27
Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Page 2: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Context

• CE Sustainability RFP: 8 projects• Technical assistance available

o Webinar serieso Individual calls

• Contribution to the field• Other Sustainability TA underway

Page 3: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Articulating the Value of

Consumer Engagement

Carla Zema, PhDZema Consulting

July 18, 2013

Page 4: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Outline• Importance• Recap of ROI from Sustainability Workshop• Articulating Value – Understanding Different

Methods• Review of Key Elements of Analysis• Determining Costs and Benefits• Valuing Benefits• Conclusion and Next Steps

Page 5: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Importance

One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their

intentions rather than their results

-- Milton Friedman

Page 6: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

More EffectiveLess

Effective

More Costly

LessCostly

ADOPT

DO NOT ADOPT Tradeoff to

consider

Tradeoff to consider

Weighing Effectiveness and Cost

Page 7: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Use of results• Justify implementation to internal and/or

external stakeholders

• Interest potential partners, such as funders, community partners

• Justify use of resources

• Complement other evaluations

Page 8: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

ROI TemplateElement Contents

Description Scope of the activity or program

Audience/point of view Stakeholders/funder(s) who will obtain ROI from participation

Financial benefits Hard dollar categories, $ for each

Strategic benefits Description with $ if possible

Intangible benefits Description, qualitative value

Costs Hard dollar costs; other costs a stakeholder might want to include

Additional components e.g., time, probability of success

ROI Calculation and/or qualitative evaluation

AF4Q Sustainability Workshop, 2013

Page 9: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

A rose by any other name…

• ROI

• Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)

• Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)

Page 10: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Comparison of Methods

CEA CBA ROI

Basic calculation

Cost-effectiveness ratio = Total costs--------------------------

Measure of effectiveness

Net benefit = Total benefit-Total costs Ratio = Total benefits/Total costs

ROI =

Net benefit-------------------------------

Total cost

Result Cost per measure of effectiveness (or incremental/marginal cost per unit measure of effectiveness)

Net benefit valued in dollars

Ratio results in number greater than or less than 1

Percentage

Page 11: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Comparison of Methods

CEA CBA ROI

Pros • Easy to compare programs with similar outcomes

• Useful if outcomes are difficult to value

• Results are in dollars making interpretation easy

• Useful when considering only one program and/or when programs have different outcomes

• Easy interpretation

• “ROI” more widely known

Cons • Measure of effectiveness can be awkward to interpret

• Difficult to use if more than one benefit

• Can be difficult to value benefits

• Indirect or intangible benefits are often not included

Page 12: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Steps to Conduct an Analysis

• Define the framework for the analysis• Determine the perspective of the analysis• Decide on the timeframe for the analysis• Define the population• Identify and measure the costs and

benefits• Value the benefits (for a CBA)• Discount (depending on timeframe)• Calculate results• Conduct a sensitivity analysis• Use results for decision-making

Page 13: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Define the Framework

• What is the overall objective?• Which options are being considered?• How will effectiveness be measured?• What is the status quo? (What if no action

is taken?)• Will the analysis be prospective,

retrospective, or concurrent?• Will a CEA or CBA be conducted?

Page 14: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Determine the Perspective of the Analysis

• Critical to defining the costs and benefits • Must be maintained throughout the

analysis• May or may not be the primary audience

for the results• Examples:

oFundersoPayersoPracticeoEmployersoSocietal

Page 15: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Decide on Timeframe

• Must be clearly defined• Considerations:

o Does program have a specific timeframe for implementation?

o When would results be expected?o What timeframe is meaningful to the primary

audience for the results?

Page 16: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Define the Population

• Considerations:o Particular subgroup of patients or practices?o Certain geography (e.g. state, county)?o Types of practices?o Multiple systems?o Types of payers?o All practices or just those with a certain number of

patients/provider?

Page 17: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Identify and Measure the Costs and Benefits

• Categories:o Directo Indirecto Intangible

• Include only actual or real costs and benefits that are beyond the status quo

• Do not include transfers• Handling missing data

Page 18: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Value the Benefits for a CBA or ROI

• For a CBA or ROI, benefits must be valued• Can be “gains” or “costs avoided”• Options:

o Market value of benefito Downstream financial impact of the benefit

• Make sure the valuations are realistic and meaningful to stakeholders

Page 19: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Discounting• Costs and benefits should be discounted if

greater than one year

• No consensus on standard discount rate

• Range of 3%-5% with 4% commonly used for social program

Page 20: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Calculate Results• Spreadsheet software such as Microsoft

Excel make calculations simple and transparent

• Keep each costs and benefit as well as quantities and rates as separate cells to increase transparency and make changes easier

• Results cells are then simply functions that calculate the results

Page 21: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Conduct a Sensitivity Analysis

• Opportunity to explore the variation in the results if inputs are modified

• Helpful given that some inputs have some uncertainty or a range of possible values

• Two types:o Partialo Extreme case

Page 22: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Partial Sensitivity Analysis

• One input variable is varied at a time while holding all other values constant

• Compare new results with base case results• Consider varying variables:

o representing assumptions that were made for the analysis

o that have a range of possible valueso that were estimated due to missing or

unavailable datao that have uncertain values

Page 23: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Tornado Diagram Example

Payer mix

Reimbursement rate

P4P incentive

Increase in improvement

Number of providers

Number of practice staff

Practice volume

Cost of training

Number of patient partners

Page 24: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Extreme Case Sensitivity Analysis

• Similar to partial sensitivity analysis in terms of variables to vary in the analysis

• Instead of one variable at a time, all variables that are selected are varying simultaneouslyo Once in a “best-case” scenarioo Again in a “worst-case” scenario

Page 25: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Summary• CEAs/CBAs are not a silver bullet and do

not provide a definitive answer

• Offer important information to inform decision-making and complement other evaluation information on effectiveness

• Critical component of any program or project evaluation

Page 26: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Next Steps• Webinar series will walk you through the

process• Homework:

o Finalize frameworko Begin to identify costs and benefits

• Individual technical assistance is available• Next webinar will be opportunity to get

group feedback

Page 27: Articulating the Value of Consumer Engagement 2 – 3:30 pm ET July 25, 2013

Contact Information

Carla Zema, PhDZema Consulting(724) 972-4141

[email protected]