Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4/8/2013
1
The Clinical Features and Rehabilitation
Challenges of Alzheimer’s and Non
Alzheimer's Degenerative Dementias -
NADD: An Educational Program for
Rehabilitation Professionals
Dina I. Drubach, DSc.PT
Learners ObjectivesSession I & II
• Describe the pathophysiology, and clinical features of
patients with Alzheimer’s Disease- AD.
• Describe the pathophysiology, and clinical features of
patients with Non- Alzheimer’s degenerative dementia –
NADD
• Identify the rehabilitation needs of patients with
Alzheimer’s Disease and Non- Alzheimer’s Disease
• Identify and gain familiarity with scales that measure
various important aspects of Alzheimer’s Dementia
Art of Listening to the story One view- What do you see?
Let’s Examine what we see in our
own reflection and start with
“Self”
4/8/2013
2
Program Outline
Two sessions
• Session I
– Background and Definition
– History
– Neuropathological Findings
– Imaging
Program Outline
• Session II
– Explain specific signs and symptoms
– Incidence and prevalence
– Review International Classification of
Functioning and Disability (ICF model)
– Rehabilitation pearls
Definition of Non Alzheimer’s
Degenerative Dementia
• A group of disorders which share some
common clinical and pathophysiological
features with Alzheimer’s Disease and yet
have unique features of their own.
International Classification of Functioning
Disability and Health (ICF), = One Approach
• Provides a systematic model to assist in approach for a treatment plan towards disablement
• This approach also gives the patient and caregiver a model that assists in decisions towards a proactive future
• Important for patient and families to come to a decision they are content with, early in the illness
• There is no “right” or “wrong” decision, just one that they can made together-early
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2005/9241592672.pdf
4/8/2013
3
BODY FUNCTION &
StructureACTIVITY PARTICIPATION
DISEASE
Page 1
The ICF Model(WHO 2002)
3 LEVELS OF HUMAN
FUNCTION
EXAMPLESEXAMPLES
SEADL SCALEBERG BALANCE SCALE
GAIT SPEED
EXAMPLESEXAMPLES
PDQ-39SF-36
UPDRS
EXAMPLESEXAMPLES
6 MINUTE WALK TESTCLOCK DRAWING TESTHAMSTRING LENGTH
WHO 2002
“What to measure?”
International Classification of Functioning Disability and
Health
BODY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE: Examples: Visual
perceptual, ROM, Strength, Sensation, Postural
control
ACTIVITY: Examples: ADLs-i.e. Schwab & England
ADL, Gait, Balance “task”
PARTICIPATION: Examples: Global health measures,
Quality of life,“Impact”measures,
Neuropsychiatric Inventory
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
History
• Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-initially described 1906. Degenerative etiology with gradual progression
• Lewy body dementia (LBD) – initially characterized in 1900’s F. Lewy first described changes in neurons seen under a microscope in patients who had Parkinson’s disease
• Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) – initially characterized in the 1960s
• Corticobasal degeneration CBD – initially characterized in the late 1960’s
Aminoff, M. J., Boller, F., & Swaab, D. F. (2008)
Syndrome vs. Disease
• Syndrome: a constellation of clinical
features-signs and symptoms
• Disease: a group of pathological findings
• There is less than perfect correlation
between specific syndromes and specific
neuropathological entities
Drubach, DA 2009
4/8/2013
4
Clinical Diagnosis of DementiaCore features
• Previously normal cognition
• Memory impairment
• Cognitive problem of sufficient
significance to interfere with
usual social
life/relationships/work
• Normal
sensorium/alertness/conscious
ness
• Absence of major depression
impairing cognition
• Presumed to be due to
“organic” CNS lesion/disease
Plus at least one of the
following:• Impaired abstract thinking
• Impaired judgment
• Personality change
• Aphasia/apraxia/agnosia/spatia
l disorientation
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders. 3rd. Ed. Revised. APA 1987
Dementia Syndromes
• Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
• Lewy body dementias (LBD)
• Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)
• Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)
• Corticobasal ganglionic degeneration (CBGD or
CBD)
Cognitive Domains
• Orientation, attention, concentration
• Learning and memory
• Executive functions
• Visual perceptual/visuospatial
• Language
• Praxis
• Behavior
Cummings, J. L., & DF., B. (1992)
Functions affected in dementias
• Learning: ability to acquire new information
• Memory: ability to recall and utilize learned
information
• Language: ability to interpret and deliver a
message (verbal and non-verbal)
• Executive Functions: ability to initiate
behavior and respond appropriately to an
internal or external stimulus
Wells, C. (1977)
4/8/2013
5
Functions affected in dementias
continued
• Visual: constructional and spatial abilities:
ability to localize a point in space in relation
to another
• Perception: ability to acquire, internalize,
and interpret information by the conscious
mind
• Praxis: Translating an idea into action
Wells, C. (1977)
Lewy Body Disease
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Cortico Basal Deg.
Alzheimer’s Disease
FTD-Language
FTD-Behavior
Memory
Behavior
LanguagePraxis
Falls
Parkinsonism
Drubach, DA 2010
Corticobasal Degeneration-
CBD
Progressive Supranuclear
Palsy PSP
Lewy Body
DementiaDLB
Frontotemporal Dementia FTD
Frontotemporal Degeneration
language variant FTD lv
Dementia + + ++++ ++++
Motor control ++++ ++ +
EPS ++++ +++ ++++
Psychosis ++++
Language + ++ ++++Behavior ++ +++++
Drubach, DA and Drubach, DI 2010
Pathophysiology
• Teasing apart the clinical presentation of
AD & NADD is complex
• Symptoms may overlap across syndromes
• Key is determining the prominence, as
opposed to the presence, of a symptom at
a given stage in the disease
4/8/2013
6
Definition of Degenerative
• Caused by progressive death of brain cells
• Intracellular deposition of abnormal
proteins (proteinopathies)
• Selective anatomical vulnerability
Dickson, Dennis Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2010; 23www.ijcep.com/IJCEP908006 2010
Normal neuron Abnormal neuron
Ubiquitin+
TDP-43+
degradedproteins
wasteproteins
clumpedproteins
wasteproteins
PathophysiologyCorticobasal degeneration, Frontotemporal
degeneration and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
PathophysiologyCorticobasal degeneration, Frontotemporal
degeneration and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Boeve, BF 2009
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Corticobasal Degeneration
Lewy Body Dementia
Frontotemporal Degeneration
Frontotemporal Degeneration language variant
Tau ++++ +++ +++ ++
α-synuclein
+++
Ubiquitin +Aβ amyloid +
Tdp43 +
Drubach & Drubach, 2010
Pathophysiology:
Tauopathy
• Proteins that stabilizes
microtubules
• Abundant in neurons in
CNS, and less common
else where
• When tau proteins are
defective and no longer
stabilize microtubules
properly, they can result
in cellular death
• Neurofibrillary tangle-NFT
Microscopy image of a neurofibrillary tangle, confirmed by hyperphosphorylated tau protein http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurofibrillary_tangle
4/8/2013
7
MRI and microscopic view of AD &
NAD pathology
http://www.mayoclinic.org/medicalprofs/non-alzheimers-dementias.html
Imaging
• Structural
– Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
– Computed Tomography (CT)
• Functional
– Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
– Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT)
– Functional MRI (fMRI)
Structural Imaging
• MRI
–Gold Standard
–Superb Resolution
–Expensive
–Contraindicated in pts with
metal devices (Pacemakers)
–Magnetic fields ?
• CT
–Lesser resolution than MRI
–No contraindication in patients
with metal devices
–Cheaper
MRI
Functional Imaging• PET
– The gold standard
– Can use different tracers
– Expensive
– Covered by medicare in certain circumstances
– Radioactivity
• SPECT
• Functional MRI
4/8/2013
8
Session II
Specific signs and symptoms
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
Dementia with Lewy Body (DLB)
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD)
Learners Objectives
• Recognize signs, symptoms and progression of each of the disorders
• Distinguish between difficulties with activities and participation through the use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model
• Appreciate alternative strategies for approaching fall prevention, and managing behaviors
Session II
Test your knowledge?
• What is the difference between syndrome and
disease?
DementiaDementia
10%
AD vascular dementiaAD vascular dementiaAlzheimer’s disease (AD)Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
53%
8%
VasculardementiaVasculardementia
8%Fronto-
temporal dementia
Fronto-temporal dementia
6%OtherOther
5%
DLBDLB10%
AD + dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)AD + dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)
Petersen 2013
4/8/2013
9
Alzheimer’s Disease
ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
• Degenerative etiology
• Gradual progression
• Basic neurological exam normal
early
• Clinical-pathology correlation 80-
90%
Petersen 2013
CP926864- 31Petersen 2013
New Diagnostic Criteria for the
Alzheimer’s Disease Spectrum
Petersen 2013
4/8/2013
10
New Criteria for the AD Spectrum
• 3 clinical phases
– Dementia
– Mild cognitive impairment
– Pre-clinical
• Separate clinical and pathophysiology
• Use of biomarkers to link clinical syndrome
to pathophsiology
Petersen 2013
New Criteria for the AD Spectrum
• 3 clinical phases
– Dementia
– Mild cognitive impairment
– Pre-clinical
• Separate clinical and pathophysiology
• Use of biomarkers to link clinical syndrome
to pathophsiology
Petersen 2013
Alzheimer’s Disease Spectrum
MCI Due to AD
Preclinical AD
Dementia Due to AD
CP926864- 35Petersen 2013
Clinical Pathophysiology of AD
• Characterize the disease along the clinical
spectrum
• Characterize the disease along the
pathophysiological spectrum
Petersen 2013
4/8/2013
11
Biomarkers for AD
• Early biomarkers
– Amyloid deposition
– PET imaging
– CSF amyloid
• Later biomarkers
– Neurodegeneration
– Structural MRI
– FDG PET
– CSF tau
Petersen 2013
Neuroimaging in AD
Neuroimaging in AD
• Structural MRI
• Functional imaging
– FDG PET
• Molecular imaging
– Amyloid PET imaging
Structural Imaging in AD
4/8/2013
12
Structural MRI: Atrophy and AD Stage
Control, 70 F MCI, 72 F AD, 74, F
Petersen 2013
Hippocampus & ERC volume Measurement - tracing
Functional Imaging in AD
2/4/2008 FDG ScanParietal temporal hypometabolism (Global FDG AD score of 1.14 is abnormal) Petersen 2013
4/8/2013
13
Molecular Neuroimaging
02-155-940 02-310-847 06-209-892
32.5
21.5
10.5
0
Low
Low
Hig
hH
igh
CNCN aMCIaMCI ADAD
00-863-895 01-873-114
CNCN aMCIaMCI
PIB Examples – Full Spectrum
3001475-2
PiB Imaging
Percent Positive
Normals: 30%
MCI: 60%
AD: 90%
Status of Amyloid Imaging
• C11 Pittsburgh Compound B (GE)
• F18 Florbetapir (Avid/Lilly)
• F18 Flutemetamol (GE)
• F18 Florbetaben (Bayer)
• F18 AZD4694 (Navidea)
Petersen 2013
4/8/2013
14
AD TREATMENTS
CHOLINESTERASE DRUGS
DONEPEZIL (ARICEPT)
RIVASTIGMINE (EXELON)
GALANTAMINE (RAZADYNE)
NMDA ANTAGONIST
MEMANTINE (NAMENDA)
CLINICAL DEMENTIARATING (CDR): 0 0.5 1 2 3
National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center , Washington Univ. 2011
NON ALZHEIMER’S DEGENERATIVE
DEMENTIAS
Non Alzheimer’s Degenerative
Dementias- NADD
• Dementia with Lewy Body (DLB)
• Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
• Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD)
4/8/2013
15
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)• Second most common cause of dementia
age >65
• Combines features of Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease (IPD) & Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
– Motor, cognitive, psychiatric, autonomic, sleep
– Pathological findings: except for localization, pathology cannot be differentiated from IPD
• Most complex degenerative disease to treat
Incidence and Prevalence
• Now considered the primary cause of
dementia in 12-25% of patients (2nd behind
Alzheimer’s disease)
• Probably over 1 million Americans affected
• Major public health issue
Incidence and Prevalence
Lewy Body Dementia Association
• approximately 20% of all dementia cases
are LBD
• more than 800,000 people in the United
States
• there are no other clear numbers of
prevalence due to complexity of diagnosis
Dementia with Lewy Bodies: Consortium Diagnostic Criteria
• Dementia +
Core Criteria - need 2 for Probable DLB
• Fluctuating cognition, attention, alertness
• Recurrent visual hallucinations
• Spontaneous extrapyramidal signs
(Cog wheeling, rigidity, bradykinesia)
( McKeith, 2005)
4/8/2013
16
Dementia with Lewy Bodies: Consortium Diagnostic Criteria
Suggestive Features
• Severe neuroleptic sensitivity
• REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
• Low dopamine transporter uptake with PET
( McKeith, 2005)
Dementia with Lewy Bodies:
Consortium Diagnostic Criteria
Supportive Criteria
• Repeated falls
• Transient unexplained loss of consciousness
• Severe autonomic dysfunction (orthostatic
hypotension)
• Auditory hallucinations
• Systematized delusions
• Depression
( McKeith, 2005)
Disordered arousal in DLB
• Excessive daytime sleepiness
• Fluctuations in alertness
– Wide variations in cognition and function
because of different levels of arousal
• Prominent visual Hallucinations
– ? The intrusion of a sleep phenomenon
(dreaming) during wakefulness
• REM sleep behavior disorder
Boeve, BF et al. (2007)
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
• A parasomnia featuring:
– Violent dreaming, often described as being chased or attacked by people or animals
– Leads to violent physical activities during sleep
• Thrashing about in sleep
• Falling out of bed
• Striking bed partner
• Physical injuries
• A powerful predictor of subsequent DLB (or multiple system atrophy) up to 10 years later
Boeve, B. F. et. al 2004
4/8/2013
17
Pathology of DLB
• Usually a mixture of AD pathology and
synuclein pathology
• α-Synuclein = the key protein in
intranuclear inclusions � Lewy Bodies
• Lewy Bodies located in:
– Brainstem locus ceruleus
– Substantia nigra
– Amygdala
– Cingulate cortex, neocortex
Boeve, B. F. et al 2007
Synucleinopathies
Lewy Body Disease (LBD)
Dickson, D. 2010; 3(1): 1–23
MRI Findings
• Relative preservation of hippocampal and
medial temporal volume
• No specific findings
• Useful to consider other etiologies
Josephs, K. A. et. al 2010
4/8/2013
18
Normal
Dementia with Lewy Bodies
4/8/2013
19
International Classification of Functioning
Disability and Health (ICF), = One Approach
• Provides a systematic model to assist in approach for a treatment plan towards disablement
• This approach also gives the patient and caregiver a model that assists in decisions towards a proactive future
• Important for patient and families to come to a decision they are content with, early in the illness
• There is no “right” or “wrong” decision, just one that they can make together-early
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2005/9241592672.pdf
“What to measure?”
Using the ICF- DLB
• BODY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE: Examples:
Visual perceptual, ROM, Strength, Sensation,
Postural control
• ACTIVITY: Examples: ADLs-i.e... SEADL, Gait,
Balance “task”
• PARTICIPATION: Examples: Global health
measures, Quality of life,“Impact”measures, NPI
75
WHO 2002
Measuring Quality of Health-
Therapists have a role in decreasing severity and
frequency to ER and cost of care
• 6. Querying about falls– All visits for patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson disease where
patients (or caregivers, as appropriate) were queried about falls
• 7. Parkinson’s disease rehabilitative therapy options– All patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (or caregivers,
as appropriate) who had rehabilitative therapy options (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapy) discussed at least annually
• 8. Parkinson’s disease–related safety issues counseling– All patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (or caregivers,
as appropriate) who were counseled about context-specific safety issues appropriate to the patient’s stage of disease (e.g., injury prevention, medication management, or driving) at least annually
4/8/2013
20
Clinical Global Impression of
Severity and Change
CGI-S / CGI-CCGI-C Interviews
Schwab and England Activities of
Daily Living (SEADL) Rehabilitation Pearls
• #1 unpredictable – multiple fluctuations – daily, minute to
minute
• Fall prevention and management- reduce risk and
minimize severity of falls- “make the floor your friend”
• Educate family on visual perceptual difficulties
• Engage in social functions to promote increased overall
activity to decrease negative consequence of isolation
4/8/2013
21
“That was me then, this is me
now.”
Jackie Bakke, PSP research participant
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Core Features
• Progressive problems with balance and
walking
• Slow movement, falling, body stiffness
• Restricted eye movements
PSP
FTD
CBD
Apraxia
Dystonia
Language
Behavior
Executive
Eye Movement,
falls
Parkinsonism
PSP-CBD-FTD Spectrum Syndrome Incidence and Prevalence
• Approximately 20,000 Americans - or one in
every 100,000 people over the age of 60
• Patients are usually middle-aged or elderly
• Men are affected more often than women
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/psp/detail_psp.htm
4/8/2013
22
PSP: Clinical Features
• Motor Dysfunction (Symmetric)
– Akinesia
– Frontalis hyperactivity
– Postural instability with early falling
– Vertical supranuclear gaze paresis - amplitude
& velocity
• bilateral anti-saccadic dysfunction
– Axial > appendicular rigidity
– Retrocollis
– Symptomatic myoclonus- basal gangliaLitvan et al. 1996
PSP: Clinical features
• Cognitive Impairment
– Executive dysfunction
– Bradyphrenia
– Non-fluent aphasia (apraxia of speech)
– Absence of episodic memory loss or severe
dementia
• Not well studied
PSP: Clinical Features
• Neuropsychiatric features
– Apathy
– Disinhibited behavior
– Depression
– Anxiety
– Psychosis
Progressive Supranuclear PalsyClinical Features
•Symmetric rigidity and bradykinesia
• axial > appendicular
• levodopa unresponsive
•Postural/gait instability
• frequent falls
• Extraocular movement dysfunction
• saccadic pursuits
• delayed, slowed saccades
• supranuclear gaze palsy,
particularly downgaze
• apathy, bradyphrenia
•Symmetric rigidity and bradykinesia
• axial > appendicular
• levodopa unresponsive
•Postural/gait instability
• frequent falls
• Extraocular movement dysfunction
• saccadic pursuits
• delayed, slowed saccades
• supranuclear gaze palsy,
particularly downgaze
• apathy, bradyphrenia
4/8/2013
23
PSP MRI
61 y.o. PSP
• Midbrain
atrophy-
“hummingbird
sign” clinical
features of extra
ocular
abnormality in
eye movements
• Including mid
brain atrophy
PSP-FTD-CBD Spectrum 57 years old female
PSP Gait
4/8/2013
24
International Classification of Functioning,
Disability and Health (ICF)= One Approach
• Provides a systematic model to assist in approach for a treatment plan towards disablement
• This approach also enables the patient and caregiver a model that assists in decisions towards a proactive future
• Important for patient and families to come to a decision they are content with, early in the illness
• There is no “right” or “wrong” decision, just one that they can make together-early
“What to measure?”
Using the ICF-PSP
• BODY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE: Examples:
Visual perceptual, ROM, Strength, Sensation,
Postural instability
• ACTIVITY: Examples: ADLs, Gait, Balance “task”
• PARTICIPATION: Examples: Global health
measures, Quality of life,“Impact”measures,
NPI
LBD, PSP, CBD, and AD
Management
LBD, PSP, CBD, and AD
Management• Approach – ask patients and caregivers to list and then rank which symptoms/problems are most bothersome, which allows the clinicians to tailor the management plan
•Problem list:
• Cognitive
• Neuropsychiatric
• Motor
• Speech/swallowing
• Sleep
• Approach – ask patients and caregivers to list and then rank which symptoms/problems are most bothersome, which allows the clinicians to tailor the management plan
•Problem list:
• Cognitive
• Neuropsychiatric
• Motor
• Speech/swallowing
• Sleep
Boeve 2002
PSP, CBD, FTD, and LBD
Pharmacological Management
PSP, CBD, FTD, and LBD
Pharmacological Management• There are no FTD-approved medications specifically developed to impact LBD, CBD, FTD,
•Few well-designed studies show that any medication improves symptoms in any of these disorders
•Considerable debate among clinicians if any medications are worth using in patients with any of these disorders
•Almost all medications to be discussed are expensive and are associated with mild to severe side-effects
• There are no FTD-approved medications specifically developed to impact LBD, CBD, FTD,
•Few well-designed studies show that any medication improves symptoms in any of these disorders
•Considerable debate among clinicians if any medications are worth using in patients with any of these disorders
•Almost all medications to be discussed are expensive and are associated with mild to severe side-effects
4/8/2013
25
Rehabilitation Pearls-What a Therapist needs to
know:
• #1 Fall prevention and management- minimize risk and severity- “Fall Rehearsal”
• Decrease visual gaze-up and down- scanning for barriers, lighting can make a big difference
• wear sunglasses due to sensitivity to light
• Listen to both the patient and the caregiver
Rehabilitation Pearls-What a Therapist needs to
know:
• Assistive devise-maintain mobility to
decrease risk of pulmonary embolism,
urosepsis
• Review of postural drainage
• Reduce risk of respiratory complications-
aspiration, pneumonia
Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS)
CBS - Clinical diagnosis
• Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is a pathological diagnosis
• Predicting CBD from CBS is average/poor
• Pathological etiology of CBS include:
– CBD, PSP
– Pick’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease
– Neurofilament inclusion body disease (NIBD)
– Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin only immunoreactive changes
– FTDP-17
– CJD
Boeve,BF et al. 2003
Corticobasal DegenerationEpidemiology
• Bower et al (1997) - no CBD cases in study of
parkinsonism in Olmsted County
• Autopsy records of the Mayo Clinic from 1970-2001
– 2 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, and
had CBD pathology
– 1 with the CBS, 1 with “Alzheimer’s disease”
• Bower et al (1997) - no CBD cases in study of
parkinsonism in Olmsted County
• Autopsy records of the Mayo Clinic from 1970-2001
– 2 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, and
had CBD pathology
– 1 with the CBS, 1 with “Alzheimer’s disease”
4/8/2013
26
Corticobasal DegenerationEpidemiology
• In the Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center
– We are typically following 10-15 patients with the CBS who reside in Minnesota
– Minimum prevalence estimate 10-15/5,000,000 =
– 2-3 per million
– Prevalence of CJD ~ 1 per million
• The unfortunate reality of current funding in CBS/CBD is that since Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease are so much more common, and CJD is much more “famous” despite its rarity
• In the Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center
– We are typically following 10-15 patients with the CBS who reside in Minnesota
– Minimum prevalence estimate 10-15/5,000,000 =
– 2-3 per million
– Prevalence of CJD ~ 1 per million
• The unfortunate reality of current funding in CBS/CBD is that since Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease are so much more common, and CJD is much more “famous” despite its rarity
Boeve, BF et al. 2003
Topographic distribution of degeneration:
• Asymmetric parietofrontal cortex
A B C
A
B
C
Corticobasal Syndrome
Manifestations
• Disorders of Motor Control
• Extrapyramidal Signs
• Language Disorders
• Cortical Sensory Abnormalities
• Neuropsychiatric Manifestations
Boeve, B. F. (2005)
Disorders of Motor Control
• Apraxia
• Alien limb phenomenon
• Levitation
• Mirror Movements
• Dysphagia
Boeve et al, 2003
4/8/2013
27
Extrapyramidal Signs
• Tremor
• Rigidity
• Dystonia
• Supranuclear Gaze Palsy
• Myoclonus
Boeve et al, 2003
Language Disorders
• Dysarthria
• Aphasia
• Apraxia of Speech
• Yes-No Reversals
Boeve et al, 2003
Cortical Sensory Abnormalities
• Dysgraphestesia
• Astereognosis
• Tactile Defensiveness (Dysesthesias specifically brought on by human touch)
Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive
Neuropsychiatric:
• Depression
• Emotional Lability
• Personality Changes
• Frontal Release Signs
Cognitive:
• Memory
• Visuospatial
• Attentional
4/8/2013
28
Asymmetric cortical atrophy, especially frontoparietal, with the more prominent atrophy existing opposite the side most severely affected clinically
Asymmetric cortical atrophy, especially frontoparietal, with the more prominent atrophy existing opposite the side most severely affected clinically
Corticobasal Syndrome Radiologic Findings
Corticobasal Syndrome Radiologic Findings
Corticobasal SyndromeRadiologic Findings - PET
Corticobasal SyndromeRadiologic Findings - PET
Oct 2005 Dec 2002
Underlying pathologies:• Corticobasal degeneration
• Alzheimer’s disease
• Pick’s disease
• Progressive supranuclear palsy
• FTLD-U
• Neurofilament inclusion body disease
• Nonspecific degenerative changes
• Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseaseReference: Boeve BF, Maraganore DM, Parisi JE, Ahlskog JE, Graff-Radford N, Caselli RJ, Dickson DW, Kokmen E, Petersen RC. Pathologic heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 1999;53:795-800
Corticobasal Syndrome
4/8/2013
29
Corticobasal DegenerationNeuropathologic Findings
Corticobasal DegenerationNeuropathologic Findings
Ballooned neuronCoiled body Neuronal threads
Astrocytic plaque
Tau stain Tau stain Neurofilament stain
Courtesy Dr. Dennis Dickson
Corticobasal DegenerationNeuropathologic Findings
Corticobasal DegenerationNeuropathologic Findings
Courtesy Joseph Parisi
Oligodendroglial coiled body
tau immunostain
“What to measure?”
Using the ICF-PSP
• BODY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE: Examples:
Visual perceptual, ROM, Apraxia, Sensation,
Postural instability
• ACTIVITY: Examples: ADLs, Gait, Balance “task”
• PARTICIPATION: Examples: Global health
measures, Quality of life,“Impact”measures,
NPI
Apraxia
• Definition: the loss of the ability to make familiar, purposeful movements, manifested as difficulty using familiar objects or doing familiar things. Examples include using utensils, combing one’s hair, and dressing
• Classification
• Measuring tools
• Neurophysiology
• Management
Leiguarda et al, 2003
4/8/2013
30
Rehabilitation Pearls
• Meaningful exercise programs- targeted to
key areas
• Motor apraxia- gait training
• Assistive devise and possible w/c
assessment
• Fall prevention and management
CBD LBD PSP FTD FTDbv
Frontal + + +++ ++++
Parietal ++ +
Temporal ++ ++
Occipital +++ +
Brainstem +++
What does the future hold?
• Goal is to have therapies that delay the onset and
even reverse the symptoms of neurodegenerative
diseases
• Therapies will be personalized on the basis of
genetic and biochemical studies
• Biomarkers such as imaging and blood proteomics
and/or metabolomics will be used as screening
tools and predictors of subsequent disease
Young AB. J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 14; 29(41):12722-8.
AcknowledgmentsMayo Clinic Behavioral NeurologyDaniel Drubach, MDBrad Boeve, MDKeith Josephs, MDDavid Knopman, MDRonald Petersen, PhD, MDMayo Clinic Laboratory Medicine and PathologyJoseph Parisi, MDDennis Dickson, MD
Mayo Clinic Physical Medicine and RehabilitationHeidi Dunfee, PT, DScPTJulie Tilley, PT, DPT, MSEd,Brad King, PT, DScPT
Mayo School of Health SciencesDesiree J. Lanzino, PT, PhD
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation ScienceUniversity of Maryland, School of Medicine
Leslie B. Glickman, PT, PhDMonica Grant, PT, DScPTGad Alon P.T, Ph.D. Michael Harris-Love, PT, DscPTFrances E. Huber, EdD, PT, OCS Jeff Hawk, MPT, MDE Terry Heron
4/8/2013
31
Questions?