Upload
onofre
View
35
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Articles of Confederation. Congress was nervous about creating a strong central government – feared that it would trample their rights (just like King George did!) Articles of Confederation – a “firm league of friendship” in which “each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Articles of Confederation Congress was nervous about creating a
strong central government – feared that it would trample their rights (just like King George did!)
Articles of Confederation – a “firm league of friendship” in which “each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence”
Congress CAN: make war and peace, raise an army and a navy, print money, and set up postal system
WEAKNESSES: no direct power over citizens, no power to tax, could not enforce laws, could not regulate trade, could not be changed without consent of all 13 states
New Land Division & Development
Land Ordinance of 1785 Before, there was no orderly way of dividing up and
selling the new western land Western lands were divided into six-mile squares called
townships Each township was then divided into 36 sections of 640
acres each
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 Divided Northwest Territory into smaller territories, each
governed by a territorial governor As soon as a territory had 5,000 free adult males, it
could elect its own legislature or law-making body When the population reached 60,000, a territory could
apply to Congress to become a state Slavery was banned in the Northwest Territory
Shay’s Rebellion & the Need for Change
Money shortage forced famers to sell their land and livestock to pay off their debts
Daniel Shays led farmers in rebellion
Marched to the national arsenal to seize weapons
Militia troops sent to Springfield to restore order
Highlighted the weaknesses of the A.O.C. - must revise!!
Call for Convention! Each state sent delegates to Philadelphia in May of 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation
Opening the Constitutional Convention
Environment: hot, sticky, steamy, slightest move was painful
President of the Convention: George Washington
WHO? 55 delegates from 12 states (R.I. boycotted) “Well-bred, well-fed, well-read, and well-wed” Average age: 42 Oldest: Ben Franklin, 81 Extensive political experience More than 2/3 lawyers More than 1/3 owned slaves “Assembly of demi-gods”
Opening the Constitutional Convention
Father of the Constitution: James Madison Addressed the convention more than 200
times Wrote down nearly every word Took more than 600 pages of printed
notes
The Rule of Secrecy Delegates wanted to feel free to speak
their minds without causing alarm among the general public
Keep secret whatever was said in the meeting until their work was done
Shared Beliefs and Clashing Views
The delegates were committed to the ideals of the Declaration of Independence
The basic purpose of government: protect the rights of life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness The just powers of government come from
the consent of the governed Formed a republic: a country governed by
elected representatives Debate remains: Strong national
government (king) vs. not-so-strong national government (no king)
Original Plan: Revise the Articles of Confederation
Bold Move: THROW OUT the A.O.C. and write a new constitution
Delegates = Framers (NOT farmers!!)
Issue 1: How Should States Be Represented in the New
Government?
KEY ISSUE
Where should the government’s power come from?
THE STATES?▪ OR
THE PEOPLE?
Articles of Confederation = STATES NEW Constitution = ???
▪ 2 plans were recommended…
The Virginia PlanStrong National GovernmentThree branches:
Legislative Branch (Congress) = MAKE the laws.
Executive Branch = CARRY OUT the laws.
Judicial Branch (System of Courts) = APPLY and INTERPRET the laws.
The Virginia Plan
Congress made up of TWO houses: House of Representatives Senate
The number of lawmakers sent to Congress depended on POPULATION Bigger population = more
representatives
The New Jersey Plan
Government with three branches.
Legislative branch with ONE house, not two.
States have equal representation in Congress, no matter how big or small they are.
The Great Compromise Tempers Rise
small states vs. large states
Roger Sherman (from CT!) presents a compromise:
Two-House Congress House of Representatives
▪ Represents the PEOPLE▪ Number of reps based on POPULATION
Senate▪ Represents the STATES▪ Each state gets TWO senators
* Represents the people* # based on population
* Represents the states* Two senators per state
Issue 2: How Should Slaves Be Counted?
“Upon what principle shall SLAVES be computed in the representation?”
The South 9 out of 10 slaves live in the South Southerners wanted as many reps in the H.O.R. as
possible Argued that slaves should be counted the same as any
other people in determining representation
The North “Blacks are property and are used to the southward as
horses and cattle to the northward.” Slaves should be counted only as property that could be
taxed like any other property
New Thinking on Slavery
Growing division over slavery among white Americans
D.O.I. and Rev. War forced many to reexamine their views on slavery
Many southerners were uneasy about slavery, but not yet ready to abolish it South’s economy too dependent on
slave labor
Resolution: Three-Fifths Compromise
Madison proposes a compromise: Count each slave as three-fifths of a person when determining a state’s population. Congress approves, naming the idea the Three-Fifths Compromise.
Made a mockery of the statement “all men are created equal,” but it kept the convention moving forward.
The Slave Trade
North: Give Congress broad power to control trade between states and other countries.
South: Worried that Congress might try to tax southern export crops such as rice and tobacco. Didn’t want Congress to use its power over trade to outlaw the slave trade (importing slaves from Africa.)
The Slave Trade By 1787, several states had outlawed the
slave trade within their boundaries. A majority of the convention’s delegates
favored ending the slave trade completely. South Carolina and Georgia objected that
their economies would collapse without a “constant supply of fresh slaves.” Neither state would agree to any constitution
that threatened the slave trade.
The Slave Trade
Compromise:Congress would have the power to control trade, but with two limitations:
1) Congress could not place any tax on exports going to other countries
2) Congress should not interfere with the slave trade for 20 years, or until 1808
“The Fugitive Slave Clause”:▪ Escaped slaves had to be returned to their owners,
even if they were caught in a free state.
Conclusion
“Without such compromises, the states might never have come
together in a single union. Still, the compromises only postponed the
day when Americans would have to resolve the terrible contradiction
between slavery and the ideals of liberty and equality. Meanwhile, generations of African Americans
would spend their lives in bondage.”
Who will head the new government’s executive branch?
Charles Pinckney: wants “vigorous executive” Vigorous = strong, active, robust, powerful in action or
effect.
James Wilson: wants a single person to serve as chief executive
Issue 3: How Should the Chief Executive Be Elected?
How Should the Chief Executive Be Elected?
Convention’s response: WHAT!? A SINGLE EXECUTIVE!? We don’t want another King George!!
Wilson’s response: Good governments need clear, timely
and responsible leadership. This is most likely found in a single person, not a group.
One Executive or Three?
People who didn’t like Wilson’s idea:
Edmund Randolph of Virginia: preferred a three member executive drawn from different parts of the country. Three people are better than one.
Benjamin Franklin: The first guy might be good, but who knows what will come after him? The next one might be too ambitious or war-hungry.
Final Decision
ONE EXECUTIVE!!
Called “President”
Term limited to four years
Vice president needs to be elected if the president dies while still in office
Choosing the Chief Executive
So.. How do we choose?
Some ideas: Congress appoints president People elect the president A special “group of electors” from each
state elects the president
Resolution: The Electoral College
So what was decided? Who should elect the president?
NOT Congress NOT the people Instead, a “special body called the
Electoral College would elect the government’s leaders.”
The Electoral College System
Electoral College is made up of: Electors who cast votes to elect the president
and vice president every four years Each state has as many electors in the E.C. as
the number of senators and representatives it sends to Congress
Each state decides HOW to choose their electors▪ TODAY: the people choose their state’s electors when
they vote in presidential elections The electors then cast their ballots for president and vice president on a date chosen by the Congress
The candidate with the most votes became president
Political Parties and Elections
Framers’ concern: Voters don’t know enough about candidates outside their own state to choose a president wisely. Thus, we need the ELECTORS to choose.
Within a few years of the convention, political parties were nominating candidates for president and educating voters in every state about those candidates.
The Electoral College Today
In most states, the candidate who gets the most votes (even if less than a majority) gets all of that state’s ELECTORAL votes.
As a result, a candidate can win a majority in the Electoral College, without necessarily winning a majority of the votes cast across the country.
EXAMPLE: In the 2000 election, George W. Bush won the presidency over Al Gore, even though more voters nationally chose Gore. Why?? ELECTORAL VOTES.
Electing the President in Plain English
The Electoral College Today
Approving the Constitution
Questions: How many states would have to ratify
(approve) the Constitution before it could go into effect?
Should ratification require approval by all 13 states?
By the majority of 7 states?
Compromise: 9 states would need to approve in order
to ratify the Constitution.
Approving the Constitution
Questions: Who should ratify the Constitution? The people? (fountain of all power) State Legislatures? (faster and easier)
Conclusion: The Constitution would be ratified at
special conventions by delegates elected by the people in each state.
Signing the Constitution
September 17, 1787: CONSTITUTION COMPLETE!
Franklin shares his final thoughts:“I confess that I do not entirely approve of this
Constitution,” (but no convention could produce a perfect plan.) “It therefore
astonishes me to find this system approaching so near to perfect… and I think it will astonish
our enemies. I expect no better, and because I am not sure that it is not the best. Everyone
member of the convention must put his name to this instrument.”
Signing the Constitution
14 delegates left the convention before it ended
3 did not sign at all
Must most felt: “A new day was dawning for the United States.”
The Constitution Goes to the Nation
Newspapers in every state printed the Constitution as soon as they could get it.
What they found: A plan that would create a “federal”
system of government in which a strong national government shared power with the states.
Before long, the entire country was debating the same issues that had kept the convention in session for four long months.
The Federalists
Argument: The Constitution would
create a national government that was strong enough to unite the quarreling states into a single republic.
Leaders: James Madison, Alexander
Hamilton, John Jay
SUPPORTED THE CONSTITUTION
The Federalists What They Did:
Reminded people of the weaknesses of the government under the A.O.C.
Showed how the Constitution would remedy those weakness by creating a stronger, more effective Union of the states.
Addressed the fears of many Americans that a strong government would threaten their freedom or take away their rights.
Pointed out that the powers given to the government were strictly limited and divided among three branches so that no one branch could become too powerful.
All of this was written in what are called The Federalists Papers.
The Anti-Federalists
Argument: Congress would ruin the country with taxes The president had enough power to rule like a
king Judicial branch would swallow up state courts The plan did not list the rights of the people
Leaders: Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas
Jefferson
OPPOSED THE CONSTITUTION
Conclusion
According to Madison, the question facing the nation was:
“whether or not the Union shall or shall not be continued. There is, in my opinion, no middle ground to be
taken.”
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Using your prior knowledge (everything we have learned about the Revolution, Declaration of
Independence, etc) and your Chapter 8 Notes, create an OUTLINE that will answer our two
essential questions:
1) How did conflict create the need for the Constitution?
2) What is the role of compromise in shaping the Constitution?