3.8% 2.2% 2-6%
Singapore* Apr N/A 04/2019
Reduce
slope
"slightly" N/A N/A 1.1% 0.5% 1-2%
^ Where ranges are not explicit, we have assumed +/- 1% from inflation targets
3
G3 Central Bank Overview:
Federal Reserve (US)
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Cumulative move since
2015* Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
1
Jerome Powell 1.625% (Fed
Fund Rate) +150 bps
- 25 bps -25 bps 12 Dec Dual
mandate
12 members Oct 2019 Q1 2020 6 Weekly Voting
QE
Status Pace of Expansion^ B/S (% of GDP)
Mildly Expansionary
B/S expansion is now resumed. But the Fed has stressed that this is not a U-turn to resume QE, framing it as a response to tackle liquidity squeeze (focused on shorter-dated T-bills). Earlier, B/S reduction, which was initiated Q4 2017 had only gradually reduced Fed’s asset by US$700bn to US$3.8trln.
18.7%
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
^Fed started QE “taper” in Dec 2013, rate normalization in Dec 2015 and initiated B/S reduction in Oct 2017.
European Central Bank (Eurozone)
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Cumulative move since
2015* Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
Christine Lagarde
-0.50%/0% (Depo/Refina
ncing)
-30 bps / -5 bps
-10 bps / -5 bps
+10 bps 12 Dec Inflation
Targeting
6 members Sept 2019 Q4 2021 6 Weekly Voting
QE
Status Pace of Expansion B/S (% of GDP)
Expansionary TLTRO III (2Y tenure) commenced Sep 2019; and APP (QE) has been restarted at a pace of EUR20bn/mth.
39.6%
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
Bank of Japan (Japan)
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Cumulative move since
2015* Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
Haruhiko Kuroda
- 0.10% (Policy-Rate
Balance) -20 bps
-20 bps Reduce QQE 19 Dec Inflation
Targeting
9 members Jan 2016 Q2 2021 6 Weekly Voting
QE Status Pace of Expansion* B/S (% of GDP)
Expansionary JPY 80tn/year of JGBs to be purchased 104.2%
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
*Policy commitment though actual amount may vary month to month
The Fed appears to be done with (cumulative 75bps) insurance cuts alluding to the economy “in a
good place”. Markets concur with no more cuts for 2019. But fluid bets on 25-50bps of additional
cuts in 2020 reveals Fed calculus premised on US-China trade negotiation outcomes; which are
consistent with pain relief, but far from a panacea. So, prospects of further Fed cuts remain on
the table. In addition, B/S expansion has been resumed in response to sharp liquidity squeeze.
Draghi’s parting hat trick of easing, of; i) another 10bp rate cut and; ii) resumption of APP (QE)
adding to; iii) 2-yr TLTRO (III) is arguably front-loaded suite of insurance. But Lagarde takes over
an ECB Council more resistant to further easing and unilateral dovish signals. So the bar is higher
for further ECB easing. In contrast, the BoJ remains unequivocally dovish despite confusion over
inclination to steepen the yield curve; especially post VAT hike and in anticipation of 2020 Olympics
construction fade. Inconvenient “safe haven” JPY strength may also be something to lean against.
1 Inflation targeting refers to central bank that uses an explicit inflation as target. Dual mandate refers to central bank with
objectives to control inflation and promote growth. Discretionary refers to central bank with no explicit target.
4
Australia
Central Bank Governor/
Board Current
Rate Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
Reserve Bank of Australia
(RBA)
Philip Lowe 0.75% (O/N Cash)
-25 bps -25 bps 3 Dec Inflation
Targeting
9 members Oct 2019 Q2 2020 Monthly Voting
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17
(Avg) 2018
1H 2019
Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 1.6% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8%
GDP 2.6% 2.7% 1.5% 1.3% 1.9% 1.8% 2.4% 2.5% 2.2%
Policy Rate *
1.50% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 0.75% 0.75% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Inflation may remain subdued (sub-2%) as sequential pick-up is narrow and crucially, demand-pull
pressures are conspicuously absent; reinforced by excess capacity. Also, nascent bottoming in
housing after a sharp correction and weak wage gains conspire to anchor, if not stifle inflationary
expectations – especially if consumers lose confidence. Upshot: Inflation re-emergence is not the
RBA’s key worry.
Growth
Growth soft patch though is a considerable worry for the RBA as near-3% growth rates dwindle to
sub-2%. Crucially, negative output gap derived from consumer confidence deficit and softening jobs
exacerbated by elevated household leverage is a prime concern. Confidence shortfall also impedes
business spending, and this appears to be driving the RBA’s precautionary easing stance.
FX
Sustained and significant AUD weakness (down ~13% since 2018) is expressly welcome by the
RBA and credited with helping with a (long overdue) rebalancing - away from the mining sector. And
insofar as the RBA attributes easier monetary conditions to a softer AUD, unexpected AUD will be
associated with compensatory policy easing, which in turn reins in AUD.
Policy
Admittedly, we had earlier underestimated the RBA’s propensity to ease; not fully anticipating sub-
1.00% policy rates. But three rate cuts (of 25bps to a record low of 0.75%) later, even the RBA is
beginning to question the cost-benefit sensibilities of more aggressively easing. To be sure,
another 25bps early next year may be on the table of external headwinds continue to seep in;
especially if jobs weaken alongside stubbornly weak wage gains. That said, prolonged pause ~ 0.50%
emerges as liquidity trap impediments arise. RBA has tempered bets on QE qualifying it is back-
up, not pipeline; even as it concedes viability if rate cut transmissions falter or back-fire.
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Australia (%)
CPI Core CPIPolicy Rate Lower BoundUpper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
5
China
Central Bank Governor/
Board Current Rate Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
The People's Bank of China
(PBoC)
Yi Gang 4.35% (1-Y Lending)
-25 bps -15bp - Dual
Mandate
13 members Oct 2015 Q3 2020 - Consensus
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17
(Avg) 2018 1H 2019 Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 1.7% 2.1% 2.2% 2.9% 3.3% 3.6% 3.2% 2.9% 2.6%
GDP 6.8% 6.6% 6.3% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 5.9% 6.0% 5.9%
Policy Rate*
4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.35% 4.20% 4.20%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
“Pork-flation” cost-push, while severe, is too narrow to spark policy concerns about much broad-
based price pressures. Crucially, underlying demand pull deficiency is diametrically opposed to
bona fide inflation risks. Especially as falling industrial profits and PPI dampen wage-price
dynamics. So, even if CPI exceeds 4%, this will be transitory; not requiring a tightening response.
Meanwhile, pork-flation is best tackled by supply-side policies such as upping pork and feed imports.
Growth
Especially given brutal mix of structural and cyclical pressures on growth requires appropriate
policy support, not tightening. And concerted fiscal boost may arguably work better with easier
monetary policy. In any case, even with supportive monetary and fiscal policies, growth is set to
decline below 6% in 2020 amid soft industrial and investment impetus. Question is, how quickly.
FX
A softer CNY NEER down ~1.8% YTD is reflective of some adjustments to absorb trade and growth
headwinds but far from competitive devaluation to restore exports and/or growth. The wider point is
that PBoC is inclined to lean against excessive CNY weakness in favour of stability.
Policy
Recent repo cut of 5bps is consistent with the PBoC’s active but measured “drip feed” liquidity
management - with a suite of tools aimed at adequate, yet calibrated liquidity infusion. Fact is a
confluence of post-Lehman credit/financial risks and lingering froth in the property market demands
nuanced monetary policy support, which is in line with more productive use of capital amid SME
reforms. We see a pipeline of easing via; i) 50-100bps of RRR cuts to provide SME finance; ii) 5-
10bps increments of rate cuts and; iii) pre-emptive measures to aid credit “rollover” (so as to
avoid destabilizing credit deterioration dynamics or impede local government financing/projects).
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
China (%)
CPI, 3mma Core CPI, 3mma Policy RateLower Bound Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
6
India
Central Bank
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Last Move Next Move Next
Meeting Target/
Decision
Reserve Bank of India
(RBI)
Shaktikanta Das 5.15% (Repo)
-25 bps - 15 bps 5 Dec Inflation
Targeting
6 members Oct 2019 Q1 2020 2 monthly Consensus
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17
(Avg) 2018 1H 2019 Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 4.4% 4.0% 2.8% 3.5% 4.4% 4.6% 4.6% 4.5% 3.9%
GDP 7.7% 7.4% 5.4% 5.0% 5.6% 5.8% 6.7% 7.0% 6.5%
Policy * 6.00% 6.50% 5.75% 6.40% 5.15% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
While at 4.6% headline inflation remains well within the RBI’s 4+/-2% range, it has picked up more briskly than expected from ~2% lows early-2019; arguably a source of worry even this is mostly food-driven. To be sure, the worry is not so much about demand-pull inflation, but more about inflation despite the lack of demand/confidence. Upshot: Inflation is set to peak soon, well below 6% cap, with core better contained. But worries of stagflation-type dynamics have grown.
Growth
Risks of a prolonged soft spot grow given credit choke (banks’ NPLs and NBFC liquidity crunch)
compound confidence deficit and dent domestic demand. Arguably, corporate tax cuts* are welcome;
but a conspicuous tax revenue gap raises fiscal slippage worries while a coincident credit crunch
may amplify “crowding out” risks, while simultaneously dampen fiscal multipliers. Resultant
headwinds challenge impeded growth recovery (to 7-8%).
FX
Post-elections rupee boost has more than faded as the slew of rate cuts (135bps YTD) clashing with
emphatic inflation bounce erodes INR allure; as real rates decline. The consolation is that subdued
oil alleviates INR pressures. But monetary dilemma and fiscal slippage point to rupee underperformer.
Policy
The RBI’s policy tensions must not be understated. While persistent growth impediments validate the
135bps of easing this year, recent inflation resurgence, emphatic fiscal stimulus that has raised fiscal
slippage risks and rupee wobbles have inadvertently raised the bar for, and costs associated with,
additional easing. This is precisely why we had preferred a 40bps rate cut at the last meeting to lower
the policy rate to 5.00% rather than the measured 25bps cut to 5.15%; but rendering room for further
cuts precarious. Regardless, we see scope for another 15-40bp of rate cuts to as low as 4.75%;
especially if underlying inflation is contained.
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
India (%)CPI, 3mma
Core CPI, 3mma
Policy Rate
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
*Please refer to Mizuho Flash – India: Corporate Tax Rate Cut Dazzles; But is No Panacea, 20 Sep 2019
7
Indonesia
Central Bank
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Last Move Next Move Next
Meeting Target/
Decision
Bank Indonesia
(BI)
Perry Warjiyo 5.00% (7-D Reverse
Repo)
-25 bps -25 bps 24 Jan Inflation targeting
6 members^ Oct 2019 Q1 2020 Monthly Consensus*
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
*Assumed consensus in the absence of minutes or vote count split.
^This number reflects the number of Board of Governors.
2015-2017
(avg) 2018
1H 2019
Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 4.6% 3.2% 2.9% 3.4% 3.3% 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 3.1%
GDP 5.0% 5.2% 5.1% 5.0% 5.0% 5.1% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3%
Policy Rate*
4.25% 6.00% 6.00% 5.25% 5.00% 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Inflation remains well-contained at around 3% given stable underlying pricing pressure across most
categories of goods. Continuous fall in inflation expectations together with steady core inflation
suggest that inflation is likely to remain benign in near future. As BI further trims inflation target to
3% for 2020, BI is expected to coordinate with the government to preserve price stability.
Growth
Household consumption continues to be the main driver of growth whilst tighter credit condition has
weighed on purchases of durable goods. Capex will probably stay under pressure amidst tepid
commodities prices given limited prospect of a quick turnaround in external demand. Evidence
of benefits from trade diversion is limited given stagnating FDI inflows. With PMI recently plunging to a
four-year low on top of moderating new orders, headwinds on growth is likely to sustain.
FX
IDR lost ground lately as market sentiment swung on conflicting US-China trade talk signals. Going
forward, IDR is expected to stay under pressure given that fiscal deficit will be much wider than
initially expected, from 1.84% of GDP to as high as 2.2%, for 2019. Consolidation plan for 2020 is
also under threat as the government intends to keep deficit flexible in order to support growth.
Policy
BI has kept policy rates unchanged while cutting RRR ratio for the second time this year by 50bps.
The bias on easing is clear and therefore we do not think that BI is done with rate cut in the
current easing cycle. Government revenue shortfall means that despite widening fiscal deficit, this
does not necessarily represent a significant expansionary fiscal stance. Furthermore loan growth
remains lackluster and this might trigger another 25-50bps rate cut next year.
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Indonesia (%)
CPI, 3mma Core CPI, 3mma Policy RateOld policy rate Lower Bound Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
8
Korea
Central Bank
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Last Move Next Move Next
Meeting Target/
Decision
Bank of Korea (BoK)
Lee Ju-Yeol 1.25% (7-D Repo)
-25 bps -25 bps 29 Nov Inflation targeting
7 members Oct 2019 Q1 2020 6 Weekly Voting
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17
(Avg) 2018
1H 2019
Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 1.2% 1.5% 0.6% 0.0% -0.1% 0.9% 0.9% 1.3% 1.6%
GDP 3.0% 2.7% 1.9% 2.0% 1.6% 2.3% 1.9% 2.2% 2.5%
Policy Rate*
1.50% 1.75% 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Headline inflation briefly slipped to negative territory led by declines in food and transport prices on
top of consistent fall in core inflation, to just 0.5%. Furthermore, continuous fall in services
inflation show that underlying inflationary pressure is largely absent. Going forward, headline
inflation is likely to escape the negative zone as high-base effect fades. Nonetheless, with prices at
producer level turning negative, inflation is expected to hover at around 1%.
Growth
Growth remains under pressure given softening domestic demand and challenging external
environment. Though employment growth showed early signs of improvement lately, its durability and
strength may be called into question in the absence of any significant turnaround in growth
momentum. On the other hand, there are tentative green shoots as semiconductor sector is
bottoming out with demand picking up evidenced by rebound in chips shipments and billings.
FX
KRW has been one of the hardest hit AxJ currencies amidst the turn of trade sentiment from optimism
to pessimism. Though there have been nascent signs of easing manufacturing slump, this may not be
followed by a quick turnaround either. As such, BoK might still cut rates further if the green shoots
turns out to be false dawn and this might weigh on the currency.
Policy
BoK is probably done with rate cut this year after slashing it to 1.25%, matching the previous record
low. Given increasing number of dissenters in its latest rate cut decision, the central bank is expected
to stay put in near term in order to assess impact of the latest easing as well any sign of improvement
in growth prospect. Further rate cut cannot be ruled out either if chip demand fails pick up as
expected on top of tepid inflationary pressure and limited impact from expansionary fiscal policies.
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Korea (%) CPI, 3mmaCore CPI, 3mmaPolicy RateLower BoundUpper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
9
Malaysia
Central Bank Governor/
Board Current
Rate Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)
Nor Shamsiah Mohd Yunus
3.00% (O/N
Policy)
-25 bps +25bps 22 Jan Implicit inflation
targeting
6 members May 2019 Q2 2021 6 weekly Consensus*
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
*Assumed consensus in the absence of minutes or vote count split
2015-17 (Avg)
2018 1H
2019 Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 2.7% 1.0% 0.2% 1.3% 1.5% 2.3% 1.8% 1.7% 1.8%
GDP 5.1% 4.7% 4.7% 4.4% 4.0% 4.1% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0%
Policy Rate*
3.00% 3.25% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Headline inflation stabilizes at around low-1% as impact from removal of GST fades. Pricing pressure
remains well-contained and stable services inflation suggests that sharp plunge is unlikely despite
mild demand-pull pressure. As the government removes retail fuel price ceiling from Jan 2020,
headline inflation may be subject to some upside risks if crude oil sustains at an elevated level.
Growth
Growth momentum continues to soften as investment has pulled back given lackluster external
environment. On the other hand, private consumption remained fairly resilient given stabilizing
employment growth supported by services sector. Going forward, measures from Budget 2020
are likely to backstop growth though room for further stimulus may be limited given a narrower deficit
target. Resilience of domestic demand and any recovery in semiconductor sector will be watched.
FX
MYR was not spared in the latest crossfire of US-China trade war. A steady increase of crude oil
prices from sub-$60 towards $60 (Brent) also helped to lend some support to the currency. Portfolio
inflows may stay cautious going forward as markets await more measures from the central
bank to keep Malaysian bonds in the FTSE index.
Policy
BNM has refrained from further easing after a pre-emptive rate cut back in May as growth moderation
has been largely in line with expectation. Going forward, though growth is still subject to downside
risks, we think BNM may pause in the current easing cycle amidst tentative signs of
improvement in semiconductor sector. Increasing volatility and upside risks in headline inflation
following the removal of retail fuel ceiling may also limit the extent of further easing.
-1.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Malaysia (%)
CPI, 3mma Core CPI, 3mma Policy Rate
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
10
Philippines
Central Bank Governor/
Board Current
Rate Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
(BSP)
Benjamin Diokno
4.00% (O/N Reverse Repo)
-25 bps -25 bps 27 Feb Inflation
Targeting
7 members Sept 2019 Q1 2020 6 weekly Consensus*
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
^While not an explicit cut, the change of policy rate constitutes a reduction in policy rate alongside lower corridor.
2015-17 (Avg)
2018 1H
2019 Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 1.6% 5.2% 3.4% 1.7% 1.9% 3.0% 3.4% 4.1% 3.8%
GDP 6.5% 6.3% 5.6% 6.2% 6.4% 6.6% 6.6% 6.3% 6.3%
Policy Rate*
3.00% 4.75% 4.50% 4.00% 4.00% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75% 3.75%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Headline inflation slipped to sub-1% as food prices fell on a YoY basis, mainly due to plunge in rice
prices (-10% YoY) amidst surging imports. Core inflation also slid, though by a less extent, as non-
food prices continued to edge up. Given that median inflation remains higher than the average
for the past three years, the upside risks for inflation next year have increased, especially if
growth momentum picks up further.
Growth
Growth has picked up led by construction investment as the government ramped up capital outlays.
Growth of household consumption also accelerated driven by consumer discretionary goods amidst
rebounding consumer confidence. Going forward, given that more new projects in the flagship
infrastructure project list are set to start in 6-8 months, these are likely to lift growth.
FX
PHP softened after gaining as much as 4% YTD alongside most other AxJ currencies. Given that
government intends to ramp up capital outlay amidst another year of 2019 budget validity on
top of a 12% in budgeted expenditure, fiscal and trade deficits are likely to widen again. As
such downside pressure on PHP is set to intensify.
Policy
We think that BSP is unlikely to cut its policy rate much further given that growth momentum is likely
to pick up on investment and government spending. As growth gains traction, this also flags upside
inflation risks given anticipated pickup in food inflation while proposed increase in excise taxes on
liquor and cigarette may also exert some upside pressure at the margin. As such, we expect BSP to
cut policy rate by just another 25bps in a bid to spur credit growth alongside further reduction in RRR.
-1.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
7.0
9.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Philippines (%)
CPI, 3mma Core CPI, 3mma Policy Rate
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
Interest rate corridorframework was introduced
11
Thailand
Central Bank
Governor/ Board
Current Rate
Last Move Next Move Next
Meeting Target/
Decision
Bank of Thailand
(BoT)
Veerathai Santiprabhob 1.25% (1-D
Repurchase)
-25 bps -25 bps 5 Feb Inflation
Targeting
7 members Nov 2019 Q1 2020 6 weekly Voting
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17 (Avg)
2018 1H
2019 Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 0.0% 1.1% 0.9% 0.6% 1.0% 1.1% 0.9% 1.4% 1.1%
GDP 3.5% 4.1% 2.6% 2.4% 2.0% 2.4% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9%
Policy Rate*
1.50% 1.75% 1.75% 1.25% 1.25% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Headline inflation has been predominately driven by higher food prices as a result of drought and
floods while falling fuel and energy cost pushed it down towards 0%. Inflationary pressure from non-
food segment remains largely dormant. With core inflation falling consistently towards 0% as well,
inflation will probably stuck at around 1% with food price is being the main contributor.
Growth
Growth continues to stay under pressure hit by a combination of moderating domestic demand and
persistent external headwinds. As the government rolls out more stimulus packages to spur
household consumption, marginal impact may be diminishing as consumer sentiment remains
downbeat given broad-based slowdown in employment growth. Manufacturing activities are
equally lackluster evidenced by plunging raw materials and intermediate goods imports as exporters
being pressured by the Baht’s strength. As a result, growth is likely to cap at 3% in 2020.
FX
THB sustained at a multi-year high as swings in sentiment on trade talks boosted the demand for
safe-havens. As domestic demand weakened across the board, sharper plunge in imports have
pushed up trade surplus, which re-enforces THB’s safe-haven status given its sizeable C/A surplus.
Policy
BoT is expected to revise down its growth forecast in its Dec meeting as the target of 2.8% for 2019 is
clearly unattainable. Growth for 2020 is likely to be lowered too as fiscal stimulus may fail to ignite
domestic demand as much as anticipated as slowing employment raises alarm bells about future
income prospects. Further delay in approval of the budget for 2020 fiscal year may increase
risks of delay in public investment. As such, we are not ruling out the potentiality of another
25bps rate cut, especially given the strength of the Baht.
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Thailand (%)
CPI, 3mma Core CPI, 3mmaPolicy Rate Lower BoundUpper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
12
Vietnam
Central Bank Governor/
Board Current Rate Last Move Next Move
Next Meeting
Target/ Decision
State Bank of Vietnam (SBV)
Le Minh Hung 6.00% (Refinancing)
-25 bps +25 bps - Dual
Mandate
6 members^ Sept 2019 Q3 2021 - Consensus
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
^This number reflects the number of Board of Governors.
2015-17
(Avg) 2018
1H 2019
Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation 2.6% 3.5% 2.6% 2.2% 2.8% 3.5% 3.3% 3.6% 2.9%
GDP 6.5% 7.1% 6.8% 7.3% 6.6% 6.9% 7.4% 6.8% 7.6%
Policy Rate*
6.25% 6.25% 6.25% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Admittedly, inflation has bottomed and is on the rise; but the wider inflation picture points to a
contained normalisation; with only fleeting forays above towards 5%. Fact is, non-food inflation
remains moderate, if not benign; and does not reflect imminent demand-pull risks. That said, at
incremental cost-push risks are on the rise as production to substitute for China stretches pockets
of capacity. This may not be an imminent policy worry, but does warn of emerging policy
dilemma risks.
Growth
Vietnam’s exports sector, a clear and outstanding beneficiary of US-China trade diversion, helps
buoy growth for the time being. But the growth picture is not devoid of risks. One of which is the
unevenness of growth as domestic industries underperform. And the other derives from uncertainty
about whether US might widen “America First” trade policies to Vietnam’s detriment. And so, a
relatively upbeat growth outlook of 6-7% is tempered by potential downside risks.
FX
Our sense is that a stable VND policy, essentially a lower beta version of CNY, will be pursued;
albeit with greater efforts to show the US that it does not engage in mercantilist FX policies (having
been added to the “Monitoring List” of the US Treasury in May this year).
Policy
A stable VND policy (with measured FX reserve accumulation) amid inflation pick up naturally
constrains room for the SBV to resort to headline policy easing. Instead, not unlike the PBoC, we
expect active liquidity management to help relieve stress in parts of the non-MNC industrial
economy. The sable currency policy will continue to be a critical policy complement for wider stability.
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Vietnam (%)CPI, 3mma
Core CPI, 3mma
Policy Rate
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
13
Singapore
Central Bank
Governor/ Board
Current Policy
Last Move Next Move Next
Meeting Target/
Decision
Monetary Authority of Singapore
(MAS)
Ravi Menon
“Slight” S$NEER
appreciation (~0.5% p.a)
“Slightly” reduced
slope
“Slightly” steepen
slope Apr 2020
Dual Mandate
Oct 2019 Oct 2021 Bi-annual Consensus
Policy Bias
Dovish Dovish-neutral Neutral Hawkish-neutral Hawkish
2015-17
(Avg) 2018
1H 2019
Q3 19
Ou
tlo
ok
Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20
Inflation -0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 1.3% 1.6%
GDP 3.2% 3.2% 0.7% 0.5% 1.1% 0.8% 1.5% 1.6% 2.0%
Policy Rate*
N.A. Slightly steepen
Status Quo
Slightly reduce
Status Quo
Status Quo Status Quo
*End of period | Forecast values in Italic
Inflation
Even as inflation normalisation is retarded by the phased reduction in electricity costs from energy
market deregulation that is not the decisive cause of a shift in the inflation outlook. Instead, risks of
weak manufacturing spillover more widely to dampen wage gains are key restraints on inflation
expectations; especially amid a negative (albeit gradually recovering) output gap. Upshot being,
inflation is not in any real danger of materially surging past 2-2.5% in the next 12 months.
Growth
With Q3 growth now revised up to 0.5% (from 0.1%), MAS lifting 2019 growth outlook to 0.5-1.0%
(top half of the earlier 0-1% range) is more arithmetic than optimism. And 2020 forecast of 0.5-2.5%
is consistent with a gentle turnaround that the MAS has flagged, and merely narrows the negative
output gap. Whereas downside risks still linger, possibly dominate. Thus a fragile and uneven
recovery scenario would thus require policy accommodation to be maintained.
FX
Despite a “slightly” reduced S$NEER (annual appreciation bias of ~0.5%), rich S$NEER valuations
offset easing. But on the other hand, a rich S$NEER constrains SGD out-performance of other trade
basket currencies. Meanwhile, bouts of trade risks may knock SGD back (in sympathy with CNY).
Policy
MAS not fully revoking S$NEER slope in Oct reveals a fairly stoic view. So the current policy stance is
more likely to be maintained if indeed the negative output gap narrows in 2020 (as the MAS expects).
Point being, the MAS does not deem a higher level of “insurance” necessary, and so there is a
higher bar (e.g. adverse trade shocks) before the MAS doubles down. But on the other hand, a
rich S$NEER allows the MAS more time before considering normalizing in a recovery; squares
with a 2020 pause with initial bias to ease amid downside growth risks and soft inflation.
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Singapore (%)CPI, 3mma
Core CPI, 3mma
Source: Bloomberg, Mizuho Bank
14
EM Asia FX Dynamics
EM Asia/G3 FX Outlook
FX Forecasts Dec 19 Mar 20 Jun 20 Sep 20 Dec 20 Mar 21
USD/JPY104 - 110
(106)
101 - 108
(104)
100 - 107
(103)98 - 106 (102) 98 - 106 (100) 98 - 108 (100)
EUR/USD1.08 - 1.13
(1.11)
1.10 - 1.15
(1.13)
1.10 - 1.16
(1.14)
1.11 - 1.17
(1.15)
1.12 - 1.18
(1.16)
1.11 - 1.18
(1.16)
USD/CNY6.92 - 7.22
(7.05)
6.95 - 7.27
(7.12)
6.90 - 7.14
(7.02)
6.75 - 7.03
(6.94)
6.72 - 7.04
(6.92)
6.53-6.83
(6.64)
USD/INR69.0 - 74.6
(71.2)
69.6 - 75.3
(72.4)
68.4 - 72.5
(70.3)
66.3 - 71.2
(69.4)
65.4 - 70.9
(68.5)
65.5-70.5
(68.0)
USD/KRW1160 - 1240
(1190)
1180 - 1270
(1220)
1150 - 1220
(1180)
1110 - 1190
(1160)
1080 - 1170
(1130)
1070 - 1140
(1110)
USD/SGD1.32 - 1.40
(1.36)
1.33 - 1.42
(1.38)
1.34 - 1.40
(1.37)
1.30 - 1.37
(1.35)
1.29 - 1.38
(1.35)
1.31-1.37
(1.34)
USD/IDR13600 - 14900
(14100)
13600 - 14300
(14300)
13600 - 14100
(14050)
13200 - 14000
(13950)
13300 - 14100
(14050)
13200 - 13900
(13850)
USD/MYR4.06 - 4.36
(4.18)
4.08 - 4.38
(4.23)
4.06 - 4.28
(4.16)
3.92 - 4.18
(4.08)
3.87 - 4.17
(4.04)
3.62 - 3.85
(3.76)
USD/PHP49.9 - 54.0
(51.5)
50.9 - 55.2
(53.0)
50.1 - 53.2
(51.5)
48.0 - 51.7
(50.3)
47.2 - 51.3
(49.5)
46.8 - 50.2
(48.8)
USD/THB29.7 - 31.2
(30.3)
30.4 - 32.0
(31.2)
29.9 - 31.0
(30.4)
29.0 - 30.3
(29.8)
29.4 - 31.0
(30.3)
29.3 - 30.6
(30.1)
USD/VND22700 - 23800
(23200)
22700 - 23900
(23350)
22700 - 23600
(23180)
22200 - 23300
(22980)
22100 - 23300
(22880)
22500 - 23500
(23160)
AUD/USD0.667 - 0.730
(0.685)
0.648 - 0.708
(0.670)
0.689 - 0.736
(0.705)
0.689 - 0.741
(0.715)
0.702 - 0.765
(0.730)
0.754 - 0.810
(0.780)
15
Appendix
Inflation – Growth Snapshot
Exchange Rate – Equities Snapshot
Growth Outlook
Inflation Outlook
Country
Next
meeting
Current
rate
Latest
inflation
(3mma)
Inflation
target^
CPI 12m
trend
3Y rolling
avg
Latest core
inflation
(3mma)
Latest GDP
growth
3Y rolling
avg
Australia 03 Dec 0.75% 1.7% 2-3% 1.8% 1.6% 1.2% 2.4%
China N/A 4.35% 3.2% 1.5-3.5% 2.0% -0.3% 6.0% 6.6%
India 05 Dec 5.15% 4.0% 2-6% 3.5% 3.2% 5.0% 7.0%
Indonesia 19 Dec 5.00% 3.3% 2.5-4.5% 3.4% 3.3% 5.0% 5.1%
Korea 29 Nov 1.25% -0.2% 1.5-2.5% 1.3% 0.6% 2.0% 2.6%
Malaysia 22 Jan 3.00% 1.2% 2-3% 1.9% 1.6% 4.4% 5.0%
Philippines 12 Dec 4.00% 1.1% 2-4% 3.5% 2.7% 6.2% 6.3%
Thailand 18 Dec 1.25% 0.3% 1-4% 0.8% 0.5% 2.4% 3.6%
Vietnam N/A 6.00% 2.2% 2-6% 3.3% 2.0% 7.3% 6.9%
Singapore* Apr N/A 0.5% 1-2% 0.5% 0.7% 0.5% 2.8%
^ Where ranges are not explicit, we have assumed +/- 1% from inflation targets
Country
Next
meeting
Current
rate Currency
FX 1m
change
FX YTD
change
NEER YTD
change Stock Exchange
1m
change
YTD
change
Australia 03 Dec 0.75% AUD -0.7% -3.7% -4.2% ASX 1.4% 21.0%
China N/A 4.35% CNY 0.6% -2.1% -2.2% Shanghai SE -1.8% 16.4%
India 05 Dec 5.15% INR -0.8% -2.4% 1.0% Sensex 4.0% 13.2%
Indonesia 19 Dec 5.00% IDR -0.5% 2.1% 3.4% JCI -3.5% -2.6%
Korea 29 Nov 1.25% KRW -0.4% -5.1% -4.1% Kospi 2.0% 4.3%
Malaysia 22 Jan 3.00% MYR 0.0% -1.2% 0.3% KLCI 1.0% -6.2%
Philippines 12 Dec 4.00% PHP 0.4% 3.3% 3.1% PSE -1.9% 4.1%
Thailand 18 Dec 1.25% THB -0.1% 7.7% 8.7% SET 1.0% 2.9%
Vietnam N/A 6.00% VND 0.0% -0.1% Ho Chi Minh SE -2.0% 9.4%
Singapore* Apr N/A SGP -0.2% -0.2% 0.8% STI 0.9% 4.8%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
China 6.4 6.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.2 6.0 5.8
India 5.8 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.8 6.7 7.0 6.5 5.4 6.5 7.2
Korea 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.6 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.5 1.8 2.2 2.7
Singapore 1.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.8 1.5 1.6 2.0 0.7 1.5 2.4
Malaysia 4.5 4.9 4.4 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.5 5.0 4.4 4.4 4.7
Indonesia 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.3
Thailand 2.8 2.3 2.4 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.7 3.3
Philippines 5.6 5.5 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.3 5.9 6.5 6.7
Vietnam 6.8 6.7 7.3 6.6 6.9 7.4 6.8 7.6 6.9 7.2 7.3
Australia 1.8 1.2 1.3 1.9 1.8 2.4 2.5 2.2 1.5 2.2 2.5
2020
2020 20212019Country
2019
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
China 1.8 2.6 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.7 3.1 2.6
India 2.5 3.1 3.5 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.5 3.9 3.0 4.4 3.7
Korea 0.5 0.7 0.0 -0.1 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.6 0.3 1.2 1.4
Singapore 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.6 0.6 1.1 1.9
Malaysia -0.3 0.6 1.3 1.5 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.8 0.8 2.0 2.3
Indonesia 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.5
Thailand 0.7 1.1 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.4
Philippines 3.8 3.0 1.7 1.9 3.0 3.4 4.1 3.8 2.7 3.6 3.5
Vietnam 2.6 2.7 2.2 2.8 3.5 3.3 3.6 2.9 2.6 3.3 3.6
Australia 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.2
20212019
2019Country2020
2020
16
Important Information
This publication has been prepared by Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (“Mizuho”) and represents the views of the author. It has not been prepared by an independent research department and it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements in any country or jurisdiction designed
to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. MHBK provides this information for free. Please request for cancellation of subscription if you do not want to receive
free-of-charge information from MHBK.
Disclaimer Unless otherwise stated, all views or opinions herein are solely those of the author(s) as of the date of this publication and are not to be relied upon as authoritative or taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by any recipient, and are subject to change without notice.
This publication has been prepared by Mizuho solely from publicly available information. Information contained herein and the data
underlying it have been obtained from, or based upon, sources believed by us to be reliable, but no assurance can be given that the information, data or any computations based thereon are accurate or complete. This publication provides general background information
only. It is information in summary form and does not purport to be complete. This publication has been prepared for information purposes
only and is not intended by Mizuho or its affiliates to constitute investment, legal, accounting, tax or other advice of any kind and all recipients of this publication are advised to contact independent advisors in order to evaluate the publication, including, without limitation,
the suitability of any security, commodity, futures contract or instrument or related derivative (hereinafter, a “financial instrument”), product
or strategy herein described. This publication is not intended to be relied upon as advice to investors or potential investors and does not take into account investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. It is not intended for persons who are Retail
Clients within the meaning of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority rules nor for persons who are restricted in accordance
with US, Japanese, Singapore or any other applicable securities laws. This publication has been prepared for information purposes only and is not intended by Mizuho to market any financial instrument, product
or service or serve as a recommendation to take or refrain from taking any particular course of action or participate in any trading or other
strategy. This publication is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or any of the assets, businesses or undertakings described herein, or any other financial instrument, nor is it an offer to participate in any trading or other strategy, nor a
disclosure document under applicable laws, rules, regulations or guidelines. Nothing contained herein is in any way intended by Mizuho or
its affiliates to offer, solicit and/or market any financial instrument, product or service, or to act as any inducement to enter into any contract or commitment whatsoever. Neither the author, Mizuho nor any affiliate accepts any liability whatsoever with respect to the use of this
publication or its contents or for any errors or omissions herein.
Mizuho and its affiliates, connected companies, employees or clients may take the other side of any order by you, enter into transactions contrary to any recommendations contained herein or have positions or make markets or act as principal or agent in transactions in any
securities mentioned herein or derivative transactions relating thereto or perform or seek financial or advisory services for the issuers of
those securities or financial instruments. All of the information contained in this publication is subject to further modification without prior notice and any and all opinions, forecasts,
projections or forward-looking statements contained herein shall not be relied upon as facts nor relied upon as any indication of future
results. Opinions stated in this publication are subject to change without notice. Future results may materially vary from such opinions, forecasts, projections or forward-looking statements. The information contained in this publication may not be current due to, among other
things, changes in the financial markets or economic environment. Mizuho has no obligation to update any information contained in this
publication. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a strictly privileged and confidential publication. This publication contains information addressed only to a specific individual and is
not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person other than the named addressee or any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country
where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Save with Mizuho’s prior written consent, you may not disclose, divulge, reproduce or furnish any information contained herein to any other party. Please notify the sender immediately if you have
mistakenly received this publication. Singapore: Mizuho is licensed as a bank under the Banking Act (Chapter 19) of Singapore, and is regulated by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore.
Japan: Mizuho is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. United Kingdom / European Economic Area: In the UK, Mizuho is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and subject to
regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of
MHBK's regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available upon request. This publication may also be distributed by Mizuho International plc (“MHI”). MHI is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and
the Prudential Regulation Authority.
United States: This publication is not a “research report” as defined in Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulations 1.71 and 23.605. The content of publications distributed by Mizuho Securities USA Inc. (“MSUSA”) is the responsibility of MSUSA. The
content of publications distributed directly to US customers by Mizuho is the responsibility of Mizuho. US investors must effect any order
for a security that is the subject of this report through MSUSA. © 2014 Mizuho Bank Ltd.