16
Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

  • Upload
    piper

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration. EU and ASEAN. Greek Crisis, East Asia Summit. EU & ASEAN: Similarities. Began as Political Projects Moved on to Economic Focus Functional Development Intergovernmental, Summit Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Asia and Europe: Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Page 2: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

EU and ASEAN

Page 3: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Greek Crisis, East Asia Summit

Page 4: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

EU & ASEAN: Similarities

• Began as Political Projects• Moved on to Economic Focus• Functional Development• Intergovernmental, Summit Process• Outreach to Neighboring Countries, other

regional organizations• Broader, Deeper, Better

Page 5: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

EU and ASEAN

Page 6: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

EU & ASEAN: Differences

• Primary Drivers: Economics vs. Politics• Stepwise Process vs. Long Latent Period• Build up of Bureaucracy vs. Crisis-driven entity• Supranationalism vs. Inter-governmentalism • Political Equality vs. Concentric Rings

Page 7: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Major Theories of European Integration

• Functionalism• Neo-Functionalism• Inter-governmentalism• Liberal Inter-governmentalism

Page 8: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Haas, Schmitter, Moravcsik

Page 9: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Other Theories of European Integration

• Institutionalism• Constitutionalism• Federalism• Regulationism• Multi-level Governance• Polycentric Governance• Neo-neo-functionalism

Page 10: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Problems Applying European Ideas

• Mercosur’s Political Process• ASEAN’s Differences

Specificity of European ConditionsCrisis-driven developmentRegional TransformationNo aims for high-level integration

Page 11: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Asia’s crises

Page 12: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Elements of Asian Integration Theory

Existing Theories:•Functionalism•Neo-functionalism•Inter-governmentalism•Liberal Inter-governmentalism

Other Theories Don’t Apply

Page 13: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Traditional I.R. Theory

• Realism• Neo-realism• Liberalism/Neo-liberalism• World Systems Theory• Constructivism

Which provides the most useful approach?

Page 14: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Giants of I.R.

Page 15: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

A Model of Asian Integration

• Politics Economics• Punctuated Equilibrium

Crisis-driven Regionalism• Strong Inter-governmentalism• Concentric Grouping

1) ASEAN, 2) ASEAN+3, 3) ASEAN+6,4) ASEAN+8, 5) SCO, SAARC

Page 16: Asia and Europe:  Federal vs. Concentric Paths to Regional Integration

Europe and East Asia