Artemio Villareal vs People of the Philippines

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Artemio Villareal vs People of the Philippines

    1/2

    Artemio Villareal vs People of the Philippines

    GR No. 151258

    FACTS:

    Seven Freshmen Law students of Ateneo de Manila University School of Law have been initiated by the

    Aquila Legis Juris Fraternity on February 1991. The initiation rites started when the neophytes were met

    by some members of the mentioned fraternity at the lobby of the Ateneo Law School. They were

    consequently brought to a house and briefed on what will be happening during the days when they will

    be initiated. They were informed that there will be physical beatings and that the neophytes can quit

    anytime they want. They were brought to another house to commence their initiation.

    The neophytes were insulted and threatened even before they got off the van. Members of the

    fraternity delivered blows to the neophytes as they alighted from the van. Several initiation rites were

    experienced by the neophytes like the Indian run, Bicol express and rounds. They were asked to recite

    provisions and principles of the fraternity and were hit everytime they made a mistake.

    Accused fraternity members, Dizon and Villareal, asked the head of the initiation rites

    (Victorino) to reopen the initiation. Fraternity members subjected neophytes to paddling and additional

    hours of physical pain. After the last session of beatings, Lenny Villa could not walk. Later that night, he

    was feeling cold and his condition worsened. He was brought to the hospital but was declared dead on

    arrival.

    Criminal case was filed against 26 fraternity members and was subsequently found guilty

    beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of homicide and penalized with reclusion perpetua.

    On January 10 2002, CA modified the criminal liability of each of the accused according to

    individual participation. 19 of the the accused were acquitted, 4 of the appellants were found guilty of

    slight physical injuries, and 2 of the accused-appellants (Dizon and Villareal) were found guilty beyond

    reasonable doubt of the crime of homicide.

    Accused Villareal petitioned for review on Certriori under Rue 45 on the grounds that the CA

    made 2 reversible errors: first, denial of due process and second, conviction absent proof beyond

    reasonable doubt. Consequently, petitioner Villareal died on 13 March 2011 and filed a Notice of Death

    of Party on 10 August 2011.

    ISSUE:

    Whether or not criminal liability for personal penalties of the accused is extinguished by death

    RULING:

  • 8/13/2019 Artemio Villareal vs People of the Philippines

    2/2

    Yes, criminal liability of the accused is extinguished by death. The Court took note of counsel for

    petitioners Notice of Death when it has been received while the petition was pending resolution.

    Personal penalties refer to the service of personal or imprisonment penalties, while pecuniary penalties

    refer to fines, costs, civil liability. Article 89 of the Revised Penal Code states that the criminal liability of

    a convict for personal penalties is totally extinguished by death of the convict. His pecuniary penalty has

    been extinguished since the death of the accused happened before his final judgment. Therefore, the

    death of the petitioner for both personal and pecuniary penalties including his civil liability has ended.

    His petition has also been dismissed and the criminal case against him has been closed and terminated.