6
3.25% Reverse repo rate 7.50% 4.75% Repo rate 8.50% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0% 5.5% 6.0% 6.5% 7.0% 7.5% 8.0% 8.5% 9.0% Feb 27 Mar 19 Apr 20 Apr 24 Jul 2 Jul 27 Sep 16, Nov 2 Jan 25 Mar 17 May 3 May 9 Jun 16 Jul 26 Sep 16 Oct 24 2010 2011 Ex-2: RBI's policy rate hikes over last 18 months Indian Steel Poised For Great Run Despite Current Blip Despite the temporary setbacks faced by the Indian steel industry in the current fiscal, the long term health remains sound as the Indian economy embarks on a new Five Year Plan, the Twelfth (201213 to 201617), on a far better footing especially the progress made on the infrastructure front. More interestingly, the role of the private sector has greatly enhanced, where private investment has increased from about 24.5% in the 10 th Plan to about 36% in the 11 th Plan, as development of infrastructure is moving away from government control to publicprivate partnership, with government’s role more of a facilitator/policy maker to aid investment in infrastructure. This big boost from infrastructure/ construction could trigger a substantial amount of steel demand by the end of the 12 th Plan, when India’s steel demand is likely to reach about 110 Mmt, i.e., an addition of 8 Mmtpa on an average over the next 5 years. Indian Economy Under Duress The Indian economy after growing at a CAGR of 8.6% during 2004‐05 to 2010‐11 (including a respectable 6.8% during the Global Recession of 2008‐09) is now on a sticky patch embattled with slowing GDP growth to 6.9% in Q2 2011‐12 (Ex‐1). To make matters worse the economy is grappled with high inflation, hovering around 9%. As an antidote to inflation the RBI has pursued a tight monetary policy, whereby policy rates have been hiked by 375‐425 basis points over the past 18 months (Ex‐2) to control demand and so anchor inflationary expectations. However RBI’s medicine instead of healing has further exacerbated the economy’s ill‐health by constraining the already tight supply line as higher cost of borrowings made fresh investment unviable, with fixed asset investment growth in the country declining to ‐0.6% in Q2 from 10.3% a year ago. Manufacturing growth has been seriously hampered, down to 2.7% in Q2 from 7.8% a year ago as higher financing costs have also hit consumers hard, private spending growth has slowed down to 4% in Q2 from 6.4% a year ago. This slump is economic fortunes have had an adverse impact on the both the business and consumer sentiments as such all plans, be it at the corporate level or households are being postponed thereby extending the downturn further. Not only that the national global image has taken a serious beating as foreign institutional investors are now shying away from the country. While FDI flows have softened, foreign institutional investment inflows (both equity and debt) have declined by 80% y‐o‐y to just $7.9 billion in 2011 vs. almost $40 billion in 2010. As people are pulling money out of the stock markets corporate weariness is rising indicated by drying up of IPOs and also unwilling to inject fresh capacity or increase production. This has had serious ramifications for the heavy industries, particularly steel, where the consumer inertia towards discretionary spending had hit steel demand hard. Also with steel now essentially a buyer’s market, producers are too wary to go ahead with their expansion plans in the current uncertain times. Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group Source: CSO Source: RBI 7.5 9.5 9.6 9.3 6.8 8.0 8.8 8.4 8.3 7.8 7.7 6.9 Fixed Asset Investment 11.1 -0.6 Manufacturing 10.6 2.7 -1.0 4.0 9.0 14.0 19.0 24.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Ex-1: Slump in India's GDP Growth GDP 425 bps 375 bps 1

Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Steel Industry Outlook

Citation preview

Page 1: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

3.25%

Reverse repo rate

7.50%

4.75%

Repo rate

8.50%

3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0%5.5%6.0%6.5%7.0%7.5%8.0%8.5%9.0%

Feb

27

Mar

19

Apr

20

Apr

24

Jul 2

Jul 2

7

Sep

16,

Nov

2

Jan

25

Mar

17

May

3

May

9

Jun

16

Jul 2

6

Sep

16

Oct

24

2010 2011

Ex-2: RBI's policy rate hikes over last 18 months

Indian Steel Poised For Great Run Despite Current Blip 

Despite the temporary setbacks faced by the Indian steel industry in the current fiscal, the long term health remains sound as  the  Indian  economy  embarks  on  a  new  Five  Year  Plan,  the Twelfth  (2012­13  to  2016­17),  on  a  far  better  footing especially  the progress made on  the  infrastructure  front. More  interestingly,  the  role of  the private  sector has greatly enhanced, where private  investment has  increased from about 24.5%  in the 10th Plan to about 36%  in the 11th Plan, as development of infrastructure is moving away from government control to public­private partnership, with government’s role  more  of  a  facilitator/policy  maker  to  aid  investment  in  infrastructure.  This  big  boost  from  infrastructure/ construction could trigger a substantial amount of steel demand by the end of the 12th Plan, when India’s steel demand is likely to reach about 110 Mmt, i.e., an addition of 8 Mmtpa on an average over the next 5 years.  

 

Indian Economy Under Duress  

The  Indian  economy  after  growing  at  a  CAGR  of  8.6%  during 2004‐05  to  2010‐11  (including  a  respectable  6.8%  during  the Global Recession of 2008‐09) is now on a sticky patch embattled with  slowing  GDP  growth  to  6.9%  in  Q2  2011‐12  (Ex‐1).  To make  matters  worse  the  economy  is  grappled  with  high inflation,  hovering  around  9%.  As  an  antidote  to  inflation  the RBI has pursued a  tight monetary policy, whereby policy rates have  been  hiked  by  375‐425  basis  points  over  the  past  18 months  (Ex‐2)  to  control  demand  and  so  anchor  inflationary expectations.  However  RBI’s  medicine  instead  of  healing  has further exacerbated the economy’s ill‐health by constraining the already  tight  supply  line  as  higher  cost  of  borrowings  made fresh  investment unviable, with  fixed  asset  investment  growth in the country declining to ‐0.6% in Q2 from 10.3% a year ago. Manufacturing  growth  has  been  seriously  hampered,  down  to 2.7% in Q2 from 7.8% a year ago as higher financing costs have also  hit  consumers  hard,  private  spending  growth  has  slowed down to 4% in Q2 from 6.4% a year ago. 

This slump is economic fortunes have had an adverse impact on the  both  the  business  and  consumer  sentiments  as  such  all plans,  be  it  at  the  corporate  level  or  households  are  being postponed  thereby  extending  the  downturn  further.  Not  only that  the  national  global  image  has  taken  a  serious  beating  as foreign  institutional  investors  are  now  shying  away  from  the country.  While  FDI  flows  have  softened,  foreign  institutional investment  inflows  (both  equity  and  debt)  have  declined  by 80% y‐o‐y  to  just $7.9 billion  in 2011 vs. almost $40 billion  in 2010.  

As people are pulling money out of the stock markets corporate weariness is rising indicated by drying up of IPOs and also unwilling  to  inject  fresh  capacity  or  increase  production.  This  has  had  serious  ramifications  for  the  heavy  industries, particularly steel, where the consumer inertia towards discretionary spending had hit steel demand hard. Also with steel now essentially a buyer’s market, producers are too wary to go ahead with their expansion plans in the current uncertain times.  

Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

Source: CSO

Source: RBI

7.5

9.5 9.69.3

6.8

8.0

8.8

8.4 8.3

7.8 7.7

6.9

Fixed Asset Investment

11.1

-0.6

Manufacturing

10.6

2.7

-1.0

4.0

9.0

14.0

19.0

24.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

Ex-1: Slump in India's GDP Growth

GDP

425 bps 

375 bps

1

Page 2: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

Does this mean that the positive strides made by the Indian steel industry, where it has risen to become the world’s 

4th largest steel producer, would be offset by the current economic scenario and policy inaction? We feel this is just a 

blip and the economy would soon turnaround and so would the fortunes of the steel industry.   

   

India’s Fundamentals Remain Strong  

The Indian economy is primarily driven by domestic demand as  even  after  20  years  of  liberalization  exports  as  a proportion of GDP has risen to about 20% in 2010‐11 from 7% in the early 1990s (in contrast to other Asian economies where exports  constitute about 40‐45% of GDP),  as bulk of the  GDP  is  generated  through  private  spending  and  fixed asset  investment  (Ex‐3).  This  was  reason  the  Indian economy  exhibited  amazing  resilience  amidst  the  Global Recession  of  2008‐09  growing  at  8%  and  8.5%  in  the  two years after the crisis.  

 

Moreover a positive demographic dividend weighs in India’s favour,  where  the  dependency  ratio  (non‐working  age population  –  children  aged  below  15  and  old  aged  people over 64) has been on a steady decline from 69% in 1995 to 56%  in  2010  and  set  to  fall  further  to  around 40%  for  the next  35‐40  years.  This  has  resulted  in  significant  wealth generation  in  the  country,  leading  to  a  big  rise  in  average disposable  income  per  year,  which  has more  than  doubled over  the  last 6‐7  years  (Ex‐4),  seeking higher discretionary spending and  so necessitating  businesses  to  expand.  It  also added  more  impetus  on  improvement  in  physical infrastructure  as  we  witnessed  a  big  rise  in  fixed  asset investment,  especially  over  the  last  6‐7  years  at  a  CAGR  of 10.3% as against 5.5% in the previous 50 years.  

 

The period of economic  liberalization has also ushered  in a rapid change in the service industry, which has now become the backbone of economic development in India. However in lieu  of  declining  agricultural  growth  and  saturation  in services growth, it is inevitable that industry should take the lead to achieve higher GDP growth on a sustainable basis, a major  part  of  this  would  be  achieved  through  higher manufacturing contribution and so push India’s GDP growth back  to  a  higher  growth  terrain.  As  per  the  latest  Oxford Economic  Forecasts  (Dec  2011),  manufacturing  is  set  to grow at  a CAGR of 9.1% over  the 12th Plan period,  suitably aided  by  an  impressive  growth  in  fixed  asset  investment (CAGR 11.9%), thus pushing GDP growth close to 9% CAGR over the Plan period (Ex‐5).  

 

Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

84.3% 78.5%73.5% 72.2%

64.9%59.9%

13.8%18.2% 18.7% 21.0% 23.0%

28.7%

5.9% 3.9% 5.5% 6.3% 8.9%18.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s

% of GDP Ex-3: India eco. primarily domestic driven

Private consumption spending Gross fixed capital formationExports of goods & services

176

681

1,682

14,330

23,005

35,917

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

1950-51 to 1990-91 1991-92 to 2003-04 2004-05 to 2010-11

41 yrs 13 yrs 7 yrs

Ex-4: Big Jump in India's Purchasing Power

Avg. rise in income per year (Rs)

Per capita income at end of period (Rs)

Source: CSO, In-house

8.7%

9.1%

9.0%

8.5%

11.9%

GDP

Manufacturing

Industrial production

Private spending

Fixed asset investment

Ex-5: India's high growth story to continue in 12th Plan

Source: Oxford Economics

2

Source: CSO, In-house

CAGR (%) 2012-13 to 2016-17

Page 3: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

 

Sustained Focus on Infrastructure  

The fast growth of the economy in recent years has placed increasing stress on physical infrastructure such as electricity, railways,  roads,  ports,  airports,  irrigation  and  water  supply  and  sanitation,  both  in  urban  and  rural  areas,  all  of  which already  suffer  from a  substantial  deficit.  The  importance  of  investment  in  infrastructure  for  achieving  a  sustainable  and inclusive  growth  of  9‐10% of  GDP was duly  emphasized  for  the  first  time  in  the  11th  Plan, where  it was  envisaged  that investment in physical infrastructure would increase from 5% of GDP during the 10th Plan to about 9% of GDP by 2011–12 (terminal year of the 11th Plan). Although the gross capital formation in infrastructure is likely to rise to about 7.55%, much below the accepted level of 11% as experienced in many other emerging developing countries, yet it constitutes a significant shift in favour of investment in infrastructure. Infrastructure development is now an India priority where the government is acting as a facilitator/policy maker to aid investment in infrastructure.  

This thrust on infrastructure investment is set to go up further in the 12th Plan where a preliminary assessment suggests that investment in infrastructure would need to be of the order of about Rs 40 lakh crore (US$ 1025 billion) to achieve a share  of  9.95% of  GDP  over  the  12th  Plan  period  (Ex‐6).  At  least  50% of  this  investment would  have  to  come  from  the private sector, which has also witnessed an increase from about 24.5% in the 10th Plan to about 36% in the 11th Plan (Ex‐7), as development of infrastructure is moving away from government control to public‐private partnership.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Construction Upswing ­ Bodes Well For Steel With  an  increasing  focus  on  infrastructure  development,  the construction sector has grown leaps and bounds, growing at a CAGR of  about 10.6%  in  the  last decade,  accounting  for over 8%  of  current  GDP  (Ex‐8).  It  is  crucial  for  creating  physical infrastructure in the country, as it accounts for more than half of the investment required for setting up critical infrastructure facilities  like  power  projects,  ports,  railways,  roads,  bridges etc.  With  construction  activities  having  strong  linkages  with various  industries,  most  notably  steel,  it  augurs  well  for  the long‐term health of the industry as nearly half of the planned investment  of  around  $1  trillion  in  the  12th  Plan  will  be channelized into construction projects. 

 

 

Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

Source: Planning CommissionSource: Planning Commission 

Source: CSO, In-house

5.71%

7.18%

8.37%

9.50% 10.70%

4.05%4.76% 5.07% 5.00%

5.55%

1.65%2.42%

3.30%

4.50%5.15%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

2015

-16

2016

-17

10th Plan

11th Plan 12th Plan

Ex-6: Rising share of infra investment in GDP

Total Public Private

75.5%

69.9%

65.7%

66.3%

65.3%

63.2%

60.6%

63.8%

50%

24.5%

30.1%

34.3%

33.7%

34.7%

36.8%

39.4%

36.2%

50%

10th Plan (actual)

11th Plan (Orginal)

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

11th Plan (revised)

12th Plan (projections)

Ex-7: Rising share of pvt investment in infra

Public Private

3.07%4.33% 4.52% 5.08% 5.43%

8.10%

6.32%

5.54% 3.03%4.59%

5.02%

10.60%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0% Ex-8: Construction on an upswing

Construction as % of GDPConstruction CAGR (%)

3

Page 4: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

      

As infrastructure construction accounts for the maximum share (54%) of construction activities, the potential investment in the construction over the next 5 years would be around 550 billion. Assuming 10% of the spending on steel and an average NSR of US$600/mt, additional steel demand from infrastructure alone could reach about 90 million mt (Mmt) by 2016‐17. 

This however should be taken with a pinch of salt as going by the track record of spending in the first 2‐3 years of 11th Plan, actual  investment  is  only  about  45‐50%  of  the  planned. While  the  revised  projections  in  power,  irrigation  and  airport sectors  are  close  to  the  initial  targets,  there  are  significant  shortfalls  in  roads,  railways,  ports,  water  supply  and sanitation/urban  infrastructure.  There  are  huge  lags  in  public  investment,  most  notably  in  power,  ports,  telecom  and railways, with public  investment as per  the mid‐term appraisal  likely  to be 9%  lower  than  initial  targets  (Ex‐9).   Private investment is likely to fare better (Ex‐10), accounting for almost two‐thirds of this increased investment thus offsetting the lags in public investment. The downside however is that private investment is only in selected sectors like power, telecom & airports, with significant lags in roads, ports and urban infrastructure.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A look at the sector‐wise trends of investment, the following points emerge:  

Despite  private  investment  in  the  electricity  sector  showing  an  increase  of  55%  as  compared  to  the  original projections, yet capacity addition in the 11th Plan would be 62,374 MW as compared to a target of 78,700 MW. 

The projected investment in the road sector is also significantly lower due to a shortfall in the award of road projects by NHAI during the first three years of the Plan. However investments in the road sector are likely to increase during the  last  two years of  the 11th Plan as  the Ministry has decided  to  speed up  implementation of  the National Highway Development Project (NHDP) to achieve a completion rate of 20 km of highways per day, though the major build‐up in expenditure as a result of this acceleration will be witnessed in the 12th Plan.  

As far as the telecom sector is concerned, the growth has been phenomenal with investment expected to be 34% more than anticipated at  the time of  formulation of the 11th Plan, mainly due to the 60% higher  level of  investment by the private sector, while investment by the Centre is likely to be 24% lower than the original projections.  

Investment  in  Railways  is  quite  dismal,  with  both  central  sector  and  private  investments  are  below  the  original projections, with private investment only 16.5% of the original projections.  

Similar  story  is  repeated  in  the  port  sector,  where  progress  has  been  much  below  expectations,  with  11th  Plan investment now projected to be less than half of the original projection, with private investment in the port sector  is also expected to be almost 40% lower as very few PPP projects have been awarded by the respective port trusts in the first two years of the 11th Plan.  

 

Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

Source: Planning CommissionSource: Planning Commission 

39.0%

12.3%

-2.8% -8.7% -9.0%-19.6% -22.9% -23.8%

-75.7%-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%Ex-9: Huge lags in public investment

59.6% 55.0%

19.9%7.1%

-40.3%-57.0%

-83.5% -91.1%-100%-80%-60%-40%-20%

0%20%40%60%80%

Ex-10: Private investment fares better, but only in selected sectors

4

Page 5: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

      

Investment in airports in the 11th Plan has been quite encouraging with projected investment about 17% higher than the original estimate as both public and private investment in airports is likely to increase compared to the investment projected at the beginning of the 11th Plan.  

Private  sector  investment  in water  supply and  sanitation  is  likely  to  be  below  2%  of  the  total  investment  in  this sector, while public investment would be about 20% lower.   

 Nevertheless the impetus on infrastructure development would continue and with government more focused on improving the level of implementation, incremental steel demand from infrastructure could reach about 65‐70 Mmt by the end of the 12th Plan. This coupled with positive demographic dividend would be a huge  impetus  to earnings and will  thus generate more  discretionary  spending  on  housing,  automobiles,  consumer  durables  and  capital  goods.  No  doubt  passenger  car segment  is  going  through a  rough patch,  but  this  is  a momentary blip  and had more  to do with RBI  rate hikes  affecting consumer sentiments. With commercial vehicle segment doing quite well, auto segment would soon turn around, especially as vehicle density in India is quite low vis‐à‐vis other major economies. Similar revival is expected in other steel intensive sectors (Ex‐11). Thus besides infrastructure/ construction, these segments could also trigger a substantial amount of steel demand by the end of the 12th Plan, when India’s steel demand is likely to reach about 110 Mmt, (Ex‐12) i.e., an addition of 40 Mmt in 5 years, an average of 8 Mmtpa.  

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Huge Steel Investments, Little on Ground

Such  high  demand  potential  has  elicited  huge  interest  from private steel players to increase their capacities to cater to this demand.  Accordingly  huge  investments  had  been  planned resulting  in  10  times  increase  in  steel  capex  over  the  last decade.  A  large  number  of MoUs  has  been  signed with  state governments,  especially  on  the  Eastern  Coast  and  also Karnataka  (Ex‐13),  states  renowned  for  their  rich  iron  ore deposits. Total planned capacity expansion  is about 200 Mmt involving  an  investment  of  over  Rs  6.3  lakh  crore,  of  which 90% involves private players. 

 

Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

Source: Oxford Economics  Source: World Steel Association, Oxford Economics, In-house

44.1

69.8

10.5

15.4

5.6

10.3

70

110

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2011-12 2016-17

(Mmt)Ex-12: Likely steel demand by end of 12th Plan

others

Automobiles

Railways

cons durables

capital goods

Infra/construction

44 4238

31

2022

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

16 15 16 15 10 14

KarnatakaJharkhand Orissa BengalChhattisgarhOthers

(Mmt) Ex-13: State-wise proposed steel capacity

5

Source: CMIE

8.0%

8.2%

8.2%

8.2%

8.2%

8.8%

9.6%

12.6%

13.0%

5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 12.5% 15.0%

Electrical equipment

Mechanical machinery

Fabricated products

consumer durables

Railways

others

Infra/construction

Transport equipment

Automobiles

CAGR (%)

Ex-11: Steel intensive sectors set to regain momentum

Page 6: Article for JPC Bulletin 2012

 

Most  of  which  are  domestic  private  players  with  150  Mmt  of planned  capacity  and  another  28 Mmt by  foreign  private players (Ex‐14). However ground realities are very different as Greenfield steel capacity expansions are seriously constrained and whatever limited  capacity  enhancements  that  has  taken  place  are  through Brownfield route only. As per information from RBI on the delays in Central Sector steel projects, the cost overrun as a proportion of the  original  project  cost  has  increased  from  19%  in  2008‐09  to over 31% in 2010‐11, and is set to go up higher, unless the issues responsible for the delays are acted upon in right earnest, some of which are enumerated as follows: 

a. Procedural  delays  in  acquiring  clearance  for  projects  ‐ environmental &, forest clearances and similar other regulatory bottlenecks 

b. Land acquisition – problems regarding rehabilitation of local people  c. Raw material securitization ‐ Shortage of raw materials is one of the major problem areas;  

i. Coke needs are met through imports as India does not have large reserves of coking quality coal.  ii. Notwithstanding huge domestic availability, high grade iron ore is exported to China.  iii. Natural gas is the best alternate fuel/raw material for manufacturing sponge iron/steel. Despite proven reserves of 

natural gas there is limited availability to domestic steel users. d.  Infrastructure bottlenecks in power, water, roads and port handling capacity  e.  Delays in allocation of captive mines    Such delays  in steel capacity expansion have made the domestic  industry more dependent on  imports, as there has been a complete role reversal; India being a net exporter of steel till 2006‐07 has now become a net importer to the tune of 4.5‐5 Mmtpa, which is likely to swell further as Brownfield expansions would not be enough to meet the rising steel demand in the country.   

The Way Forward  

A. Improve raw material habits   i. As  raw  material  costs  of  Indian  steel  constitute  about  65%  of  total  costs,  we  need  to  improve  domestic 

availability by curtailing exports and utilize proven domestic reserves ii. Also allocation of captive mines need to be put on a fast track  iii. Use new technologies to economize low grade domestic ore  iv. Specially designed washeries should be constructed to deal with low volatile coking coal which will contribute 

to increased availability of metallurgical coking coal v. All efforts should be made to increase its natural gas availability, like enabling the participation of private sector 

in the area of exploration of oil and natural gas  

B. A Congenial policy framework   i. Create land banks in one specific area ii. Single window clearance for Greenfield projects iii. Set up Steel Development Finance Corporation for easy availability of project finance and also minimize project 

backlogs iv. Set up multi‐modal linkages for better logistical support v. Flexible financing options to reduce debt leverage 

  Dr. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Senior Economist, Essar Group 

1928

150

178

020406080

100120140160180200

9 5 72 77

Govt. Pvt. (Foreign) Pvt. (Indian) Pvt. (Total)

Ex-14: Proposed steel capacity by ownership (Mmt)

Source: CMIE

6