AS REQUIRED BY THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT …...Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season

Project/Site:Applicant/Owner: Investigator(s):Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:Soil Map Unit Name:Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes NoAre Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Yes No

Remarks:

HYDROLOGYWetland hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)

Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

(includes capillary fringe)

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA068_UM. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 5, T7SR5W

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region

Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: April 24, 2012

Prentiss silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hilltop Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.46280 Long: -88.49761 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT

X within a Wetland? X

This point was determined not to be within a wetland due to the lack of all three wetland criteria.

X N/A

NO NO NO

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.

X

X Is the Sampled Area

X >20

X >20 X

No positive indication of wetland hydrology was observed.

AS REQUIRED BY THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) THIS FILE IS BEING MADE AVAILABLE ONLINE BECAUSE THE MOBILE DISTRICT FOIA OFFICE HAS RECEIVED MORE THAN THREE (3) REQUESTS

FOR SAME. ANY QUESTIONS ABOU TTHE FOIA PROCESS MUST BE DIRECTED TO OUR FOIA OFFICES. [email protected]

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.

Dominance Test worksheet:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) Number of Dominant Species1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)2.3. Total Number of Dominant4. Species Across All Strata: (B)5.6. Percent of Dominant Species

= Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:

Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) Prevalence Index Worksheet:

1.2. OBL species3. FACW species4. FAC species5. FACU species6. UPL species

= Total Cover Column Totals: (A) (B)50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:

Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.2. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:

3. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation4. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%5. 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01

6. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

= Total Cover50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) be present, unless disturbed or problematic.1. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:

2. Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

3. approximately 20 ft (6m) or more in height and 3 in.4. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).5.6. Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

7. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less

8. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.

9.10. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,

11. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.

= Total Cover50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody

1. plants, except woody vines, less than approximately

2. 3 ft (1 m) in height.

3.4. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.

5.= Total Cover Hydrophytic

50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Vegetation

Present? Yes No

Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).


Sampling Point: DPA068_U

Absolute Dominant Indicator

1

% cover Species? StatusNone Observed 0

0

0 0

None Observed Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

0

0 x 3 = 0

99 x 4 = 396

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0 04.00

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 99 396

00 0

Trifolium repens 99 Yes FACU

9949.5 19.8

None Observed

00 0

X

No positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (≥50% of dominant species indexed as FAC− or drier).



SOIL

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)

% %5/3 100 —

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.Hydric Soils Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils

3:

Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)

Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)

Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)

Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)

Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)

5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)

Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)

Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)

Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)

Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)

Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)

Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)

Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)

Restrictive Layer (if observed):

Type: Depth (inches): Yes No

Remarks:



Depth (inches)

Matrix Redox FeaturesColor (moist) Color (moist) Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

0-20 10YR None — — Sand

3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Hydric Soil Present? X

No positive indication of hydric soils was observed.





Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA069_PEMM. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 5, T7SR5W



Prentiss silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4/EM1C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.46417 Long: -88.49759 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT


This point was determined to be within a wetland due to the presence of all 3 wetland criteria.

X 10

NO YES NO


X


X >20

X >20 X

A positive indication of wetland hydrology was observed (at least one primary indicator).











3. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation4. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%5. X 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01

















Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPA069_PEM


3


100%

0 0


0

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

175 x 1 = 175

10 x 2 = 20

0 01.11

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 190 210

00 0

Paspalum urvillei 5 No FAC

Alternanthera philoxeroides 50 Yes OBLNymphaea odorata 10 No OBL

Juncus effusus 10 No FACWSagittaria latifolia 75 Yes OBLPolygonum hydropiperoides 40 Yes OBL

19095 38

None Observed

00 0

X

A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (>50% of dominant species indexed as OBL, FACW, or FAC).

A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed (Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.00).



SOIL


% %see below


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) X Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)










Remarks:



Depth (inches)



X


A positive indication of hydric soil was observed.

Due to inundation a clear soil profile was unobtainable. Soils are assumed to be hydric.





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Prentiss silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4/EM1C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.46491 Long: -88.49754 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





1


0

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

90 x 4 = 360

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0 04.00

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 90 360

00 0

Trifolium repens 90 Yes FACU

9045 18

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %5/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


0-20 10YR None — — Loamy Sand


Depth (inches)







Project/Site:Applicant/Owner: Investigator(s):Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:Soil Map Unit Name:Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes NoAre Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? v (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)


Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)

X Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows

Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)

X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X

NO

NO

X

(if no, explain in Remarks.)


County: April 24, 2012DPA071_PFO

X

Sec. 5, T7SR5W

PEM1F

Sampling Date:Sample Point:State:

and

Long: -88.49752

M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range:Concave

JacksonPascagoula P.L. - AL, MS

NO

Plains Southcap LLC M. Hess

X

Mississippi

Hyde silt loam

NO

NO

4

(Yes / No)NO



X

30.46785Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T)

X

Oxbow 05-10Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20

Local relief (concave, convex, none):UTM 16N N83 USFT


Datum:

Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

>20X

Is the Sampled Area




























Present? Yes No



X

0

4

Acer rubrum

15

Cyrilla racemiflora

5

5



25

10 Yes FACx 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

45

100%

OBL

FAC

Multiply by:Total % Cover of:

8

DPA071_PFO

OBLNyssa aquatica

Triadica sebifera

12.5

15

OBL

None Observed

2010

00

8

85

OBL10

FAC5

20Acer rubrum

Absolute% cover

NoNoYes

Triadica sebifera

Species?Dominant

0

0

45

20

40

Alternanthera philoxeroides

Sabal minor

Taxodium distichum

Nyssa aquatica

4020

Yes

FACW

0

40

0

120

Sampling Point:

4

105

IndicatorStatus

Yes

1.95

205

x 1 =Yes

Yes

2010

5

FACWYes

15Yes

FAC



SOIL


% %5/1 100 —


3:





Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)











Remarks:


Clay Loam

DPA071_PFO



—Loc2

10YR

Sampling Point:

Matrix Redox FeaturesType1 Texture


0-20

Depth (inches)

X

—Color (moist) Color (moist)

NoneRemarks





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:



Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: April 24, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA072_PEM

Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.46787 Long: -88.49763 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT

Hyde silt loam NWI Classification: PFO4/EM1C

M. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 5, T7SR5WOxbow Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


X



(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)NO NO NO X

NO YES NO



X 12

X >20

X >20 X




























Present? Yes No





3


100%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

120 x 1 = 120

5 x 2 = 10

0 01.04

Cyrilla racemiflora 5 Yes FACWCarya aquatica 5 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

0 125 130

105 2

Alternanthera philoxeroides 90 Yes OBLHydrocotyle umbellata 10 No OBLLemna minor 5 No OBLJuncus effusus 10 No OBL

11557.5 23

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %see below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)



X








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Harleston fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4/EM1C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





1


0

0 0


0

5 x 3 = 15

35 x 4 = 140

2 x 1 = 2

5 x 2 = 10

0 03.55

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 47 167

00 0

Digitaria ciliaris 30 Yes FACU

Centella asiatica 5 No FACW

Rubus trivialis 5 No FACUSmilax rotundifolia 5 No FACRhynchospora macrostachya 2 No OBL

4723.5 9.4

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %4/2 50 —5/2 50 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR NONE — — Loam10YR NONE — — Loam








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Harleston fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PEM1F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X



This point was determined not to be within a wetland due to the lack of hydric soils and wetland hydrology.

X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3

% cover Species? StatusPinus elliottii 30 Yes FACW 3

100%

15 6


30

60 x 3 = 180

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

70 x 2 = 140

0 02.46

Cyrilla racemiflora 40 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 130 320

4020 8

None Observed

00 0

Vitis rotundifolia 60 Yes FAC

6030 12

X





SOIL


% %4/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR None — — Sandy Loam








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Oxbow Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.47257 Long: -88.49768 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X 12

NO YES NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





4


100%

0 0

Taxodium distichum 2 Yes OBL Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

77 x 1 = 77

0 x 2 = 0

1 0.41.00

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

2 77 77

00 0

Carex lupulina 30 Yes OBLPolygonum hydropiperoides 10 Yes OBLMyriophyllum spicatum 5 No OBL

4522.5 9

Smilax walteri 30 Yes OBL

3015 6

X





SOIL


% %see below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)



X








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA076_PFOM. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 32, T6SR5W



Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO4A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X 6

NO YES NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPA076_PFO


4

% cover Species? StatusNyssa aquatica 80 Yes OBL 4

100%

40 16

Nyssa aquatica 10 Yes OBL Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

80

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

130 x 1 = 130

10 x 2 = 20

5 21.07

Nyssa aquatica 40 Yes OBLCyrilla racemiflora 10 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

10 140 150

5025 10

None Observed

00 0

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %see below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)



X








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Saucier fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





2


50%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

45 x 4 = 180

0 x 1 = 0

35 x 2 = 70

0 03.13

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 80 250

00 0

Cynodon dactylon 10 No FACU

Axonopus fissifolius 30 Yes FACW

Raunuculus caduca 5 No FACWTrifolium repens 30 Yes FACUSporobolus indicus 5 No FACU

8040 16

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %5/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X












3. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation4. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%5. 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01

















Present? Yes No





Triadica sebifera 10 No FAC3

% cover Species? StatusQuercus nigra 80 Yes FAC 2

Pinus palustris 20 No FAC

67%

55 22


110

130 x 3 = 390

15 x 4 = 60

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0 03.10

Triadica sebifera 10 Yes FACMagnolia grandiflora 5 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 145 450

3517.5 7

None Observed

Rubus trivialis 10 Yes FACUQuercus nigra 5 No FACTrifolium repens 5 No FACU

00 0

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR None — — Loam








Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)

X Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X 8

NO YES NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





6

% cover Species? StatusTaxodium distichum 25 Yes OBL 6

Nyssa aquatica 40 Yes OBL

100%

32.5 13


65

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

100 x 1 = 100

0 x 2 = 0

0 01.26

Nyssa aquatica 15 Yes OBLMorella cerifera 10 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 115 145

4020 8

None Observed

Acer rubrum 5 No FACTaxodium distichum 10 Yes OBL

00 0


105 2

X





SOIL


% %see below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)



X








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.48136 Long: -88.49964 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT


This point was determined not to be within a wetland due to the lack of wetland hydrology.

X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Triadica sebifera 10 No FAC8

% cover Species? StatusMagnolia grandiflora 15 No FAC 8

Quercus nigra 80 Yes FAC

100%

52.5 21

Triadica sebifera 15 Yes FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

105

170 x 3 = 510

0 x 4 = 0

Cyrilla racemiflora 30 Yes FACW 0 x 1 = 0

30 x 2 = 60

0 02.85

Ilex vomitoria 10 Yes FACAcer rubrum 5 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 200 570

2010 4

Ilex vomitoria 5 No FAC


Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FACAmpelopsis arborea 5 No FACQuercus nigra 10 Yes FAC

157.5 3

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/2 100 —6/4 45 5/8 54/1 45 5/8 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


10YR 7.5YR C PL Loam

0-5 10YR None — — Loam5-20 10YR 7.5YR C PL Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Columbus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.48208 Long: -88.50046 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Quercus nigra 2 No FAC3

% cover Species? StatusCarya illinoinensis 10 Yes FACU 2

Pinus palustris 5 Yes FAC

67%

8.5 3.4


17

9 x 3 = 27

10 x 4 = 40

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0 03.53

Triadica sebifera 2 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 19 67

21 0.4

None Observed

00 0

None Observed

00 0

X


Grazed horse pasture



SOIL


% %3/1 95 3/4 5


3:





Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)











Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C PL Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Stough loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.48322 Long: -88.50048 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Cyrilla racemiflora 10 No FACW5

% cover Species? StatusPinus palustris 60 Yes FAC 4


80%

45 18


90

170 x 3 = 510

5 x 4 = 20

0 x 1 = 0

40 x 2 = 80

0 02.84

Quercus nigra 80 Yes FACTriadica sebifera 10 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 215 610

11055 22

Ilex glabra 10 Yes FACW

Ilex glabra 20 No FACW

Rubus trivialis 5 Yes FACU

157.5 3

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %4/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:




Depth (inches)









Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)

X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

>20X

Is the Sampled Area

UTM 16N N83 USFT


Datum:

X


X

Depression 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

0

Local relief (concave, convex, none):


County: 042612DPA083_PFO

X

Sec. 32, T6SR5W

PFO4A


and

Long: -88.49958

M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range:Concave


NO


X

Mississippi

Daleville silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes

NO

NO

N/A

(Yes / No)NO



X

NO

NO

X





























Present? Yes No



535

x 1 =Yes

Yes

4522.5

14

FACYes

5Yes

FACWYes

FACW

No

0

290

0

240

Sampling Point:

Yes

9

230

FACW

IndicatorStatus

Yes

2.33

0

0

5

145

80

Magnolia virginiana

Ilex glabra

Woodwardia areolata

Acer rubrum

Quercus laurifolia

10050

10

10

FAC3040

30Pinus elliottii

Absolute% cover

YesYes

Species?Dominant

None Observed

157.5

00

35

20

FACW

OBL5

20

DPA083_PFO

FACWQuercus laurifolia

Acer rubrum

70

30 Yes FACx 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

5

100%

FACW

FACW


Quercus laurifolia

40

Ilex glabra

Acer rubrum

205

5



X

0

3



SOIL


% %2/1 100 —3/1 100 —3/1 49 —4/1 49 3/6 2


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)X Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)

1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)










Remarks:


10-20

RemarksNone

X

10YR

—Color (moist) Color (moist)

0-33-10

10YR10YR None

Depth (inches)

— —10YR None Sandy Loam



—Loc2

10YR

Sampling Point:

Matrix Redox Features

—

Type1 Texture

LoamC


Organic Soil Layer

Loam—

PL

DPA083_PFO





Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:




X N/A

X >20

X 0 X


X




NO NO NO


Daleville silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4A

M. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 29, T6SR5WDepression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: 042612Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA084_PSS




























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

9045 18

None Observed

Lachnocaulon anceps 5 No FACWLophiola aurea 5 No OBL

00 0

Spartina patens 80 Yes FACW

22.5 91.97

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

45 145 285

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

Ilex glabra 10 Yes FACW 5 x 1 = 5

Ilex coriacea 20 Yes FACW 140 x 2 = 280

100%

5 2

Pinus elliottii 15 Yes FACW Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

10

6


Ilex myrtifolia 5 Yes FACW

Sampling Point: DPA084_PSS




SOIL


% %3/1 80 3/6 105/3 10 —


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-20 10YR 10YR C M Loam10YR None — — Loam

Sampling Point: DPA084_PSS

Depth (inches)






Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X 0 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Daleville silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO4A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: 042612




























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

00 0

None Observed

Ilex coriacea 5 No FACW85

42.5 17

None Observed

Morella inodora 10 No OBLMagnolia virginiana 5 No FACWAcer rubrum 5 No FAC

0 02.56

Acer rubrum 40 Yes FACPinus palustris 20 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 135 345

90 x 3 = 270

0 x 4 = 0

15 x 1 = 15

30 x 2 = 60

100%

25 10


50

Taxodium distichum 5 No OBL4


Symplocos tinctoria 25 Yes FAC





SOIL


% %3/1 90 3/6 10


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-20 10YR 10YR C M Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Saucier fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PEM1C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

9949.5 19.8

None Observed

Sarracenia alata 3 No OBL

Aletris obovata 4 No FACCentella asiatica 1 No FACWCleistes divaricata 1 No FAC

Pinus elliottii 2 No FACWPaspalum urvillei 1 No FACDichanthelium scoparium 2 No FACW

00 0


0 02.03

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 99 201

6 x 3 = 18

0 x 4 = 0

3 x 1 = 3

90 x 2 = 180

100%

0 0


0

1






SOIL


% %2/1 95 3/6 55/2 40 5/8 303/1 30 —


3:





Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)











Remarks:





X

10YR NONE — — Loam

0-7 10YR 10YR C M Loam7-20 10YR 10YR C M Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)X High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)

Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X 8

X 0 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Saucier fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO2/1F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

6030 12

None Observed

Lachnocaulon anceps 20 Yes FACW

9045 18


Persea palustris 10 No FACWIlex glabra 30 Yes FACW

37.5 152.20

Acer rubrum 30 Yes FACMagnolia virginiana 20 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

75 245 540

Ilex myrtifolia 5 No FACW 50 x 3 = 150

0 x 4 = 0

Magnolia virginiana 20 Yes FACW 0 x 1 = 0

Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC 195 x 2 = 390

100%

10 4


20

9






SOIL


% %2/1 100 — Umbric Surface3/1 100 —


3:








Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)








Remarks:





X

0-5 10YR None — — Loam5-20 10YR None — — Silty Clay Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X 0 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Bayou sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00

X

10251 20.4

None Observed

Rhynchospora caduca 5 No OBLLachnocaulon anceps 2 No FACWAcer rubrum 30 Yes FAC

Ilex glabra 15 No FACWPanicum virgatum 30 Yes FACRhynchospora latifolia 10 No FACW

00 0

Andropogon virginicus 10 No FAC

0 02.64

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 102 269

70 x 3 = 210

0 x 4 = 0

5 x 1 = 5

27 x 2 = 54

100%

0 0


0

2






SOIL


% %2/1 100 —4/1 100 —5/2 80 5/8 20


3:
















Remarks:





X

6-20 10YR 10YR C M Silt Loam

0-3 10YR None — — Silt Loam3-6 10YR None — — Silt Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Saucier fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PEM1F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Prairie Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.49307 Long: -88.49785 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

9246 18.4

None Observed

Andropogon virginicus 60 Yes FACSpartina patens 30 Yes FACW

5527.5 11

Acer rubrum 2 No FAC

Pinus elliottii 5 No FACW

0 02.61

Morella cerifera 30 Yes FACIlex coriacea 20 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 152 396

92 x 3 = 276

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

60 x 2 = 120

100%

2.5 1


5

5






SOIL


% %3/1 85 3/4 15


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-20 10YR 7.5 C M Sandy Clay Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)X High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)

Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows

Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X 4

X 0 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

94.5 1.8

None Observed

Acer rubrum 2 Yes FACTriadica sebifera 2 Yes FAC

6030 12

Alternanthera philoxeroides 5 Yes OBL

Nyssa aquatica 10 No OBL

55 221.91

Cyrilla racemiflora 30 Yes FACWMagnolia virginiana 20 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

110 229 437

44 x 3 = 132

0 x 4 = 0

Cyrilla racemiflora 40 Yes FACW 65 x 1 = 65

Magnolia virginiana 30 Yes FACW 120 x 2 = 240

100%

25 10

Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

50

10


Nyssa aquatica 40 Yes OBL





SOIL


% %5/2 95 5/6 5


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)X Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) X Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)











Remarks:





X

0-20 10YR 10YR C M Muck


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO2/1F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hilltop Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 05-10Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region(T) 30.49567 Long: -88.49763 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

42 0.8

None Observed

Acer rubrum 2 Yes FAC

7035 14


Liquidambar styraciflua 5 No FAC

0 02.43

Ilex vomitoria 50 Yes FACIlex glabra 15 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 134 325

57 x 3 = 171

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

77 x 2 = 154

100%

30 12


60

6







SOIL


% %5/4 100 —5/6 100 —


3:
















Remarks:





0-6 10YR None — — Loam6-20 10YR None — — Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish BurrowsX Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)

Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X 6 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PEM1F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

52.5 1

None Observed

3517.5 7

Sabal minor 5

Woodwardia areolata 10 Yes OBL

0 02.16

Ilex vomitoria 5 No FACCyrilla racemiflora 20 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 155 335

35 x 3 = 105

0 x 4 = 0

10 x 1 = 10

110 x 2 = 220

100%

60 24


120

Cyrilla racemiflora 20 No FACW4

% cover Species? StatusQuercus laurifolia 70 Yes FACW 4






SOIL


% %3/1 100 —6/1 60 5/8 40


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) X Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)










Remarks:





X

0-6 10YR None — — Silt Loam6-20 10YR 10YR C M Silt Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


YesX

within a Wetland?

X

>20X


UTM 16N N83 USFT


Datum:

X


Hillslope 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



County: 042712DPA093_U

X

Sec. 28, T6SR5W

None


and

Long: -88.49648

M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range:Convex


NO


X

Mississippi

Escambia very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

NO

NO

N/A

(Yes / No)NO



X

NO

NO

X





























Present? Yes No



445

x 1 =

Yes

8542.5

0

FACYes

5Yes

UPLNo

UPL

No

15

70

0

300

Sampling Point:

17

150

FACW

IndicatorStatus

Yes

2.97

0

75

0

35

100

Ilex opaca

Ilex ambigua

Ilex opaca

Quercus nigra

5527.5

4

5

FAC1510

30Pinus elliottii

Absolute% cover

NoYes

Species?Dominant

None Observed

105

00

0

70

FAC

11

DPA093_U

None Observed

0

x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

0

80%

FAC

FACW


Ilex ambigua

Ilex coriacea

Ilex vomitoria

105

5



X

0

2



SOIL


% %4/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


RemarksNone —

Color (moist) Color (moist)0-20

Depth (inches)



—Loc2

10YR

Sampling Point:



Loamy Sand

DPA093_U





Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:




X N/A

X >20

X 0 X


X




NO NO NO


Atmore loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes NWI Classification: None

M. Hess and M. Wood-Ramirez Section, Township, Range: Sec. 10, T6SR5WN/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 00-05


Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: 042712Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPA094_PFO




























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

7035 14

None Observed

6030 12


Ilex myrtifolia 10 No FACW

0 02.00

Ilex coriacea 40 Yes FACWPersea palustris 10 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 180 360

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

180 x 2 = 360

100%

25 10


50

4


Magnolia virginiana 10 Yes FACW





SOIL


% %2/2 98 3/4 23/1 98 4/4 2


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-6 10YR 7.5YR C PL Sandy Loam6-20 10YR 7.5YR C PL Sandy Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X 2 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Escambia very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PEM1Fd(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

00 0

None Observed

7537.5 15

None Observed

Ilex coriacea 30 Yes FACWAcer rubrum 10 No FAC

5 22.16

Magnolia virginiana 30 Yes FACWIlex vomitoria 5 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

10 155 335

25 x 3 = 75

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

130 x 2 = 260

100%

35 14


70

4


Magnolia virginiana 10 No FACW





SOIL


% %3/1 60 5/2 40


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) X Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)










Remarks:





X

0-20 10YR 10YR D M Loamy Sand


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PFO2/1Fd(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

105 2

None Observed

9547.5 19

Ilex coriacea 10 Yes FACW


0 02.48

Ilex coriacea 60 Yes FACWIlex vomitoria 20 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 165 410

80 x 3 = 240

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

85 x 2 = 170

100%

30 12


60

4

% cover Species? StatusPinus palustris 60 Yes FAC 4





SOIL


% %3/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X 6

NO YES NO


X



NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

8040 16

None Observed

6030 12

Woodwardia virginica 80 Yes OBL

0 01.28

Nyssa aquatica 30 Yes OBLMagnolia virginiana 30 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 215 275

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

155 x 1 = 155

60 x 2 = 120

100%

37.5 15


75

Nyssa aquatica 30 Yes OBL6


Pinus elliottii 30 Yes FACW





SOIL


% %see remarks below


3:
















Remarks:






X


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)

X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X 6

NO YES NO


X


Myatt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

00 0

None Observed

3015 6

Sphagnum moss 70 Yes OBL

Cyrilla racemiflora 5 No FACW

22.5 91.21

Ilex myrtifolia 15 Yes FACWTaxodium distichum 10 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

45 165 200

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

Nyssa aquatica 30 Yes OBL 130 x 1 = 130

35 x 2 = 70

100%

10 4

Cyrilla racemiflora 15 Yes FACW Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

20

6






SOIL


% %see remarks below


3:
















Remarks:






X


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.58359 Long: -88.45028 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT

Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB016_UA. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 26, T5SR5W


Pascagoula P.L.- AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: April 26, 2012

Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO4/SS3B




























Present? Yes No




00 0

X

9246 18.4

None Observed

Tripsacum dactyloides 15 No FAC

Rumex hastatulus 25 Yes FACUPinus taeda 2 No FACSmilax bona-nox 10 No FAC

00 0

Andropogon virginicus 40 Yes FAC

0 03.27

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 92 301

67 x 3 = 201

25 x 4 = 100

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

50%

0 0


0

2


Sampling Point: DPB016_U




SOIL


% %5/2 100 —2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:





0-7 10YR None — — Sand7-20 10YR None — — Sand


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB017_PEMA. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 26, T5SR5W






























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

9447 18.8

None Observed

Carex longii 5 No OBLJuncus marginatus 2 No FACW

Smilax walteri 2 No OBLPolygonum hydropiperoides 10 Yes OBLRubus trivialis 10 Yes FAC

Scirpus cyperinus 5 No OBLLudwigia repens 10 Yes OBLCarex louisianica 10 Yes OBL

00 0

Juncus effusus 40 Yes OBL

0 01.23

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 94 116

10 x 3 = 30

0 x 4 = 0

82 x 1 = 82

2 x 2 = 4

100%

0 0


0

5


Sampling Point: DPB017_PEM




SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:




X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)












Remarks:





0-20 10YR None — — Sandy Clay Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows

X Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X 3

NO NO NO


X


Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO1/4C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB018_PFOA. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 26, T5SR5W






























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

157.5 3

None Observed


105 2

Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC

0 01.33

Acer rubrum 5 Yes FACNyssa biflora 5 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

0 120 160

20 x 3 = 60

0 x 4 = 0

100 x 1 = 100

0 x 2 = 0

100%

47.5 19


95

Taxodium distichum 5 No OBL5

% cover Species? StatusNyssa biflora 80 Yes OBL 5

Acer rubrum 10 No FAC

Sampling Point: DPB018_PFO




SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish BurrowsX Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)

Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X

Swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.58157 Long: -88.45092 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

2211 4.4

None Observed

Smilax walteri 2 No OBL

2010 4

Carex lupulina 20 Yes OBL

0 01.04

Cyrilla racemiflora 5 Yes FACWNyssa biflora 15 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

0 127 132

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

122 x 1 = 122

5 x 2 = 10

100%

42.5 17


85

5


Nyssa biflora 45 Yes OBL





SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PFO1/4C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

7035 14

None Observed

Lygodium japonicum 10 No FAC

7537.5 15


Morella cerifera 35 Yes FACLigustrum sinense 10 No FACIlex opaca 10 No FAC

0 02.50

Ilex vomitoria 15 Yes FACCallicarpa americana 5 No FACU

0 x 5 = 0

0 230 575

165 x 3 = 495

5 x 4 = 20

60 x 1 = 60

0 x 2 = 0

100%

42.5 17


85

Acer rubrum 25 Yes FAC5

% cover Species? StatusLiquidambar styraciflua 45 Yes FAC 5

Quercus nigra 15 No FAC





SOIL


% %3/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X



This point was determined not to be within a wetland due to the lack of hydric soils.

X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

5025 10

None Observed

105 2

Chasmanthium laxum 50 Yes FACW

0 02.73

Morella cerifera 10 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 165 450

80 x 3 = 240

20 x 4 = 80

0 x 1 = 0

65 x 2 = 130

75%

52.5 21


Triadica sebifera 5 No FAC

105

Magnolia virginiana 15 No FACWMorella cerifera 15 No FAC 4

% cover Species? StatusPinus palustris 20 Yes FACU 3






SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows

X Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO1/4C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

3517.5 7

None Observed

4020 8

Tripsacum dactyloides 35 Yes FAC

0 01.88

Nyssa biflora 30 Yes OBLMorella cerifera 10 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 160 300

55 x 3 = 165

10 x 4 = 40

95 x 1 = 95

0 x 2 = 0

100%

42.5 17


85

Pinus palustris 10 No FACU4

% cover Species? StatusQuercus nigra 10 No FAC 4

Nyssa biflora 65 Yes OBL





SOIL


% %3/1 95 4/6 5 See Below


3:
















Remarks:




Soil was determined to be hydric at given depth due to the presence of a hydrogen sulfide odor.


X

0-10 10YR 10YR C PL Sandy Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO1/4C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

10251 20.4

None Observed

Saccharum giganteum 20 Yes FACWEupatorium serotinum 20 Yes FACAcer rubrum 2 No FAC

Scirpus cyperinus 25 Yes OBLSphagnum capillifolium 15 No OBLHypericum cistifolium 10 No FACW

00 0

Helianthus angustifolius 10 No FACW

0 01.82

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 102 186

22 x 3 = 66

0 x 4 = 0

40 x 1 = 40

40 x 2 = 80

100%

0 0


0

3






SOIL


% %4/1 90 4/6 10


3:
















Remarks:





X



Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X

Swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.57731 Long: -88.45271 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT































Present? Yes No




00 0

X

6532.5 13

None Observed

Juncus tenuis 5 No FACSmilax bona-nox 10 No FAC

00 0

Digitaria filiformis 50 Yes UPL

0 04.54

None Observed

50 x 5 = 250

0 65 295

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0

0 0


0

1






SOIL


% %3/2 100 —4/4 100 —


3:
















Remarks:





0-4 10YR None — — Sandy Loam4-20 10YR None — — Sandy Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

9246 18.4

None Observed

Sphagnum capillifolium 10 No OBL

Lycopodiella appressa 10 No OBLDrosera brevifolia 10 No OBLSarracenia alata 2 No OBL

00 0

Hypericum cistifolium 60 Yes FACW

0 01.65

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 92 152

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

32 x 1 = 32

60 x 2 = 120

100%

0 0


OBL

0

1






SOIL


% %3/1 98 5/6 2


3:
















Remarks:





X



Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Columbus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1B(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No




00 0

X

105 2

None Observed

Serenoa repens 15 No FACU12562.5 25

Muhlenbergia capillaris 10 Yes FAC

Quercus nigra 20 Yes FACIlex vomitoria 20 Yes FACCliftonia monophylla 25 Yes OBL

0 03.08

Morella cerifera 35 Yes FACVaccinium arboreum 10 No FACU

0 x 5 = 0

0 185 570

95 x 3 = 285

65 x 4 = 260

25 x 1 = 25

0 x 2 = 0

86%

25 10


50

7


Ilex opaca 10 Yes FAC





SOIL


% %4/4 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Columbus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

7537.5 15

None Observed

Dichanthelium aciculare 25 Yes FACU

7537.5 15


0 02.90

Persea palustris 40 Yes FACWMorella cerifera 35 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 150 435

85 x 3 = 255

25 x 4 = 100

0 x 1 = 0

40 x 2 = 80

75%

0 0


0

4






SOIL


% %2/2 100 —5/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:





0-4 10YR None — — Sandy Loam4-20 10YR None — — Sand


Depth (inches)






Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)X High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)X Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Moss Trim Lines (B16)

Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


X 3

X 0 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB028_PSSA. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 35, T5SR5W






























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

52.5 1

None Observed

10552.5 21



0 02.41

Cyrilla racemiflora 60 Yes FACWAcer rubrum 10 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 110 265

45 x 3 = 135

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

65 x 2 = 130

100%

0 0


0

3


Sampling Point: DPB028_PSS




SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X 4

NO NO NO


X



NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

4522.5 9

None Observed

Ludwigia repens 20 Yes OBLSaccharum giganteum 15 Yes FACW

00 0

Polygonum hydropiperoides 10 Yes OBL

0 01.33

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 45 60

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

30 x 1 = 30

15 x 2 = 30

100%

0 0


0

3






SOIL


% %3/1 90 5/6 2


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-10 10YR 10Y/R C M Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No




00 0

X

105 2

None Observed

5527.5 11

Vaccinium arboreum 10 Yes FACU

0 03.50

Morella cerifera 25 Yes FACIlex opaca 30 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 130 455

65 x 3 = 195

65 x 4 = 260

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

50%

32.5 13


65

4

% cover Species? FACUPinus Palustris 55 Yes FACU 2

Morella cerifera 10 No FAC





SOIL


% %4/4 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1B(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

2512.5 5

None Observed

Smilax bona-nox 5 Yes FAC

9547.5 19


0 02.46

Persea palustris 65 Yes FACWMorella cerifera 30 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 120 295

55 x 3 = 165

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

65 x 2 = 130

100%

0 0


0

4






SOIL


% %4/3 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:

Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No



Remarks:


X >20

X X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

6532.5 13

None Observed

Sphagnum capillifolium 30 Yes OBL

Hypericum cistifolium 10 Yes FACWSmilax walteri 10 Yes OBLEleocharis minima 10 Yes OBL

00 0

Eupatorium serotinum 5 No FAC

0 01.31

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 65 85

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

50 x 1 = 50

10 x 2 = 20

100%

0 0


0

4






SOIL


% %2/2 100 — See Below


3:
















Remarks:




Soil was determined to be hydric at given depth due to the presence of a hydrogen sulfide odor.




Depth (inches)






Remarks:


X Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X 6

NO YES NO


X


Nugent and Jena soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No





00 0

X

52.5 1

None Observed

105 2


30 122.39


0 x 5 = 0

60 115 275

75 x 3 = 225

0 x 4 = 0

30 x 1 = 30

10 x 2 = 20

100%

20 8

Nyssa sylvatica 60 Yes FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

40

5


Nyssa sylvatica 15 Yes FAC





SOIL


% %2/1 100 — See Below


3:
















Remarks:






X



Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No




00 0

X

105 2

None Observed

7035 14


Morella cerifera 15 Yes FACIlex opaca 5 No FAC

0 03.13

Ilex vomitoria 40 Yes FACSerenoa repens 10 No FACU

0 x 5 = 0

0 80 250

70 x 3 = 210

10 x 4 = 40

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

100%

0 0


0

3






SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X
































Present? Yes No




00 0

X

52.5 1

None Observed

105 2

Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FAC

5 23.71


0 x 5 = 0

10 85 315

25 x 3 = 75

60 x 4 = 240

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

75%

30 12


60

4






SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X

NO

NO

X



County: April 26, 2012DPB036_PEM

X

Sec. 35, T5SR5W

None


and

Long: -88.45521

P. McKnight Section, Township, Range:None


NO

Plains Southcap LLC A. Tuggle

X

Mississippi

Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes

NO

NO

3

(Yes / No)NO



X

30.57007Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T)

X

Swamp 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



Datum:

Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

>20X

Is the Sampled Area




























Present? Yes No



X

0

19

Diospyros virginiana

5

No



0

x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

20

100%


0

DPB036_PEM

None Observed

0

15

FACW

FACWFACWOBL

101020

None Observed

9547.5

00

3

3

None Observed

Absolute% cover Species?

Dominant

0

0

20

70

20

Hypericum cistifolium

Diospyros virginiana

Lachnocaulon anceps

Juncus marginatus

Sarracenia alata

00

FAC

0

140

0

60

Sampling Point:

No

3

110

IndicatorStatus

2.00

220

x 1 =

Yes

157.5

0

FACYes

Yes

50No



SOIL


% %3/1 95 5/6 5


3:
















Remarks:


Sandy Loam

DPB036_PEM



PLLoc2

10YR

Sampling Point:



0-10

Depth (inches)

X

CColor (moist) Color (moist)

10YRRemarks





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:



Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: April 26, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB037_PSS

Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.57001 Long: -88.45525 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT

Freest sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes NWI Classification: None

A. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 35, T5SR5WSwamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 00-05


X




NO NO NO



X 2

X >20

X >20 X




























Present? Yes No





3


100%

0 0


0

40 x 3 = 120

10 x 4 = 40

25 x 1 = 25

75 x 2 = 150

0 02.23

Diospyros virginiana 40 Yes FACPinus palustris 10 No FACU

0 x 5 = 0

0 150 335

6030 12



Carex Longii 10 No OBL

Sarracenia alata 15 No OBLJuncus marginatus 20 Yes FACWLachnocaulon anceps 10 No FACW

9045 18

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %See below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:





Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB038_PSSA. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 35, T5SR5W




NO NO NO X




Wetland is cut off by a straight berm that was put in for a man-made pond - WBB008.

X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No





5


100%

0 0


0

85 x 3 = 255

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

42 x 2 = 84

15 62.67

Diospyros virginiana 10 No FACTriadica sebifera 25 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

30 127 339

5728.5 11.4


Sesbania drummundii 2 No FACWMyrica cerifa 20 Yes FAC

Saccharum giganteum 5 No FACWJuncus validus 20 Yes FACW

4020 8

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %5/1 95 5/6 53/1 100 —


3:











X Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)





Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C PL Sand0-20 10YR None — — Sandy Loam








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1B(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Data Point was taken adjacent to a man-made pond so soil hydrology is disturbed.

X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





1


100%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

100 x 2 = 200

0 02.00

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 100 200

00 0

Carex cherokeensis 100 Yes FACW

10050 20

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %7/1 90 5/8 10


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C M Sand








Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

X Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X

Swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.60064 Long: -88.43960 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Quercus nigra 35 Yes FAC6


Nyssa sylvatica 40 Yes FAC

100%

50 20


100

77 x 3 = 231

0 x 4 = 0

35 x 1 = 35

50 x 2 = 100

0 02.26

Cyrilla racemiflora 20 Yes FACWIlex opaca 2 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 162 366

2211 4.4

Carex lupuliformis 10 Yes OBLPanicum repens 30 Yes FACW

4020 8

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %4/1 95 3/6 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)




X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X 30

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





2


100%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

110 x 1 = 110

10 x 2 = 20

0 01.08

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 120 130

00 0

Bacopa rotundifolia 60 Yes OBL

Hymenocallis caroliniana 5 No FACW

Ludwigia peploides 30 Yes OBLScirpus cyperinus 20 No OBLHypericum cistifolium 5 No FACW

12060 24

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %See below


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:





Benndale fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Quercus laurifolia 5 No FACW4

% cover Species? StatusAcer rubrum 45 Yes FAC 4


100%

35 14


70

45 x 3 = 135

0 x 4 = 0

20 x 1 = 20

25 x 2 = 50

0 02.28

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 90 205

00 0

Sphagnum capillifolium 10 Yes OBLWoodwardia areolata 10 Yes OBL

2010 4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %7/2 95 5/6 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C M Sand








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Benndale fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI Classification: PSS3C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 05-10South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.60619 Long: -88.43189 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





8


Magnolia grandiflora 30 Yes FAC

63%

30 12


60

70 x 3 = 210

65 x 4 = 260

20 x 1 = 20

0 x 2 = 0

0 03.16

Callicarpa americana 20 Yes FACUIlex opaca 15 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 155 490

7035 14


Ilex vomitoria 15 Yes FACMagnolia grandiflora 5 No FACSerenoa repens 15 Yes FACU

2010 4


52.5 1

X




SOIL


% %5/2 100 —5/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-3 10YR None — — Sandy Loam3-20 10YR None — — Sand








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO3/1A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 05-10South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.60894 Long: -88.42788 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


67%

0 0

Pinus palustris 10 Yes FACU Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

0

30 x 3 = 90

10 x 4 = 40

0 x 1 = 0

85 x 2 = 170

5 22.40

Persea palustris 85 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

10 125 300

8542.5 17


3015 6

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %4/4 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Vancleave loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO3/1A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 05-10South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.61393 Long: -88.42258 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





9

% cover Species? StatusPinus taeda 20 Yes FAC 8


89%

35 14

Quercus nigra 40 Yes FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

70

130 x 3 = 390

5 x 4 = 20

0 x 1 = 0

15 x 2 = 30

20 82.93

Acer rubrum 5 Yes FACCallicarpa americana 5 Yes FACU

0 x 5 = 0

40 150 440

2010 4

Casmanthium laxum 15 Yes FACW

Ilex vomitoria 5 Yes FACIlex opaca 5 Yes FAC

157.5 3


52.5 1

X





SOIL


% %3/1 95 4/6 52/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-5 10YR 10YR C PL/M Loam5-20 10YR None — — Clay Loam


X







Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Daleville loam, ponded NWI Classification: PFO3/1A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Acer rubrum 10 No FAC3

% cover Species? StatusNyssa sylvatica 50 Yes FAC 3

Quercus laurifolia 10 No FACW

100%

35 14


70

65 x 3 = 195

0 x 4 = 0

15 x 1 = 15

10 x 2 = 20

0 02.56

Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 90 230

52.5 1

Carex lupuliformis 15 Yes OBL

157.5 3

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 95 4/6 52/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


0-5 10YR 10YR C PL/M Loam5-20 10YR None — — Clay Loam


Depth (inches)





X





Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

>20X

Is the Sampled Area

UTM 16N N83 USFT


Datum:Dorovan-Levy association, 0 to 1 percent slopes

NO

NO

X

30.61447South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P)

X

Swamp 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



County: April 27, 2012DPB047_PEM

X

Sec. 18, T5SR4W

PFO3/1A


and

Long: -88.42230

P. McKnight Section, Township, Range:Concave


NO

Plains Southcap LLC A. Tuggle

X

Mississippi

3

(Yes / No)NO



X

NO

NO

X





























Present? Yes No



x 1 =

Yes

00

0

15Yes OBL30

0

0

0

0

Sampling Point:

No

0

50

IndicatorStatus

1.00

0

0

50

0

0

Proserpinaca palustris

Carex lupuliformis

Polygonum hydropiperoides

50

00

Absolute% cover Species?

Dominant

2

2

None Observed

None Observed

4824

00

0

OBL5

0x 5 =

50

100%


x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =

OBL

0

DPB047_PEM

None Observed

None Observed



X

0

9.6



SOIL


% %3/1 95 4/6 52/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


10YR C10YR None

0-55-20

Depth (inches)


Color (moist) Loc2

10YR

Sampling Point:

Matrix Redox Features

—

Type1 TextureColor (moist)


PL/M

X

Clay Loam


Loam—

DPB047_PEM

Remarks





Remarks:





Field Observations:




Remarks:




X N/A

X >20

X >20 X


X




NO NO NO

South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.61444 Long: -88.42218 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT

Dorovan-Levy association, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: None

A. Tuggle and P. McKnight Section, Township, Range: Sec. 18, T5SR4WSwamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: April 26, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPB048_PFO




























Present? Yes No





00 0

X

157.5 3

None Observed


157.5 3

Carex lupuliformis 10 Yes OBL

0 02.78

Triadica sebifera 5 Yes FACLiquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 115 320

100 x 3 = 300

0 x 4 = 0

10 x 1 = 10

5 x 2 = 10

100%

42.5 17


85

5

% cover Species? StatusNyssa sylvatica 85 Yes FAC 5





SOIL


% %3/1 98 5/6 2


3:
















Remarks:





X

0-6 10YR 10YR C PL/M Sandy Clay Loam


Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


X >20

X >20 X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


Dorovan-Levy association, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO3/1A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05South Atlantic and Gulf Slope Cash Crops, Forest, and Livestock Region (P) 30.61469 Long: -88.42197 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT































Present? Yes No





157.5 3

X

157.5 3

Smilax bona-nox 15 Yes FAC

2512.5 5



0 02.87

Nyssa sylvatica 5 Yes FACIlex opaca 15 Yes FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 115 330

100 x 3 = 300

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

15 x 2 = 30

100%

35 14


70

Nyssa sylvatica 10 No FAC7

% cover Species? StatusPinus taeda 30 Yes FAC 7

Ilex opaca 20 Yes FAC





SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:







Depth (inches)






Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


YesX

within a Wetland?

X

X


N/A 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



Datum:


County: May 22, 2012DPD001_U

X

Sec. 28, T7SR5W

PFO6F


and

Long: -88.48362

M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range:Convex


NO

Plains Southcap LLC L. Wolfe

X

Mississippi

Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded

NO

NO

N/A

>20

(Yes / No)NO


X



X

NO

NO

X





























Present? Yes No



0

50

0

285

Sampling Point:

8

150

IndicatorStatus

Yes

2.43

365

x 1 =

Yes

4020

0

0

30

25

95

Toxicodendron radicans

0

FACYes

20

6

6

FACW2520

30Nyssa biflora

Pinus elliottii

Liquidambar styraciflua FAC

15

7.515

2010

Absolute% cover

7537.5

YesYes

Species?Dominant

None Observed

0

40

FAC

Toxicodendron radicans

Ilex vomitoria

15

DPD001_U

0

x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

30

100%


OBL



4

FACYes

X

3



SOIL


% %2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


Remarks—

Color (moist) Color (moist)None0-20

Depth (inches)

Loam—Loc2

Sampling Point:

Redox FeaturesType1 Texture

DPD001_U



10YR

Matrix






Remarks:



X Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:



Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: May 22, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD002_PFO


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F

L. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 28, T7SR5WDepression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


X




NO NO NO



X N/A

X >20

X >20 X

Buttressing present




























Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPD002_PFO


Pinus elliottii 2 No FACW5


Liquidambar styraciflua 5 No FAC

100%

43.5 17.4


87

20 x 3 = 60

0 x 4 = 0

90 x 1 = 90

2 x 2 = 4

0 01.38

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 112 154

00 0

Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FACWoodwardia areolata 5 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 5 Yes OBL

2010 4


52.5 1

X





SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:













X Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)



Remarks:



Depth (inches)






Organic material





Remarks:

HYDROLOGYWetland hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X Surface Soil Cracks (B6)

Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD003_PEML. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 28, T7SR5W


Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: May 22, 2012


NO NO NO X

Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.40926 Long: -88.48375 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


A positive indication of wetland hydrology was observed (at least two secondary indicators).

X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPD003_PEM


4

% cover Species? StatusTriadica sebifera 2 Yes FAC 4

100%

1 0.4


2

17 x 3 = 51

0 x 4 = 0

50 x 1 = 50

5 x 2 = 10

0 01.54

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 72 111

00 0

Rumex crispus 15 Yes FAC

Carex frankii 10 No OBLJuncus effusus 5 No FACW

Polygonum hydropiperoides 15 Yes OBLLudwigia palustris 15 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 10 No OBL

7035 14

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/1 95 3/6 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C M Sandy Clay Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD004_UL. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 28, T7SR5W




NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.40944 Long: -88.48371 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPD004_U


6


Quercus nigra 5 No FAC

100%

22.5 9


45

35 x 3 = 105

0 x 4 = 0

0 x 1 = 0

95 x 2 = 190

0 02.27

Ilex glabra 40 Yes FACWMagnolia virginiana 15 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 130 295

5527.5 11

Symplocos tinctoria 10 Yes FAC

105 2

Vitis cinerea 15 Yes FAC

2010 4

X

Rubus arvensis 5 Yes FAC





SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Vancleave loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.41354 Long: -88.48295 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





1


0

0 0


0

2 x 3 = 6

92 x 4 = 368

0 x 1 = 0

0 x 2 = 0

0 03.98

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 94 374

00 0

Sorghum halepense 80 Yes FACUPaspalum notatum 10 No FACURubus arvensis 2 No FACAmbrosia artemisiifolia 2 No FACU

9447 18.8

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:





Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD006_PFOL. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 21, T7SR5W




NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Magnolia virginiana 15 No FACWAcer negundo 10 No FACW 4

% cover Species? StatusTriadica sebifera 65 Yes FAC 4

Salix nigra 20 No OBL

100%

55 22


110

75 x 3 = 225

0 x 4 = 0

Acer negundo 5 Yes FACW 25 x 1 = 25

30 x 2 = 60

7.5 32.38

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

15 130 310

00 0

Saururus cernuus 5 Yes OBL

52.5 1

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —4/1 90 4/6 10


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-3 10YR None — — Organic Soil Layer

3-20 10YR 7.5YR C PL Clay Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.41365 Long: -88.48298 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





6



100%

15 6


30

45 x 3 = 135

0 x 4 = 0

Pinus elliottii 15 Yes FACW 0 x 1 = 0

35 x 2 = 70

15 62.56

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

30 80 205

00 0


105 2

Rubus arvensis 10 Yes FAC

105 2

X





SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Maurepas muck, frequently flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X 12

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





4



100%

10 4


20

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

110 x 1 = 110

0 x 2 = 0

0 01.09

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 115 125

00 0

Sagittaria latifolia 60 Yes OBLTypha latifolia 25 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 10 No OBL

9547.5 19

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 — Muck


3:






X 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)










Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





7

% cover Species? StatusQuercus nigra 70 Yes FAC 6

Pinus palustris 10 No FACU

86%

40 16


80

155 x 3 = 465

15 x 4 = 60

Pinus palustris 5 Yes FACU 5 x 1 = 5

0 x 2 = 0

12.5 53.03

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

25 175 530

00 0

Liriodendron tulipifera 15 Yes FACToxicodendron radicans 15 Yes FAC

3015 6


4020 8

X

Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FACRubus arvensis 5 No FACSmilax walteri 5 No OBL




SOIL


% %3/2 100 —3/1 100 —


3:


X Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)














Remarks:



Depth (inches)







Organic





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X 3

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


100%

7.5 3


15

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

90 x 1 = 90

0 x 2 = 0

0 01.00

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 90 90

00 0

Leersia hexandra 60 Yes OBLTypha latifolia 15 Yes OBL

7537.5 15

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 — Mucky mineral


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR None — —








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Water (>40 acres) NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X












3. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation4. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%5. X 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01

















Present? Yes No





2


50%

0 0


0

12 x 3 = 36

45 x 4 = 180

40 x 1 = 40

0 x 2 = 0

0 02.75

None Observed

5 x 5 = 25

0 102 281

00 0

Leersia hexandra 40 Yes OBL

Ambrosia artemisiifolia 5 No FACUMimosa microphylla 5 No UPLRubus arvensis 2 No FAC

Cynodon dactylon 25 Yes FACUPaspalum notatum 15 No FACUVerbena brasiliensis 10 No FAC

10251 20.4

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


33%

0 0


0

15 x 3 = 45

40 x 4 = 160

0 x 1 = 0

15 x 2 = 30

0 03.36

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 70 235

00 0

Ambrosia artemisiifolia 20 Yes FACU

Rubus arvensis 5 No FAC

Cynodon dactylon 20 Yes FACUSolidago sempervirens 15 Yes FACWVerbena brasiliensis 10 No FAC

7035 14

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X 12

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





6



100%

12.5 5


25

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

60 x 1 = 60

15 x 2 = 30

0 01.31

Salix nigra 15 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

0 80 105

157.5 3

Typha latifolia 15 Yes OBLEriocaulon decangulare 10 Yes OBLPolygonum pensylvanicum 10 Yes FACWSesbania drummondii 5 No FACW

4020 8

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)






Mucky mineral





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Handsboro mucky silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X 12

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


100%

15 6


30

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

132 x 1 = 132

5 x 2 = 10

0 01.04


0 x 5 = 0

0 137 142

52.5 1

Leersia oryzoides 90 Yes OBLSagittaria latifolia 10 No OBLWoodwardia virginica 2 No OBL

10251 20.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 — Muck


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

X


X

N/A 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



Datum:


County: May 23, 2012DPD015_PFO

X

Sec. 10, T6SR5W

None


and

Long: -88.47166

M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range:Concave


NO


X

Mississippi

Myatt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded

NO

NO

N/A

>20

(Yes / No)NO


X


Is the Sampled Area

X

NO

NO

X





























Present? Yes No



0

20

0

405

Sampling Point:

14

145

IndicatorStatus

Yes

2.93

425

x 1 =

7035

0

0

0

10

135

None Observed

0

FACYesFACWNo

3

3

70Symplocos tinctoria

5

2.55

00

Absolute% cover

7035

Species?Dominant

None Observed

0

60Lyonia lucida

Vitis cinerea

Symplocos tinctoria

10

14

DPD015_PFO

0

x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

0

100%


FAC



0

FACYes

X

1



SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:


Remarks—

Color (moist) Color (moist)None0-20

Depth (inches)

Sandy Loam—Loc2

Sampling Point:


DPD015_PFO



10YR

Matrix






Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:



Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: May 23, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD016_PFO


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: None

L. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 10, T6SR5WN/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


X




NO NO NO



X N/A

X >20

X 0 X

Buttressing present




























Present? Yes No





6



100%

17.5 7


35

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC 110 x 1 = 110

40 x 2 = 80

7.5 31.32


0 x 5 = 0

15 155 205

2512.5 5

Eriocaulon decangulare 60 Yes OBLSphagnum spp. 15 No OBLHypericum cistifolium 5 No FACW

8040 16

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/1 100 —5/1 98 4/6 2


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-3 10YR None — — Sandy Loam3-20 10YR 10YR C M Sand




Organic layer





Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Vancleave loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1Bd(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X












3. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation4. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%5. X 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.01

















Present? Yes No





4


50%

0 0


0

20 x 3 = 60

12 x 4 = 48

5 x 1 = 5

90 x 2 = 180

1 0.42.31

Cyrilla racemiflora 80 Yes FACWIlex glabra 10 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

2 127 293

9045 18

Andropogon virginicus 20 Yes FACCynodon dactylon 10 Yes FACUWoodwardia areolata 5 No OBL

3517.5 7

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %2/2 98 4/4 2


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C PL Loam








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1Bd(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X

Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 05-10Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.54301 Long: -88.47170 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





5



80%

25 10


50

5 x 3 = 15

5 x 4 = 20

2 x 1 = 2

100 x 2 = 200

0 02.12


0 x 5 = 0

0 112 237

5025 10

Serenoa repens 5 Yes FACUSymplocos tinctoria 5 Yes FACWoodwardia virginica 2 No OBL

126 2.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)


Field Observations:




Remarks: Buttressing observed






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Magnolia virginiana 10 No FACW7


Taxodium distichum 50 Yes OBL

100%

50 20

Nyssa biflora 20 Yes OBL Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

100

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

Taxodium distichum 10 Yes OBL 140 x 1 = 140

10 x 2 = 20

15 61.07

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

30 150 160

00 0

Ludwigia glandulosa 10 Yes OBLEriocaulon decangulare 5 Yes OBLLeersia oryzoides 5 Yes OBL

2010 4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 100 — Muck


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)X Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)











Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR NONE — — Organic Soil Layer








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





2

% cover Species? StatusMagnolia virginiana 2 Yes FACW 2

100%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

85 x 1 = 85

2 x 2 = 4

0 01.02

Cliftonia monophylla 85 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

0 87 89

8542.5 17

None Observed

00 0

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:





Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X

N/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05Atlantic and Gulf Coast Lowland Forest and Crop Region (T) 30.54453 Long: -88.47171 Datum: UTM 16N N83 USFT



X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No





Pinus elliottii 10 No FACWMagnolia virginiana 15 No FACW 5



100%

42.5 17


85

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC 92 x 1 = 92

25 x 2 = 50

5 21.29

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

10 122 157

00 0

Leersia oryzoides 20 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 5 No OBLWoodwardia areolata 2 No OBL

2713.5 5.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 100 — Organic material


3:


Histic Epipedon (A2) X Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)














Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR NONE — — Clay


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


67%

0 0


0

75 x 3 = 225

25 x 4 = 100

2 x 1 = 2

5 x 2 = 10

0 03.15

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 107 337

00 0


Woodwardia virginica 2 No OBL

Stenotaphrum secundatum 30 Yes FACCynodon dactylon 25 Yes FACUSolidago sempervirens 5 No FACW

10753.5 21.4

None Observed

00 0

X




SOIL


% %2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:





Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No





Pinus elliottii 5 No FACW6



100%

27.5 11


55

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

149 x 1 = 149

17 x 2 = 34

1 0.41.26

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

2 181 228

00 0

Typha latifolia 15 Yes OBL

Ludwigia glandulosa 10 No OBLWoodwardia virginica 2 No OBLEriocaulon decangulare 10 No OBL

Leersia oryzoides 60 Yes OBLHypericum cistifolium 10 No FACWRubus arvensis 15 Yes FAC

12462 24.8

None Observed

Woodwardia areolata 2 No OBL

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/1 60 5/2 40


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR D M Sandy Clay


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





5


100%

10 4


20

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

2 x 1 = 2

125 x 2 = 250

0 02.09

Ilex glabra 80 Yes FACWMagnolia virginiana 15 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 142 297

9547.5 19

Rubus arvensis 10 Yes FACSolidago sempervirens 10 Yes FACWWoodwardia virginica 2 No OBL

2211 4.4


52.5 1

X





SOIL


% %2/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


67%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

5 x 4 = 20

82 x 1 = 82

15 x 2 = 30

2.5 11.29

Cliftonia monophylla 80 Yes OBLCyrilla racemiflora 10 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

5 102 132

9547.5 19

Woodwardia virginica 2 Yes OBL


21 0.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



X Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





4


Pinus elliottii 5 No FACW

100%

32.5 13


65

2 x 3 = 6

0 x 4 = 0

97 x 1 = 97

5 x 2 = 10

10 41.09

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

20 104 113

00 0

Liquidambar styraciflua 2 No FACLeersia oryzoides 10 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 5 Yes OBLWoodwardia areolata 2 No OBL

199.5 3.8

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —2/2 95 3/4 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-3 10YR None — — Sandy Loam3-20 10YR 10YR C PL Sandy Clay Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





4


75%

0 0


0

20 x 3 = 60

5 x 4 = 20

2 x 1 = 2

70 x 2 = 140

2.5 12.29

Cyrilla racemiflora 40 Yes FACWIlex glabra 30 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

5 97 222

7035 14

Andropogon virginicus 20 Yes FACWoodwardia virginica 2 No OBL

2211 4.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 606/1 40 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR NONE — — Sandy Loam10YR NONE — — Sandy Loam








Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





5



100%

40 16

Magnolia virginiana 10 Yes FACW Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

80

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

67 x 1 = 67

30 x 2 = 60

5 21.31

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

10 97 127

00 0

Sarracenia rubra 2 Yes OBLWoodwardia virginica 5 Yes OBL

73.5 1.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —2/1 100 —


3:


Histic Epipedon (A2) X Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)














Remarks:



Depth (inches)







X





Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


Yes

X

X

within a Wetland?

X


X

N/A 00-05Slope (%):

NWI Classification:

>20



Datum:


County: May 24, 2012DPD029_PFO

X

Sec. 3, T6SR5W

None


and

Long: -88.47172

M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range:Concave


NO


X

Mississippi

Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded

NO

NO

N/A

>20

(Yes / No)NO


X


Is the Sampled Area

X

NO

NO

X



Buttressing present




























Present? Yes No



0

130

0

0

Sampling Point:

No

9

135

OBL

IndicatorStatus

Yes

1.48

200

x 1 =

Yes

4522.5

0

0

70

65

0

Lycopodiella alopecuroides

Leersia oryzoides

Woodwardia virginica

Sarracenia rubra

0

FACWYes

15Yes

FACW

OBL

YesYes

7

710

OBL15

FACW10

20Pinus elliottii

Nyssa biflora

Taxodium distichum

00

3517.5

Absolute% cover

5527.5

NoNoYes

Quercus laurifolia

Species?Dominant

None Observed

0

25Ilex glabra

Cliftonia monophylla

OBL

OBLOBL

55

None Observed

Quercus laurifolia

1010

11

DPD029_PFO

0

x 2 =x 3 =x 4 =x 5 =

70

100%


OBL

FACW

10

No



7

X

0



SOIL


% %3/1 98 3/4 2


3:
















Remarks:


RemarksC

Color (moist) Color (moist)10YR0-20

Depth (inches)

X

Clay LoamMLoc2

Sampling Point:


DPD029_PFO



10YR

Matrix






Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:



Pascagoula P.L. - AL, MS County: Jackson Sampling Date: May 24, 2012Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD030_PEM


Croatan and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO6F

L. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 3, T6SR5WN/A Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 00-05


X




NO NO NO




X N/A

X >20

X 0 X




























Present? Yes No





3


67%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

42 x 1 = 42

15 x 2 = 30

0 02.04

None Observed

15 x 5 = 75

0 72 147

00 0

Eriocaulon decangulare 20 Yes OBL

Lophiola aurea 5 No OBLLycopodiella alopecuroides 5 No OBLSphagnum capillifolium 2 No OBL

Andropogon glomeratus 15 Yes FACWHypericum perforatum 15 Yes UPLTypha latifolia 10 No OBL

7236 14.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —3/1 60 6/1 40


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)



3-20 10YR 10YR D M Clay Loam


X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PSS7/EM1B(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





1


100%

0 0


0

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

70 x 1 = 70

10 x 2 = 20

0 01.42

Cliftonia monophylla 70 Yes OBLNyssa sylvatica 15 No FAC

0 x 5 = 0

0 95 135

9547.5 19

None Observed

Lyonia lucida 10 No FACW

00 0

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/2 100 —2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)











Remarks:




Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD033_PSSL. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 3, T6SR5W




NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No



Sampling Point: DPD033_PSS


3


100%

0 0


0

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

92 x 1 = 92

25 x 2 = 50

0 01.29

Cliftonia monophylla 60 Yes OBLCyrilla racemiflora 15 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 122 157

8040 16

Eriocaulon decangulare 20 Yes OBL

Symplocos tinctoria 5 No FAC

Sarracenia rubra 2 No OBL

Andropogon glomeratus 10 Yes FACWTypha latifolia 5 No OBLLophiola aurea 5 No OBL

4221 8.4

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —3/1 60 6/1 40


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)





X







Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Johns loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO1/4C(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





7



71%

10 4


20

0 x 3 = 0

65 x 4 = 260

35 x 1 = 35

30 x 2 = 60

0 02.73

Cliftonia monophylla 20 Yes OBLIlex glabra 15 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 130 355

4522.5 9

Muhlenbergia capillaris 40 Yes FACU

Lyonia lucida 10 Yes FACW

Woodwardia virginica 15 Yes OBLSerenoa repens 10 No FACU

6532.5 13

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 99 3/4 1


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C M Sandy Loam








Remarks:



Field Observations:




Remarks:





Johns loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: None(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





3


100%

0 0


0

20 x 3 = 60

0 x 4 = 0

10 x 1 = 10

10 x 2 = 20

0 02.25

Lyonia lucida 5 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 40 90

52.5 1

Dichanthelium strigosum 20 Yes FACCliftonia monophylla 10 Yes OBLHypericum cistifolium 5 No FACW

3517.5 7

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 —


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)










Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)

X Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:






NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No





2


100%

0 0


0

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

35 x 1 = 35

20 x 2 = 40

0 01.36

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 55 75

00 0

Rhynchospora tracyi 15 Yes OBL

Hypericum cistifolium 5 No FACW

Juncus effusus 15 Yes FACWRhynchospora inundata 10 No OBLLeersia oryzoides 10 No OBL

5527.5 11

None Observed

00 0

X





SOIL


% %2/1 100 —3/1 80 6/1 20


3:
















Remarks:


Muck


Depth (inches)



2-20 10YR 10YR D M Sandy Clay Loam


X







Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks: Buttressing present





Smithton loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded NWI Classification: PFO1/4A(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X



X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





Pinus elliottii 5 Yes FACW10



100%

12.5 5


25

15 x 3 = 45

0 x 4 = 0

Taxodium distichum 5 Yes OBL 75 x 1 = 75

25 x 2 = 50

5 21.48

Ilex myrtifolia 20 Yes FACW

0 x 5 = 0

10 115 170

2010 4

Eriocaulon decangulare 20 Yes OBLDichanthelium dichotomum 15 Yes FACSarracenia rubra 10 Yes OBL

4522.5 9


157.5 3

X





SOIL


% %2/2 100 — Muck3/1 75 6/2 25


3:






5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) X Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)X Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)











Remarks:



Depth (inches)





X







Remarks:



X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:





Johns loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X 0 X





























Present? Yes No





Magnolia virginiana 10 Yes FACW8



100%

20 8


40

0 x 3 = 0

0 x 4 = 0

55 x 1 = 55

25 x 2 = 50

2.5 11.31

Cliftonia monophylla 10 Yes OBL

0 x 5 = 0

5 80 105

105 2

Lycopodiella alopecuroides 5 Yes OBLSarracenia rubra 5 Yes OBL

105 2


157.5 3

X





SOIL


% %3/1 100 —2/1 80 6/1 20


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)





X







Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:


Plains Southcap LLC State: Mississippi Sample Point: DPD039_PSSL. Wolfe and M. Gagnon Section, Township, Range: Sec. 3, T6SR5W




NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





5


80%

5 2


10

0 x 3 = 0

30 x 4 = 120

45 x 1 = 45

95 x 2 = 190

0 02.09

Ilex glabra 75 Yes FACWIlex myrtifolia 5 No FACW

0 x 5 = 0

0 170 355

8040 16

Muhlenbergia capillaris 30 Yes FACULophiola aurea 15 Yes OBLPolygala lutea 5 No FACW

5025 10


3015 6

X





SOIL


% %2/1 90 3/6 103/1 90 4/6 10


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-15 10YR 10YR C PL Clay Loam15-20 10YR 2.5YR C PL Silty Clay Loam


X







Remarks:


Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)

Field Observations:




Remarks:





Johns loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: PFO6F(Yes / No) Yes (if no, explain in Remarks.)

NO NO NO X




X N/A

NO NO NO


X


X >20

X >20 X





























Present? Yes No





2


100%

0 0


0

5 x 3 = 15

0 x 4 = 0

37 x 1 = 37

50 x 2 = 100

0 01.65

None Observed

0 x 5 = 0

0 92 152

00 0


Sarracenia rubra 5 No OBLRhynchospora corniculata 5 No OBLDichanthelium dichotomum 5 No FAC

Eriocaulon decangulare 15 Yes OBLLycopodiella alopecuroides 10 No OBLAndropogon glomeratus 10 No FACW

9246 18.4

None Observed

Lophiola aurea 2 No OBL

00 0

X





SOIL


% %3/1 95 3/6 5


3:
















Remarks:



Depth (inches)


0-20 10YR 10YR C PL Clay Loam




X



Site Number Latitude Longitude Cowadin_Code Size of Aquatic Resopuces / acres Class of Aquatic ResourceTributary to Bangs Lake 30.362182 -88.48339 E2 0.039236 Section 10 StreamTributary To Escatawpa River 30.453436 -88.496383 E2 0.011978 Section 10 StreamWETA010-E0 30.440285 -88.495076 PEM 1.049453 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA010-E1 30.442042 -88.495287 PEM 0.056191 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA010-F0 30.439109 -88.49493 PFO 0.037304 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA010-S0 30.441587 -88.495169 PSS 0.0499 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA010-S1 30.442305 -88.49524 PSS 0.359759 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA011-E0 30.443978 -88.495433 PEM 0.011453 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA011-F0 30.444467 -88.49542 PFO 0.183765 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA012-E0 30.445744 -88.495528 PEM 0.396934 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA013-E0 30.447735 -88.495693 PEM 0.392974 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA013-F0 30.447669 -88.495692 PFO 0.196485 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA015-E0 30.457139 -88.496995 PEM 0.216332 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA015-F0 30.45683 -88.496877 PFO 0.161557 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA016-E0 30.459757 -88.497489 PEM 0.362438 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA016-F0 30.459863 -88.497403 PFO 0.235135 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA017-E0 30.46169 -88.497469 PEM 0.095255 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA017-F0 30.462052 -88.497486 PFO 0.364629 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA018-E0 30.464251 -88.497492 PEM 0.250255 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA019-E0 30.467774 -88.497582 PEM 0.004676 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA019-F0 30.469093 -88.49745 PFO 1.436872 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA020-E0 30.473183 -88.497439 PEM 0.079487 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA020-F0 30.472718 -88.497456 PFO 0.499755 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA021-F0 30.481021 -88.499277 PFO 0.369242 Non-Section 10 WetlandTributary To Escatawpa River 30.480699 -88.49896 E2 0.064011 Section 10 StreamWETA007-E0 30.431844 -88.49427 PEM 0.474507 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA007-F0 30.431225 -88.493924 PFO 0.392852 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA008-E0 30.43346 -88.494469 PEM 0.24165 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA008-F0 30.433225 -88.494449 PFO 0.114998 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA009-E0 30.435953 -88.494658 PEM 0.725599 Non-Section 10 WetlandTrib to Escatawpa 30.541568 -88.471532 E2 0.02544 Section 10 StreamEscatawpa River 30.600429 -88.440052 R1 0.273699 Section 10 StreamWETB003-E0 30.582393 -88.450722 PEM 0.282325 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB003-F0 30.582502 -88.45055 PFO 1.07348 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB004-F0 30.576724 -88.452742 PFO 1.265763 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB004-F1 30.578248 -88.452185 PFO 0.049036 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB004-F2 30.578351 -88.452137 PFO 0.03734 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB004-F3 30.578483 -88.452087 PFO 0.06832 Non-Section 10 Wetland



WETB004-F4 30.57868 -88.452028 PFO 0.086014 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB005-E0 30.57315 -88.454164 PEM 0.007548 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB005-S0 30.573502 -88.453955 PSS 0.400504 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB006-F0 30.571028 -88.454834 PFO 0.179267 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB007-E0 30.570067 -88.455222 PEM 0.019697 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB007-S0 30.569482 -88.454925 PSS 0.8715 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB008-E0 30.602683 -88.436931 PEM 0.302254 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB008-F0 30.603653 -88.435373 PFO 4.442759 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB009-E0 30.614783 -88.422012 PEM 0.025485 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETB009-F0 30.614325 -88.42225 PFO 0.526511 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC028-E0 30.588061 -88.448668 PEM 0.106415 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC028-F0 30.587937 -88.448587 PFO 0.336623 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-E0 30.5956 -88.445599 PEM 1.483488 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-E1 30.598805 -88.442462 PEM 0.006358 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-E2 30.599426 -88.441593 PEM 0.08224 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-F0 30.594986 -88.445842 PFO 3.624847 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-F1 30.598906 -88.442272 PFO 0.01204 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC030-F2 30.599512 -88.441345 PFO 0.857707 Non-Section 10 WetlandBlack Creek 30.502095 -88.495605 E2 0.005642 Section 10 StreamWETA022-E0 30.490198 -88.49857 PEM 0.176541 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA022-E1 30.491761 -88.498159 PEM 0.80707 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA022-F0 30.48817 -88.49911 PFO 2.250672 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA022-F1 30.490734 -88.498419 PFO 0.511197 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA022-S0 30.48846 -88.499033 PSS 0.154254 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA023-F0 30.494282 -88.498115 PFO 0.272844 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA023-F1 30.495018 -88.497904 PFO 0.517442 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA024-F0 30.497525 -88.49718 PFO 0.101816 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA024-F1 30.49793 -88.497067 PFO 0.225167 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA024-F2 30.498524 -88.4969 PFO 0.234651 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA024-F3 30.498825 -88.496858 PFO 0.025082 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC011-S0 30.502156 -88.495592 PSS 0.000506 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC011-S1 30.505973 -88.493337 PSS 5.699956 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC011-S2 30.50881 -88.48887 PSS 1.289703 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC012-E0 30.517697 -88.482751 PEM 1.899604 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC012-S0 30.516843 -88.48249 PSS 4.113781 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC013A-E0 30.525149 -88.482924 PEM 0.006201 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC013A-F0 30.525218 -88.482971 PFO 0.123066 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC013B-E1 30.526788 -88.481729 PEM 0.183708 Non-Section 10 Wetland



WETC013B-S0 30.527758 -88.48114 PSS 1.934126 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC014-E0 30.529116 -88.478395 PEM 0.044581 Non-Section 10 WetlandTributary To Escatawpa River 30.529825 -88.473622 E2 0.18916 Section 10 StreamWETA025-F0 30.533446 -88.471446 PFO 3.372373 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA026-F0 30.539553 -88.471496 PFO 2.482972 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA026-F1 30.541749 -88.471514 PFO 0.222318 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC015-E0 30.529608 -88.474354 PEM 0.104281 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC015-E1 30.529658 -88.473651 PEM 0.103253 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC015-F0 30.529738 -88.473585 PFO 0.136076 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETC015-F1 30.529817 -88.474133 PFO 0.410048 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD005-F0 30.544245 -88.47154 PFO 1.034792 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD006-F0 30.546173 -88.471564 PFO 0.50567 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD006-F1 30.546525 -88.471622 PFO 0.090098 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD006-F2 30.546699 -88.471424 PFO 0.005804 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD007-F0 30.549764 -88.471767 PFO 0.000093 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD008-E0 30.552386 -88.471209 PEM 0.131962 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD008-F0 30.551834 -88.471281 PFO 0.920156 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD008-S0 30.552008 -88.471431 PSS 0.127466 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-E0 30.556217 -88.46759 PEM 0.832893 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-E1 30.561872 -88.46224 PEM 0.09838 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-F0 30.555128 -88.468466 PFO 1.891344 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-F1 30.559647 -88.464199 PFO 0.693853 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-F2 30.563393 -88.46065 PFO 0.094534 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-F3 30.564215 -88.459867 PFO 0.242171 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-S0 30.557914 -88.465834 PSS 1.826189 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-S1 30.561906 -88.462055 PSS 2.238561 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD009-S2 30.563761 -88.460295 PSS 0.489641 Non-Section 10 WetlandBayou Cumbest 30.408922 -88.483665 E2 0.008219 Section 10 StreamWETA005-E0 30.402456 -88.480487 PEM 0.928868 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA005-F0 30.399605 -88.480215 PFO 0.816381 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA005-F1 30.401163 -88.480189 PFO 1.039646 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA005-F2 30.402914 -88.48038 PFO 0.869498 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA005-F3 30.404657 -88.481776 PFO 1.370994 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA006-E0 30.405758 -88.482866 PEM 0.000006 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA006-F0 30.405726 -88.482742 PFO 0.073732 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD001-E0 30.409222 -88.483729 PEM 0.001734 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETD001-F0 30.409188 -88.483596 PFO 0.07682 Non-Section 10 WetlandTributary To Escatawpa River 30.417539 -88.482813 E1 0.273201 Section 10 Stream



Tributary To Escatawpa River 30.546504 -88.471538 E2 0.012823 Section 10 StreamTributary To Escatawpa River 30.54828 -88.471461 E2 0.082912 Section 10 StreamEscatawpa River 30.421556 -88.488021 R1 0.306914 Section 10 StreamWETD003-F0 30.415524 -88.4828 PFO 2.372595 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG001-E0 30.425325 -88.490205 E2EM 2.306704 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG002-E0 30.429894 -88.493077 E2EM 1.480351 Non-Section 10 WetlandTributary to Escatawpa River 30.428796 -88.492387 E1 0.03972 Section 10 StreamTributary to Bangs Lake 30.355996 -88.487114 E2 0.020695 Section 10 StreamTributary to Bangs Lake 30.355345 -88.488546 E2 0.02058 Section 10 StreamWETA002-E0 30.355914 -88.483128 PEM 0.020132 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA002-F0 30.35954 -88.483321 PFO 2.971802 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA002-S0 30.356455 -88.483245 PSS 0.904027 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-E0 30.369475 -88.48335 PEM 0.134436 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-E1 30.387883 -88.480184 PEM 3.666266 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F0 30.366186 -88.483325 PFO 3.973211 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F1 30.369468 -88.483355 PFO 0.027821 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F2 30.376162 -88.480005 PFO 2.61661 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F3 30.381341 -88.480093 PFO 2.995657 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F4 30.384325 -88.48026 PFO 0.077068 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F5 30.38626 -88.480261 PFO 2.025548 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F6 30.391311 -88.480315 PFO 2.811363 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-F7 30.397463 -88.480264 PFO 1.896313 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETA003-S0 30.3717 -88.481736 PSS 3.133356 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-E0 30.355411 -88.488546 PEM 0.062469 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-E1 30.355136 -88.488547 PEM 0.241702 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-E2 30.354811 -88.488548 PEM 0.039566 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-S0 30.355988 -88.484306 PSS 0.826683 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-S1 30.355993 -88.4862 PSS 0.972171 Non-Section 10 WetlandWETG005-S3 30.35589 -88.488086 PSS 1.218603 Non-Section 10 Wetland



DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, MOBILE DISTRICT

P.O. BOX 2288 MOBILE, ALABAMA 36628-0001

February 5, 2013

No Inland South Branch Regulatory Division SUBJECT: Department of the Army Jurisdictional Determination SAM-2012-01165-MBM, Plains Southcap, L.L.C., Jackson County, Mississippi. Plains Southcap, L.L.C. C/o SWCA Environmental Consultant Attention: Mr. R. Thomas Sankey 7255 Langtry, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77040 Dear Mr. Sankey:

Reference is made to your December 10, 2012 request for a jurisdictional determination and verification of a wetland delineation for an a 41-mile pipeline starting at the Plains Ten-Mile Crude Oil Facility in Mobile Alabama, located approximately 11 miles northwest of downtown Mobile, and extends southwest to Pascagoula, Mississippi. This letter addresses the segment of the pipeline located in Mississippi that starts at the Alabama/Mississippi state line near 30.625219 North, -88.405534 West, and ends at the Pascagoula Chevron Facility near 30.354811 North, -88.488548 West. In Mississippi, the 50-foot wide pipeline corridor crosses 128 wetland polygons, 11 stream crossings, as well as being directionally bored under the Escatawpa River at two locations and under two tributaries to the Escatawpa River. The project will cross Black Creek and its tributaries, as well as tributaries to Bayou Cumbest and Bangs Lake. The 128 wetland polygons are located within the larger wetland systems adjacent to the above mentioned streams. This action has been assigned file number SAM-2012-01165-MBM, which should be referred to in all future correspondence with this office concerning this matter.

This project was reviewed and jurisdictional areas were identified based upon criteria contained in the

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). Based on our review of information submitted, field data collected during site inspections on January 16, 2013, and other information available to our office, we have determined that there are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and there are wetlands on the above described project subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). We have determined that the wetland/upland boundaries reflected in the December 10, 2012, wetland polygon shape files provided for the project have been determined to be accurate. In Mississippi, the pipeline corridor contains 11 stream crossings causing temporary impacts to a total of 278 linear feet of stream. The pipeline corridor crosses 128 wetland polygons causing temporary impacts to a



- 2 -

total of 105.49 acres of wetlands. The pipeline will be directionally bored under the Escatawpa River at 2 locations as well as under 2 tributaries, which are all Section 10 waters. Please be advised that this wetland delineation verification reflects current policy and regulation and is valid for a period of 5 years from the date of this letter. If after the 5-year period this wetland delineation has not been specifically revalidated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) it shall automatically expire. If the information you have submitted, and on which the USACE has based its determination is later found to be in error, this decision may be revoked.

Also attached to this determination letter are two copies of the Preliminary Jurisdictional

Determination (PJD) form for the waters of the U.S., identified within the project area. Both copies must be signed and returned to this office. A copy signed by a representative of this office will be returned to you. The preliminary jurisdictional determination is a non-binding action and shall remain in effect unless new information or a request for an approved jurisdictional determination supporting a revision is provided to this office. Please note that since this jurisdictional determination is preliminary in nature; it is subject to change and therefore is not an appealable action under the Corps administrative appeal procedures defined at 33 CFR 331.

This letter grants no property rights nor shall it be construed as excusing you from compliance with

other Federal, State, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations that may affect any proposed work at this site. Furthermore, this wetland determination has been conducted to identify the limits of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for particular sites identified in this request.

Section 404 prohibits the placement of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including

wetlands, unless the work has been authorized by a Department of the Army permit. Activities such as (but not limited to) slab-on-grade construction, grading, land clearing with heavy equipment, some pile-supported structures, and constructing a built-up road are considered filling activities and will require a permit if located in jurisdictional waters of the U.S.

We appreciate your cooperation with the Corps Regulatory Program. Please contact me by

e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (251) 694-3771 should you have any questions concerning this matter. For additional information about permitting and our Regulatory Program, visit our web site at www.sam.usace.army.mil/RD/reg, and please take a moment to complete our customer satisfaction survey while you’re there. Your responses are appreciated and will allow us to improve our services. Sincerely, Michael B. Moxey Team Leader, Inland South Regulatory Division Enclosures



1

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 02/4/2013

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: AGENT: SWCA Environmental Consultant Attention: R. Thomas Sankey 7255 Langtry, Suite 100 Houston, TX 77040 For APPLICANT: Plains Southcap, LLC 333 Clay Street, Suite 1600 Houston, Texas 77002 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Mobile District, Plains Southcap, LLC – Mississippi, SAM-2012-01165-MBM D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Plains Southcap, LLC (Plains) requested that SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) complete the wetland and waters delineation for the approximately 41 miles of 24-inch crude oil pipeline. The project area begins at the Plains Ten-Mile Crude Oil Facility in Mobile Alabama, located approximately 11 miles northwest of downtown Mobile, and extends southwest towards Pascagoula, Mississippi. The line ends at the Chevron Pascagoula refinery (project site) approximately one mile north of the Gulf of Mexico. Construction of the proposed project is slated to begin in March 2013 and end before September 2013. There are no permanent fill impacts to wetlands or streams. The proposed project will consist of the construction and placement of approximately 41 miles of 24-inch diameter pipeline from Ten-Mile facility in Alabama to Pascagoula, Mississippi. Construction of the pipeline will be within a 75-foot-wide right-of-way (ROW) in most places and will consist of clearing vegetation, excavating a trench, laying the pipe, replacing the soil, adjusting the topography to match pre-construction contours, and allowing the re-establishment of endemic vegetation. The 50-foot utility corridor over the pipeline will be maintained as emergent vegetation only. There are no permanent impacts to wetlands other than wetland habitat conversion from forested to emergent wetlands within the maintained corridor. All stream impacts consist directional drilling under larger streams and temporary ditching and full restoration afterwards. The project will utilize horizontal directional drill (HDD) methods under the Escatawpa River at 2 locations, as well as 2 tributaries that are also Section 10 waters.



2

State: Alabama County/parish/borough: Mobile County City: Mobile Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 30.57315 N, Long. -88.454164 W (wetland WETB005-EO). Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Escatawpa River, Black Creek, Bayou Cumbest, and Bangs Lake. (SEE THE WATER RESOURCES TABLE ATTACHED TO THIS PACKET THAT DOCUMENTS MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: STREAMS: In Jackson County, the 50-foot wide pipeline corridor will require trenching of 11 stream crossings, as well as direction boring under the Escatawpa River at two locations and 2 tributaries to the Escatawpa River. All trenching impacts to intermittent and perennial streams will be temporary. These streams include the Escatawpa River, Black Creek, as well as tributaries to the Escatawpa River, Black Creek, Bayou Cumbest, and Bangs Lake. All streams are tidally-influenced Section 10 waters. WETLANDS: In Jackson County, the pipeline corridor crosses 128 wetland polygons causing temporary impacts to 105.49 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. All impacts to wetlands are associated with conversion of forested wetlands to non-forested wetlands. The wetland polygons are located adjacent to the streams listed above and their tributaries. Total linear feet of temporary stream impacts: 11 stream crossings,

total of 278 linear feet (ft) and/or 0.48 acres requiring temporary trenching impacts. The project will directionally bore under the Escatawpa River at two locations and 2 tributaries to the Escatawpa River which are Section 10 Waters (see attached table).

Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial and intermittent Wetlands: Cumulatively 105.49 acres of jurisdictional wetlands within 128

wetland polygons. The polygons are located within larger wetland systems adjacent to the above listed streams (see attached table).

Cowardin Class: Palustrine and emergent wetlands Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Escatawpa River, Bayou Cumbest, Black Creek, and Bangs Lake, and tributaries to these streams. Non-Tidal:



3

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):

Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 1/7/2013 Field Determination. Date(s): 1/16/2013.

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or



4

to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there “may be” waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply

- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):

Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: SWCA delineation maps.

Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.

Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.

Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .

Corps navigable waters’ study: .

U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USGS NHD data.

USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: .

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .

National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: .

State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .

FEMA/FIRM maps: .

100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)

Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth 2012. or Other (Name & Date): See Attached. Photographs prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.

Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: . Other information (please specify): Wetlands are adjacent to RPW

streams that are tributaries to the Escatawpa River which is a tidal TNW closer to the coast.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.



5

_________________________ __________________________ Signature and date of Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining

the signature is impracticable)



6



Documents

AS REQUIRED BY THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT …...Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Dry-Season